Why Wash is 100% alive and mostly well.
POSTED BY: pastorbadger
UPDATED: Thursday, November 22, 2007 09:57
VIEWED: 83595
PAGE 25 of 30
i.e. my opinion is not worth the time to read it, i.e. it is worthless.
You obviously agree with PB's theory, otherwise you wouldn't judge him with such lattitude and me with none whatsoever. If you've decided that I must be the one in the wrong because you prefer his opinion fine, but it takes two to argue and by his own admission PB has been baiting me, ergo he wanted an argument, and that's what he got.
Not particularly fantastic behaviour for "a man of the cloth".
More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
if you don't value your own opinion enough to read the whole thread then you find it worthless. look at it from that point of view
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/llama.php
-try it out, I dare you
98% of teens have smoked pot, if you are one of the 2% that haven't, copy this into your signature
I'm so into Firefly, my butt glows in the dark.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Except of course that wasn't the statement, the statement was equivelent too "You HAVENT read the entire thread" and "NOT reading the entire thread makes your opinion worthless".
There's no IF there at all as you suggest, he was saying specifically that my opinion is worthless, and this is also backed up by later statements.
I do value my own opinion enough to read the thread, which I did but I simply don't have the time to read every single post, I read as many as my time will allow. At the moment I have to complete an update on a website much as I did last night before I go away for a week in about three hours time.
The continuing assertion that by not reading every post I have no right to a voice simply sounds like "Since I have a life outside this website, I have no right to post on it".
And by his own admission PB wanted an argument, and chose to pick it with me, how do you account for that?
More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
now, wash is my fav charechter ever! and should be kept alive at all costs, kill off mal, inara, jayne, just dont kill off wash, he WILL be back, joss wont let such a popular charecter be kiled off, if its a compotision between book coming back and wash coming back, it'll unfortunatly be book,(DAMN YOU! MYSTERIOUS PREACHER!
)
but, and its a big butt, wash will be back eventually, maybe not in serenity 2, but definatly in firefly series 2.
thank you, that is all.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RAGLESCHFLUGLE!!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by zzetta13:
cut to Serenity: reaver takes a bite out of Wash, pinned to the pilot seat, looks up and replies " Tastes like chicken "....drum roll
No...
He tastes FUNNY! Get it?
"Why're you arguin' what's already been decided?"
Mal to Jayne, "Jaynestown"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I'm not going to bother responding to citizen because he won't see anything from anyone else's point of view
I would like to say that Wash WILL be back, but not being Joss, I can't.
I can however say that I would love to see Wash return
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/llama.php
-try it out, I dare you
98% of teens have smoked pot, if you are one of the 2% that haven't, copy this into your signature
I'm so into Firefly, my butt glows in the dark.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Guywhowantsafireflyofhisown preaching to others about not seeing it from other peoples point of view.
Originally posted by Guywhowantsafireflyofhisown:
I'm not going to bother responding to citizen because he won't see anything from anyone else's point of view
FUNNY!
The child who doesn't even know the difference between a joke and a fight, as proven numerous times in other threads, preaching.
You obviously can't see it from my point of view, nor do you want to because you believe that no ones point of view besides yours and the trolls you support is worthy of existence, that would make you far worse than me.
More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hey, at least (s)he didn't ignore you completely.
Quote:
Btw, I never said Wash can't still be alive, I said he shouldn't still be alive. Big difference, at least IMO.
There was more to it, but I didn't hear a word about this aspect of it.
Or maybe that's a good thing.
* steals back into the shadows to be ignored again, happily *
"We need to keep our heads so we can ... keep our heads."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by citizen:
My theory as too why Wash is dead:
He had a big stake through his chest.
He had a BIG stake through his chest.
He had a REALLY BIG STAKE THROUGH HIS CHEST!
A stake through the chest isn't a sure fire death sentance. Wash isn't a Vampire. Remember this is Firefly, not Buffy/Angel.
"I'm not going to say Serenity is the greatest SciFi movie ever; oh wait yes I am." - Orson Scott Card
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Just so everyone knows, I did read the whole thread. Now that that's covered.
Tracey, the ex-soldier from the episode The Message has come up a few times. About how he was dead, and shipped in the mail, and then wasn't dead anymore. I'd just like to point out that Tracey wasn't pole-through-the-chest dead. He was faking dead, just like River and Simon did in Ariel. It's different. Tracey was perfectly healthy and then he, or those in charge of him, told him to inject something that would "suspend suspend cerebral, cardiac, and pulmonary activity in order to induce a proto-comatose state." Look at Simon in Ariel. When he gave River the shot he was calm. He knew it would work out alright, because even if this isn't something that is commonly done, it is something that's done. So it's not really right to compare Tracey's situation to Wash's in any way.
Next, the Spike reference. From what I've read, on other boards and such, a lot of people were angry when Spike was magically resurrected. I loved Spike's involvement in Angel Season 5. But still, I think that Spike coming back cheapened his death. Knowing that he'll come back, watching the sacrifice in Chosen means a lot less (to me). I'm not trying to start anything about the Spike issue. I'm just saying, that isn't really a wonderful example to site about a back-from-the-dead that everyone loved.
It's also been stated many times that Serenity will bring Wash back because that's what sci fi does. I think that's a pretty bad point. I don't think that the writers on this show would do something just because it's expected, and I'd be more than a little disappointed if they did.
For what it's worth: I do think that Wash is dead. And if he isn't, and he's brought back in Serenity 2 (in a well written way), then I'll probably love his involvement in that movie. But it won't be the same to watch that scene in Serenity, it will be cheapened.
Wash was killed for a reason, as was Book. And the reason was that there's no reason. Life is hard and war is hell and there are casualities. Firefly wasn't ever about everything going perfectly. It wasn't about an ideal future. It was about normal people living a normal life.
-
DB: Doesn't exactly fit the thug in the profile alley. Wait, what?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME