Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
POSTED BY: 6ixStringJack
UPDATED: Sunday, September 6, 2026 16:05
VIEWED: 185382
PAGE 390 of 479
Quote:When Maga finally accepts that Trump is a pedophile, they still wouldn't question him. They'd question whether being a pedophile is wrong.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
MAGA would be so upset if an email came out that proved Trump helped Epstein cover up the systematic rape of children.
Oh, that happened this morning and they don’t care?
No it didn't happen.
Yesterday, Megyn Kelly proved me right.
“Jeffrey Epstein, in this person's view, was not a pedophile. He was into the barely legal type. He liked 15-year-old girls. I realize this is disgusting. I'm definitely not trying to make an excuse for this. I'm just giving you facts: he wasn't into, like, 8-year-olds. He liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were but would look legal to a passerby." —Megyn R. Kelly
https://people.com/megyn-kelly-questions-jeffrey-epstein-pedophile-lab
el-11849172
GOP = Gross Old Pedophiles
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Advocates Warn of ‘Forced Labor’ Camp for Homeless People in Utah Designed to Enforce Trump Order
An advocate for the National Homelessness Law Center warned that the 1,300-bed facility could be a “pilot” to put homeless people into similar conditions to Florida’s “Alligator Alcatraz.”
As far back as 2023, Trump has proposed using “large parcels of inexpensive land” to set up “tent cities” or camps for homeless people, coupled with a pledge to use “every tool, lever, and authority” to clear encampments from city streets. On the podcast Invisible People, which focuses on homelessness in America, Eric Tars of the National Homelessness Law Center said Utah’s new facility could be a “pilot program” for that effort around the country.
Much more at https://www.commondreams.org/news/utah-homeless-internment-camp
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Dems and the Deep State and complicit media thought they could fire an "Elstein" media bazooka to distract from the Dem's utter failure with the govt shutdown.
Among other things, they dug up Virginia Giuffre emails, but redacted her name to hide the fact they were from Giuffre, who repeatedly testified that she had never seen Trump do anything inappropriate with teenagers.
Quote:
One of the claims - now a deleted X post, the Democratic Party's official account stated, "NEW: Documents show Donald Trump spent Thanksgiving with Jeffrey Epstein in 2017. At the time, Trump was already president, and Epstein was already a convicted sex offender."
And like the TRUMP!RUSSIA!COLLUSION! hoax, they overreached with the complete fiction that Trump, as President, spent Thanksgiving with convicted trafficker Epstein... when there are photos that Trump spent that Thanksgiving dishing out dinners to veterans.
Yanno, if there was ACTUAL EVIDENCE that Trump diddled teens, he'd be in court already, especially since various documents were available to Biden's* FIB and DOJ already. And Dems wouldn't have to make shit up.
This is just so much bullshit.
Epstein was VERY political, targeted upper ups like Prince Andrew, had lots of money (Where did it all come from??? Why is nobody following the money?), even tried meeting Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov thru the good graces of the then Danish PM... IMHO Epstein was Mossad, and teens were honeypots.
And he pulled in as many Dems as Repubs.
----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal."- Henry Kissinger
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:When Maga finally accepts that Trump is a pedophile, they still wouldn't question him.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
MAGA would be so upset if an email came out that proved Trump helped Epstein cover up the systematic rape of children.
Oh, that happened this morning and they don’t care?
No it didn't happen.
If Trump were a pedophile, the Democrats would have already made sure he was in prison for it and Harris would be President right now.
How stupid are you, dude?
If Trump were a pedophile, and there were a single shred of evidence in the Epstien files proving it, they would have put that out last August and we'd be swimming in another 20 Million Illegal immigrants with a wide open boarder now. None of the half-billion real estate or E. Jean Carroll stuff would have been necessary at all. None of the lawfare or negative media spin for ten fucking years straight would have been necessary at all.
You had 4 years to fucking bury Trump once and for all with undeniable proof he is a pedophile if there was anything implicating him in there, but you didn't use that?????
There are only 3 reasons that didn't happen under Biden*'s watch:
1. Trump isn't guilty. (and/or there's nothing in the Epstein documents that implicate him)
2. A lot of fucking Democrats (and I'm sure Republicans as well) are on that list and nobody ever wants it released on either side and both sides will just pretend they care when they're not in power and have no real way of doing anything about it other than attack the other side for covering up the truth.
3. All of the above.
Get fucked dude. You're too fucking stupid to use a computer you dumb, thoroughly-propogandized little monkey.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The Democrats had 4 years to get a case to trial in Federal court, but the court system moved so slowly that nothing got to trial. Meanwhile, the state courts did convict Trump in those 4 years. The Federal court system does not work because the Republicans in Congress have partial control of who becomes a judge and how much is spent to operate the courts. The Republicans in Congress do NOT want that court system to work, just as they do NOT want the IRS to work, which is the most important reason why $1 trillion in taxes is NOT collected each year. It is also the reason why Trump recently signed a bill to lower the taxes by several $trillion dollars of the fabulously wealthy and why he fired most of the auditors who handle rich people's tax returns. He does NOT want the court and tax systems to work smoothly or swiftly.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
If Trump were a pedophile, the Democrats would have already made sure he was in prison for it and Harris would be President right now.
How stupid are you, dude?
Donald Trump indictments, 2023-2025
https://ballotpedia.org/Donald_Trump_indictments,_2023-2025
These are things that would have disqualified anybody from becoming president, but a degraded human would see nothing disqualifying about Trump
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
These Reagan-appointed judges have had it with Trump
By Kyle Cheney | 11/14/2025 05:24 PM EST
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/14/donald-trump-judges-00652762
When Donald Trump moved on his first day back in office to strip birthright citizenship from children born in the U.S. to some immigrant parents, U.S. District Judge John Coughenour called the newly inaugurated president a threat to the rule of law.
Days after Trump mass-pardoned Jan. 6 defendants who attacked the Capitol, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth warned that for the first time in his career, “meritless justifications of criminal activity have gone mainstream.”
And in September, U.S. District Judge William Young warned that Trump’s crackdown on pro-Palestinian immigrants studying at U.S. universities “poses a great threat to Americans’ freedom of speech.”
In a year full of judicial rebukes for the president — often followed by vindication for Trump at the Supreme Court — these judges’ fierce and direct assessments of the president have stood out. But there’s more than lofty rhetoric that binds them. All were appointed to the bench decades ago by the same president: Ronald Reagan.
Now a fourth member of the Reagan-era fraternity has joined them: U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf, who took the bench in Massachusetts 40 years ago on the same day as Young. Wolf resigned his senior judgeship last week with the sole purpose of speaking out against what he sees as Trump’s incursion on the rule of law and the high court’s acquiescence to it.
It’s not an accident. Not only do these Reagan-appointed judges wield their seniority as a weapon, but their legal and judicial careers were all forged in the embers of Watergate, when a president’s assertion of vast, unprecedented power threatened to topple the justice system. They all worked and clerked for attorneys and judges tasked with rebuilding confidence in the federal government after Richard Nixon’s resignation and saw in it a vindication of principled appeals to impartial justice.
In a wide-ranging interview with POLITICO, Wolf said his own upbringing as a public corruption prosecutor during that moment of rebuilding is what has contributed to his alarm today. He sees echoes of that era in Trump’s second term but is worried that Americans — who would not have tolerated such behavior in the Watergate era, he says — may be too conditioned to view the world through partisan lenses to respond similarly today.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:The Democrats had 4 years to get a case to trial in Federal court
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
If Trump were a pedophile, the Democrats would have already made sure he was in prison for it and Harris would be President right now.
How stupid are you, dude?
Yes. They did.
The managed to get all sort of bullshit cases against Trump without any problems, but this one magically couldn't be done in time, huh?
Well... Then I guess you have to give Trump 4 years to not get it done now too. Then you can give Democrats 4 more years to never get it done the next time they're in office.
Go fuck yourself, stupid.
It's like talking to a retard.
--------------------------------------------------
Be Nice. Don't be a dick.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ben Shapiro claims Marjorie Taylor Greene supports the release of the Epstein files because she wants to destroy Trump's presidency.
Why would releasing the Epstein files destroy Trump’s presidency?
This is cool. COURIER has created a searchable database with all 20,000 of the files just released from Epstein’s estate.
Trump's name appears in them more than anyone else, in 1,628 documents.
https://couriernewsroom.com/news/we-created-a-searchable-database-with
-all-20000-files-from-epsteins-estate/
Gosh that’s a lot for an innocent guy.
In a normal world, this would not be a political issue.
Republicans: “You libtards are asking for the release of the Epstein files, but aren't you scared that there are also a lot of big-name Democrats in there?"
Well, here is the thing: Unlike you, I don't give a shit about a child rapist's political affiliation. The child-raping part takes precedence over anything else.
Raping children is not a political issue. There are no "republican child rapists" and "democrat child rapists". There are only "child rapists", and they should all be exposed and treated as such.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Reopening the government drags the Jeffrey Epstein files back into the spotlight.
His opposition to releasing the documents is a political disaster waiting to happen. Why fight transparency if there's nothing to hide?
And the bill they passed only funds most agencies until Jan. 30. That means if there is no solution to rising health care costs by then, Democrats can try a partial shutdown weeks before primary season – blaming Republicans at the top of an election year.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Republicans consider rolling back safety rules aimed at chemical hubs like Houston's
By James Osborne, Staff Writer, Washington Bureau | Nov 7, 2025
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/politics/texas/article/chemical-rules
-houston-ship-channel-21131244.php
Nine years after Congress reached a landmark deal to limit Americans' exposure to toxic chemicals in places like the Houston Ship Channel, the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress are moving to loosen what had once been bipartisan regulations on chemical plants.
The Trump administration has undertaken a series of administrative actions this year to weaken EPA's oversight of the industry. Now Congress is weighing a rollback of 2016 legislation that amended the Toxic Substances Control Act — the landmark 1976 law that put limits on the distribution of toxic chemicals including PCBs, lead and radon.
Republicans have yet to release a draft bill, but at an industry event in Washington last month Lynn Dekleva, deputy assistant administrator of EPA's Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention and a former senior director at the American Chemistry Council, which lobbies for the industry, said House legislation she'd seen was "pretty radical," according to the news site Inside EPA.
She didn't go into details but derided the 2016 legislation as "a freight train."
"Some sections I want to blow up, but that's not for me to say," she said.
The unwinding of chemical standards pose a risk to communities surrounding Houston's petrochemical plants along the ship channel, which an EPA report last year showed have long suffered from elevated rates of asthma, cancer and other disease.
The 2016 reforms were supposed to reduce those communities' exposure to some of the most dangerous chemicals.
For instance, the Oxy Vinyls plant in La Porte, produces tetrachloroethylene, a known carcinogen that also causes neurological disorders, which the EPA ordered to be phased out last year, according to data collected by the Environmental Defense Fund. And Exxon Mobil's chemical plant in Baytown produces 1,3-Butadiene, a chemical used to make synthetic rubber and plastics that EPA scientists said in a draft appraisal last year presented "an unreasonable risk of injury to human health for workers and the general population (including fence line communities)."
"You have chemical plants and lots of freeways built around houses and playgrounds," said Inyang Uwak, research and policy director at Air Alliance Houston, an environmental group. "They're being exposed to a variety of compounds, and they all have different health impacts. If it's butadiene, it's the kidneys or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. If it's benzene, I look for leukemia."
Earlier this year President Donald Trump issued an executive order rolling back tougher emissions standards for petrochemical plants like those that line the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coasts. And EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin proposed last month to limit that agency's ability to declare a chemical of "unreasonable risk," which typically results in limits or prohibitions on a chemical's uses to limit exposure.
The moves come amid pushback from chemical companies over the 2016 changes, which they say have resulted in long delays in chemical approvals and made them less competitive against overseas rivals.
John Huntsman, CEO of the Houston chemical company Huntsman Corp., derided U.S. chemical safety laws at a Senate hearing last month as taking "an overly conservative approach, not based on real world risks."
"This has led to unnecessary bans and highly restrictive regulations that are well outside the range of the rest of the world," he said.
'It will just make people sicker'
Up until the 2016 legislation, a new chemical would be placed on the market automatically if the EPA exceeded its 90-day review period to decide if a chemical presented "an unre
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME