The Thread of Court Cases Trump Is Winning
POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Thursday, September 3, 2026 03:01
VIEWED: 5857
PAGE 1 of 11
If there is another one, I don't see it.
Please refer to other one(s).
Obviously, most cases are obstructed by Libtard Judges and prevented from being heard, which Libtards count as a "win" for Team Libtard.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.u
scourts.flsd.648652.100.0_1.pdf
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION
CASE NO. 23-80101-CR-CANNON
UNITED STATES,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DONALD J. TRUMP,
WALTINE NAUTA, and
CARLOS DE OLIVEIRA,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
ORDER STRIKING SEALED FILINGS AND ORDERING BRIEFING
THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Special Counsel’s Motion for a Garcia
Hearing [ECF No. 97] and related filings [ECF Nos. 95, 96 (Sealed)]. It is ORDERED AND
ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Special Counsel moves [ECF No. 97] for a Garcia hearing to inquire into
“potential conflicts of interests that may arise from attorney Stanley Woodward, Jr.’s
prior and current representation of three individuals the Government may call to testify
at the trial of his client Waltine Nauta” [ECF No. 97 p. 1]. Simultaneously, the Special
Counsel moves for leave [ECF No. 95] to file under seal a “Supplement” containing
additional information “to facilitate the Court’s inquiry” [ECF No. 96; see ECF No. 97
p. 2 n.2, p. 6]. The Special Counsel states in conclusory terms that the supplement
should be sealed from public view “to comport with grand jury secrecy,” but the motion
Case 9:23-cr-80101-AMC Document 100 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 23-80101-CR-CANNON
2
for leave and the supplement plainly fail to satisfy the burden of establishing a
sufficient legal or factual basis to warrant sealing the motion and supplement.
2. The Special Counsel’s motion for leave to file under seal [ECF No. 95] is DENIED.
3. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE from the docket sealed entries 95 and 96.
4. Waltine Nauta shall file a response to the Motion for a Garcia hearing [ECF No. 97]
on or before August 17, 2023. Among other topics as raised in the Motion, the
response shall address the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury
proceeding to continue to investigate and/or to seek post-indictment hearings on
matters pertinent to the instant indicted matter in this district. The Special Counsel
shall respond to that discussion in a Reply in Support of the Motion [ECF No. 97], due
on or before August 22, 2023. The remaining Defendants may, but are not required
to, file briefs of their own related to the grand jury issue referenced herein, but any such
briefs are due by August 17, 2023, and may be submitted in combined or individual
fashion.1
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Fort Pierce, Florida, this 7th day of August 2023.
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/judge-aileen-cannon-comes-swinging-170207097
.html
Today's Fake news is largely ignoring this, to concentrate on the Hunter Biden Cover-Up . . . errrrr, assignment of SP to delay until after all Statutes of Limitations have run out. (Hey, is this the very first time, ever, that a Federal Administration Employee has ASKED to be named Special Prosecutor, and then awarded the gig?)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
its a joke a clownshow now
Sometime ago the court system became the Mob system, they would kill with Bureaucracy and Lawsuits rather than bullets
the Neo-Cons, the weirdo Masonic clubs, perverted Globalist Jews, the Saudis, the elite Euro Royals invaded and fucked up the US Legal system
Micro Bush fucked up the US Courts so it was long ago being destroyed before Bolsevik 'Libtard' truly got near it...the system has been dying for decades but the Neo-Left might be the final nail in the coffin
IT could go full Wakanda before it dies
an actual imbecile is put into the US Supreme Court, she defends islamist terrorists and she can not tell the difference between a man or woman
she is pro-pedophile
but Globalist media says you must celebrate because she is Black and Female
the Anti-American Low IQ retard Ketanji Brown Jackson
enjoy the show
but....
There are a lot of cases I'm not sure how many he will win
It seems like he will have lost more than he has won
- He said she said Liable or Defamation, one or two cases it could go either way?
counter Defamation Lawsuits,
Trump vs CNN 'Fake News'
the news agency CNN calls Trump Hitler so Trump sued CNN in the Southern District of Florida, alleging that "CNN has sought to use its massive influence—purportedly as a 'trusted' news source—to defame the Plaintiff in the minds of its viewers
https://thehill.com/media/4126560-judge-dismisses-trumps-defamation-la
wsuit-against-cnn/
,
https://ca.style.yahoo.com/style/federal-judge-dismisses-trump-big-203
137986.html
Insurrection or as some call it here 'The Coup'
maybe at least 10 Lawsuits
also counter Lawsuits one Trump lawsuit claimed that the House committee was illegitimate and that its request for the records was a partisan sham. The Supreme Court denied Trump's request without providing a reason. The next day, the National Archives and Records Administration released the White House documents to the committee.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jan/19/us-capitol-riot-trump-
documents-national-archives
Money Financial
perhaps 6 Cases going to court, the nu-Left going crazy that he would reduce the amount of taxes he and his company paid, cases about financial and tax information
34 felony counts of falsifying business records, in Florida, the Justice Department brought 37 counts against him
Asking about Votes or Election interference
at least 2 cases
did he pick up a phone,
Georgia case is a criminal investigation.
Wayne County, Detroit, Michigan suing Trump and the Republican National Committee for threatening to overturn the election results, a political show for BLM Antifa or NAACP? National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
Grab Em By the Pussy words or Sexual misconduct
another 1 or 2 coming?
E Jean Carroll it was rape but not rape he used nasty words
Judge said GUILTY
Lawsuits by state
Wisconsin, Michigan, Hawaii, SHITHOLE Commiefornia, Arizona, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Georgia...more phone calls, Securing Ballots Cast
Other
Ex-Lawyers stabbing him in the back Lawsuits for breach of contract,
he sues them back?
BigTech vs Trump
They already kicked his ass, then you have WeChat Users v. Trump, Facebook vs Trump, Trump vs Facebook counter lawsuits, Utubes vs Trump...Trump will of course be more worried about Tiktok or some shit or his blog that nobody reads.
People and groups vs Trump Executive orders
Trump bans terrorists, the jihad lawyers and Leftwing loons sue to get his orders overturned call him 'racist' or some nonsense, they want 'The Wall' gone, they alledge crime or investigate payments into the Wall, Sanctury Cities vs Trump,
San Fran-SHIT-SICKO v. Trump
Hawaii v. Trump
it is now bruned to the ground but Hawaii is more worried about Violation of the Amendment Establishment Clause claiming the travel ban targeted Radical islamist Jihadi Terrorists...adn that is suppo
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Possibly HUNDREDS of cases coming
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/threads/fl-former-president-donald-t
rump-indicted-40-counts-classified-documents-and-obstruction-of-justice-june-2023-trial-may-2024-2.686530/page-2
You think he would win 50% or 60% of them?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So let's imagine he wins a little more than half
From that other thread
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Here is a list of crimes Donald Trump has been credibly accused of since first running for office: This does not include his last indictment nor the Georgia indictment yet to come.
1) 52 U.S.C. §§ 30109, 30116, 30118; 18 U.S.C. § 2 Causing (or accepting) an individual contribution in excess of the lawful limit (2015)
2) 18 U.S.C. § 371 Conspiring to commit campaign finance offenses and/or defraud the enforcement of campaign finance laws (2015-2017)
3) 52 U.S.C. §§ 30104, 30109; 18 U.S.C. § 2 Causing a campaign committee to fail to report an unlawful corporate contribution (2016 - AMI)
4) 52 U.S.C. §§ 30104, 30109; 18 U.S.C. § 2 Causing a campaign committee to fail to report an unlawful corporate contribution (2016 - Cohen)
5) 52 U.S.C. §§ 30109, 30116, 30118; 18 U.S.C. § 2 Causing (or accepting) an individual campaign contribution in excess of statutory limits (2016)
6) 52 U.S.C. §§ 30109, 30118; 18 U.S.C. § 2 Causing (or accepting) an unlawful corporate campaign contribution (2016)
7) 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1519 Causing a campaign committee to fail to report an unlawful corporate contribution (2016-2017)
8) 18 U.S.C. § 1001 Knowingly omitting or failing to disclose a material fact (2017)
9) 5 U.S.C. app. § 104(a)(1)-(2) Knowingly and willfully failing to report required information (2017)
10) 18 U.S.C. § 1001; 18 U.S.C. § 2 Obstruction of justice and witness tampering (2017)
11) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(b); 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice and witness tampering (2017)
12) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2017 - Flynn)
13) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2017 - firing Comey)
14) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2017 - Mueller)
15) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2017 - attempted influencing Comey)
16) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2017 - attempted firing Mueller)
17) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2017 - 2018 - Sessions)
18) 18 U.S.C. § 1001 False statement (2017 - 2019)
19) 5 U.S.C. app. § 102(a)(3)) Criminal violation of the Ethics in Government Act (2017 - 2019)
20) 18 U.S.C. § 1361 Willful destruction of government property (2017 - 2021)
21) 18 U.S.C. § 2071 Willful destruction of government records (2017 - 2021)
22) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(b); 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice and witness tampering (2018 - Manafort)
23) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2018 - McGahn)
24) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice (2018 - Manafort jury)
25) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(b); 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice and witness tampering (2018 - 2019 - Cohen)
26) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1505, 1512(b); 1512(c)(2) Obstruction of justice and witness tampering (2018 - 2019 - Stone)
27) 18 U.S.C. § 201 Bribery (2019)
28) 18 U.S.C. § 610 Coercion of political activity (2019)
29) 18 U.S.C. § 641 Misappropriation of federal funds (2019)
30) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1505, 1512 Obstruction of Justice (2019 -Ukraine)
31) 52 U.S.C. §§ 30109, 30121 Soliciting unlawful foreign campaign contributions (2019)
32) 18 U.S.C. § 595 Criminal violation of the Hatch Act (2020)
33) 8 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy against rights (2020 - 2021)
34) 52 U.S.C. § 20511(2)(B) Depriving state residents a fair and impartial election process (2020 - 2021)
35) Ga. Code Ann. § 16-10-20 Knowingly making a false statement (2020 - 2021)
36) Ga. Code Ann. § 16-10-93 Influencing government officials to withhold or alter a record (2020 - 2021)
37) GaCodeAnn.§16-4-7 (soliciNOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
None of that means anything or matters.
All that list is showing is the desperation of a Democrat party that is terrified of losing.
They very well should be since not only Republicans but Trump himself have embraced the mail-in fraud ballot system that Democrats instituted during Covid to get Trump out of office and will have destroyed the American system of voting for the rest of the life of the country.
Be well prepared to see CNN, MSNBC and all the Lefty news websites that copy whatever CNN and MSNBC say all telling you how evil Republicans cheated by ballot harvesting and using mail in fraud ballots to win the 2024 elections as if they weren't the party that started all of this in the first place. And then watch Ted and Second complaining about it to, as if this is some new thing that only started happening next year because it was perfectly fine when they got their way but it's cheating after they lost.
And I'm going to agree with them. It IS cheating. It IS illegitimate.
But it's what their party did to the country and for the rest of our lives nobody is going to have any faith in the voting process and will have very valid reasons for claiming that the results of any election going forward are illegitimate.
I do hope that somebody will put the shit back in the horse, but there's a reason why the tale of Sauron's ring resonates so deeply with so many people. I have little faith that the damage done leading up to the 2020 election will ever be fixed by either party.
--------------------------------------------------
How you do anything is how you do everything.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:
So let's imagine he wins a little more than half
From that other thread
Half?
Libtards are only hoping for ONE!
They are so desperate to get ONE conviction, that they are throwing thousands of Fake Charges like feces against the wall, hoping that SOMETHING will stick. They are barely equivalent to untrained monkeys.
They are hoping that illiterate clowns who cannot pay attention will see their thousands of Fake Claims as somehow legitimate.
Congratulations, you won their prize.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
We are seeing courtroom victories, legislative leadership, investigation breakthroughs, partnership opportunities, and best of all, a steady rise in the number of faithful Americans who recognize our country is in peril and are speaking out and stepping up in new ways, translating their passions into actions, all for the good of the Republic. It’s exciting!
The last few years have been extremely difficult - and we all know the difficulties are far from over. But, there is no battle that cannot be won if Americans stand together. I’ll restrain myself from launching a full-on pep rally, but we have a lot to be positive about:
Arizona Superior Court in Yavapai County found that the state’s process for signature matching on mail-in ballots was unlawful. A Georgia Federal Court affirmed protections against ballot harvesting and dropbox abuse. And in Florida Federal Court, a suit that attempted to prevent President Trump from running for reelection was dismissed.
Common-sense legislative reforms are happening all over the country. To give you a sense of the scale of battle, check out this tracker from Voting Rights Lab, currently following 1,894 election related bills. (Note: Voting Rights Lab is not a fan of ours, nor do we share their views, but I thought you would find their spreadsheet approach insightful).
Researchers are making strides in uncovering ballot trafficking, machine manipulation, election finance abuse, noncitizen registration, and more. Evidence-backed announcements from Kari Lake’s team and Gateway Pundit are testaments to the value of perseverance - and there’s more to come! We are privileged to work with so many great teams, providing research, tech, and legal support when needed.
Last week I wrote about our three non-negotiable goals for 2024:
Election processes must follow the law.
Voter rolls must be accurate.
Citizens, sheriffs, and legislators must be equipped to participate.
While we continue to make great headway, last week we advanced exponentially; new tech, new collaborations, new opportunities - all good!
And finally, we are thrilled to see the growing numbers of people who recognize that America is worth saving; that we are not going to stand by silently and let WEF, WHO, and Marxist politicos define our future; and that engaging in elections, by voting, by serving, will unite us in ways we’ve never experienced, for the good.
Hard times are still ahead. We will continue to take massive incoming. But we are over the target. And God’s people are awake and increasingly, rightfully, unafraid.
Keep the faith. Never quit.
Ever onward-
PS - I’ll be back online tonight (Monday, 9/11 @ 7p et). Click here to join in!NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/judge-issues-interim-stay-york-223000554.htm
l
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/judge-aileen-cannon-hands-trump-175149183.ht
ml
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And also this:
Quote:
October 06, 2023 | Read Online
Logo
Ineligibles and The Aftermath
Several weeks ago, True the Vote published a short paper titled The Aftermath. Written as part of a broader collection of our recent work in Georgia, The Aftermath addressed the impact Georgia’s dirty voter rolls had on the 2020 election and a meeting I had in 2020 with Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and his team, where we discussed True the Vote’s plans to assist Georgia citizens in challenging ineligible voter records.
The Lawsuit
Our efforts were immediately met with a lawsuit filed against us by attorney Marc Elias on behalf of Stacey Abrams’ organization Fair Fight. The DOJ has now joined with Fair Fight against us. This case has been ongoing since December 2020. Our federal court trial begins in Georgia on October 26th, 2023.
The Indictments
Now, nineteen people, including Donald Trump, have been indicted by Fulton County D. A. Fani Willis. She’s charged them with multiple felony counts over their involvement in the 2020 election, each related explicitly to whether there were known, potentially outcome-determinative inaccuracies in Georgia’s election that were being covered up.
The Truth
Seeing this, I decided to take what I’d written in The Aftermath and turn it into an affidavit. A notarized copy is attached here for use in any way that may be helpful. Here’s an excerpt:
“... I left the meeting unsettled by the seeming indifference the Raffensperger team had shown about their knowledge that the voter rolls had been so markedly inaccurate during the November election. At that time we did not yet have a copy of the state’s published record of voters in the General Election, but because the state uses services like ERIC, which also uses NCOA to identify ineligible records, the Secretary of State’s office knew, or should have known, there were hundreds of thousands of potentially ineligible voters casting votes, hence Raffensperger’s admonition that “The G.O.P should have been doing this all along.”
8. Little more than two weeks later, on January 2nd, 2021, Secretary Raffensperger and members of his staff had a call with President Trump and members of his team. On that call, President Trump asked about inaccurate voter records. Both Secretary Raffensperger and General Counsel Ryan Germany stated that they had fully evaluated the various claims of election irregularities and said without qualification there was no evidence to support them, including no problems with the voting records. This statement was knowingly false. Both men were well-aware of that falsity at the time.
9. True the Vote has completed a review of the voting patterns relating to those 364,541 records identified as ineligible based on permanent change of residency.
10. In Georgia’s November 2020 elections, approximately 67,284 votes were cast that should likely not have been counted because the voters’ registrations were ineligible based on permanent change of residency.
a. Out of County. 48,207 of those votes corresponded to voters who had moved to a different county within Georgia.
b. Out of State. 19,077 of those votes corresponded to voters who no longer lived in Georgia.
11. While we cannot know who voted for which candidate in those ballots that should not have been counted, we do know that the two presidential candidates were separated by only 11,779 votes. It is of great concern that the number of votes for which the address verification requirement was essentially waived in the 2020 General Election could well have been outcome-determinative.”
Aftermath of The Aftermath
This week, Secretary Raffensperger announced efforts to evaluate, inactivate, or remove the voter registration records of 679,749 ineligible voter records.
While we applaud what appear to be efforts to ensure only eligible voters vote in 2024, there were no such efforts in 2020. According to available state and federal data, over 300,000 ineligible records were on the rolls, and over 67,000NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME