Donald Trump Has Been Indicted And Yes Arrested; Four Times Now And Counting. I was Right
POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Wednesday, August 19, 2026 03:20
VIEWED: 50875
PAGE 66 of 96
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Why is your President* so unpopular, Ted?
Why are minorities and women turning against him, Ted?
Is it even possible for your guy to win a fair election without throwing his political opposition in prison, Ted?
It was Trump who wanted Barr to arrest Biden moron not the other way around.
No. It IS the other way around.
Don't try to gaslight me you fucking idiot.
Quote:
And what your polls are not telling you is that voters that move away from Biden, for now, don't move over to Trump. Wait for it, people are beginning to pay attention.
No. That is EXACTLY what the polls are telling us.
December 30th of 2019 Biden lead the polls against Trump by 4.5 points. He only won that election by 3.7 points. This is both for the Popular Vote. We're doing the Electoral vote where Joe only won by 40,000 votes in a few swing states. All of those, he's losing to Trump now in polls carried out by Leftist organizations.
Quote:
In other words, tick tock...
Tick Tock, indeed.
Trump ain't going to prison, so you'd better demand more from your party.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Trump's Trumptards went to jail. Trump will be on trial next for his role.
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Trump ain't going to prison, so you'd better demand more from your party.
Fred C. Dobbs says: January 4, 2024 at 9:26 am
… While some of the cases have attracted nationwide attention, particularly those involving far-right groups like the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers militia, most of the prosecutions have flown beneath the radar, unfolding in quiet hearings often attended only by the defendants and their families. These proceedings have helped to flesh out the story of how an angry crowd of Mr. Trump’s supporters, egged on by his lies about a stolen election, stopped the democratic process, if only for several hours.
The bulk of the riot cases, more than 710, were resolved without trial through guilty pleas. As of the Justice Department’s latest update in December, about 170 people have gone to trial in Federal District Court in Washington, in front of either a jury or just a judge, with a vast majority resulting in convictions.
As for punishment, more than 450 people have been sent to jail or prison, with the longest term so far being the 22-year sentence imposed on Enrique Tarrio, the former leader of the Proud Boys. Several people who were not associated with extremist groups but who assaulted the police in what officers have described as a “medieval” battle outside the Capitol have been sentenced to a decade or more behind bars. …
… About 450 people have been charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement officers at the Capitol, and about 330 have been accused of obstruction of the certification of the election that was taking place inside the building on Jan. 6. But the Supreme Court recently announced that it was going to review the obstruction charge to see if it should apply to the Capitol attack. …
https://angrybearblog.com/2024/01/government-is-not-the-problem-bad-go
vernment-is-the-problem
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yes. Your administration behaves like a 3rd world Dictatorship. Very impressive.
Trump will be fine. Trump will be your next President. Trump will pardon all of Joe Biden*'s political prisoners.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Not Political Prisoners
Federal Judges Have Shown Leniency in Nearly All Jan. 6 Cases
By James Risen, Margot Williams | January 5 2024, 6:00 a.m.
https://theintercept.com/2024/01/05/january-6-cases-judges/
Trump and his allies have repeatedly claimed that the federal judicial system has been unnecessarily punitive in its treatment of January 6 defendants, complaining that they are “political prisoners” who have been unfairly persecuted for trying to prevent the congressional certification of Biden’s 2020 election. One leading January 6 defendant compared himself to a Jew living in Nazi Germany and said that his “only crime is opposing those who are destroying our country.”
The Intercept’s analysis sharply contradicts that right-wing narrative. In many cases, judges have rejected prosecutors’ requests for prison time, often reducing defendants’ sentences to home detention or probation. Defendants have been sentenced to standard prison terms in only 429 out of 719 cases, or 60 percent. Another 31 defendants were sentenced to intermittent incarceration, meaning they only had to serve time on nights or weekends. Home detention was given instead of prison in 101 cases, while defendants in 135 cases got probation.
The Intercept’s analysis is the most comprehensive examination so far of how federal judges appointed by Republican and Democratic presidents ruled in January 6 cases that have reached a final resolution in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which is handling all the criminal cases stemming from the insurrection. Hundreds more cases are still in progress and will likely be assigned to the same group of judges. A total of 1,233 individuals have so far been charged in connection with the January 6 mob, according to a running tallyOpens in a new tab compiled by the Associated Press.
Lawyers for Peter Schwartz, who threw a chair at police officers and attacked them with pepper spray, told the court that he was only following Trump’s directions. “There remain many grifters out there who remain free to continue propagating the ‘great lie’ that Trump won the election, Donald Trump being the most prominent,” they wrote in an April 2023 court filingOpens in a new tab. “Mr. Schwartz is not one of these individuals; he knows he was wrong.”
Trump and the MAGA right have ignored these statements of remorse and continue to treat the defendants as heroic figures. At a campaign event in Texas in November, the Republican front-runner described incarcerated January 6 offenders as “hostages, not prisoners.” Last June, Trump attended a fundraiser for January 6 defendants, calling them “great people” who have “been made to pay a price.”
J. Michael Luttig, a former judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, said that the pro-Trump attacks on the judicial process in the January 6 cases are deeply damaging to the nation. “The American people, as well as the courts, must understand that the former president will continue these disgraceful, condemnable attacks on our institutions of law and democracy until he has succeeded in delegitimizing them in the eyes of a sufficient number of Americans that not only will they not accept the justice system’s verdicts against him, but they will return him to The White House in 2024 precisely because of those verdicts.”
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
The Intercept’s analysis sharply contradicts that right-wing narrative.
Oh gee. You don't say?
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-intercept/
Fuck you.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:In November 2024, if your brain still insists you vote for Trump, that brain will dump you into a hellish 2025. 6ix, you better get control of your funny little brain soon or you are doomed. (As a reminder, 6ix's brain told him for years to drink himself stupid, but he got over it, eventually. He still lives with health consequences of alcoholism, unfortunately. Trump is 6ix's present addiction, replacing beer, abruptly swapping one harmful habit for another.)
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
The Intercept’s analysis sharply contradicts that right-wing narrative.
Oh gee. You don't say?
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-intercept/
Fuck you.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump will be your next President.
If you don't like it, I suggest you move out of my country.
--------------------------------------------------
Political correctness is just tyranny, with a smiley face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
From the Texas Law Review
https://texaslawreview.org/prosecuting-and-punishing-our-presidents/
Prosecuting and Punishing Our Presidents
Article - by Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash Volume 100 - Issue 1
Can a President be arrested, indicted, prosecuted, and punished? Although some believe that these possibilities are unconstitutional, even absurd, I demur. For a host of reasons, the presidency lacks immunities from criminal process and punishment. First, some constitutions from the Founding Era included express executive immunities, not relying upon shadowy inferences. This practice sheds light on how to best read our Constitution. Second, though James Madison sought the creation of express presidential privileges at the Philadelphia Convention, he failed. Third, during the ratification fight, many denied that the President would have special immunities of any sort, with some noting that presidents had fewer privileges than members of Congress. Fourth, a sitting President was arrested and essentially admitted his guilt, never asserting that the Constitution shielded him from arrest, prosecution, or punishment. Fifth, the Constitution supplies a constitutional solution when circumstances, including arrest or incarceration, incapacitate a sitting President. The “Acting President”—the Vice President—takes over, ensuring continuity and energy in the Executive. Lastly, the Constitution authorizes Congress to supply a statutory immunity. By ordinary law, Congress can grant immunities that the Constitution itself never accords. Further, it can curb, expand, or eliminate its grant as circumstances warrant. Because Congress can solve any difficulties that might arise from the arrest, prosecution, and punishment of our presidents, there is little need to infer or imagine a constitutional solution.
[S]uppose the President commits Murder in [the] Streets. Impeach him[?] But You can only remove him from Office on impeachment. Why When he is no longer President, You can indict him. But in the Mean While he runs away. But I will put another case. [S]uppose he continues his Murders daily, and neither houses are sitting to impeach him. Oh! the People would rise and restrain him. [V]ery well You will allow the Mob to do what the legal Justice must abstain from.
—Senator William Maclay, arguing in 1789 that the President enjoys no immunity from criminal process and punishment
Much more at https://texaslawreview.org/prosecuting-and-punishing-our-presidents/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
It was Trump who wanted Barr to arrest Biden moron not the other way around.
No. It IS the other way around.
Don't try to gaslight me you fucking idiot.
Trump Calls on Barr to ‘Act’ Against Biden Before Election
Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. in Wilmington, Del., on Monday. President Trump repeatedly called him a “criminal” this week, insisting that the Justice Department investigate him.
Credit...Hilary Swift for The New York Times
President Trump on Tuesday called on William P. Barr, the attorney general, to take action before Election Day against his Democratic opponent, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., over his son’s foreign work, an extraordinary attempt to pressure the government’s chief law enforcement to help him politically.
The president made the remark during an interview with “Fox & Friends,” after days of caustic criticism of Mr. Biden, the moderators of the presidential debates, the news media and, increasingly, Mr. Barr. He recently said the attorney general would go down in history “as a very sad, sad situation” if he did not indict Democrats like Mr. Biden and former President Barack Obama.
“We’ve got to get the attorney general to act,” Mr. Trump said on Tuesday, when asked whether he wants to see investigations into unverified information about Mr. Biden and his son Hunter that the president’s personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, claims he recently obtained. Mr. Giuliani, who has made a range of outlandish and false assertions in an effort to damage the president’s rivals and critics, has refused to provide news outlets with the information he claims to have.
Mr. Trump called on Mr. Barr to appoint a special prosecutor or similar official, saying: “He’s got to act. And he’s got to act fast.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/20/us/politics/trump-barr-biden.html
This is the New York Times confirming Trump wanted Barr to go after Biden, not the other way around stupid. Barr wasn't even the head of the DOJ when Biden took office. He had already walked out on Trump.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Reporter stuns Hunter Biden by asking 'what kind of crack' he smokes
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME