Real World Event Discussions

9/11 Conspiracy Theories

POSTED BY: GreenFaerie
UPDATED: Wednesday, February 26, 2025 15:36
VIEWED: 25728
PAGE 5 of 9

Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:57 PM

I think you are mixing up the message with the padding. For PN the message is that Jews are keeping white men like him down, the 9/11 stuff is just there to get you to read the message.

If you watch TV then the adverts are just irritations between programs. If TV is your business the programs are just things to make you watch the adverts.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, April 11, 2006 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
I think you are mixing up the message with the padding. For PN the message is that Jews are keeping white men like him down, the 9/11 stuff is just there to get you to read the message.

If you watch TV then the adverts are just irritations between programs. If TV is your business the programs are just things to make you watch the adverts.



This is why I'm somewhere in the middle ground. PN clearly has an agenda to propagate as does our government, I'm betting someplace in the middle somewhere is the truth...

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, April 11, 2006 10:55 PM

I don't have to make any "case". I just report the facts and draw the obvious extrapolation based on historical reality. The ranting, theorizing and wild conspiracy theories by Citzen, Bush et al just exposes their insanity for all to see. Don't worry, USA is being ripped to shreds right before your closed eyes, so you're never see it, so it can't be real - or can it? The definition of insanity is ignoring reality.

So if I AM "crazy", what does that tell you that your govt hired me to work on supersonic F-111 aircraft and nuclear bombs, conventional high explosive bombs, gatling guns firing 6,000 grenades per second, C-4 plastic explosives, and everything in between? Your govt trusted me to start a jet engine, climb in the cockpit and fire up the weapons system of a nuclear bomber loaded with live nukes...


www.raf-upper-heyford.org
www.geocities.com/pentagonwhistleblower

When my penthouse home was a towering inferno in Knoxville Tennessee, the fire was started by a billionaire Arab contractor of Gangsta Govt. I'm one of those lucky people who hears on a police scanner that your home is on fire, so you race at 100mph, see 50-foot tall flames shooting off your roof visible from the interstate, cross the police barracade, run up 5 flights of stairs to be sure everyone and all pets got out safe, then rescue my computer(!), then confront the fire chief with photos of the arsonists waving fire immediately prior to the inferno, then be threatened with arrest if I said the word "arson". The fire chief alleged he already knew the cause was an "accident" by the govt roofing contractors. This was 5 hours BEFORE the fire was extinguished, with total loss of the building (owned by the Arab contractor who "accidentally" burned down its own HQ 6 months later, getting a "free" new HQ via insurance fraud). The fire chief told me "I have a jail cell with your name on it if you try to provide photographic evidence of arson"! Of course, I was screaming in his face by that point, standing on the sidewalk, holding my computer, as the towing inferno threatened to torch an entire city block of 100-year-old brick buildings, as one did on that same block 100 years ago. Funny thing is, those brick and woods buildings did NOT collapse like the WTC. Even the wood beams even survived, despite the "total loss" insurance claim (building renamed "The Phoenix"). Over $300,000 damage done to my family's building next door, mainly water damage, tho if the wind had shifted 90 degress, our building would have been destroyed, rather than just a burned roof and walls cracked from heat.

Fire depts were invented as extortion rackets since Emperor Nero (a Jew) in Rome, who torched the city then blamed the Christians (ethical Jews). NY Fire Dept approved the genocide of 350 FDNY firefighters on 9/11, as confessed by OZ Jew Larry Silverstein and mafia mayor Sir Rudy Giulinani Knight of the BRITISH Empire.


CIA HQ in WTC7 was bombed/pulled
by controlled demolition by
Controlled Demolition Inc
www.controlled-demolition.com
www.whatreallyhappened.com/fema_report.html
LARGE ANIMATION: whatreallyhappened.com/wtc-7_1_.gif

Scientific experts agree:

Quote:

Physicist says heat substance felled WTC

EXXXTREMELY hot fires caused structures to fail, BYU expert says


Suzanne Dean
Deseret Morning News
April 11 2006

EPHRAIM — A Brigham Young University physicist said he now believes an incendiary substance called thermite, bolstered by sulfur, was used to generate exceptionally hot fires at the World Trade Center on 9/11, causing the structural steel to fail and the buildings to collapse.


This is what 1,000s of EXPLODING BOMBS looks like

"It looks like thermite with sulfur added, which really is a very clever idea," Steven Jones, professor of physics at BYU, told a meeting of the Utah Academy of Science, Arts and Letters at Snow College Friday.

http

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:04 AM

A lot of conspiracy theories emerge from a sense of poetic balance. This is true of the JFK assassination conspiracies. Some people can’t seem to wrap their heads around the facts of this issue, because they can’t believe that someone as inconsequential and trivial as Oswald could have killed someone as important and influential as Kennedy. To many people, there is a sense of balance that is skewed, and in spite of all the facts pointing to Oswald, they are compelled to invent a fantasy to add more weight to the Oswald side of the story.

The same thing is true, I think, of the 9/ll conspiracy theories. I think people see a lack of poetic balance in the way 19 inconsequential nobodies could have killed 3000 innocent people, permanently altered the skyline of one of the World’s most influential cities and provoked one of the most powerful nations to war. When Pearl Harbor was attacked, it was from the Japanese Empire; there’s the sense of poetic balance there, but in some peoples’ minds, they just can’t grasp that 19 hijackers could have accomplished what it took the Japanese Air force to do in 1941. No matter how much factual evidence that is presented to them, they will insist upon inventing fantasies to add weight to the hijacker side of the equation. They will insist that only the United Stats itself could have pulled off such a terrible attack, all factual evidence be damned, because in their minds the facts are too lopsided to accept.

Even some more rational people are smitten by a sense of poetic balance. They accept the factual evidence, but then insinuate or sometimes even insist that the government let it happen, contrary to common sense and completely without supporting evidence. Just as all the evidence points to the Oswald as a lone gunman, all the evidence points to 19 lone hijackers. And as Fletch2 said, this is a terrifying concept. Some people may be prone to the conspiracy theories simply because the reality is just far too frightening.


And I don’t generally read Piratenews’ posts (mostly just look at the pictures), but I’m certain that he’s in his element here.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:05 AM

Well, one other thing still bugs me. If these radical Islamic terrortists are still at us, why, after almost 5 years, have they not attempted to attack us again? I have heard no news of thwarted attacks, or anything of the sort. If they exist, what are they waiting for? Where are all these hidden cells? Why wouldn't the goverment at least tell us they have stopped their attempts if they had occurred?

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:15 AM

Well they have, just not in the US. They attacked Australians in Bali, the Spanish in Madrid and the Brits in London. There have been attempts here in the US but the FBI has been on the case and stopped most of them.

I also think they outdid themselves. After 9/11 if they try anything smaller people will see it as a sign of weakness "well ...... was the best they were able to do this time." I think it's a mind game. If you can't pull off another 9/11 scale attack it's better to keep the US worrying about another 9/11 attack rather than pull something farty and have folks downgrade your threat. Sometimes being seen as a big dog that hasn't bitten anyone yet is better than being a nippy little dog.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:18 AM

Finn, yes I think that's a big part of it too. The truth of JFK was that an insignificant could take out the most powerful man in the world. If the President can be killed nobody is safe and there are a lot of Oswalds out there.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:35 AM

To the above, it's mainly because we completely routed them and they're trying to get things back together. They'll attack us again, but this insane police state we're pushing for is not going to help us defend ourselves.

Quote:

So if I AM "crazy", what does that tell you that your govt hired me to work on supersonic F-111 aircraft and nuclear bombs, conventional high explosive bombs, gatling guns firing 6,000 grenades per second, C-4 plastic explosives, and everything in between? Your govt trusted me to start a jet engine, climb in the cockpit and fire up the weapons system of a nuclear bomber loaded with live nukes.


Clearly because no one else was crazy enough to do it.

I find it interesting that your only response to me was to insult my mother. I remember when "your mom's a whore" jokes were funny. It was in third grade. Did you stop working on planes because of a dishonorable discharge? Probably should've been.

On top of that, American Airlines is one of the few airlines that is not bankrupt, so I wonder how bankrupt your other facts are.

The only thing that you seem to have any information on is that Paxil is an SSRI. Yes, it is. That's probably where Joss Whedon got the name Pax, right? No. "Paxil" and "Pax" are both named from the Latin word for "Peace"; remember "Pax Romana"? "Pax Dei"? Were the Catholic Church of the 1000s and the Romans of the 100s giving their population SSRIs? I'm guessing they weren't, but you might suggest they were. A similarity of three letters means nothing.

You use words as if you know what they mean, which is a foolish assumption; see, for us SCIENTISTS, there is a certain economy of scale involved.

For example, take my claim that the WTC towers were similar to a watermelon being hit with a bullet; when you scale up, they are. They're being hit with more mass, more momentum, and more kinetic energy and heat than a watermelon being hit by a bullet, but they can also withstand more. The two models are roughly analogous. Because the steel beams in the WTC were on the exterior of the buildings, they were like the hard rind of the melon. With only drywall and elevator shafts on the interior, the heat from jetfuel fires caused the drywall to weaken (drywall does not burn, rather it gets weaker and weaker with heat). With the weight of the building resting on broken steel beams (they would not have had to melt, after all they were severed by the impact), the thing was bound to collapse. You see the buildings collapse downward and outward like that because you have a large weight on the top of something that is essentially hollow and empty.

The thing that someone realises from actually doing difficult mathematics and physics is that human scale is pathetically small. It's hard to understand if your mind hasn't worked on that level before, I don't blame you for not understanding that. I blame you for being completely insulting about it.

"See, morbid and creepifying, I got no problem with, long as she does it quiet-like."

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, April 12, 2006 1:00 AM

I'm glad you like staring at my pretty pictures. FIRE... DEATH... PRETTY.......... Just like Cremation of Care and snuff porn from Bohemian Grove, huh?

Quote:

Originally posted by freeradical42:

Clearly because no one else was crazy enough to do it.



I joined USAF to drive race cars and meet chicks, which worked out very well, except for all that killer Gulf War Syndrome Thing.
Quote:

Originally posted by freeradical42:

I find it interesting that your only response to me was to insult my mother. I remember when "your mom's a whore" jokes were funny.

On top of that, American Airlines is one of the few airlines that is not bankrupt, so I wonder how bankrupt your other facts are.



While I'm not sure I ever met your mother, I'm basing my description of pilot groupies based upon my own personal knowledge of airline stewardesses. As Randi Rhoads says on her radio show, "I'll spread my legs anytime for a pilot." Is that a fair description of your mommy?

Crikey, someone is full of poo today. And it sure ain't me. American Airlines management is THREATENING to FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY, in BANKRUPTCY COURT, under Chapter 11 of the BANKRUPTCY CODE. AA is looting its pension funds. When I flew to New Orleans on AA last month, reading airport signs in COMMUNIST CHINESE, NONE of the 4 aircraft were made in USA. (100,000 homes in New Orleans are still without power and condemned for demolition, with a confessed "500" bodies still inside, ready for burial as landfill, but the real # is probably 50,000 dead, judging by how Gangsta Govt and Media Mafia cook the books.)

American Airlines bought BANKRUPT TWA. AA certainly didn't pay TWA's creditors, and looted its pensions funds by robbing TWA employees, then firing them. TWA's unsecured creditors got NOTHING.

"Bankrupt" also means it can't pay its bills, which IS true today, and has been for quite some time. Either you rob your creditors (who counterfeited the "money" out of thin air), or you rob your employees, as AA is now doing. That's great, AA robbing your mommy's pension, if not her job, but at least you can brag that AA's not technically bankrupt, at least not yet, while AA managers bail out with their Golden Parachutes.

On top of that AA has been criminally prosecuted by the US Govt for antitrust monopoly, price rigging, racketeering and organized crime:
www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f8100/8134.htm

No, AA would never do anything illegal, like aid and abet the Bush Gang in perping 9/11, and killing a few bitchy employees trying to get paid... Hell, that would save money on pensions, wouldn't it...

100,000 US airline employees got fired after 9/11. That's what happens when airline slaves keep their mouths shut while George "I'm A Dictator" Bush destroys the US economy and the US aircraft manufacturers and the US airlines.

Obviously, you have nothin intelligent to say about 9/11. Too bad Bush didn't murder you too that day. Would've been good riddance! At least Bush murdered a shitload of copsters and useful idiot RepubliCONs. It's like the tobacco corporations genociding 400,000 customers every year - they just find 400,000 new suckers to take their place.

Quote:

The parent company of American Airlines will lose 20,000 workers - spread across American, Trans World Airlines and the American Eagle commuter carrier, the parent company, AMR Corporation. But the US Treasury Secretary, Paul O'Neill, told Congress that the US government would move swiftly to give aid to the industry, to ensure that the costs of extra safety measures and the increased costs of insurance did not fall on the industry. The US government has proposed a $5bn handout to help US airlines and assist with insurance liabilities, but has stopped short of the $12.5bn (bribe) the industry says it needs to stave off bankruptcies (and shut up about 9/11 being an inside job).
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1553416.stm

American Airlines, the world's largest passenger carrier, could seek Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection as early as next week, The New York Times repo

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, April 12, 2006 3:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by freeradical42:
It's hard to understand if your mind hasn't worked on that level before, I don't blame you for not understanding that. I blame you for being completely insulting about it.




Oh, I don't think it's a question of his not understanding, I think it's just his being a looney toon that gets in the way.

For once I think I actually agree with Finn (I know, write this date down). I think some people need to feel safe so badly (not just feel safe, I think, but explain why others don't feel the same way- i.e., because others just don't 'see' or 'get' what's happening around them) that they construct wild fantasies using whatever facts they can cobble together out of heresay and speculation.

But what do I know. I have to go visit Citizen and the rest of the sane posters in our Bohemian Grove, Jew-Commie-Capitalist-Islamo-Christian-Socialist paradise. Or something, assuming the flouride in my water or the lack of tinfoil on my head doesn't get me first.

------------------------------------------
He looked bigger when I couldn't see him.

Anyone wanting to continue a discussion off board is welcome to email me - check bio for details.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME