PirateNews and Child Porn
POSTED BY: Hero
UPDATED: Thursday, December 7, 2006 16:42
VIEWED: 36438
PAGE 7 of 17
Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
He doesn't know the meaning of the phrase "even-handed".
Means you slap them with both hands...
Quote:
BTW Hero, I noticed you got awfully quiet when I brought up the DOJ. You don't like the shoe being on the other foot, do you? Not to worry- altho my point was true, my contacts with the DOJ are in the distant past. You can breathe easy now. But like any bully, you back down as soon as confronted.
Or I was off in court helping resolve a Domestic Violence case that was set for trial this morning when the victim I subpoena'd didn't show. I had her arrested and brought before the Judge where she admitted under oath that her written statement to the police was a lie. I then had her arrested for falsification and she's in jail till she gets her bail hearing tomorrow.
She cried...can't say I didn't smile a little, because some days I just love my job. She deserved it, either she lied to the police, who she called out there, or she's lying now because she and her sister have made up. I don't care which.
H
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
How are we to read this?
For one, opportunism. Look Boss! Look what I did! Pant pant pant slobber lick.
If I licked my boss, he'd fire me...and rightfully so.
Quote:
For another, egoism. See everyone here ! I'M important ! Look what I know! Look what I can do to any one of you ! If you can't LIKE me then you will FEAR me !
Considering that any one of you could do the same thing, makes this POWER of mine...common. The only difference is that I actually did something. Its not me you fear...its your own shadow, which explains why you and so many others are advocating leaving your heads buried in the ground (or is it up your...)
Quote:
How are we to read this?
Here's my take from listening to the enlightened discussion on this topic:
Liberals can't defend America...part six: "Hating Republicans is more important then doing the right thing and really, when you get down to it, there is no right thing because child porn, terrorism, and reality TV are all ok by us. In other words, only right is really wrong." I bet Danny Glover and Hugo Chavez will be glad to come to your press conferance for that one.
H
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Whatever.
You think you're the only one who's ever taken action to protect a child? I've taken children into my home... kids that I'm still helping out today. I've reported to CPS, but not because of a 15-year-old out of context photo. You're sanctimonious and just plain boring.
---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:Quote:These pictures would be from a case that's about 15 years old by now. If this was a recent picture, I sure as hell would want him to report it! But the "context" of the picture, as I understand it, is it was posted by the mom because it shows her son who was abducted many many year ago and she was trying to revive interest in his case.
...and failed to report potentially criminal acts involving a minor
No, I get that. Just trying to give a brother the benefit of the doubt while also trying to prove to Hero that the House leadership reacted to Foley in a way that contradicted his actions in a similar circumstance. The whole goose & the gander thing, ya' know? I thought that was somewhat pertinent...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Hero:
If that's true, why didn't you say something? If you look at the original thread, you'll notice that I express dismay that people were not already speaking out against it. Its dismay I still feel. As for me, I saw, I reported, I made my fuss, I did my part. If someone else wants to drop the ball, thats their business. But I don't want to be the one that lets this kind of thing pass by. Thats not something I could live with.
Oh, it's true. I didn't speak out because I didn't consider it porn. I, furthermore, did not know that any photo in that vein might even be considered illegal. Unsettling and distasteful, yeah, but not illegal. As others have already mentioned, there is far worse on broadcast television quite often.
And I'm not a rat, Agent Kujan...
Quote:
We don't send these kind of folk to Gitmo (with its good food and sunny climate). They go to County at best or state prison at worst and, lets just say justice gets served.
I was refering to the pinkos. From what I understand, you cast the child pornographers down amongst the sodomites. And good for you in that regard...
Quote:
I've found, despite the bluster...
Yeah, I've suspected for several weeks that a good deal of what you post is just to see how quickly you can piss off all the lefties.
Quote:
Except the liberal long haired hippy types and anybody who has a 'John Kerry' bumper sticker...
Guess I best not speed through your jurisdiction...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hey PN Randy Rhodes was suppose to have Jeff Gannon on her show today, he said he would do the interview and then backed out of it a few minutes before he would go on.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by HKCavalier:
What the--? Am I the only one who doesn't see any "child porn" going on in those pictures? Jeez, there's a difference between sex and violence. Put your fantasies aside and take a look at what's happening in the pictures. I see fully clothed children bound and gagged, and visibly terrified. One boy doesn't have a shirt and there seems to be evidence of a star branded on his shoulder. They're disturbing images, heartbreaking, but any sex is in the eyes of the beholder. PN tells us about a child sex ring and shows us these pictures. If he were talking about a simple kidnapping and showed these pictures, they would arouse nothing but sympathy. But because PN says the children in the pictures were sexually abused, that somehow changes the pictures? No.
It disturbs me that so many folks believe that pictures that show the unambiguous suffering of children should be censored--makes me wonder if they'd really rather not know about it. I know that's not particularly fair, but the invisibility of child abuse is one of its most insidious characteristics. PN is not sexualizing these children, he's politicizing them.
HKCavalier
Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.
Exactly there were no child porn pictures posted on this site,
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
Thanks for being the voice of reason Succatash.
I found the picture offensive and so did Haken or a mod.
It saddens me that certain member's of this site would try to defend PN simply because it was Hero who raised the red flag. IMHO, posting that picture somehow vindicates the picture taker, their sickness is being spread for all to see. PN's posts should stand on merit alone, why the need to 'shock and awe' with highly questionable pictures? I guess if the substance is lacking, flashing lights and pictures are the way to go.
And the not so subtle hint that a certain member 'enjoyed' the pic is irresponsible as well, IMHO.
Hero is a lawyer. If he thinks the picture is illegal I will have to bow to his greater understanding of the applicable laws.
Now go back to defending PN in this thread while castigating Foley in the other.
Posting to stir stuff up.
You can find something offensive, but that doesn't classify it as kiddie porn..
Zero has major issues, one of them being he can't stand to face the truth about the party he's sold his soul to.!! , that or he just doesn't care that he worships the devil!!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
So anyway, in general, this is what I find interesting.
Alleged republican pedophilia is in the news.
In less than a week Zero blows PN into the FBI on a possible 'pedophilia' technicality. Not for earlier postings that are borderline hate speech. Not for postings that may or may not call for violence against the government. But for an out of context photo trying to get action on an unsolved real-life case.
How are we to read this?
Zero is just flaming mad because what is happening in the new right now gives crediblity to what we've been posting for months..and that pisses him off, one of our so called tin hat foil theorys is actually looking like there is something to it and he can't stand it!! Thats the point of this whole thing!!
For one, opportunism. Look Boss! Look what I did! Pant pant pant slobber lick.
For another, egoism. See everyone here ! I'M important ! Look what I know! Look what I can do to any one of you ! If you can't LIKE me then you will FEAR me !
Cowardice. What else was I to do ?? Whine, cringe. I had no options !sigh ...
Do you wonder why I call him Zero?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
So anyway, in general, this is what I find interesting.
Alleged republican pedophilia is in the news.
In less than a week Zero blows PN into the FBI on a possible 'pedophilia' technicality. Not for earlier postings that are borderline hate speech. Not for postings that may or may not call for violence against the government. But for an out of context photo trying to get action on an unsolved real-life case.
How are we to read this?
For one, opportunism. Look Boss! Look what I did! Pant pant pant slobber lick.
For another, egoism. See everyone here ! I'M important ! Look what I know! Look what I can do to any one of you ! If you can't LIKE me then you will FEAR me !
Cowardice. What else was I to do ?? Whine, cringe. I had no options !
Do you wonder why I call him Zero?
Zero is just flaming mad because what is happening in the news right now gives crediblity to what we've been posting about for months..and that pisses him off, one of our so called tin hat foil theorys is actually looking like there is something to it and he can't stand it!! Thats the point of this whole thing!!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME