The 2023 Disney Failure Thread
POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Thursday, January 25, 2024 20:58
VIEWED: 8549
PAGE 4 of 13
It just occurred to me that people might not be reading this thread right. As the weekend numbers come in, I update the original post after copying the previous week's OP at the end of the thread (This is usually sometime late-evening Monday or early-morning Tuesday). This isn't how I'm doing the other 3 lists encompassing the top US produced movies in the Top 50 Worldwide, so I thought I should point that out.
Under the 2x Rule of Thumb model which appears could be an outdated model, with evidence from Variety.com articles that I've presented in this thread, Disney would have been set to finally show a modest profit of around $33 Million this past weekend for 2023 had it not been for the fact that the nearly $160 Million Budget reboot of Haunted Mansion came out and only made 21% of its budget over the weekend.
There were two reasons for this. The first reason is Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol. 3, the only successful Marvel property released this year, has been carrying the studio limping to the finish line, it has been able to erase nearly $340 Million of the losses that various other films have created. That is over now though. Not only did it make only around $100k domestic in the last 7 days, but over the last 3 weeks the official worldwide number has lost nearly $2.5 Million, with losses of roughly $700k, $1.1 M, and $500k in that time. This has to be due from miscalculating and/or misreporting international numbers and rectifying that after the fact. But bottom line is that Guardians will help Disney no more. Not in 2023. Not beyond 2023. Guardians is over.
The second reason is the surprise longevity and back-end performance of Elemental. For a movie with a $200M budget and a $400M rule of thumb goal, it wasn't looking good after the first weekend when it only managed to pull in 22% of its production budget worldwide. It didn't quite break even this weekend, but there is zero doubt that it will now that it's sitting at 197% and still looking reasonably strong for a movie that has been out this long.
Moderate "wins" for Disney like Antman's final $63+ million profit, or The Little Mermaid's almost final $60+ million profit are not helpful for a company that loves putting out massive budget flicks and hasn't managed to put out a single one that came close to pulling in a Billion at the box office this year to offset movies like Indy 5 that are nearing the end of their theater run while they just pulled in only $7.5 Million last week in the domestic box office and are still nearly $250 Million in the hole... or Peter Pan and Wendy which cost $170 Million to make and lost all of that money plus marketing costs when they made the decision to release it on their streaming platform that is already reportedly losing $800 Million in the last quarter alone.
With the current box office updated to Sunday, July 30th, current losses for Disney with the 2x Rule of thumb are -$282,417,525.
And all of this assumes that the 2x Rule of Thumb model is even valid anymore in 2023. Variety.com doesn't seem to think so when they claim that Antman and the Wasp: Quantumania lost Disney tens of millions of dollars, which would suggest that the Rule of Thumb has changed to 2.5x the Production Budget.
https://variety.com/2023/film/news/disney-box-office-failures-indiana-
jones-elemental-ant-man-1235660409
Quote:
. There was the dispiriting release of “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania,” a rare Marvel movie to likely lose tens of millions in its theatrical run
(See my in-depth analysis on this comment and the implications of it on the post in this thread I made on June 13th)
So while limping along and hoping to break even in the box office of 2023 and maybe eeking out just a little bit of profit using the 2x Rule of Thumb is bad enough, if the rule has changed to 2.5x, here's what Disney's Box Office Numbers look like as of 7/30/2023:
Peter Pan and Wendy ----------------------- ($170,000,000) [Direct to Disney+]
Ant-Man
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/desantis-controlled-disney-world-district-17
5756727.html
Quote:
DeSantis-controlled Disney World district abolishes diversity, equity initiatives
The Canadian Press
Tue, August 1, 2023 at 12:57 p.m. CDT·3 min read
ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — Diversity, equity and inclusion programs were abolished Tuesday from Walt Disney World's governing district, now controlled by appointees of Gov. Ron DeSantis, in an echo of the Florida governor's agenda which has championed curtailing such programs in higher education and elsewhere.
The Central Florida Tourism Oversight District said in a statement that its diversity, equity and inclusion committee would be eliminated, as would any job duties connected to it. Also axed were initiatives left over from when the district was controlled by Disney supporters, which awarded contracts based on goals of achieving racial or gender parity.
Glenton Gilzean, the district's new administrator who is African American and a former head of the Central Florida Urban League, called such initiatives “illegal and simply un-American." Gilzean has been a fellow or member at two conservative institutions, the James Madison Institute and the American Enterprise Institute Leadership Network, as well as a DeSantis appointee to the Florida Commission on Ethics.
“Our district will no longer participate in any attempt to divide us by race or advance the notion that we are not created equal," Gilzean said in a statement. "As the former head of the Central Florida Urban League, a civil rights organization, I can say definitively that our community thrives only when we work together despite our differences.”
An email was sent seeking comment from Disney World.
Last spring, DeSantis, who is running for the GOP presidential nomination, signed into law a measure that blocks public colleges from using federal or state funding on diversity programs.
DeSantis also has championed Florida's so-called “Stop WOKE” law, which bars businesses, colleges and K-12 schools from giving training on certain racial concepts, such as the theory that people of a particular race are inherently racist, privileged or oppressed. A federal judge last November blocked the law’s enforcement in colleges, universities and businesses, calling it "positively dystopian.”
The creation of the district, then known as the Reedy Creek Improvement District, was instrumental in Disney’s decision to build a theme park resort near Orlando in the 1960s. Having a separate government allowed the company to provide zoning, fire protection, utilities and infrastructure services on its sprawling property. The district was controlled by Disney supporters for more than five decades.
The DeSantis appointees took control of the renamed district earlier this year following a yearlong feud between the company and DeSantis. The fight began last year after Disney, beset by significant pressure internally and externally, publicly opposed a state law banning classroom lessons on sexual orientation and gender identity in early grades, a policy critics call “Don’t Say Gay.”
As punishment, DeSantis took over the district through legislation passed by Republican lawmakers and appointed a new board of supervisors to oversee municipal services for the sprawling theme parks and hotels. Disney sued DeSantis and his five board appointees in federal court, claiming the Florida governor violated the company’s free speech rights by taking the retaliatory action.
Before the new board came in, Disney made agreements with previous oversight board members who were Disney supporters that stripped the new supervisors of their authority over design and development. The DeSantis-appointed members of the governing district have sued Disney in state court in a second lawsuit stemming from the district’s takeover, seeking to invalidate those agreements.NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
7/31 Numbers...
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
This will encompass all Disney/Pixar/Fox Studios failures for the year. This OP will be updated from time to time as more data comes in, particularly when a movie officially ends its theatrical run and we have solid numbers.
[ALL FIGURES UPDATED 07/31/2023]
Sub-threads for notable movies can be found here:
The Little Mermaid Failure Thread: http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=65598
The Elemental Failure Thread: http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=65628
The Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny Failure Thread: http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=65629
Live Action Remakes that were so bad they skipped a theatrical release and went straight to Disney+:
Peter Pan and Wendy (April 23rd, 2023)
Production Budget: $170 Million
source: https://vancouversun.com/entertainment/local-arts/disney-peter-pan-wen
dy-canadian-film-industry
Box Office: $0 [FINAL]
Net Gain/Loss: -$170,000,000 - Marketing Costs (Unknown) [FINAL]
Theatrical Releases (WINNERS):
Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania * [Walt Disney Pictures/Marvel Studios] (February 17th, 2023)
Production Budget: $200,000,000
source: https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Ant-Man-and-the-Wasp-Quantumania-(20
23)#tab=summary
Worldwide Opening Weekend: $250,000,000 (125% of Production Budget)
FINAL Worldwide Gross: $463,635,303 (232% of Production Budget)
Net Gain/Loss: +$63,635,303 [FINAL]
Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol 3. [Walt Disney Pictures/Marvel Studios] (May 5th, 2023)
Production Budget: $250,000,000
source: https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Guardians-of-the-Galaxy-Vol-3-(2023)
#tab=summary
Worldwide Opening Weekend: $290,000,000 (116% of Production Budget)
Current Worldwide Gross: $837,312,951 (335% of Production Budget)
Weird... After losing about $700,000 in the previous 8 days (07/11-07/18), despite making about a million in the US Box Office in that time, Guardian's 3 worldwide total went down again this weekend from $839,050,733 to $837,895,825. I have no explanation for this, although I did notice it happened to a few other films this week such as Fast X when making the 2023 top lists in the Sound of Freedom thread. Without any explanation, I'm going to assume that something in the international counts were off and corrected.
UPDATE 07/31: WTF Bruce? Again?
Despite making around $100k in the Domestic Box office this week, Guardians 3 went down again to $837,312,951 from $837,895,825
Net Gain/Loss: +$337,312,951
The Little Mermaid [Walt Disney Pictures] (May 26th, 2023)
Production Budget: $250,000,000
source: https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Little-Mermaid-The-(2023)#tab=summar
y
Worldwide Opening Weekend: $164,000,000 (66% of Production Budget)
Current Worldwide Gross: $560,010,838 (224% of Production Budget)
Net Gain/Loss: +$60,010,838
The Boogeyman [20th Century Studios] (June 2nd, 2023)
Production Budget: $35,000,000
source: https://variety.com/2023/film/news/the-boogeyman-director-indie-movies
-disney-1235620503/
Worldwide Opening Weekend: $20,000,000 (57% of Production Budget)
FINAL Worldwide Gross: $82,351,335 (234% of Production Budget)
Net Gain/Loss: +$7,351,335
I don't know what happened with this one. It made less than $1.5 Million in the US on the weekend ending 7/09, but all of the sudden it jumped from a $10 Million + loser to a $6 Million + winner in the span of that week. I'll chalk that up to very late international reporting on the numbers for now.
UPDATE 07/24: This one went down several thousand this week with no explanation from $82,351,069 to $82,344,950. Since this seems to be a trend now that I'm really paying attention to numbers on a broad range of films I'm going to begin assuming that the international figures are just estimates, similar to the estimates that we get for domestic numbers, but it just takes a lot longer for them to be finalized.
NOTE TO SELF 07/31: Even though this one wasn't in tNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
As of 08/07/2023:
TOTAL NET GAIN/LOSS FOR DISNEY 2023 [2.0x RoT]: -$161,573,674
TOTAL NET GAIN/LOSS FOR DISNEY 2023 [2.5x RoT]: -$861,948,674
--------------------------------------------------
How you do anything is how you do everything.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
FINANCIAL TIMES: Bob Iger’s Disney comeback hampered by TV woes and box office flops
https://www.ft.com/content/4630ad12-6e4a-447f-9dce-ede3dc673f67?segmen
tId=b385c2ad-87ed-d8ff-aaec-0f8435cd42d9
Get fucked, Bob.
Everybody knows that YOU are the reason Disney is failing and your little Chapek stunt isn't fooling anybody.
--------------------------------------------------
How you do anything is how you do everything.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
FINANCIAL TIMES: Bob Iger’s Disney comeback hampered by TV woes and box office flops
https://www.ft.com/content/4630ad12-6e4a-447f-9dce-ede3dc673f67?segmen
tId=b385c2ad-87ed-d8ff-aaec-0f8435cd42d9
Get fucked, Bob.
Everybody knows that YOU are the reason Disney is failing and your little Chapek stunt isn't fooling anybody.
--------------------------------------------------
How you do anything is how you do everything.
Bobby put all the wrong woke people in charge, now the Disney dollars are gone.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by whozit:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
FINANCIAL TIMES: Bob Iger’s Disney comeback hampered by TV woes and box office flops
https://www.ft.com/content/4630ad12-6e4a-447f-9dce-ede3dc673f67?segmen
tId=b385c2ad-87ed-d8ff-aaec-0f8435cd42d9
Get fucked, Bob.
Everybody knows that YOU are the reason Disney is failing and your little Chapek stunt isn't fooling anybody.
--------------------------------------------------
How you do anything is how you do everything.
Bobby put all the wrong woke people in charge, now the Disney dollars are gone.
--------------------------------------------------
How you do anything is how you do everything.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Aug 9, 2023 8:46am PT
Pixar President on ‘Elemental’s’ Unlikely Box Office Rebound: ‘This Will Certainly Be a Profitable Film’
Q: Will “Elemental” be profitable?
We have a lot of different revenue streams, but at the box office we’re looking at now, it should do better than break even theatrically. And then we have revenue from streaming, theme parks and consumer products. This will certainly be a profitable film for the Disney company.
Q: Is there a way to make these kinds of movies at a lower price point?
That’s a constant question. One of the ways you make these films for less money, and almost all of our competitors do this, is to do work offshore. It’s only us and Disney Animation that makes animation films in the U.S. anymore with all of the artists under one roof. We feel like having a colony of artists approach has differentiated our films. We hope to find a path to make that work. “Elemental” was particularly expensive because all the characters have visual effects. We had been getting the film costs down.
The other thing I’ll say about our film budgets is that our whole company exists only to make these films. So when we say a budget, that is everything it takes to run the whole company. Sometimes, the budgets [for other films] that get reported are physical production costs and don’t include the salaries of executives and things like that. Our budgets include all of that, so there’s some accounting context that gets lost. But that doesn’t mean they’re not expensive.
Q: What’s the biggest challenge right now in getting family audiences to theaters?
It’s expensive for a family to go to the movies. It can be a $100 afternoon for a family, and that can be a stretch for some to do. The other thing is that during COVID, we trained audiences to watch our movies on Disney+. I won’t say there was a lot of choice. For periods of time, it was the only thing we could do. We have a little work to unring the bell and motivate families to go to the theater and not wait a few months to see it on Disney+.
Q: Is there an ideal window between a film opening in theaters and moving to Disney+?
Thinking back historically, a summer movie would go to pay-per-view in autumn, which gave a three- or four-month window. That would be a traditional window that I’d love to see reestablished. We make our films for the big screen. We love for people to see them with an audience.
Q: Something that has always distinguished Pixar is that parents can enjoy these movies as much as their kids. Do you ever worry that Pixar films are too smart?
We always think about those things. I’m often surprised at how astute kids are at figuring out bigger ideas. Historically, our films have dealt with more sophisticated themes. We’ve tried to make them accessible to everyone in the audience. It’s something we’re constantly working on. We make a certain kind of film that does have ideas in it. We don’t want to stop doing that. But we obviously want audiences to go to theaters for our films.
More at https://variety.com/2023/film/news/pixar-elemental-box-office-rebound-
1235691248/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
We have a lot of different revenue streams, but at the box office we’re looking at now,Quote:And then we have revenue from streaming, theme parks and consumer products. This will certainly be a profitable film for the Disney company.
it should do better than break even theatrically.
Arguable, although I've said as much myself that this was the case back in late July if we're still going by the 2x Rule of thumb. I've commented at least twice about how impressive the late box office results were for this movie after it initially looked like it was going to be a major flop.
But Variety themselves have said that Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania lost Disney tens of millions of dollars, and with the 2.0x Rule of Thumb I have it as a $60+ Million winner. It was only when I went to 2.5x Rule of Thumb that it shows tens of millions lost.
At 2.5x, Elemental needs $500 Million to break even, and as admirable as its suprise comeback was, it's still over $75 Million short of that and will never hit that while in the theaters.
As far as streaming goes, Pixar may see some money for it being on Disney+, but that would essentially just be Disney paying itself. Disney lost a GIANT source of revenue when it stopped licensing out its property for streaming on other services only to show it on their own service which is loosing hundreds of millions of dollars every quarter.
Merchandising is basically flat-lined for Disney in current year. Nobody is buying toys from any Disney properties.
Quote:
The other thing I’ll say about our film budgets is that our whole company exists only to make these films. So when we say a budget, that is everything it takes to run the whole company. Sometimes, the budgets [for other films] that get reported are physical production costs and don’t include the salaries of executives and things like that. Our budgets include all of that, so there’s some accounting context that gets lost. But that doesn’t mean they’re not expensive.
That's not an excuse. If you have a different scenario that you're operating under than other studios and you're making the claim that everybody else out there isn't doing this (I don't believe that), then you need to downsize your company. Particularly those million dollar per year plus executives who are making all the bad decisions.
Elemental, at best, breaks even here and makes a few bucks with no merchandising bumps and streaming being a losing proposition for Disney, at least for the foreseeable future.
The only way Pixar makes money in the future is to lower the budget for their movies any way possible, or gets back to making Billion Dollar movies. PR statements such as this article are a way to calm investors short-term, but without fixing the core issues it's not going to make your problems go away.
--------------------------------------------------
How you do anything is how you do everything.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
