UK Police State, Surveillance Society Out Of Control
POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Friday, May 5, 2006 13:01
VIEWED: 3500
PAGE 2 of 2
It's all gone quiet in Tennessee.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
This thread reminded me of something I saw on BBC last week about the goverment actively encouraging people to snitch on their neighbours for watering their gardens (there's a water "crisis" in Britian, RE: bad managment). Apparently theres some old cow who even goes around her whole town looking for people to shop to the cops, what a lovely old dear.
My names Micheal Caine and I am a nosy neighbour...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
We cant have people watering their gardens, There wont be enough left to work the fountains at the Queens Birthday garden party.
And besides, being a nosey nieghbour is an accepted leisure passtime in England.
Just like killing furry animals and kicking inflated pigs bladders around.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I drove thru my first Australian Robocop Spy Cam in Knoxville Tennessee USSA this week. I noticed the yellow lights had been shortened so much that only ONE SINGLE car could pass through the green light before it turned yellow then red. That way the robocops catch more slaves for running red lights. Never mind that robocops always INCREASE the number of crashes... Just an added bonus.
www.piratenews.org/kill-robocops.html
www.redflex.com.au
Quote:
Database State: The UK's Electronic Prison
Steve Watson
Infowars.com UK
PrisonPlanet.com UK
April 20 2006
The gathering and holding of information has permeated into every facet of life in Great Britain and no one batters an eyelid. It's time to reveal what's really going to happen in the UK.
The UK has lapsed into a database surveillance state, an electronic prison where every aspect of the lives of its citizens is determined by the control and flow of personal information between companies and government departments.
Simply in order to own a house, a car, a TV and pay tax we must provide information which is stored forever on electronic databases and very often sold to whomever provides the highest bid.
The population of the United Kingdom are being trained like chimpanzees to sing and perform when any designated 'authority figure' demands they hand over their personal information in anticipation of the mandatory ID card that will weed out the subversives and block the non-conformists from using public services or being able to travel.
Worse still we are routinely reminded that no longer is it necessary for human interaction with this information - the database will manage everything and issue punishments accordingly should we not comply.
Recently in this country we have been subjected to threatening adverts remind us that the TV Licensing company has "a database of 28 million addresses that shows us who does and does not have a current TV licence".
The purpose of the licence fee is to provide income for the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) radio and television services. Under the Wireless Telegraphy Acts anyone using or owning 'with intent to use' a television to watch any channel (including satellite or cable) or to record and watch video tapes needs a licence.
The adverts are set to sinister music, use dark lighting and inform us that they no longer need to "watch us" because they have a massive database that will do it for them and issue fines automatically to addresses that do not appear on the database but use televisions.
Furthermore people who watch TV on mobile phones or computers could face massive fines unless they're on the database. There are also moves afoot to replace the TV license with a "computer tax" for anyone that owns a PC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4708170.stm
www.theregister.co.uk/2005/03/03/pc_tax/
TV Licensing already gathers data from computer retailers and is "in touch with" mobile phone companies and retailers. This would possibly lead to regulation of the flow of information on the internet and the fusing of the TV license database into one for all internet users in the UK.
Another area of database control in the UK lies with the The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), who also tell us in their advertisements that they no longer need to see our road tax discs in our car to determine if they're out of date because all the information they need is contained on their huge database.
What they don't tell us is they sell all this information not just to other companies, such as capita, who use it for other big brother schemes like the London Congestion charge CCTV system, but also to convicted CRMINALS. This activity, as admitted by the government itself, breaches the European Convention on Human Rights.
www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_i
d=369838&in_page_id=1770&in_a_source=&ct=5
If the DVLA cannot effectively prevent abuse when they deal with fewer than 150 companies,NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
PIRATEJEW
We missed you at Her Masjesty's birthday. There was jelly and spotted dicks and everything. Not many Faggots though, so just as well you did'nt come.
Was'nt "Slick Willy" a film about a Killer Whale? I dont think Arnie was in it.
Happy St. George's day.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
A couple of years ago I caught an episode of "The Scarborough Report" (or whatever it's called on MSNBC.) The crux of it being that "bad liberals" were stopping a good Republican twice decorated former Marine from putting up a 25 ft flagpole at the end of his drive so he could fly old glory.
Turned out once you'd removed the spin that the local resident's association (likely to be a wee bit more conservative than liberal me thinks) objected to the flagpole being so high so Mr ExMarine put it up anyway and they sued him.
Two thoughts I had.
1) If the man wants a flagpole, he should have a flagpole, provided it doesnt effect anyone else.
2) It reminded me of how big a group of busybodies suburban Britains can be. Back in the early days of satellite TV a friend of mine was told by the council that he needed permission to put up a dish (even though it's on the building and inside his boundary.) When he later applied he was refused, he later discovered that some of his neighbours had objected......
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
See? British Gangsta Govt is just like US Gangsta Govt. Criminal aliens are terrorists, so for gods sake, DON'T deport them!
Quote:
Clarke hid truth about freed foreign prisoners for 3 weeks
By Andrew Pierce, Richard Ford and Greg Hurst
The London Times
Sunday, April 30th, 2006
Charles Clarke is licensed to kill Brits
CHARLES CLARKE knew that foreign prisoners convicted for serious crime had been released without being considered for deportation more than three weeks before he told the Prime Minister, it emerged last night.
While the lengthy delay was condemned as “outrageous”, Tony Blair continued to insist that Mr Clarke should remain in office as he tried to avoid a bloody political upheaval in the run-up to this week’s local elections.
Genius Charles Clarke, chairman Labour Party,
promoted to Edjucashun Secretary
http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=572&id=1183592002
The Times has learnt that Mr Blair has ruled out any change now because he fears even more political turmoil would be triggered by the loss of either the Deputy Prime Minister or the Home Secretary — two of the heavyweights in the Government.
John Prescott was the subject of more embarrassing claims yesterday after his former assistant diary secretary Tracey Temple gave graphic details of their two-year affair to The Mail on Sunday.
Labour MPs and party canvassers have warned Downing Street that the prisoner release fiasco is playing particularly badly on the doorstep.
The new disclosure that Mr Clarke failed to tell Mr Blair as soon as he knew about the extent of the problem will not only lead to further dismay within the party as Thursday’s polls draw nearer but revive questions about Mr Clarke’s position. David Davis, the Shadow Home Secretary, said yesterday: “How many more serial errors of judgment can the Home Secretary make to put the public at risk? It is outrageous that he did not tell the Prime Minister for three weeks.”
Prevention of Terrorism Bill places citizens under house arrest by fiat of Home Secretary Charles Clarke
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/02/27/nbook27.xml&s
Sheet=/news/2005/02/27/ixhome.html
The release of the 1,023 prisoners, the most serious lapse in penal policy since Labour came to power in 1997, has dominated the last few days of the local election campaign. “It’s all about Charles Clarke and the prisoners. People will not look us in the eye,” one Labour MP said.
A 40-year-old mother, who was dragged from the street and raped at knifepoint by a foreign criminal freed from jail after serving a sentence for robbery, yesterday called on Mr Clarke to resign.
Mr Blair telephoned Mr Prescott from his Chequers retreat yesterday to insist that he carry on as Deputy Prime Minister despite the publication of lurid details of his sexual relationship with Ms Temple, 43.
In The Mail on Sunday Ms Temple said that sexual encounters with Mr Prescott, 67, took place in his private office with the door open while a team of seven civil servants worked outside. They also took place in Mr Prescott’s grace-and-favour apartment in Admiralty Arch.
Mr Prescott has said that details of their relationship had been “spiced up” for money and that he will refer The Mail on Sunday to the Press Complaints Commission. The newspaper also reported that Mr Prescott, who has been married to his wife Pauline for 44 years, had a second, two-year relationship with a married former Labour parliamentary candidate at the end of the 1980s.
A Downing Street source said: “Nobody is trying to understate or disguise the serious nature of all this but at the same time he [Prescott] is somebody who works closely with the Prime Minister and is continuing as such.”
A friend of Mr Prescott said: “John is very distressed for Pauline and his family and for the damage he has done to the party. He feels humiliated but PaulNOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
