The Thread of Court Cases Trump Is Winning
POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Thursday, September 3, 2026 03:01
VIEWED: 5857
PAGE 9 of 11
We are actively dealing with enemies of the American People.
They're all being exposed now for who they truly are.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I don't even understand this reporting, or the thought behind anything here...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/ro-khanna-explains-how-he-helped-
engineer-the-vote-that-ripped-maga-apart/ar-AA1QJodj
You fell into a trap, buddy.
Not only isn't anybody acknowledging you, but most of the media went complete blackout on the Epstein situation the last 2 days.
I think the ACTUAL plan was to use stooges like you and MTG to make a huge media circus out of this, and watch as Trump forced Republicans to block it by going straight to TruthSocial and screaming about how he was going to primary any Republican who voted to release them. If he did what you all thought he was going to do, he'd be spending the next 3 years doing everything he could to block or at least stall them from coming out. And that would have worked if it went down that way too. That would have shut down the rest of his agenda for the next 3 years with Epstein in the media every day.
I mean, yeah... It was working there for 2 or 3 weeks. You had idiots like Ted and Second calling him President Pedophile and all sorts of shit, and having them try to get under everyone else's skin like chiggers.
But how long was that going to go on for when Trump's got nothing to worry about on that list?
I know the idiots here and on BlueSky are hoping that this is finally the time that they got him and Trump is going down, but you've been let down so many hundreds of times by now you should know better.
Enjoy the slight bump in name recognition for the weekend, Ro, and maybe a little bit more in the next 30 days, but that's about it dude.
People are going to go down. I think it's pretty obvious right now that you're not one of them. But there will be people offered up for this, and though I have zero doubt that a lot of people will be shielded from the fallout, there will be casualties on both sides.
SPOILER ALERT: Trump isn't going to be one of them. And Democrats are in such a weak position nationally right now that you're going to lose a lot in the closed door negotiations figuring out exactly who is going to be taking the fall here.
If you actually cared at all, you should and would have released this information while Joe Biden* was President, but you all waited to make a big fucking noise about it 5 years later when it was politically convenient. Since we all know that there are guilty parties on both sides, I can completely understand why you swept it under the rug for 4 years, but why try to force it now? Other than pulling a bluff for the next 3 years and making everyone watch Trump desperately try to suppress this if he were guilty, what was the plan? Was there a plan for how it went down? I don't see how you possibly could have had a Plan B here because I don't think any of this went according to your plan at all and you didn't even see this coming.
And The American People know that there are a LOT of people who voted to release those files this week on both sides that just fucked themselves over if Trump doesn't do what everyone, for some reason, got it in their heads he was going to do.
For the first time in a while, I'm pretty fucking confused about what just went down. Strategically, none of this makes sense, particularly when trying to see it through a Democratic Politician's lens.
The way I see it, one of two things just happened here...
1. I'm wrong, and not only is Trump on that list but there's video proof of him doing the unspeakable and he just got couped.
2. Trump played everyone on a long con and just got a lot of really dumb fucking child rapists that we voted into office on both sides to destroy their own lives. Seemingly for no reason.
Not that I would ever expect any politician to do the right thing, let alone one of these people on this issue, but what is the thinking here? There's a zero percent chance that nobody is guilty on either side. What were those people told to vote in fav
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The Opinion:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Scathing Opinion from Judge Jerry Smith, including rebuke of Judicial Misbehavior by corrupt rogue activist Judge Jeffrey Vincent Brown in Texas Redistricting case. Including PAGES of list of errors, lies, and misbehavior at the end of the Opinion.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/11/20/texas-redistricting-most-scathi
ng-denunciation-of-court-decision-ive-ever-read/
https://realamericasvoice.substack.com/p/scathing-dissent-rocks-texas-
redistricting
https://ussanews.com/2025/11/20/texas-redistricting-the-most-scathing-
denunciation-of-a-court-decision-ive-ever-read/
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1150387/gov.
uscourts.txwd.1150387.1439.0.pdf
The last 2 pages are a partial list of Judge Brown's lies and falsehoods.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:https://www.axios.com/local/san-antonio/2025/11/22/supreme-court-texas
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:The Opinion:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Scathing Opinion from Judge Jerry Smith, including rebuke of Judicial Misbehavior by corrupt rogue activist Judge Jeffrey Vincent Brown in Texas Redistricting case. Including PAGES of list of errors, lies, and misbehavior at the end of the Opinion.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/11/20/texas-redistricting-most-scathi
ng-denunciation-of-court-decision-ive-ever-read/
https://realamericasvoice.substack.com/p/scathing-dissent-rocks-texas-
redistricting
https://ussanews.com/2025/11/20/texas-redistricting-the-most-scathing-
denunciation-of-a-court-decision-ive-ever-read/
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1150387/gov.
uscourts.txwd.1150387.1439.0.pdf
The last 2 pages are a partial list of Judge Brown's lies and falsehoods.
-congressional-map-redistricting
Saw that one coming. Didn't take long at all.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
More Immigration judges.
https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-11/notice_eoir_announces_39_new_immigr
ation_judges_11072023.pdf
More Deportation judges.
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/doj-immigration-judges/2025/11/21/id/
1235560/
roh row
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Start in Dearborn. Right now.
Otherwise, that will be ground zero for the 2nd Civil War.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
ABC NEWS: Georgia prosecutor drops election interference case against Trump, others
It marks the end of the two major election interference cases Trump faced.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/georgia-prosecutor-drops-election-interferen
ce-case-trump/story?id=127898245
Quote:
The Fulton County, Georgia, election interference case against President Donald Trump and others has been dismissed after the prosecutor who took over the case requested that it be dropped.
"In my professional judgment, the citizens of Georgia are not served by pursuing this case in full for another five to ten years," wrote Pete Skandalakis, the executive director of the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council of Georgia, who took over the case after the original prosecutor was disqualified from the case.
Within minutes of Skandalakis' court filing, the judge overseeing the case granted the request and dismissed the case.
"This case is hereby dismissed in its entirety," wrote Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee, who earlier this month had scheduled a Dec. 1 "status/pretrial" hearing in the case.
Trump and 18 others pleaded not guilty in August 2023 to all charges in a sweeping racketeering indictment for alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in the state of Georgia.
Another one bites the dust.
Womp, womp.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
On Ilan Omar... She won't be our problem for much longer.
Trump attends to the Omar matter
Quote:
On Wednesday evening President Trump gave a statement on the shooting of the National Guardsmen near the White House. In his statement he took up the Minnesota fraud cases. At about 2:00 President Trump asserted that “hundreds of thousands” of Somalis are “ripping off our country and ripping apart that once great state [of Minnesota]. Billions of dollars are lost and gangs of Somalians come from a country that doesn’t even have a government, no laws, no military, nothing — as their representatives in our country preach to us about our Constitution and how our country is no good.”
“Hundreds of thousands” is an exaggeration. We have some 100,000 Somali citizens and residents in Minnesota. In the United States we have “hundreds of thousands” of Somalis in total. The number committing fraud in Minnesota must number in the hundreds rather than the thousands. However, we certainly have a serious problem and Trump did everything but call out Ilhan Omar by name.
President Trump has adopted the expression “Thank you for your attention to this matter.” Attending to the matter of the massive public-programs fraud committed by Minnesota Somalis, Trump inevitably turned to Minnesota Fifth District Rep. Ilhan Omar. Omar can serve as Exhibit A in the matter of Somali fraud. It may be her highest and best use.
Trump returned to Omar late last night in the X post below. He garbled the facts, as he did in his comments on Wednesday evening, but he nailed the essence:
[T]he worst “Congressman/woman” in our Country, Ilhan Omar, always wrapped in her swaddling hijab, and who probably came into the U.S.A. illegally in that you are not allowed to marry your brother, does nothing but hatefully complain about our Country, its Constitution, and how “badly” she is treated, when her place of origin is a decadent, backward, and crime ridden nation, which is essentially not even a country for lack of Government, Military, Police, schools, etc.
I have been on Omar’s case since August 2016. I summarized my initiation in the City Journal column “The curious case of Ilhan Omar.” I believe that Omar entered the United States illegally as a fradulent member of the Omar family. Getting out of Kenya, the family was split. A brother and sister emigrated to England. The brother was brought to Minneapolis to extract him from a homosexual life in London.
Omar married her brother in 2009, probably for purposes of immigration fraud. A Christian pastor signed their marriage license. Omar continued living with her “real” husband and father of her children all the while. She also filed joint tax returns with her “real” husband (even though she had never legally married him) while she was legally married to her brother.
The hijab that Trump mocks appears to be a prop. She is a one-woman crime wave. Rob Long turned the saga into the hilarious 2019 National Review column “That’s My Husbro: Ilhan Omar’s Family Drama.”
Omar has now obtained a divorce from her brother, married and divorced her “real” husband, and married the man who was her non-Muslim campaign fundraiser. Omar had taken up with him while she was still married to her real husband (she legally married him in January 2018 and divorced him in November 2019).
David Steinberg tied up loose threads in the curious case in a 2019 Power Line post. At the moment that six-year-old post is the most read on Power Line. David has linked to it on X. It has become timely again.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/07/david-steinberg-tying-u
p-loose-threads-in-the-curious-case.php
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME