Shocking Real World Events
POSTED BY: dreamtrove
UPDATED: Thursday, March 9, 2006 04:53
VIEWED: 3093
PAGE 3 of 4
Quote:
I think the world would be safest with no nuclear weapons at all
reminds me of one of those philosophical question thing's.
you have a time machine and can go back and change one thing do you....
a.kill Hitler
b.kill the guy that invented gun powder (off course till it was superseded by other explosives gunpowder was rather useful stuff)
so c. kill the guy that came up with the idea to use it to propel small weights of lead and iron.
and that citizen always picking on the French
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Citizen:
people who actually used nuclear weapons against civilian populations...
Oh! You mean democrats!
Walkerhound:
a) because the world is not going to randomly come up with another of these.
If you kill the inventor of XYZ death thing, someoene else will invent it. But Eistein would be a better target if you were going to.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Some people believe that society is better when everyone is packing a piece. But they reverse themselves when it comes to explosive nuclear warheads. Personally? I think every nation should have at least three, along with ICBM delivery capability. I'll bet we'd all be a lot nicer to each other if we never knew where a warhead might be lobbed from.... 
---------------------------------
Free as in freedom, not beer.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreamtrove:
Oh! You mean democrats!
Because as we all know the Republicans wouldn't have done it, they'd of prayed for peace, and since they are all saints of the highest calibre and as I’m sure Cartoon will agree God is always on their side, everyone would have immediately put done their weapons and we'd be living in a land of milk and honey. Or something else if Milk and Honey ain’t your thing.
Or, we can start living in the real world where Republicans are as bad (or as good) as Democrats and the Left is as bad (or as good) as the Right. You know, the real world, where all those people you desperately try to convince everyone is actually a socialist is, in fact, rightwing
.
More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
You should never give powers to a leader you like that you’d hate to have given to a leader you fear
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Citizen:
Republicans wouldn't have done it
Ah, something else we agree on.
Quote:
they'd of prayed for peace, and since they are all saints of the highest calibre and as I’m sure Cartoon will agree God is always on their side, everyone would have immediately put done their weapons and we'd be living in a land of milk and honey. Or something else if Milk and Honey ain’t your thing.
Still not a Christian.
Quote:
Or, we can start living in the real world where Republicans are as bad as Democrats
Um, which world is this?
Quote:
everyone is actually a socialist
Nope, not me. Bush maybe. But then Bush is a democrat. When everyone on my side who hasn't figured that out yet figures that out, they'll feel stupid. When everyone who hasn't figured that out on your side figures that out, you'll come and join our side. Except for Fletch, who will be elated.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I don't see any point in discussing it DT. I'm talking about the terms everyone uses, where the Right is as bad or as good as the Left. Your using the ones you've made up, which you've decided are correct, where right == good and left == evil which your convinced is correct and everyone else is wrong. So there's no point in discussing it.
Edit (a few clarifications):
Quote:
Still not a Christian.
That was more a swipe at Cartoon, because he's an ignorant moron with a consistently smarmy self important superior attitude. He has thoroughly earned my contempt, but it wasn't meant for you, sorry.
Quote:
But then Bush is a democrat.
Yes, he just happens to be called a Republican, the son of a Republican, elected as Republican by Republican voters. Keep reaching.
More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
You should never give powers to a leader you like that you’d hate to have given to a leader you fear
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Can I still be elated? Been a while since that happened....
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Sorry Fletch, didn't realize you were on the Bush is Clinton page. I'm never sure where you stand actually. It's occurred to me that you blanketly oppose. I have to confess I've done it some myself.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I dont think Bush is Clinton.
I know Bush is not very conservative. I know he seems to value loyalty over competance. I also know that you dont have to be conservative to be a Republican, and that if you are unwilling to play the religion card then you probably wont make the primary.
Oh, and as the most powerfull man in the world Clinton should be able to do better than Monica. Halle Berry at least....
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME