Iran Is Losing This War, and the Global Balance of Power Is Shifting
POSTED BY: 6ixStringJack
UPDATED: Tuesday, July 21, 2026 03:34
VIEWED: 781
PAGE 1 of 3
https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/04/30/iran-war-global-power-shifting/
Quote:
We’re approaching 60 days of the so-called Iran war, and we’re still getting these loud voices that Donald Trump has failed, that the war’s not going well.
It’s completely nonempirical. It’s antithetical to the evidence.
Here we are at 60 days, and Iran is losing about $500 million in input per day. It’s running out of storage space in a week or two for its daily output of oil, at which point they either have to stop pumping or they’re going to have—if they don’t stop pumping—their wells will collapse.
They either have to stop pumping, or they have to build, as fast as they can, storage facilities, which will be known to us and we can take out.
So, they’re at the brink economically. They have no military ability. The course of the war, how it ends, is entirely in the hands of the United States. It depends on whether you want an unconditional surrender and you want to pay an extra price—maybe another month or two—with economic strangulation, or you want to use air power to take out bridges, and you can do that.
What I’m getting at is it’s not a military problem like Afghanistan and Helmand Province, or the Marines having to go into Fallujah in Iraq. It’s entirely a political problem. It’s not a military problem. The military problem has been solved. It’s just a question of how much political price does President Donald Trump—or risk, I should say—want to take to get an unconditional surrender and the removal of the regime.
He doesn’t need to do that. That was not one of his prewar agendas. The prewar agenda was to neutralize the nuclear proliferation of Iran, the missile and drone force, to attrite its military so it was not capable of conducting war, to stop the subsidies to its terrorist proxies, and to make sure it no longer attacked Americans and our allies as it has for 47 years. These have mostly been met—not quite, but mostly.
So, what are the ripples strategically? Well, just recently, OPEC has announced—I should say the United Arab Emirates and perhaps Oman as well—that they don’t want to be in OPEC. Remember about OPEC: It was formed in 1973, and the whole purpose was to drive up the price of oil, and they did that by not pumping what they could pump.
So, right now, they have each individual country has a quota, and that’s only about 70% or 80% of what they could pump if they were not in the cartel. That is what the United States is pumping right now—maximum. Russia will probably be pumping at maximum very soon. Venezuela will be pumping at maximum very soon.
But what you’re talking about is 2 million barrels, maybe, from the UAE alone. Maybe if Saudi Arabia gets out, they can pump another 20%. What I’m getting at is the long-range strategic value of the Straits of Hormuz are going to decline because all of these countries, once they see one person getting out and taking advantage of these high prices, they will swarm to get out.
But once they get out and pump more oil—and they’re immediately capable of pumping more oil—the price will drop, and the Straits of Hormuz will not be so important. And that will not be good for Iran if it has oil wells at all in two or three weeks.
The other thing to remember is China. Everybody talks about, “Well, China, China, China.”
China hasn’t come out well. It had threatened to go into Taiwan all of the Biden administration. Year after year, it issued videos of bombing Japan, threatening to take out Taiwan, lecturing people: “Don’t tell us that we can’t take it.”
Pundits saying that they were emboldened by the Russians. I never understood that—Russia is in a Stalingrad-like quagmire. But once they looked at this type of war—an air war in a gulf—and they were thinking, we have to transmit, what, 300,000 troops or so across 110 miles of open sea. And from what we can see from the Americans, the Israelis, these Western powers have enormous ability to flood the zone with drones, with missiles, sophisticated air defenses, submarine drones, surface drones.NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/04/30/iran-war-global-power-shifting/Quote:
We’re approaching 60 days of the so-called Iran war, and we’re still getting these loud voices that Donald Trump has failed, that the war’s not going well.
It’s completely nonempirical. It’s antithetical to the evidence.
Here we are at 60 days, and Iran is losing about $500 million in input per day. It’s running out of storage space in a week or two for its daily output of oil, at which point they either have to stop pumping or they’re going to have—if they don’t stop pumping—their wells will collapse.
They either have to stop pumping, or they have to build, as fast as they can, storage facilities, which will be known to us and we can take out.
So, they’re at the brink economically. They have no military ability. The course of the war, how it ends, is entirely in the hands of the United States. It depends on whether you want an unconditional surrender and you want to pay an extra price—maybe another month or two—with economic strangulation, or you want to use air power to take out bridges, and you can do that.
What I’m getting at is it’s not a military problem like Afghanistan and Helmand Province, or the Marines having to go into Fallujah in Iraq. It’s entirely a political problem. It’s not a military problem. The military problem has been solved. It’s just a question of how much political price does President Donald Trump—or risk, I should say—want to take to get an unconditional surrender and the removal of the regime.
He doesn’t need to do that. That was not one of his prewar agendas. The prewar agenda was to neutralize the nuclear proliferation of Iran, the missile and drone force, to attrite its military so it was not capable of conducting war, to stop the subsidies to its terrorist proxies, and to make sure it no longer attacked Americans and our allies as it has for 47 years. These have mostly been met—not quite, but mostly.
So, what are the ripples strategically? Well, just recently, OPEC has announced—I should say the United Arab Emirates and perhaps Oman as well—that they don’t want to be in OPEC. Remember about OPEC: It was formed in 1973, and the whole purpose was to drive up the price of oil, and they did that by not pumping what they could pump.
So, right now, they have each individual country has a quota, and that’s only about 70% or 80% of what they could pump if they were not in the cartel. That is what the United States is pumping right now—maximum. Russia will probably be pumping at maximum very soon. Venezuela will be pumping at maximum very soon.
But what you’re talking about is 2 million barrels, maybe, from the UAE alone. Maybe if Saudi Arabia gets out, they can pump another 20%. What I’m getting at is the long-range strategic value of the Straits of Hormuz are going to decline because all of these countries, once they see one person getting out and taking advantage of these high prices, they will swarm to get out.
But once they get out and pump more oil—and they’re immediately capable of pumping more oil—the price will drop, and the Straits of Hormuz will not be so important. And that will not be good for Iran if it has oil wells at all in two or three weeks.
The other thing to remember is China. Everybody talks about, “Well, China, China, China.”
China hasn’t come out well. It had threatened to go into Taiwan all of the Biden administration. Year after year, it issued videos of bombing Japan, threatening to take out Taiwan, lecturing people: “Don’t tell us that we can’t take it.”
Pundits saying that they were emboldened by the Russians. I never understood that—Russia is in a Stalingrad-like quagmire. But once they looked at this type of war—an air war in a gulf—and they were thinking, we have to transmit, what, 300,000 troops or so across 110 miles of open sea. And from what we can see from the Americans, the Israelis, these Western powers have enormous ability to flood the zone with drones, with missiles, sophisticatedNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hindu Nationalists would argue different
then...Grilled At Senate Hearing
and
Something is different about Trump’s $1 trillion war on Iran and its stress on the national debt
https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/something-different-
trump-1-trillion-200140208.html
Daily Signal and Murdochs? Fox News editor is the managing editor, Shapiro's friend are there but they didnt vist pedo islands, Bluey would push John Boehner, Paul Ryan and Bohemian Grove former House Speaker Newt Gingrich on the platforms, plus DailySingla is seeply tied into Bush Clinton Heritage Foundation era the Heritage Foundation "laid much of the groundwork for Bush administration thinking" about post-Soviet foreign policy, big fan of War in Iraq, bomb Saddam because he got Nukes etc
https://web.archive.org/web/20180319085034/http://articles.baltimoresu
n.com/1991-01-20/news/1991020140_1_saddam-hussein-kuwait-iraqi-president-saddam
a new world order rag that helped get TheWest into this chaotic mess
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I read articles like this and all I think is "What???"
It's just bits of murky thinking disconnected from other bits of murky thinking.
A few examples
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/04/30/iran-war-global-power-shifting/Quote:
We’re approaching 60 days of the so-called Iran war, and we’re still getting these loud voices that Donald Trump has failed, that the war’s not going well.
It’s completely nonempirical. It’s antithetical to the evidence.
Here we are at 60 days, and Iran is losing about $500 million in input per day.
According to marine traffic observers, 90% of Iranian ships are getting thru the blockade. It would only require slowing down the oil wells 10% to balance production with export
Quote:
It’s running out of storage space in a week or two for its daily output of oil, at which point they either have to stop pumping or they’re going to have—if they don’t stop pumping—their wells will collapse.
They either have to stop pumping, or they have to build, as fast as they can, storage facilities, which will be known to us and we can take out.
There's another inconsistency between what this article says v what Trump admin says. This article assumes that we destroyed Iran's storage facilities and have a commitment to destroy any newly built ones. At the same time, Trump admin claims that Iran is just days away from "tank tops", implying that Iran still has storage facilities. So, which is it? Have we destroyed Iran's storage tanks? Do we even have the capacity to? Or are enough of them too far inland and out of reach of our bombers? Wouldn't it be better to use actual ... yanno ... numbers, like numbers of tanks, spare capacity, etc instead of just making up stuff?
Quote:. This is a big stumbling block. I know Trump keeps repeating "Their military is destroyed" but in reality Iran still retains the capacity to do the three things that really matter:
So, they’re at the brink economically. They have no military ability.
hold the Straits,
destroy all remaining US bases, and destroy critical infrastructure in Israel and the Gulf States
defend against a "boots on the ground" invasion.
Quote:
The course of the war, how it ends, is entirely in the hands of the United States. It depends on whether you want an unconditional surrender and you want to pay an extra price—maybe another month or two—with economic strangulation, or you want to use air power to take out bridges, and you can do that.
What I’m getting at is it’s not a military problem like Afghanistan and Helmand Province, or the Marines having to go into Fallujah in Iraq. It’s entirely a political problem. It’s not a military problem. The military problem has been solved. It’s just a question of how much political price does President Donald Trump—or risk, I should say—want to take to get an unconditional surrender and the removal of the regime.
He doesn’t need to do that. That was not one of his prewar agendas. The prewar agenda was to neutralize the nuclear proliferation of Iran, the missile and drone force, to attrite its military so it was not capable of conducting war, to stop the subsidies to its terrorist proxies, and to make sure it no longer attacked Americans and our allies as it has for 47 years. These have mostly been met—not quite, but mostly.
So, what are the ripples strategically? Well, just recently, OPEC has announced—I should say the United Arab Emirates and perhaps Oman as well—that they don’t want to be in OPEC. Remember about OPEC: It was formed in 1973, and the whole purpose was to drive up the price of oil, and they did that by not pumping what they could pump.
So, right now, they have each individual country has a quota, and that’s only about 70% or 80% of what they could pump if they were not in the cartel. That is what the United States is pumping right now—maximum. Russia will probably be pumping at maximum very soon. Venezuela will be pumpiNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
This is a big stumbling block. I know Trump keeps repeating "Their military is destroyed" but in reality Iran still retains the capacity to do the three things that really matter:
hold the Straits,
destroy all remaining US bases, and destroy critical infrastructure in Israel and the Gulf States
defend against a "boots on the ground" invasion.
Do it then. Or shut the fuck up.
Quote:
Should the USA restart military action, Iran will uncork its missiles and drones and you can kiss Israel and the Gulf States goodbye.
I couldn't be bothered to read the rest. there's no information here. Just a rhash of unsupported talking points.
You're so full of shit, Sigs. I'm glad there isn't more to read.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
This is a big stumbling block. I know Trump keeps repeating "Their military is destroyed" but in reality Iran still retains the capacity to do the three things that really matter:
hold the Straits,
destroy all remaining US bases, and destroy critical infrastructure in Israel and the Gulf States
defend against a "boots on the ground" invasion.
Do it then. Or shut the fuck up.
UNLIKE THE UNITED STATES AND ISRAEL, Iran doesn't attack other nations. (Dont forget, it was Israel and the USA that attacked Iran, not the other way around). Iran's military is for defense and deterrence. You really want Iran to behave mindlessly aggressively, like you?
Quote:
SIGNY:
Should the USA restart military action, Iran will uncork its missiles and drones and you can kiss Israel and the Gulf States goodbye.
I couldn't be bothered to read the rest. there's no information here. Just a rhash of unsupported talking points.
SIX:
You're so full of shit, Sigs. I'm glad there isn't more to read.
Engage critical thinking, son.
ETA:
You're angry white trash, SIX. Trash not bc you're poor, or stupid, but bc the economy discarded you. As much trash as the coal miners of Appalachia, the steel workers of Pittsburgh and Buffalo, the auto workers of Detroit. In your lifetime you've been kicked down the ladder, with less and less income and fewer and fewer options at each step.
No wonder you're angry. You have every right to be.
But Iran isn't your enemy.
Muslims aren't your enemy.
CHINA isn't your enemy.
FOCUS. Stop lashing out in all directions.
WHO did that to you?
Until Trump focuses on TPTB who brought you, and America, to this sad state, he isn't your savior either.
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
This is a big stumbling block. I know Trump keeps repeating "Their military is destroyed" but in reality Iran still retains the capacity to do the three things that really matter:
hold the Straits,
destroy all remaining US bases, and destroy critical infrastructure in Israel and the Gulf States
defend against a "boots on the ground" invasion.
Do it then. Or shut the fuck up.
UNLIKE THE UNITED STATES AND ISRAEL, Iran doesn't attack other nations. (Dont forget, it was Israel and the USA that attacked Iran, not the other way around). Iran's military is for defense and deterrence. You really want Iran to behave mindlessly aggressively, like you?
What the fuck are you talking about? Iran attacked literally everyone surrounding them.
Did you miss that news story.
Shut the fuck up.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
You are massively ignorant, SIX.
Who did Iran attack?
Iraq?
Er, no. Iraq attacked Iran.
Kuwait?
No. Iraq did that.
Syria?
Wrong again.
Lebanon?
Nope!
Israel?
Nope!
Israel attacked first.
Did Iran strike UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain?
Yes, after those countries allowed the USA and Israel to use their bases and airspace to attack Iran.
Self defense, SIX.
IDK WTF you're talking about.
YOU don't know WTF you're talking about.
You're a stupid fuck on geopolitics.
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
You are massively ignorant, SIX.
No. I'm not. You are.
And I'm finished having any political conversations with you.
You don't know your ass from a fucking hole in the ground.
Ted and Second need to stay out of the garden. You need to stay in it.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I noticed that you can't post one single example to prove your point.
It's all blah blah blah and butt-hurt name-calling.
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME