Gravity Onboard
POSTED BY: iwasafrycook
UPDATED: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 16:52
VIEWED: 3086
PAGE 3 of 3
Sorry SAMEERTIA,
the thread began suffering from technical difficulties ( but that can be fun) Anyway I will steer it back on track.
How does everyone feel about inviting the Brady Bunch onto the boat?
Bartender takes the bottle of mudders milk away from Z " I think you've had your limit, fella."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
yeah, Z I think you have to
JUST CALL ME DARLING!!!
-I was bored, and slightly mental, what can I say?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:It conflicts because we've always been shown a single star in a single system. In order to support the multiple star theory we have to trust in what we haven't seen, not what we have. One is basing what you think on what you have seen the other is basing it on belief, to a degree.
The multiple star theory conflicts with what that we have seen exactly? What specific piece of published/filmed/refered to information makes multiple suns impossible? Nothing. I've got a map of Chicago in my apartment. Just because it doesn't zoom out any farther there is no reason to say that the rest of the US doesn't exist.
And actually if you had no knowledge of the rest of the US, your only data is that map, then scientifically you only know Chicago exists. You’re starting from the supposition that we KNOW more stars exist within the system, but we've only got a map for one of them, which is a fallacy.
More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
"I had a rose named after me and I was very flattered. But I was not pleased to read the description in the catalog: 'No good in a bed, but fine against a wall'." -- Eleanor Roosevelt.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME