Voter fraud - American election vastly corrupted
POSTED BY: Ghoulman
UPDATED: Monday, January 27, 2025 00:47
VIEWED: 29159
PAGE 15 of 16
Recent news (that won't get covered):
Quote:
http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Exit_Polls_2004_Edison-Mitof
sky.pdf
Authors and Endorsers:
Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D. Temple University Statistics Department
Kathy Dopp, MS mathematics, USCountVotes, President
Steven F. Freeman, Ph.D. Visiting Scholar & Affiliated Faculty, Center for Organizational Dynamics, University of Pennsylvania
Brian Joiner, Ph.D. Professor of Statistics and Director of Statistical Consulting (ret), University of Wisconsin
Frank Stenger, Ph.D. Professor of Numerical Analysis, School of Computing, University of Utah
Richard G. Sheehan, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Finance, University of Notre Dame
Paul F. Velleman, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Statistical Sciences, Cornell University
Victoria Lovegren, Ph.D. Lecturer, Department of Mathematics, Case Western Reserve University
Campbell B. Read, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University
Jonathan Simon, J.D. Alliance for Democracy
Ron Baiman, Ph.D. Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago
Bruce O'Dell, USCountVotes, Vice President
The exit pollster of record for the 2004 election was the Edison/Mitofsky1 consortium. Their national poll results projected a Kerry victory by 3.0%, whereas the official count had Bush winning by 2.5%.2 Several methods have been used to estimate the probability that the national exit poll results would be as different as they were from the national popular vote by random chance. These estimates range from 1 in 959,000 to 1 in 1,2403. No matter how one calculates it, the discrepancy cannot be attributed to chance.
Edison/Mitofsky disavowed the results of their own poll, saying that the data cannot be construed as evidence that the official vote count was corrupted, and hypothesized that Kerry voters were more amenable to completing the poll questionnaire than Bush voters.
However, Edison/Mitofsky's own exit poll data does not support their theory that a higher exit poll response rate by Kerry voters accounted for the discrepancies between the exit polls and the presidential election results.
Using Edison/Mitofsky’s data tables we demonstrate that the “reluctant Bush responder” hypothesis is implausible because it is inconsistent with the combination of high response rates and high discrepancy rates among the precincts with the highest percentage for Bush.
............
The fact that, in the 2004 election, all voting equipment technologies except paper ballots were associated with large unexplained exit poll discrepancies all favoring the same party certainly warrants further inquiry.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I agree with ghoulman. As an american I believe the paper ballot where, the voter writes, the name of his canidate, (prerabliy, a third party, not a corrupt republican or democratic party).How simply is this folks?
YES!, PAPER BALLOTS ARE BETTER THAN HACKABLE COMPUTERS!!!!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue [excerpt from report]:
The fact that, in the 2004 election, all voting equipment technologies except paper ballots were associated with large unexplained exit poll discrepancies all favoring the same party certainly warrants further inquiry.
Thanks for the link, Rue. I look forward to reading it over my morning coffee tomorrow. This paragraph, however, sums up my feelings on the reported voting irregularities of the past election in a nutshell. I expect error in anything we as humans do. But I also expect that error to be randomly distributed (and I'm probably getting myself into trouble using statistical terminology in a non precise way). Any time discrepencies are weighted overwhelmingly in one direction I sit up and pay attention.
---------------------
Next up: Early "Nutcrusher" Jubal and the Firebuggers
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Recent news (that won't get covered):
............
The fact that, in the 2004 election, all voting equipment technologies except paper ballots were associated with large unexplained exit poll discrepancies all favoring the same party certainly warrants further inquiry.
I especially like the summary.
Quote:
Summary
There is already a strong case that there were significant irregularities in the presidential vote count from the 2004 election. Nevertheless, critics are asking for firmer proof before going
forward with a thorough investigation24. We feel strongly that this is the wrong standard. One
cannot have proof before an investigation.
In fact, the burden of proof should be to show that the election process is accurate and fair.
The integrity of the American electoral system can and should be beyond reproach. Citizens in
the world’s oldest and greatest democracy should be provided every assurance that the
mechanisms they have put in place to count our votes are fair and accurate. The legitimacy of
our elected leaders depends upon it.
Yep. Guilty until proven innocent. USVoteCount's site is interesting, if carefully crafted to look non-partisan. Hope they do an analysis of JFK's 1960 win.
BTW, the USVoteCount site already notes an ongoing GAO investigation, and offical requests for FBI, Dept. of Justice, and Congressional Research Service investigations. When these come up with something, let me know.
"Keep the Shiny side up"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Geezer:
Hope they do an analysis of JFK's 1960 win.
Off topic attempt at humor...
I'm guessing that if you asked JFK, he'd probably say that winning the election might not have been the best thing to happen to him. I'm thinking he'd rather have stayed alive than been President. But I could be wrong.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Deutschmannecros:
I agree with ghoulman. As an american I believe the paper ballot where, the voter writes, the name of his canidate, (prerabliy, a third party, not a corrupt republican or democratic party).How simply is this folks?
YES!, PAPER BALLOTS ARE BETTER THAN HACKABLE COMPUTERS!!!!
Prerabliy, we will develop a system that can't be confounded by poor handwriting or bad spelling.
And in this day and age, in our instant gratification society, are we willing to wait for three people to agree that scribble X means President Y?
Electronic voting is definitely the way of the future. We just need a better electronic system. (And a 'gaming commission' to oversee it.)
--Anthony
"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_
stolen
Rollingstone.com
Back to Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted -- enough to have put John Kerry in the White House. BY ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.
Like many Americans, I spent the evening of the 2004 election watching the returns on television and wondering how the exit polls, which predicted an overwhelming victory for John Kerry, had gotten it so wrong. By midnight, the official tallies showed a decisive lead for George Bush -- and the next day, lacking enough legal evidence to contest the results, Kerry conceded. Republicans derided anyone who expressed doubts about Bush's victory as nut cases in ''tinfoil hats,'' while the national media, with few exceptions, did little to question the validity of the election. The Washington Post immediately dismissed allegations of fraud as ''conspiracy theories,''(1) and The New York Times declared that ''there is no evidence of vote theft or errors on a large scale.''(2)
But despite the media blackout, indications continued to emerge that something deeply troubling had taken place in 2004. Nearly half of the 6 million American voters living abroad(3) never received their ballots -- or received them too late to vote(4) -- after the Pentagon unaccountably shut down a state-of-the-art Web site used to file overseas registrations.(5) A consulting firm called Sproul & Associates, which was hired by the Republican National Committee to register voters in six battleground states,(6) was discovered shredding Democratic registrations.(7) In New Mexico, which was decided by 5,988 votes,(8) malfunctioning machines mysteriously failed to properly register a presidential vote on more than 20,000 ballots.(9) Nationwide, according to the federal commission charged with implementing election reforms, as many as 1 million ballots were spoiled by faulty voting equipment -- roughly one for every 100 cast.(10)
The reports were especially disturbing in Ohio, the critical battleground state that clinched Bush's victory in the electoral college. Officials there purged tens of thousands of eligible voters from the rolls, neglected to process registration cards generated by Democratic voter drives, shortchanged Democratic precincts when they allocated voting machines and illegally derailed a recount that could have given Kerry the presidency. A precinct in an evangelical church in Miami County recorded an impossibly high turnout of ninety-eight percent, while a polling place in inner-city Cleveland recorded an equally impossible turnout of only seven percent. In Warren County, GOP election officials even invented a nonexistent terrorist threat to bar the media from monitoring the official vote count.(11)
Any election, of course, will have anomalies. America's voting system is a messy patchwork of polling rules run mostly by county and city officials. ''We didn't have one election for president in 2004,'' says Robert Pastor, who directs the Center for Democracy and Election Management at American University. ''We didn't have fifty elections. We actually had 13,000 elections run by 13,000 independent, quasi-sovereign counties and municipalities.''
But what is most anomalous about the irregularities in 2004 was their decidedly partisan bent: Almost without exception they hurt John Kerry and benefited George Bush. After carefully examining the evidence, I've become convinced that the president's party mounted a massive, coordinated campaign to subvert the will of the people in 2004. Across the country, Republican election officials and party stalwarts employed a wide range of illegal and unethical tactics to fix the election. A review of the available data reveals that in Ohio alone, at least 357,000 voters, the overwhelming majority of them Democratic, were prevented from casting ballots or did not have their votes counted in 2004(12) -- more than enough to shift the results o
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
getting the paralyzed to vote with Neural-link
Trump ‘Considering’ Elon Musk as Adviser if Elected
https://greekreporter.com/2024/05/30/trump-considering-elon-musk-advis
er/
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
its about to get more strange?
some claim he is J.D. Vance's political guru says Americans need to "get over their dictator phobia." that guy Curtis Yarvin calling for Trump to be given total power, with no checks and balances, people claim this is where Trump's VP -- and his boss man, Peter Thiel influence
https://x.com/KamalaHQ/status/1783632397243736438
The Seven Thinkers and Groups That Have Shaped JD Vance’s Unusual Worldview
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/07/18/jd-vance-world-view-
sources-00168984
Curtis Yarvin: 'He understood power.' How FDR hid paralysis from Americans
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Footage Shows Illegals Being Registered To Vote
https://vidmax.com/video/228763-footage-shows-illegals-being-registere
d-to-vote
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME