RE:
POSTED BY: Succatash
UPDATED: Thursday, February 26, 2004 05:36
VIEWED: 26788
PAGE 4 of 6
Quote:
Originally posted by Succatash:
Right now, I'm fighting tears and trying hard not to cry.
B/C you are:
a. Drunk
b. Confused
c. Psychotic
? Is there a poll we can vote on?
Like Fireflyfans.net?
Haken needs a new development system. Donate.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=5&t=3283
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Steering this thread back to a more constructive heading, here's a question for parents and adults in general. While Succatash's frame captures do not appear to show nipples, the question is, how much of a breast do we actually need to see before it becomes indecent?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Succatash:
WB shows boobs too? This is from Angel's "Smile Time" puppet episode. But I don't think she's a puppet.
Some better pictures:
http://www.geocities.com/vardfaw/jm1.JPG
http://www.geocities.com/vardfaw/jm2.JPG
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Momaw:
Steering this thread back to a more constructive heading, here's a question for parents and adults in general. While Succatash's frame captures do not appear to show nipples, the question is, how much of a breast do we actually need to see before it becomes indecent?
Okay, I'll answer as a parent. My ten year old daughter has seen Mal's naked butt, and Kaylee getting it on with a guy just to get close to an engine, and now a semi-exposed Nina the werewolf, and I don't think she has been harmed in the slightest. If Nina's breasts were fully exposed, I don't see how that would have harmed her either. I think alot of people are WAY too hung up on body parts being something dirty.
As for kids somehow being harmed by the pics on this thread, it says bare breasts in the title. That's plenty enough warning.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Maybe Haken needs a "inappropriate for kids" warning. I personally don't think this kids is "kid friendly" by any means. It's not about Harry Potter, it's not Sasame Street or Electric Company, it's not Nova or any KPBS type. It's not "against kids" or *porno* - it's just not geared towards kids like BigBird and Grover are.
Quote:
Originally posted by JustDavid:Quote:
Originally posted by Momaw:
Steering this thread back to a more constructive heading, here's a question for parents and adults in general. While Succatash's frame captures do not appear to show nipples, the question is, how much of a breast do we actually need to see before it becomes indecent?
Okay, I'll answer as a parent. My ten year old daughter has seen Mal's naked butt, and Kaylee getting it on with a guy just to get close to an engine, and now a semi-exposed Nina the werewolf, and I don't think she has been harmed in the slightest. If Nina's breasts were fully exposed, I don't see how that would have harmed her either. I think alot of people are WAY too hung up on body parts being something dirty.
As for kids somehow being harmed by the pics on this thread, it says bare breasts in the title. That's plenty enough warning.
Like Fireflyfans.net?
Haken needs a new development system. Donate.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=5&t=3283
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Knibblet:
My issue is you posted it knowing that minors (little kids even) visit daily.
Quote:
Jasonzzz wrote:
1. Why aren't the little kids in school and What are little kids doing on this site? The show has nothing that any little kids should want.
2. Why are those little kids being left alone with a computer (or anything for that matter)? Their parents should be pre-screening everything that they touch - TV programs, websites, etc.
Just so you guys know, I'm a minor. I'll be 15 in March. And frankly, a naked breast doesn't faze me in the least. Heck, I've played Grand Theft Auto: Vice City. And I don't visit daily, but I come here pretty regularly. The way I see it, when you're 14, you can see anything an adult can.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
The way I see it, when you're 14, you can see anything an adult can.
I think though, that as a 14-year-old, you may be somewhat biased in your opinion of what 14-year-olds should do.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Tash. All i gotta say is "Good eye!" Its like a single frame! 1/30th of a second, (and obvious unintentional)
Wife and I were examining the tape frame by frame yesterday morning. She mentioned that the white stuffing Wolfgirl had in her mouth, and around her groin, (there is a pile of it in front of her as she sits up, apparently to hide other naughty bits) made her think of other white things.
But then, she says, maybe it is just her dirty mind.
I like that in a woman I'm married to 
"Wash, where is my damn spaceship?"
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Okay, I'll answer as a parent. My ten year old daughter has seen Mal's naked butt, and Kaylee getting it on with a guy just to get close to an engine, and now a semi-exposed Nina the werewolf, and I don't think she has been harmed in the slightest. If Nina's breasts were fully exposed, I don't see how that would have harmed her either. I think alot of people are WAY too hung up on body parts being something dirty.
Thank you, David! I get sooooo tired of how body-phobic most people are in the US. As a parent myself, I could care less what body parts my 6-year-old sees. What those body parts are *doing* is another matter entirely. No, I'm not going to let him watch sex acts, but I refuse to make a big deal about him seeing the occassional body part. If you don't make a big deal about it, then it becomes a non-issue.
--Kala
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
I think though, that as a 14-year-old, you may be somewhat biased in your opinion of what 14-year-olds should do.
I know my view will be somewhat in the minority, but I disagree - I think it's far more likely that the views of a parent are skewed than the view of the actual 14 year old in question. Parents trick themselves into imposing an ultra-flawed or an ultra-innocent version of themselves onto their children. At the age of 14, however, we are often at our most critical and self-aware.
If you want to find out how someone feels about something, or how it affects them, you talk to them first, and those around them later. How comes the debate surrounding minors and what they can and can not see never involves any dialogue with anyone under the age of 25?
As a society, we need to get a grip on this delusion that it's even remotely possible to hide the real world from children - or that it's preferential to do so. Having parents or a parent who can be looked up to and respected, and who goes about their life with a decent amount of conviction and decency, will do a far greater good to a child's moral sense than blindfolding them whenever breasts seem imminent ;)
My two (euro) cents :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME