Finally God is with this country

POSTED BY: TheRightStuff
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 20:38
VIEWED: 25491
PAGE 11 of 23

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Khyron:
Wait... so you're God and Molech!? Whoa dude...

---

Well, it's a bit of a wheeze innit, watching the mortals get all twisted up.

---

More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
And as you know, these are open forums, you're able to come and listen to what I have to say.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Buying Firefly on DVD - $40 bucks
Purchasing any and all Serenity/Firefly material ever made $Lots of dough
Making the RightStuffs list - PRICELESS


Hey where is the little w&nker? Surely he has not taken his ball and gone home?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Back, BACK I say!! Go back to...
ummm...
ummm...

Can't we all just get along?

Words fail Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

*scribbles 'FollowMal' onto the List of Forsaken Ones in blood*

You are now 27th in line to the throne of the Forsaken Ones.

*places crown of leaves and berries upon your head*

That should go really well with your browncoat. But alas, we must now dance around a fire in the moonlight, celebrating our heathen ways. Let the induction ceremonies begin!

And FMF, I so want one of those t-shirts. I would proudly wear it.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Long lies by your evil President Bush hating piratenews who will be with satan.
Now long truth! Disrgard this? I don't think you can because it speaks from truth and reality!
SMH covers up Bush successes in Iraq
Gerard Jackson
BrookesNews.Com
Monday 3 November 2003

The Bush-hating Marian Wilkinson of the Sydney Morning Herald is another of those ideologically motivated journalists whose reports on Iraq seem to be written with the sole intention of misleading the public about the true state of affairs in that hapless country.

The war looms as a liability with approach of poll (30 October) was a typical piece of Wilkinsonian disinformation that did not contain a single positive statement in favour of President Bush or the liberation of Iraq. The country is doomed, Iraqi support for the liberation is collapsing and Bush is frustrated by "a growing insurgency." Insurgency my foot. What we have is a temporary wave of terrorism carried out by a group of murderous thugs.

That these terrorist acts are a sign of growing weakness by a group of fanatics who realise that terrorism is all they have left is completely lost on Wilkinson. Instead, she slyly insinuates that these thugs are legitimate insurgents who have growing local support. But this view is belied by the fact that these murderers make no attempt to rally the Iraqi people to their cause. Moreover, these thugs (Wilkinson refuses to call them thugs or terrorists) are focusing more of their attacks on soft targets, with about half of the attacks directed against Iraqis.

A further sign of weakness is that the terrorist organisers are now having to pay about $US5,000 for each attack against allied troops against the $US500 they recently paid. Even the cost of paying the unemployed to demonstrate has jumped to $US50 per demonstrator/rioter. Not that our journalists would ever mention that 'demonstrators' have been receiving blood money.

She quotes a single poll as stating that "two-thirds of Iraqis now felt occupied rather than liberated". The same so-called reporter never quoted polls showing that Iraqis supported the liberation and wanted the allies to stay until political stability was secured. No sireeee. The only poll results this lefty reporter is interested in are those that support her political prejudices. Likewise, the only politicians she is interested in quoting are GOP-hating hypocrites like Daschle. No wonder she and her fellow lefties ignored a letter of appreciation to the US that was signed by 30,000 Iraqi farmers.

So desperate is she to see Bush fail regardless of the consequences for millions of Iraqis that she quoted anonymous Democrats as saying that they would "not be surprised to see Mr Bush declare next year that enough 'progress' has been made to start pulling large numbers of US forces out of Iraq, whatever the consequences". This is the kind of malicious wishful thinking that passes for journalism at the Sydney Morning Herald, aka The Saddam Times

What was notable about Wilkinson's report was her total indifference to the tragic consequences for the Iraqi people if Bush-hating Dems and their media pals forced an early American withdrawal from Iraq. So much for her compassion.

New York's Daily News quoted Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz as saying that at a recent public meeting he attended in Najaf a resident asked: "What's going to happen to us if George Bush loses the election?" This question made it clear that by giving aid and comfort to Saddam's terrorists the Dems and their media enablers are beginning to frighten ordinary Iraqis.

Actions have consequences, and it's about time that ideologically corrupt leftwing journalists were held publicly responsible for their actions. The truth is that these journalists and their loathsome editors already have a great deal of blood on their hands.

Now the likes of Wilkinson's so-called reporting on Iraq bears an eerie comparison with media reporting of the 1968 communist Tet offensive. Despite promising a truce during the religious festival of Tet the Communis

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

*Solemnly regards name on list in blood*

Good.. good company I'm with.

*Dances fiendishly in the moonlight*

Oh, look FMF, there he is right behind us...

damn he's long- winded.

"You hold. Hold 'til I get back." Mal

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by TheRightStuff:

Monday 3 November 2003

---

Dude, you have to go back 2 1/2 YEARS to dig up something POSITIVE!?

Quote:

---

God directs our President!

---

He needs a new leading man.

Are you competing with Piratenews?
You can't win.

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Quote:

---

Originally posted by TheRightStuff:
Long lies by your evil President Bush hating piratenews who will be with satan.
Now long truth! Disrgard this? I don't think you can because it speaks from truth and reality!
SMH covers up Bush successes in Iraq
Gerard Jackson
BrookesNews.Com
Monday 3 November 2003

The Bush-hating Marian Wilkinson of the Sydney Morning Herald is another of those ideologically motivated journalists whose reports on Iraq seem to be written with the sole intention of misleading the public about the true state of affairs in that hapless country.

The war looms as a liability with approach of poll (30 October) was a typical piece of Wilkinsonian disinformation that did not contain a single positive statement in favour of President Bush or the liberation of Iraq. The country is doomed, Iraqi support for the liberation is collapsing and Bush is frustrated by "a growing insurgency." Insurgency my foot. What we have is a temporary wave of terrorism carried out by a group of murderous thugs.

That these terrorist acts are a sign of growing weakness by a group of fanatics who realise that terrorism is all they have left is completely lost on Wilkinson. Instead, she slyly insinuates that these thugs are legitimate insurgents who have growing local support. But this view is belied by the fact that these murderers make no attempt to rally the Iraqi people to their cause. Moreover, these thugs (Wilkinson refuses to call them thugs or terrorists) are focusing more of their attacks on soft targets, with about half of the attacks directed against Iraqis.

A further sign of weakness is that the terrorist organisers are now having to pay about $US5,000 for each attack against allied troops against the $US500 they recently paid. Even the cost of paying the unemployed to demonstrate has jumped to $US50 per demonstrator/rioter. Not that our journalists would ever mention that 'demonstrators' have been receiving blood money.

She quotes a single poll as stating that "two-thirds of Iraqis now felt occupied rather than liberated". The same so-called reporter never quoted polls showing that Iraqis supported the liberation and wanted the allies to stay until political stability was secured. No sireeee. The only poll results this lefty reporter is interested in are those that support her political prejudices. Likewise, the only politicians she is interested in quoting are GOP-hating hypocrites like Daschle. No wonder she and her fellow lefties ignored a letter of appreciation to the US that was signed by 30,000 Iraqi farmers.

So desperate is she to see Bush fail regardless of the consequences for millions of Iraqis that she quoted anonymous Democrats as saying that they would "not be surprised to see Mr Bush declare next year that enough 'progress' has been made to start pulling large numbers of US forces out of Iraq, whatever the consequences". This is the kind of malicious wishful thinking that passes for journalism at the Sydney Morning Herald, aka The Saddam Times

What was notable about Wilkinson's report was her total indifference to the tragic consequences for the Iraqi people if Bush-hating Dems and their media pals forced an early American withdrawal from Iraq. So much for her compassion.

New York's Daily News quoted Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz as saying that at a recent public meeting he attended in Najaf a resident asked: "What's going to happen to us if George Bush loses the election?" This question made it clear that by giving aid and comfort to Saddam's terrorists the Dems and their media enablers are beginning to frighten ordinary Iraqis.

Actions have consequences, and it's about time that ideologically corrupt leftwing journalists were held publicly responsible for their actions. The truth is that these journalists and their loathsome editors already have a great deal of blood on their hands.

Now the likes of Wilkinson's so-called reporting on Iraq bears an eerie comparison with media reporting of the 1968 communist Tet offensive. Despite promising a truce du

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME