Angelus Arcanum

RE:

POSTED BY: Succatash
UPDATED: Thursday, February 26, 2004 05:36
VIEWED: 26788
PAGE 1 of 6

Thursday, February 19, 2004 8:54 AM

WB shows boobs too? This is from Angel's "Smile Time" puppet episode. But I don't think she's a puppet.





NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:20 AM

WHAT!?! how can they cancel this show? amoung other things its soft core porn! usually a massive hit....but how much of a pervert are you for spotting that? heh heh

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:50 PM

Yes, yes you did see what you thought you saw.

"Wherever you go, there you are."
- Dr. B. Banzai

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 19, 2004 3:30 PM

Yes, it must have taken skill to notice this. I watched this scene several times (uh, for the dialogue) but never noticed any actual nudity.
-Steve

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 19, 2004 3:55 PM

Nice work on the photo manipulation. I watched it quite closely thinking that the producers and network would be *Very* careful after Janet and Boobgate.

I'm certain the actress involved won't appreciate the sub-perfect set you pasted over her.

"Just keep walkin, preacher man."

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 19, 2004 4:26 PM

I saw this headline and thought to myself, "Self, I'm betting orange chicken from LeAnn Chin that's Succatash again, starting another male hubba-hubba thread."

I win! I win!



We have art so as not to die of truth ~ Neitzsche
http://www.mnartists.org/artistHome.do?rid=7922

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Knibblet:
Nice work on the photo manipulation. I watched it quite closely thinking that the producers and network would be *Very* careful after Janet and Boobgate.

I'm certain the actress involved won't appreciate the sub-perfect set you pasted over her.

You are mistaken. I did not manipulate the photo at all. I captured this episode at 30 fps and snapped a frame. It's real.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:45 PM

The top picture is clearly showing that the actress has her hand over anything considered in poor taste. However, the fraction of a second that the second picture occurs does reveal a glimpse of some no-no stuff.

Anyhow, NYPD Blue and other TV shows use similar scenes to draw ratings, I don't see aproblem here.

"Whoa, good Bible."

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:50 PM


Thalos, I think you're right. In the top photo, we're looking at her finger.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 19, 2004 6:25 PM

Of for goodness sake....



***Never judge a book by its movie***

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME