PirateNews and Child Porn
POSTED BY: Hero
UPDATED: Thursday, December 7, 2006 16:42
VIEWED: 36438
PAGE 8 of 17
Oh come now, you knew he was a sociopath, and if you didn't... you should have.
I've twice deliberately baited wouldbehero into showing his true colors - often shared by others in law enforcement and government, which is one part of why things are so messed up.
So either you're way too damn oblivious, or way too damn forgiving, and either one is a curse.
Treat him like the troll he is.
And I am too durned busy out here to play tit for tat with him either, there's stuff to be done, a little "house" cleaning, if you would, instead of running around trying to negotiate with flat-earther apologists and trolls trying to distract from the issue at hand... and had you enough sense, you would NOT allow exactly what has happened, once again an important discussion has been sidetracked and sandbagged by these trolls.
Stop falling for that shit, you've got more sense, USE it, willya.
-Frem
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Hero:Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Given all that, Zero took ONE photo in ONE post out of context and felt 'compelled' to notify the FBI. That wasn't an anti-porn action. It was simply to make trouble for someone he disagrees with.
So child porn is ok with you if the pictures are limited in number, and you understand the context, and you agree with the person posting it.
You claim that I was "compelled" by politics to take action. In the very first post on this thread I cite the Federal law that provides the basis for my legal duty to report child porn. I also cite the potential liability for this site. In other words I did what I HAD to do. Perhaps you would prefer me to ignor my legal duties because of my political leanings...somehow I think that would be wrong.Quote:
Do you now trust Zero to NOT do that to you? To NOT find some pretext to get you into legal trouble just because he doesn't agree with you? Do you now feel as free to express your opinions? Or to share whatever information you may have?
So for you child porn is ok. But our political differences are the real evil. Thats why you liberals are so dangerous. A civil discussion is more dangerous to you then pictures of the violent abuse of children. I think you should run on that platform in 2008 and see how far it gets you.
If PN was a Republican, then you'd be upset, not that he posted child porn, but that he's a Republican. I think you allow your Republican Rage to overshadow your reason. Knock it off.
H
give it up Zero, we are not as stupid as the people who watch Faux news..we are aware of the games people like you try to play, your selfrightious hyocrisy is a little to late, you've already shown that your more then willing to defend and support pedohiles as long as they have an R. next to their name
trying to take the attention off of yourself and your own disgusting deeds and put the focus on P.N is not going to work!! your not fooling anyone but yourself if you think this ploy is working its not!!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by FellowTraveler:
Oh, it's true. I didn't speak out because I didn't consider it porn.
When I first saw them I wasn't sure, but I suspected. The only child porn I've prosecuted involved nudity at least, but I thought the SM stuff was there, so I checked and discovered not only the section "iv" SM ban, but also my own duty to report and Haken's potential liability. So I did my thing.
Quote:
you cast the child pornographers down amongst the sodomites.
Don't have a problem with the sodomites...so long as they don't immigrate.
Quote:
Yeah, I've suspected for several weeks that a good deal of what you post is just to see how quickly you can piss off all the lefties.
They don't need my help. Hold up a Bush/Cheney sign and they charge like bulls. Which explains all the bullshite.
Quote:
Guess I best not speed through your jurisdiction...
I advise cautious adherance to the speed limit and the road conditions. Safety and good sense has no jurisdiction.
H
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by piratejenny:
You can find something offensive, but that doesn't classify it as kiddie porn..
I agree. The law classifies it as child porn. Pictures of children bound and gagged and in distress meet the legal definition provided by the US Code.
If you don't believe me, your incapable of that much faith, look it up, I cited the code section earlier.
If you don't believe me and wont look it up for yourself...then your an idiot.
Prove me wrong...I dare you.
H
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
This is the entire legal section, unedited:
Quote:
For the purposes of this chapter, the term—
(1) “minor” means any person under the age of eighteen years;
(2)
(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), “sexually explicit conduct” means actual or simulated—
(i) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
(ii) bestiality;
(iii) masturbation;
(iv) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(v) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;
(B) For purposes of subsection 8(B) of this section, “sexually explicit conduct” means—
(i) graphic sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex, or lascivious simulated sexual intercourse where the genitals, breast, or pubic area of any person is exhibited;
(ii) graphic or lascivious simulated;
(I) bestiality;
(II) masturbation; or
(III) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(iii) graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;
(3) “producing” means producing, directing, manufacturing, issuing, publishing, or advertising;
(4) “organization” means a person other than an individual;
(5) “visual depiction” includes undeveloped film and videotape, and data stored on computer disk or by electronic means which is capable of conversion into a visual image;
(6) “computer” has the meaning given that term in section 1030 of this title;
(7) “custody or control” includes temporary supervision over or responsibility for a minor whether legally or illegally obtained;
(8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
(9) “identifiable minor”—
(A) means a person—
(i)
(I) who was a minor at the time the visual depiction was created, adapted, or modified; or
(II) whose image as a minor was used in creating, adapting, or modifying the visual depiction; and
(ii) who is recognizable as an actual person by the person’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature; and
(B) shall not be construed to require proof of the actual identity of the identifiable minor.
(10) “graphic”, when used with respect to a depiction of sexually explicit conduct, means that a viewer can observe any part of the genitals or pubic area of any depicted person or animal during any part of the time that the sexually explicit conduct is being depicted; and
(11) the term “indistinguishable” used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.
The definition requires that to be child porn it must be "graphic or lascivious". (Either one will suffice.) I didn't see a deifnition for "lascivious" but "graphic" means "that a viewer can observe any part of the genitals or pubic area". Since by definition it must be graphic or lascivious, by the definition of graphic, it's not child porn.
(B) For purposes of subsection 8(B) (the kiddie porn section) “sexually explicit conduct” means —
(ii) graphic or lascivious
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hero,
Sorry man, but you're a goddamned idiot.
Don't you have friends?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Hero:
The law classifies it as child porn. Pictures of children bound and gagged and in distress meet the legal definition provided by the US Code.
If you don't believe me, your incapable of that much faith, look it up, I cited the code section earlier.
What's the VOLUME NUMBER? I'm lazy.
Hero, please attack pedophile pimp Congressman Barney Frank, Jewish candidate for US Senate. His pimp partner alleged murdered himself by gunshot to the head during the Washington Times' expose of 80 newspaper articles of Bush Sr's White House pedophiles.
FYI, here's how our sodomites in Congress use the internet. Mark Foley is instant sodomizing a former page in Knoxville, Tennessee, home of Skull & Boner ambassador/mayor Victor "Victoria" Ashe, Bush Jr's lifetime sodomite boytoy.
Quote:
maf54: so are you single now
maf54: no ties that bind
Ty1066: the divorce should be final in the next two weeks.
Ty1066: why do you ask?
maf54: cool
maf54: cause
Ty1066: you lookin' for a boyfriend?
maf54: yup
Ty1066: are you ever gonna come out or are you happy in the closet?
maf54: with a nice ... (expletive deleted)
maf54: i love the closet like you do
www.knoxnews.com/kns/politics/article/0,1406,KNS_356_5045606,00.html
If you click the link, they discuss Congressman Zack Wamp (R-TN), who's a convicted drug dealer.
It's a good thing Noreen Gosch posted those photos of her kidnapped son on her website, otherwise the other 2 kidnapped boys would never have been identified, since the copsters and FBI REFUSE to investigate. My website got at least one tip for Noreen, from a former resident of her town.
Maybe Hero did a good thing, and the FBI might actually investigate THIS CASE, and not investigate FireFlyFans.net?
And remember, the photos in question display a White House Correspondent, unless proven otherwise by DNA test. Since FBI, US attorneys general, state prosecutors, local cops and "Gannon/Guckert" refuse this DNA test, lack of rebuttal argument proves these photos are in fact Jeff Gannon, aka Johnny Gosch.
www.johnnygosch.com
"You can't stop the signal. Get away from me with that sword, you Police State Death Squad psycho!"
-Mr Universe, Pirate TV
FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org

Does that seem right to you?
www.scifi.com/onair/
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Of course, he's a lawyer == Souless scumbag
Originally posted by FellowTraveler:
Yeah, I've suspected for several weeks that a good deal of what you post is just to see how quickly you can piss off all the lefties.
. A prosecutor as well, the kind of guy who makes all the overtures about community mindedness, saving 'US' from 'THEM' but when it gets right down to it the only person 'Hero' is interested in is himself. Kinda like borderline sociopathy.More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME


More graphics available at www.desktophippie.com - yes, I've moved!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME