What next..Bush to blame for S.E. Asian quake/Tsunami ?
POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Friday, March 11, 2005 16:01
VIEWED: 8371
PAGE 4 of 6
Quote:
Yeah I heard that the Terrorists websites have accused the US of detonating a nuclear device under the ocean at the fault in order to cause the Tsunami.
Or how about this one
Quote:Fawzan al-Fawzan, professor at al-Imam University, Saudi Arabia, al-Majid tv 31st December, 2004.
We know that at these resorts which unfortunately exist in Islamic and other countries in South Asia, especially at Christmas, fornication and sexual perversion of all kinds are rampant. The fact that it happened at this particular time is a sign from Allah. It happened at Christmas when the fornicators and corrupt people from all over the world come to comit fornication and sexual oerversion
Or the chap from Aceh, Maulana Yusuf who says the tsunami was caused by a group of off duty policemen. I kid you not. Apparently they were enjoying themselves on a beach near Banda Aceh. They were drinking alcohol. There were girls with them. This "orgy" attracted the attention of local people who chastised them for their "moral laxity". They ignored the warning, yelled at the locals and waved their guns. The next day after the party the disaster happened. Apparently.
"This movie may be a beautiful butterfly, but I loved that damn caterpillar." Joss Whedon.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by FarscapePKWars:
WHAT ??
Would you people show some respect, thousands of homes have been destroyed, hundreds of billions in damage, and thousands of people may have lost their lives ( maybe twice as much as the WTC attacks ).
If you want to continue you Bush-ranting or GW Worshipin' threads, then fine
but show a little respect for those who have died
May they rest in peace
Not to be morbid, but the number of lives lost inthe tsunami is probably more like 100+ times that of the WTC attacks.
The difference, of course, is that the tsunami is a "natural disaster" and WTC was a "man-made disaster."
Why not just call them "disasters"??? But I digress...
--Jefé The Hat
***************************
--Don't bother trying to predict, figure out, second guess, criticize, or suggest anything that comes from the mind of Joss Whedon, for you shall usually be wrong, and shall find out the Truth and Purpose in due time.
(This is the Truth of Whedoning)
"I like smackin 'em"--Jayne
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by NeutrinoLad:Quote:
Originally posted by Jadehand:
I heard that the Terrorists websites have accused the US of detonating a nuclear device under the ocean at the fault in order to cause the Tsunami.
I heard a caller say this on a radio show, so I don't knowthe source but it certainly is makingthe rounds.
. Which just goes to show that there's no statement so insanely absurd that it won't find a receptive audience eventually.
Any nuclear device capable of producing that magnitude of an earthquake would never be tested under water, and would certainly not be without SERIOUS radiation fallout. We'd be seeing geiger counters off the scale thousands of miles away. Not to mention the amount of ocean and oceanlife that would have been vaporized, and would lower the sea-levels enough to be visible to the naked eye.
Some folks is dumb...
--Jefé The Hat
***************************
--Don't bother trying to predict, figure out, second guess, criticize, or suggest anything that comes from the mind of Joss Whedon, for you shall usually be wrong, and shall find out the Truth and Purpose in due time.
(This is the Truth of Whedoning)
"I like smackin 'em"--Jayne
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by BadgersHat:
Some folks is dumb...
--Jefé The Hat
Boy howdy.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by CrevanReaver:
At this point, it actually wouldn't surprise me. The crazy environmentalist wackos like to fly out the nuttiest of conspiracies.
Michael Moore will maybe come out with Fahrenheit Tsunami.
Oh my gosh, that is good. actually I thought the same thing.
I want Jane on the Red Wings, hed kick butt.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I don't want to debate anything, but the actual spelling is Al-Qaeda if you don't believe me Hardware look at your own link. for all who may become angry at this post it wasn't meant to cause anger but rather to gather all the facts. it also doesn't mean that I sympathize with Bin-Laden (because I DON'T)I'm just gathering facts(you know facts, the reason Sen. Kerry was accused of flip-flopping). Also, natural cause was to blame for the quake/tsunami, no one will debate that! (I hope!)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Hardware:Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Hardware
I made the simple request that you present some examples, and you balked. That right there speaks volumes.
We've got to invade Iraq because Al Quaida is working in cooperation with Saddamn Hussein. Iraq is supporting Al Quaida.
Doesn't this sound familiar? That's what Dubya's administration harped about in an attempt to drum up grass roots support for the invasion.
Huh? OBL + Iraq was NEVER the reason for invading Iraq. You ask if it sounded familiar, and I reply - Nope. Never heard it, sorry. How soon do you forget the Gulf War, the agreements Iraq broke, the 17 U.N. Resolutions brought up, the 10+ yrs of 'Second chances' that Saddam got , only to fall back on his word.....
It's clear you hate Bush, but so what ? Can't you at least be intellectually honest when discusssing the issues.
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
OBL + Iraq was NEVER the reason for invading Iraq. You ask if it sounded familiar, and I reply - Nope. Never heard it, sorry.
Your master wnats that little point erased and you goose-step right in line. Wow. Amnesia on command. What a feat.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:Quote:
OBL + Iraq was NEVER the reason for invading Iraq. You ask if it sounded familiar, and I reply - Nope. Never heard it, sorry.
Your master wnats that little point erased and you goose-step right in line. Wow. Amnesia on command. What a feat.
Heh heh. Your inability to prove your position really does speak volumes. Name calliing is about all you have left, huh? I don't know, but perhaps Geo political issues are a bit too complex for you. Sure seems like it.
" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I just HAD to highlight your statement for everyone's consideration.
http://www.house.gov/reform/min/pdfs_108_2/pdfs_inves/pdf_admin_iraq_o
n_the_record_rep.pdf
And for your perusal, a lengthy report on the misleading statements in the public record made by the Bush admin about Iraq. Below is a brief exerpt:
"They (President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary Rumsfeld, Secretary Powell, and National Security Advisor Rice) made 61 misleading statements about the strength of the Iraq-al Qaeda alliance in 52 public appearances.
For example:
• In a November 7, 2002, speech, President Bush stated: Saddam Hussein is “a threat because he is dealing with Al Qaida. . . . [A] true threat facing our country is that an Al Qaida-type network trained and armed by Saddam could attack America and not leave one fingerprint.”
• In his January 28, 2003, State of the Union address, President Bush stated: “Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications, and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of al Qaeda. Secretly, and without fingerprints, he could provide one of his hidden weapons to terrorists, or help them develop their own.”"
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME