Funny Amazon review

POSTED BY: EmpXenu
UPDATED: Tuesday, February 7, 2006 16:36
VIEWED: 10681
PAGE 3 of 6

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NEXT PAGE

ASARIAN

Monday, February 6, 2006 12:58 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Gixxer:
Jayne is a princess' name.

Princeless! I mean, priceless! :)

"Mei-mei, everything I have is right here." -- Simon Tam.

ASARIAN

Monday, February 6, 2006 1:25 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SameErtia:
I've mentioned that I love you guys, right?

No, you haven't. But I could stand to hear some more. :)

"Mei-mei, everything I have is right here." -- Simon Tam.

KOMELION

Monday, February 6, 2006 1:28 AM

The princess of Canton the man they call Jayne.

------
Well, here I am.

ASARIAN

Monday, February 6, 2006 1:51 AM

In defense of our movie, I'd have to agree with you on this:

Quote:
Originally posted by Mattie:
In defense of our movie, I'd have to agree with you on this:

Quote:
And I'd take Serenity's sets and effects over the bloated extravaganza in the Prequel trilogy any day.

It's kinda sad that such a low-budget film such as Serenity can have better specail effects than another un-named trillogy that cost almost three times to make (not to bag on said trillogy--okay, I lied, it is to bag on said trillogy)

You know, come to think of it, I'm staring at a cargo hold. A rusty one, at that. And I'm loving it! See? That's not "Industrial Light and Magic" (to bag on said un-named trillogy), but simply Magic.

"Mei-mei, everything I have is right here." -- Simon Tam.

GUTTERBALL

Monday, February 6, 2006 2:18 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Gixxer:
Jayne is a princess's name.

*cracks up*

Yeah, but Jayne ain't no princess! If you'll give him a second, he'll show you that he's got man-parts!

________________________________________

Please remember that the 9:30 show is completely different from the 7:30 show. Don't forget to tip your waitress.

CHRISTHECYNIC

Monday, February 6, 2006 2:50 AM

Why doesn't report this have a function for adding a comment on why it is bad, I came across a review that says how horible it is without actually giving any indication the guy saw it.

I mean some things make it clear the person writing it never watched the movie, sure it says I can report it, but it's not as if it's profane.

-

I also want to be able to say in some of these:
This person quotes details as untrue, if you watch the movie you will see this.

I mean I'm reading through these 110 so far, and I just want to say to Amazon, "A person who did not understand the movie is not equipped to review it."

I mean if someone watched Star Wars and said, "It sucked, let me use the sex scene to illustrate," are they really ok to be giving a 1 to 5 score? Some people are saying things that are that off.

The flip side is also true, but I'm really just looking at the negitive reviews so I don't know if people are saying, "I love it becasue of something that isn't in it."

I want someone to say, in honesty and detail, why they didn't like it. I'm sure that there are many people like that but apparently none of them go to Amazon.com.

CHRISTHECYNIC

Monday, February 6, 2006 3:07 AM

And some things I want people to elaborate on, I mean where did someone get the impression two factions ruled?

What were the factions?

It says clearly, I thought, that the independents were defeated, and the only thing in the movie that looks like there is more than one faction is when the Reavers attack the alliance but I didn't think anyone got the impression they ruled anyone.

When someone really dislikes it I want to know why, when someone misunderstands I want to know why and where they got the idea.

NANDIFAN

Monday, February 6, 2006 3:11 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Komelion:
The princess of Canton the man they call Jayne.

------
Well, here I am.

Hi-freakin'-larious!!

After the day I had, that is possibly the funniest thing I have ever heard or read!

"If they've got guns or brains at all."
"They've got guns."

CHRISTHECYNIC

Monday, February 6, 2006 3:16 AM

If anyone cares about my trek through the reviews:
on the 171-180 there is a review by a Firefly fan who did not like the movie. While I do not agree with the grievances listed there it wins the prize as the first (and only so far) negative review that actually gives reasons for disliking the movie.

lost the charm, January 1, 2006
Reviewer: J. Ford (flyover country)

i cannot say how disappointing this movie was, after loving the TV series so much. the movie lost everything that was good about the series: relationships, values, wit, and quirkiness that comes along with people just trying to make it the best way they can. serenity pandered to 10 year old boys who want kick boxing and space ships shooting at each other. i was bored out of my mind. now, don't get me wrong: i love a good fight in any format, when there is some motivation behind it that is worthwhile. i wanted so much to love this and cannot express fully my disappointment... sorry, joss, but this, in my opinion, is the stake in the heart of one of my favorite scifi TV series ever.

ASARIAN

Monday, February 6, 2006 3:24 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by christhecynic:
And some things I want people to elaborate on, I mean where did someone get the impression two factions ruled?

What were the factions?

It says clearly, I thought, that the independents were defeated, and the only thing in the movie that looks like there is more than one faction is when the Reavers attack the alliance but I didn't think anyone got the impression they ruled anyone.

When someone really dislikes it I want to know why, when someone misunderstands I want to know why and where they got the idea.

Eh, don't let it get to you. The guy's so full of go-se, why waste even a single thought on him? Reavers being a faction is fiction.

"Mei-mei, everything I have is right here." -- Simon Tam.

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NEXT PAGE