My race baiting, hate filled , divisive idiot of a Congresswoman.

POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Friday, March 28, 2025 15:53
VIEWED: 8550
PAGE 8 of 8

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

CITIZEN

Sunday, April 9, 2006 10:11 AM

And I said you and your buddies. Go read what Hero said, good attempt at wriggeling out of it though.

However saying "this is what Liberals are like" denotes all, notice the s at the end of Liberal. Clarifying her as a Liberal especially once you are talking about her wrong doings means your sentence is exactly implying what I said it does.

Like if they caught some mass murder and on the news they said "...killed 50 people and voted Republican". As if you wouldn't have something to say about that.

Sorry spin it however you want but the English language is not on your side .

In fact the sentence "See this is what Liberals are like", means exactly the same thing as "See this is what all Liberals are like". Don't they teach English in American schools? Or did it just go over your head? Is it time for the crayon and pop up edition already?

Quote:
assumed

Yeah you erm, did that one all ready, sayin' it twice twice don't make it no smarter smarter.

If you want to sound clever it's probably best if you let me write your material, no what I'm sayin' cup cake.

More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No beast so fierce but knows some touch of pity. But I know none, and therefore am no beast.

AURAPTOR

Sunday, April 9, 2006 1:29 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by citizen:
And I said you and your buddies. Go read what Hero said, good attempt at wriggeling out of it though.

However saying "this is what Liberals are like" denotes all, notice the s at the end of Liberal. Clarifying her as a Liberal especially once you are talking about her wrong doings means your sentence is exactly implying what I said it does.

Like if they caught some mass murder and on the news they said "...killed 50 people and voted Republican". As if you wouldn't have something to say about that.

Sorry spin it however you want but the English language is not on your side .

In fact the sentence "See this is what Liberals are like", means exactly the same thing as "See this is what all Liberals are like". Don't they teach English in American schools? Or did it just go over your head? Is it time for the crayon and pop up edition already?
Quote:
assumed

Yeah you erm, did that one all ready, sayin' it twice twice don't make it no smarter smarter.

If you want to sound clever it's probably best if you let me write your material, no what I'm sayin' cup cake.

While I agree w/ HERO often, I am not his keeper. You can't lump what he says along w/ my comments unless we specifically do agree on something. I'm unaware , and you failed to show any examples , of where I took up and ran w/ something he said. When you say me and my buddies, you paint w/ an overly broad brush. And that seems to be your M.O. , if two or more folks of like opinion about a topic , you feel you can lump them together by what only one says. This 'guilt by association' game you play is clouding your ability to see things for how they really are. But that's ok, as you seem to see only what you want to see anyway.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

CITIZEN

Sunday, April 9, 2006 1:45 PM

Mainly referring to the fact that you say nothing about Hero's comments, you know when he said Liberals are at fault for everything, you say nothing, no comment about how that detracts from the facts of the case (which it does, especially since those comments were the initial spark for the subsequent off-topic that has been blazing). However if anyone dares to say "hold on now, not all Liberals are like that and Republicans do it too!" that's when you start throwing your toys out of the pram.

Logical conclusion:
You agree with Hero's comments, since we know you read them and don't see turning this event in to an "all Liberals are evil/morally corrupt/etc" bashing session as off topic.

You disagree with the idea that Liberals aren't at fault for everything and disagree with the idea that people you disagree with have the right to state their case or defend themselves on 'your' thread.

So here's your move:
Tell me how you'd interpret your reaction with out the Liberal use of insults.

Or

Just attempt to insult me, which will pretty much prove everything I just said.

As for the accusations in your post I believe the word "projecting" fits rather well.

Dong ma gong zhu?

More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No beast so fierce but knows some touch of pity. But I know none, and therefore am no beast.

AURAPTOR

Sunday, April 9, 2006 7:40 PM

Quote:
Logical conclusion:
You agree with Hero's comments, since we know you read them and don't see turning this event in to an "all Liberals are evil/morally corrupt/etc" bashing session as off topic.

You disagree with the idea that Liberals aren't at fault for everything and disagree with the idea that people you disagree with have the right to state their case or defend themselves on 'your' thread.

So here's your move:
Tell me how you'd interpret your reaction with out the Liberal use of insults.

You, once again, assume too much. I did NOT read HERO's , or everyone else's post, as a matter of practice. ( No offense meant to HERO ) But as I've explained before, when a thread gets so long winded as this, I find it tedious to read and follow each and every tangent. Your ILL[l/b]ogical conclusion that I let HERO speak for me is at the heart of your false comprehension of the issue. You've got it all wrong, boy! How would I interpret my own reaction w/ out blah blah blah insults? I suppose like I usually do, w/ out insulting anyone who doesn't insult me first ?

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

CITIZEN

Sunday, April 9, 2006 7:44 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
You, once again, assume too much. I did NOT read HERO's , or everyone else's post, as a matter of practice. ( No offense meant to HERO ) But as I've explained before, when a thread gets so long winded as this, I find it tedious to read and follow each and every tangent. Your ILLogical conclusion that I let HERO speak for me is at the heart of your false comprehension of the issue. You've got it all wrong, boy! How would I interpret my own reaction w/ out blah blah blah insults? I suppose like I usually do, w/ out insulting anyone who doesn't insult me first ?

Just attempt to insult me, which will pretty much prove everything I just said.

I actually had my money on this reaction, thanks for proving me right.

I mean *IF* you didn't read the initial post you still had plenty of opportunity to see where the posts you *DID* reply to came from. You *CHOSE* by your own admission to ignore them, only going for the side that you disagreed with, so my comments still stand.

I gave you a chance to reasonably defend yourself, you know defence with out irrelevant erroneous insults

. You didn't take it. That's your choice as well.

More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No beast so fierce but knows some touch of pity. But I know none, and therefore am no beast.

AURAPTOR

Sunday, April 9, 2006 8:40 PM

Quote:
I gave you a chance to reasonably defend yourself, you know defence with out irrelevant erroneous insults . You didn't take it. That's your choice as well.

I've got nothing to defend myself from. Your delusional,baseless charges aren't worth my time in the first place. I was just setting the record straight that you've been making false charge after false charge, and I've clearly shown this to be the case. Sorry, but the world outside your mind does not always follow the script you have INSIDE you mind.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

CITIZEN

Sunday, April 9, 2006 8:55 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
I've got nothing to defend myself from. Your delusional,baseless charges aren't worth my time in the first place. I was just setting the record straight that you've been making false charge after false charge, and I've clearly shown this to be the case. Sorry, but the world outside your mind does not always follow the script you have INSIDE you mind.

Of course you have honey, of course you have.

Proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, which is why the only person to comment on this conversation besides yourself and I supported my conclusions, obviously.

*cough*Projecting*cough*.

Clearly in your mind, because your critical analysis tools, especially when in regard to yourself, are not only crippled, but non-existent.

One day my friend you'll join the rest of the Human race in the real world and realise that it is not the script in my head that is at fault, but only yourself

More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No beast so fierce but knows some touch of pity. But I know none, and therefore am no beast.

PIRATENEWS

Sunday, April 23, 2006 9:44 AM

Wonder why this ain't the top story on CNN, Faux News?

Quote:

McKinney fiasco shakes Capitol Police, officer knew her

By Robert Redding Jr.
Redding News Review
April 18, 2006

WASHINGTON - A source said an officer, who says Rep. Cynthia McKinney struck him in the chest with a closed fist, knew who she was, and claims the incident has caused infighting among U.S. Capitol Police.

The source, who is close to the ongoing grand jury investigation of the March 29 scuffle, said Paul McKenna, a third year officer in the U.S. Capitol Police, was given a picture of the congresswoman in training.

"No one believes that a man with a name that similar to hers would not know who she is," the source told Redding News Review. "He clearly knew who she was and what she looked like but stopped her anyway."

McKinney faces charges that she assaulted McKenna, who the source says is white, while entering a House office building last month. The Democrat, who has changed her hairstyle from her trademark cornrows, has said she was not wearing proper identification.

She has since apologized for the misunderstanding, which she first hinted may have been racism.

The source - who did not want to be identified in fear that they might lose their job - also said that the incident has resulted in "fighting and heated arguments between white and black officers."

"This case is tearing the department apart," the source said. "The blacks say the whites were screwing with her, but the white officers are saying that she should have stopped."

Sgt. Kimberly Schneider, a Capitol Police spokeswoman, denies that there is dissention among black and white officers.

"It sounds more like like gossip rather than fact," said the spokeswoman, who would not deny whether officers had been recently reprimanded for fighting.

She also referred all question about whether McKinney was recognized by McKenna to the U.S. Attorney's office, which is investigating the case.

The department, which protects Congress, has had a history of rifts between its black and white officers dating back to 2001. There is currently a class action complaint still pending.

www.reddingnewsreview.com/newspages/2006newspages/mckinney_police_infi
ghting_06_0910012.htm

Anderson Cooper: A pointed image. Well, immigration wasn't the only border issue in Washington, D.C. this week. Georgia representative Cynthia McKinney had an altercation with a Capitol Hill police officer, who refused her entry into the Capitol Building, when she refused to show proper identification. Joining us now - Congresswoman McKinney.

Cynthia McKinney: Yeah, thank you, Anderson.

Anderson Cooper: So, what exactly happened, Congresswoman?

Cynthia McKinney: Anderson, this was just a big to-do about a hairdo.

Anderson Cooper: Well, let me apologize in advance for this not rhyming - but I think it was a big to-do about you slapping a police officer in the face.

Cynthia McKinney: Anderson, let me ask you this: what black woman in her right mind would want to go into the Capitol if she didn't have to? I mean, we're talking about a building full of rich, old, white men, Anderson. It wasn't like I was trying to get into a Peabo Bryson concert!

Anderson Cooper: But you do admit you weren't wearing your Congressional pin. There are 535 members of Congress. You can't expect a police officer to remember all of you.

Cynthia McKinney: Here's the deal, Anderson Cooper: There's 535 members of Congress - only 84 of them are black; and only 14 of them are women; and only one of them looks this crazy when she goes walking down the steps. Remember my face!!

Anderson Cooper: So you do admit to slapping the police officer?

Cynthia McKinney: What do you want, Anderson? I apologized already. Do not make me feel like a Mexican trying to cross the border when I go to work! You put a police officer in my way, and I will slap him! If you put that police off

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME