Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
POSTED BY: 6ixStringJack
UPDATED: Sunday, September 6, 2026 16:05
VIEWED: 185382
PAGE 335 of 479
Wow. Pretty early in the day for idiot Second to post 5 anti-Trump articles already.
Two weeks from now, he will have forgotten every fake headline he posted here today.
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Got shit to do. Might not be around much tonight either.
If I'm not here, I promise I'll be back tomorrow to give the idiots their daily spanking tomorrow.
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Democrats who controlled the IRS had all of Trump's tax returns, but didn't release them because Trump didn't want them released, since it would show Trump wasn't paying taxes.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Republicans blocked a motion to subpoena the CEOs of 4 banks that moved Epstein`s money and later reported $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions
It seems that the entire Republican party is now involved in keeping these secrets from the American public
https://x.com/JohnCleese/status/1968435774451265555
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
You guys practically denied that Epstein even existed for 4 years, and if there was any info to release to the public you had the power to do it. And everyone knows that if any of it had Trump dead to rights it would have been brought up every single day up until election day last November.
Nobody cares what you Lefty cocksuckers are whining about today.
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
Democrats controlled the Epstein files for four years, Trump said, “So if they had something, they would’ve released it before the election.” Trump is not releasing the Epstein files because they show Trump raping children, just as Trump's tax files show him raping the IRS. Democrats should have only talked about Trump not paying taxes, but paying prostitutes and raping children. Too bad, so sad they didn't.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/6/fact-check-did-democrats-take-
action-over-epstein-case-transparency
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump’s Idea of the Criminal Left Is a Fiction. A Coordinated Defense Against His Fascism Shouldn’t Be.
By Natasha Lennard | Sep 19, 2025 at 8:34 AM
https://theintercept.com/2025/09/19/trump-charlie-kirk-george-soros-an
tifa/
Multibillionaire investor George Soros is not funding a network of militant left-wing activists. That fact has not stopped President Donald Trump from spending the days since Charlie Kirk’s killing calling to press charges against the liberal philanthropist under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations, or RICO, Act for allegedly bankrolling “violent” leftist protests across the country.
This absurd idea is among an array of repressive proposals, ranging from the illegal to the unconstitutional, that Trump and his acolytes have pulled from a cartoonishly blatant playbook of fascist scapegoating — conspiracies of Jewish dark money and all. The Trump administration will likely fail to bring successful prosecutions against the disparate liberal and leftist individuals and organizations they see as a well-funded criminal network. But we are long past the point of pretending the administration will be bound by law, or tethered to factual reality, when it comes to achieving its broader authoritarian goals.
Trump announced on Wednesday night, for example, that he was designating antifa a “major terrorist organization.” The proclamation, posted on Truth Social, is senseless in a number of ways.
Firstly, as has been stated ad nauseam, there is no such organization as “antifa” — an abbreviation of “anti-fascist” — which is a set of practices and militant tactics, deployed by activists for nearly a century. There are groups who come together under the “antifa” banner, but there is zero centralized leadership or membership structure. Secondly, the U.S. has no statutes under which groups are designated domestic terror organizations.
Some might recall Trump’s very similar announcement during the 2020 George Floyd uprisings, when he took pains to target left-wing activists and discredit the Black-led movement. At the time, his tweet did not call into being a non-existent domestic terror statute against a non-existent organization.
It should not be overlooked that since Trump’s first term, all significant efforts to collectively prosecute social justice movements have failed.
On Trump’s 2017 Inauguration Day, over 200 anti-fascist “J20” protesters were mass-arrested and hit with hefty felony riot charges based on no more than presence at the protest; the charges were later dismissed or dropped en masse. Just last week, a judge in Fulton County, Georgia, announced that he was dismissing overreaching RICO charges against 61 participants in the Atlanta-based Stop Cop City movement. The prosecutors’ two-year effort to frame the protest movement as a criminal conspiracy collapsed.
Having reported directly on both the J20 and Stop Cop City cases, I saw firsthand the toll a lengthy prosecutorial process can take on defendants, their supporters, and the entire targeted movement. Prosecutions need not lead to convictions to ruin lives and decimate social movement capacities; federal investigations do not need to have factual basis for their targets to be harassed and intimidated; First Amendment-protected speech can still get you fired. Fear spreads, cowardice abounds, and the real risks of state and state-sanctioned persecution hang over targeted communities.
The Atlanta RICO case may have been, as political scientist Joseph Brown told The Guardian, “probably the highest-profile failure of using conspiracy charges to indict a protest movement,” but even malicious prosecutions drain movement resources, both material and emotional, while directly keeping defendants from movement work.
What these cases nonetheless made clear is that collective persecution must be met with collective defense. None of the J20 or Atlanta defendants collaborated with prosecutors or took deals that entailed throwing other movement participants under the bus. Without compliant targets, the meritless
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Pity Trump’s Defenders
Conservatives rushed to exonerate the president from the charge of censorship. He swiftly contradicted them.
By Jonathan Chait | September 19, 2025, 1:10 PM ET
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/09/trump-kimmel-free
-speech-censorship-critics/684275/
Minutes after news broke that ABC had bowed to the Trump administration’s threats and indefinitely suspended Jimmy Kimmel, Ari Fleischer, the former Bush-administration press secretary, tried to explain why the thing that just happened was not actually what happened. “Liberals want to make this firing about ‘free speech,’” he wrote on X, “Did it ever occur to them the issue might be accuracy? Kimmel told his viewers that Charlie Kirk was murdered by MAGA.”
Nothing to see here, just a network imposing a zero-tolerance standard for factual accuracy upon its comedians and implementing it without warning. (Despite his fanatical belief in the importance of factual accuracy, Fleischer’s own tweet substantially misconstrues the facts: Kimmel’s joke implied that it was possible Kirk’s murderer was a MAGA supporter, but did not say so outright. Fleischer’s self-punishment for this error will no doubt be merciless.)
These are glorious, heady days for the Republican Party’s unselfconsciously authoritarian wing. Every day President Donald Trump tramples on the rights of their enemies, and the natcons rejoice, This is what I voted for.
But we should spare a thought for the party’s more conflicted wing, the anti-anti-Trump conservatives such as Fleischer. They profess support for free speech, democracy, and the rule of law while attempting to remain Republicans in good standing. They resolve this tension by focusing on the hypocrisy and foibles of their old liberal foes and ignoring the actions of the world’s most powerful person.
It is a survival strategy, and not a pleasant way to spend four years. That which causes the natcons unremitted joy forces the anti-anti-Trumpers into painful mental contortions. No event to date has given them more anguish than Trump’s gleeful defenestration of Kimmel.
As the story developed, a slightly more complicated explanation than Fleischer’s hasty effort took shape. The anti-anti-Trumpers conceded that the sequence of events looked bad. Yes, the Federal Communications Commission chair, Brendan Carr, threatened to revoke broadcast licenses from ABC stations, warning, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” Rolling Stone reported that “multiple execs” at ABC and Disney considered Kimmel’s comments to be minor, but “the threat of Trump administration retaliation” forced their hand.
But perhaps the relationship between these events was purely coincidental. “Neither Carr nor the FCC ever asked ABC or any of the broadcast stations to do anything specifically. There was no formal complaint or a specific action requested,” Conn Carrol wrote in the Washington Examiner. The conservative commentator Mike Solana insisted that, despite the perception that Trump ordered Kimmel off the air, “this didn’t happen.” Rather, Solana elaborated on X, “jimmy’s ratings were abysmal. he spread a conspiracy theory about kirk. two major affiliates refused to carry his show. ABC fired him.”
Ilya Shapiro, a fellow at the Manhattan Institute, argued on X that Kimmel was fired because his show “was losing money”—“there was thus no govt coercion here.” But, he allowed, “FCC statements were unhelpful because makes it look like threat of govt action for bad viewpoints.”
Trump’s FCC chair threatened to destroy ABC’s business, and the network just so happened to then do something Trump very much wanted it to do, but only paranoid leftists would presume these two things were somehow related. Sure, the threat was “unhelpful” for the way it might seem like coercion to the uninitiated. But if anybody was the victim here, it was Trump, who was unfairly blamed for the blunders of a subordinate.
Alas, as often happens when his friends attempt to devise a tortured alibi, Trump promptly blurte
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Democrats who controlled the IRS had all of Trump's tax returns, but didn't release them because Trump didn't want them released, since it would show Trump wasn't paying taxes.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Republicans blocked a motion to subpoena the CEOs of 4 banks that moved Epstein`s money and later reported $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions
It seems that the entire Republican party is now involved in keeping these secrets from the American public
https://x.com/JohnCleese/status/1968435774451265555
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
You guys practically denied that Epstein even existed for 4 years, and if there was any info to release to the public you had the power to do it. And everyone knows that if any of it had Trump dead to rights it would have been brought up every single day up until election day last November.
Nobody cares what you Lefty cocksuckers are whining about today.
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
Democrats controlled the Epstein files for four years, Trump said, “So if they had something, they would’ve released it before the election.” Trump is not releasing the Epstein files because they show Trump raping children, just as Trump's tax files show him raping the IRS. Democrats should have only talked about Trump not paying taxes, but paying prostitutes and raping children. Too bad, so sad they didn't.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/6/fact-check-did-democrats-take-
action-over-epstein-case-transparency
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
You are an idiot. Period.
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:President Donald Trump says American forces have carried out another strike targeting a ship that he claimed was “trafficking illicit narcotics”, killing at least three men on board the vessel.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
You are an idiot. Period.
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
The announcement, late on Friday, marks the third time the US has claimed a deadly attack on an alleged drug smuggling vessel this month.
How many drugs were found? None mentioned. Trump had a feeling there were drugs, so the boat was bombed. Does Trump care that he got the wrong boar? Nope! And you can’t make him care.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/trump-orders-lethal-kinetic-strike-alleg
ed-drug-trafficking-boat-international-waters-three-killed
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The Trump administration said on Friday it would ask companies to pay $100,000 per year for H-1B worker visas, potentially dealing a big blow to the technology sector that relies heavily on skilled workers from India and China.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
You are an idiot. Period.
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the visa would cost $100,000 a year for each of the three years of its duration but that the details were "still being considered."
The new fees aren’t legal. Congress has only authorized the government to set fees to recover the cost of adjudicating an application. Under the current system, entering the lottery for the visa requires a small fee. Do you think Trump cares it is illegal? Nope! And you can’t make him care.
India accounted for 71% of H-1B visas last year, while China was a distant second at 11.7%. The H-1B program offers 65,000 visas annually to employers bringing in temporary foreign workers in specialized fields, with another 20,000 visas for workers with advanced degrees.
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/trump-mulls-adding-new-
100000-fee-h-1b-visas-bloomberg-news-reports-2025-09-19/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:President Donald Trump
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
You are an idiot. Period.
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
You are an idiot. Period.
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:The Trump administration said on Friday it would ask companies to pay $100,000 per year for H-1B worker visas, potentially dealing a big blow to the technology sector that relies heavily on skilled workers from India and China.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
You are an idiot. Period.
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the visa would cost $100,000 a year for each of the three years of its duration but that the details were "still being considered."
The new fees aren’t legal. Congress has only authorized the government to set fees to recover the cost of adjudicating an application. Under the current system, entering the lottery for the visa requires a small fee. Do you think Trump cares it is illegal? Nope! And you can’t make him care.
India accounted for 71% of H-1B visas last year, while China was a distant second at 11.7%. The H-1B program offers 65,000 visas annually to employers bringing in temporary foreign workers in specialized fields, with another 20,000 visas for workers with advanced degrees.
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/trump-mulls-adding-new-
100000-fee-h-1b-visas-bloomberg-news-reports-2025-09-19/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
Good. No more visas either then.
You want to hire people for good jobs from outside the country, that's your right.
But it's going to cost you $100k per head per year to hire them.
Have fun with that.
Good luck taking Trump to court on this. It will make its way up to SCOTUS and it will be another loss for Democrats in Ted's court case thread.
And in the meantime this will be Democrats on the wrong side of yet another 80/20 issue that will be on full blast.
The People are sick of your bullshit. You're finished.
--------------------------------------------------
The Democrats are the party of Murder.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME