Trump Is Racking Up Court Victories (You really need to read this, Ted)

POSTED BY: 6ixStringJack
UPDATED: Wednesday, June 11, 2025 06:30
VIEWED: 480
PAGE 1 of 1

https://spectator.org/trump-is-racking-up-court-victories/

Quote:

---

While mainstream news outlets, cable networks and social media obsess over Elon Musk’s latest antics, they have neglected a far more important story — the Trump administration is accumulating a significant catalogue of appeals court and SCOTUS victories. Last Friday alone three more wins were added to the list. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the White House may exclude AP from its press pool while SCOTUS stayed a district court order requiring DOGE to heed a Freedom of Information Act request and ruled that it can access Social Security Administration records.

The Supreme Court will rule on Trump v. CASA before the end of June, and it’s a good bet that the Trump administration will be able to chalk it up as a win.

These rulings follow a spate of similar wins last month. On May 30, the Supreme Court stayed a district court ruling that DHS Secretary Kristi Noem couldn’t revoke former President Biden’s parole of 532,000 non-citizens. On May 29, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stayed a U.S. Trade Court ruling that President Trump’s tariffs are somehow unlawful. On May 22, SCOTUS stayed a district court order reinstating two Biden administration officials fired by Trump. On May 19, SCOTUS stayed a district court ruling that Secretary Noem does not possess the legal authority to terminate the temporary protected status of 350,000 Venezuelan non-citizens.

The seven cases noted above do not exhaust the list of the Trump administration’s wins. During April the administration won three Supreme Court cases. On April 17, Justice Elena Kagan declined to stay a deportation order involving four Mexican nationals without referring the case to the full court. On April 8, SCOTUS stayed a district court order to reinstate 16,000 fired federal employees. On April 7, the Court vacated a district court order blocking deportations pursuant to the Alien Enemies Act. This particular ruling, combined with two others, led the editors of the Wall Street Journal to conclude that the Supreme Court was sending a message to the district courts:

President Trump is exercising executive power in aggressive and often novel ways, and opponents are suing to stop him. But in a trio of recent orders, the Supreme Court has sent lower-court judges an important reminder that they must still respect judicial rules and procedures. A 5-4 majority handed Mr. Trump a partial victory Monday by allowing his Administration to continue deporting Venezuelans believed to be members of the Tren de Aragua gang under the Alien Enemies Act.

This last ruling turned out to be a Pyrrhic victory for the Trump administration, however. On May 16, the Court effectively reversed itself — prompting Justice Samuel Alito to issue this blistering dissent: “In sum, literally in the middle of the night, the Court issued unprecedented and legally questionable relief without giving the lower courts a chance to rule, without hearing from the opposing party, within eight hours of receiving the application.” The good news, on the other hand, is that there are six additional cases on the Supreme Court’s “Emergency Docket,” half of which invite definitive rulings concerning nationwide injunctions issued by district courts.

The most obvious vehicle for such a ruling is Trump v. CASA, which revolves around the following issue: “Whether the Supreme Court should stay the district courts’ nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration’s Jan. 20 executive order ending birthright citizenship except as to the individual plaintiffs and identified members of the organizational plaintiffs or states.” In order to get to birthright citizenship, the Court must first deal with the proliferation of nationwide injunctions. The following exchange between Justice Clarence Thomas and Solicitor General D. John Sauer during oral arguments reveals why this metastasis matters so much:

JUSTICE THOMAS: So we survived until the 1960s without universal injunctions?

GENERAL SAUER: Tha

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

THG

Wednesday, June 11, 2025 4:00 AM

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Bump for Ted.


Fuckin' dummy.

---

"During a portion of May 2025, the Trump administration saw a 96% loss rate in federal district courts, according to analyses by Stanford political science professor Adam Bonica. This rate represents the outcomes of 26 rulings out of 27 cases where the administration was involved. This statistic, highlighting a significant losing streak in the lower courts, has been widely discussed

" This 96% loss rate in May represents a significant increase compared to earlier months in Trump's second term.
Judges across the ideological spectrum are reportedly ruling against the Trump administration at similar rates.
Some sources suggest this high loss rate could be attributed to the administration's actions being seen as testing constitutional boundaries or even attacks on the legal profession itself, triggering a defensive reflex among judges."

---

I'm sure we'll both agree with Rachel. And when Trump, on tape, says he can't send in the national guard without the permission of the governor.

T

Trump PANICS as MSNBC host REVEALS his PLAN for WAR IN LA

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Nobody watches Richard Maddow or her clickbait in 2025.

And certainly, nobody cares about any losses in your activist run lower courts. They are the dummies that are too stupid to stop fast-tracking these cases up to the higher courts or even the Supreme Court where these new rules can be written in stone.

Keep 'em coming, dummy.

We're winning more every day and your party and media are almost dead now.



--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Poor Gilligan, he doesn’t even realize I’m his click bate. He can’t come across a post of mine where he can keep himself from clicking on it or posting a response.

I’m laughing in your face again loser.

T

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Keep laughing.

Meanwhile, we're winning everything and the world you thought you were living in 6 months ago is now dead.

You just keep jerking off to your headlines and clickbait everyday and wake up a few years from now and wonder what the fuck happened that you weren't paying attention to because it wasn't put in a headline or a Midas Touch ad-farm.



--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Let me put this in words that even a retard can understand...

You are keeping score of meaningless flag football games.

But in reality we've had Super Bowl after Super Bowl after Super Bowl play out so far this year and EVERY game was a victory for the Good Guys.

Nobody cares about your flag football and their team record, fag.



--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME