Trump Is Destroying Everything He Touches
POSTED BY: JJ
UPDATED: Friday, September 11, 2026 17:41
VIEWED: 85257
PAGE 79 of 137
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
You are a fool. There is no reasoning with fools.
We just let events play out and watch as everything you've ever said would happen never happens, meanwhile all of my predictions keep coming true.
Trump says inflation has been 'defeated' as rising prices burden households
Inflation has risen in three of the last four months and is slightly higher than it was a year ago, when it helped sink then-Vice President Kamala Harris' presidential campaign. Yet you wouldn't know it from listening to President Donald Trump or even some of the inflation fighters at the Federal Reserve.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/trump-says-inflation-has-been-
defeated-as-rising-prices-burden-households/ar-AA1Onn1t?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=68ed3c501886404ba758ceaf88ebe611&ei=18
I won't be the one surprised.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Paul would love for America to lose because he went all in on America failing and it is the only way he remains relevant.
Fuck Paul Krugman.
Trump bet China would face ‘tremendous difficulties’ without U.S. consumers—Beijing just focused on the rest of the world instead
President Trump’s tariff offensive against China appears to be backfiring as Beijing sidesteps U.S. consumers and boosts exports elsewhere. Chinese shipments to the U.S. plunged 27% in September, but overall exports rose 8.3%—their highest total this year—driven by strong demand from Europe and other markets.
The World Bank now expects China’s economy to grow 4.8% in 2025, while it downgraded U.S. growth to 1.4%.
Despite Trump’s renewed threat of 100% tariffs, analysts at UBS and Deutsche Bank say both sides appear open to compromise, with markets betting negotiations will resume soon.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/trump-bet-china-would-face-tre
mendous-difficulties-without-u-s-consumers-beijing-just-focused-on-the-rest-of-the-world-instead/ar-AA1OmXol?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=68ed3c501886404ba758ceaf88ebe611&ei=23
Gilligan, I find your stupidity nauseating.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That's what you're presence here does to everyone else, Ted. I assume it's exactly the same in the real world and that's why you don't have any friends or family and you're all alone in your final years left on this planet.
--------------------------------------------------
For all that I've blessed, and all that I've wronged. In dreams until my death, I will wander on.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
That's what you're presence here does to everyone else, Ted. I assume it's exactly the same in the real world and that's why you don't have any friends or family and you're all alone in your final years left on this planet.
If thinking that makes you happy Gilligan, you go right ahead. And thanks for the laugh.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
This is a no spin zone here. I just tell it like it is. 
--------------------------------------------------
For all that I've blessed, and all that I've wronged. In dreams until my death, I will wander on.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Trump said Don't mind me and my big reversals ten times per day:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Trump threatens to shoot himself in the head. The Chinese say, "Go for it, Fatso!"
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Paul would love for America to lose because he went all in on America failing and it is the only way he remains relevant.
Fuck Paul Krugman.
Trump is starting a war with China that he cannot win, and yet you blame Krugman?
Trump can end the war before it starts (and prevent his own suicide) by NOT increasing tariffs by 100% on Chinese imports.Quote:https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/trump-tariffs-live-updates-trump-d
Trump ratcheted up tariff and trade tensions with Beijing on Friday. In a post on Truth Social, the president said the US would impose an additional 100% tariff on Chinese goods starting on Nov. 1.
ownplays-china-tensions-goldman-sees-us-consumers-paying-55-of-costs-162418187.html
"Don’t worry about China, it will all be fine! Highly respected President Xi just had a bad moment. He doesn’t want Depression for his country, and neither do I. The U.S.A. wants to help China, not hurt it!!!" the president wrote.
Speaking later to reporters aboard Air Force One on his way to Israel, Trump said: "I think we'll get along just fine. I have a great relationship with China."
The Chinese muttered, "Shove it up your ass, Fatso. Your words are meaningless noise."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/10/13/trump-meeting-
xi-china-tariffs/86672514007/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
T
A Dark Future for American Agriculture
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Donald TACO Trump, is the laughing stock of the world.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
--------------------------------------------------
For all that I've blessed, and all that I've wronged. In dreams until my death, I will wander on.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Clarence Thomas’s Legal Clerk Issues Dire Warning About Supreme Court’s Agenda
‘BOMBSHELL’
Legal scholar Caleb Nelson is worried about the “pro-president” direction the Supreme Court seems to be moving toward.
By Wiktoria Gucia | Oct. 14 2025 2:16AM EDT
https://www.thedailybeast.com/clarence-thomas-clerk-issues-dire-warnin
g-about-supreme-courts-agenda/
A former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas has warned that the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution “appears to be moving toward a sweepingly pro-president position.”
In an essay for the NYU Law Democracy Project, originalist legal scholar and University of Virginia School of Law professor Caleb Nelson argued that the Constitution’s text and historical context give Congress wide latitude to organize the executive branch and to impose limits on the president’s power to remove officials. https://democracyproject.org/posts/must-administrative-officers-serve-
at-the-presidents-pleasure
It’s an issue that is already front and center on the court’s docket, and one that Nelson warns “can do lasting damage to our norms and institutions” in the case of “a President bent on vengeful, destructive and lawless behavior.”
In September, the Supreme Court issued a 6–3 emergency order allowing President Donald Trump to remove Federal Trade Commission leader Rebecca Kelly Slaughter from her position. Slaughter, who was appointed to the FTC in 2018 during Trump’s first administration, argued that she was “illegally” fired in a move that violated “clear Supreme Court precedent.”
The Court will hear arguments in the case in December, when it will consider whether to overturn the 1935 precedent that limits the president’s ability to remove independent agency regulators over policy disagreements.
“It is true that Article II vests the executive power in the President,” Nelson, who clerked for Thomas from 1994 to 1995, wrote in his article. “But Congress is in charge of creating offices within the executive branch, and the Constitution does not give the President unilateral power to dictate who will fill those offices or what their authorities and duties will be.”
While the current Supreme Court has repeatedly sided with the Trump administration since the president returned to office in January, Nelson hopes “the Justices will not act as if their hands are tied and they cannot consider any consequences of the interpretations that they choose” when deciding cases like Slaughter’s.
However, The New York Times’ Supreme Court reporter Adam Liptak believes “There is little question that the court will side with the president. Its conservative majority has repeatedly signaled that it plans to adopt the ‘unitary executive theory,’ which says the original understanding of the Constitution demands letting the president remove executive branch officials as he sees fit.”
Still, Nelson’s article has elicited a massive response from the legal community.
“Bombshell!” was constitutional law scholar and professor William Baude’s immediate reaction to Nelson’s commentary. “Caleb Nelson, one of the most respected originalist scholars in the country, comes out against the unitary executive interpretation of Article II,” he wrote.
https://bsky.app/profile/williambaude.bsky.social/post/3lzyvlfbz4s2w
Nelson’s originalist understanding of the Constitution has led to his opinions previously being cited in more than a dozen Supreme Court decisions. Thomas himself referenced his former clerk’s work six times in a 2023 concurring opinion, while Justice Brett Kavanaugh named Nelson among a small group of “respected scholars” in a concurring opinion last year.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-86_l5gm.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf
Article II of the U.S. Constitution states that “the executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” The “unitary executive interpretation” referenced by Baude is based on the “unitary executive theory,” which holds that the president has sole authority ov
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME