Global Warming Network News- AKA- The Polar Water Caps
POSTED BY: chrisisall
UPDATED: Tuesday, February 7, 2006 17:41
VIEWED: 2400
PAGE 4 of 4
Firstly, wow, I had an overwhelming desire to look at this thread seconds before you made that post, then I surf off somewhere else and my email beeps.
Weird.
Anyway, most of that may have sounded a little vicious, wasn't meant for you, it was meant for AURaptor really. Someone who sounds like they believe there is no problem.
Someone who should have a brain who elects to turn it off and take the crap force fed to them by the arseholes that run the world.
More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
The statistics on sanity are that one out of every four persons is suffering from some sort of mental illness. Think of your three best friends -- if they're okay, then it's you.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
But for AURaptors benefit:
Yes, pumping tons of greenhouse gases, carcinogens and other nasties into the atmosphere has no effect; really, it’s good for us, especially the 1% of the population getting rich off it. We aren’t in the middle of a Cancer epidemic, oh no, everything will be fine, it’s actually getting colder. Can you see the rainbow, oh and is that a pot of gold with your name on it?
While there's Oil to burn trying to keep the species alive is bad for business, so let’s kill us all, it'll probably happen after we're dead anyway, so someone else will have to deal with it and in the meantime we all have yachts!
Halleluiah!
Volcanos pump out far more poisonous gasses and C02 than we humans have, and our air is still fine to breath. Well, it is for me. There's no need for chicken little cries or the Kyoto Treaty. ( the latter which did more to harm capitalism than to curb pollution ) Your comment about yachts is more telling than you realize. The enviromental movement is , primarily, anti wealth, and more intent on redistribution than saving the planet.
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Okay, back to disagreement.
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Your comment about yachts is more telling than you realize. The enviromental movement is , primarily, anti wealth, and more intent on redistribution than saving the planet.
The environmental movement is primarily (I believe) about saving the environment, and like any cause, is being enthuastically pushed as hard as it can be by it's supporters. If they have their way, forests and oceans will be spared the ravages they've been suffering, and those poor rich folk getting fat off of toxic waste dumping in the sea and de-regulation of protected land will see a noticable hit to their bottom line.
So, YEAH. It IS anti-wealth, when you look at it that way.
And why crab? Are you in danger of having to sell a yacht or two to keep your Italian villa while the plankton you're killing say bye-bye?
Please. We're all in this together.
Yacht-less Chrisisall
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:No worries, I knew.
Originally posted by citizen:
Anyway, most of that may have sounded a little vicious, wasn't meant for you
Some folks are all in a rush to get to 'Earth that Was', without even realizing it
.Chrisisall
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yes AU, as I guessed, no Pollution, no deaths in fifties London due to smog, no Cancer epidemic, lead in your water strengthens the heart, pour carcinogens on your cornflakes, they're good for you and don't cause cancer.
Sing with me:
Asthma isn't on the rise,
That's just lefty lies,
Cancer's just a fake,
It's all just a little half baked,
The air here is good, *cough* *splutter*
I don't even like wood,
Natives like it when you burn 'em,
'Cause now they all have toaster ovens,
Sit in you're garage,
And leave the engine on,
You won't die,
That's just lefty lies,
As usual AURaptor you're reconstituted response is as predictable and devoid of facts as ever.
Quote:
Your comment about yachts is more telling than you realize. The enviromental movement is , primarily, anti wealth, and more intent on redistribution than saving the planet.
Not really, most pollution is caused by people who do it because it's more cost effective to dump toxic crap than to dispose of it responsibly. But since you'd prefer to die than think stockholders will lose 0.1% of their dividend go ahead, just tell me when you’re going to do it, so I can sell tickets, there must after all be a profit in everything.
But yes, what craziness is this, suggesting that we should divert our attention away from the pure pursuit of money and toward preventing the extinction of the Human race for a change.
Crazy, where’s the profit in that?
Here's a bucket of sand, it's to replace the one you've currently got your head in, you'll prefer this one, full of nice non-polluting non-toxic Oil (a drop of crude makes birds stronger and healthier, right).
More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
The statistics on sanity are that one out of every four persons is suffering from some sort of mental illness. Think of your three best friends -- if they're okay, then it's you.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Wow.
Originally posted by citizen:
Here's a bucket of sand, it's to replace the one you've currently got your head in, you'll prefer this one, full of nice non-polluting non-toxic Oil (a drop of crude makes birds stronger and healthier, right).
Anti-environmentalists sure do get your dander up.
Side Note; Citizen, have you ever seen 'On Deadly Ground'? The last ten minutes sums up perfectly how I feel about polluters (plus, lots of cool fight scenes
).Chrisisall, with a pony tail
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Anti-environmentalists sure do get your dander up.
Anti-environmentalists are one thing, pro polluters who believe a bit of benzine in the morning is a good part of a healthy diet are something else...
Quote:
Side Note; Citizen, have you ever seen 'On Deadly Ground'? The last ten minutes sums up perfectly how I feel about polluters (plus, lots of cool fight scenes
I vaguely remember it, I did have to go off and find a little reminder. I did find this that made me chuckle, partly because its the complete opposite of the conversation between Adam Baldwin and Joss Whedon about Jayne:
Quote:
Jennings remains such a stock cartoon villain that one concludes that Caine was only hired after both Bluto and Snidely Whiplash were found to be busy on other projects.
...
Jennings pretty much proves to be the worst performance in Caine’s long and busy career
...
Director Seagal: "OK, Michael, you’re the Bad Guy. So act really, like, Evil here."
Caine: "But look, Steven. You know that, in my character’s mind, he’s not the bad guy. To him, he’s the hero, see. He believes totally in what he’s doing, and in his right to do it. In fact, to him, your character is the bad guy, not he."
Director Seagal, after staring at Caine for a very long time without changing expression: "OK, Michael, you’re the Bad Guy. So act really Evil here. Oh, and more Awe when he sees me enter the room."
http://www.jabootu.com/ondeadlyground.htm
Might be blaspheme, but it just made me laugh
.More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
The statistics on sanity are that one out of every four persons is suffering from some sort of mental illness. Think of your three best friends -- if they're okay, then it's you.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:LOL, that was great, thanks, I'd not read that before, but it rings so true.
Originally posted by citizen:
Director Seagal, after staring at Caine for a very long time without changing expression: "OK, Michael, you’re the Bad Guy. So act really Evil here. Oh, and more Awe when he sees me enter the room."
Caine gave Segal the cartoon bad guy he wanted, and more
.The movie is pure un-intentional funny, however, the pro-environment message at the end is still completly valid and spot-on. Actually chokes me up (no pun) for real.
Chrisisall, as always, Ex-CIA
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Volcanos pump out far more poisonous gasses and C02 than we humans have, and our air is still fine to breath.
Auraptor, this is patently false. Volcanos did, millions of years ago, they certainly don't today, not even within several orders of magnitude.
This is not the flaw in Kyoto. The flaw in Kyoto is that China, which is currently about to become the world's greatest poluter, is exempt from the treaty. According to the document anyone who signs it can't say anything about China's environmental policies for 20 years. In 20 years, the US and Europe will be on alternative zero emmission fuel out of political and economic necessity, and China's billion people will be pumping out an estimated 2-4 times what Europe and the US combined is right now. Why would any reasonable environmentalist support such a position?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:'Cause otherwise we'd never get to 'Earth That Was', duh.
Originally posted by dreamtrove:
Why would any reasonable environmentalist support such a position?
FF fans goin' too far Chrisisall
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME