Biden
POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Monday, August 31, 2026 21:54
VIEWED: 53741
PAGE 75 of 90
Judges were ruling on voting and vote-counting procedures, dimwit. NOT on the disinformation and censorship campaign waged on behalf of Biden*. And since the DOJ, FBI, and CIA were in on it, you think they're going to out themselves?
Meanwhile...
Quote:
Over Two Thirds Of Voters, 43% Of Democrats Say Biden Not Physically Or Mentally Fit Enough; New Poll Finds
An NBC News poll has found that 68 percent of voters, including 43 percent of Democrats, are “concerned that Joe Biden does not have the necessary mental and physical health to be president.”
MORE AT https://summit.news/2023/06/26/poll-more-than-two-thirds-of-voters-43-
of-democrats-say-biden-not-physically-or-mentally-fit-enough/
57pct of Dems are dummies on this topic.
Don't worry, there is an equal percentage of Republicans that are dummies on other topics. Try not to be a dummy of either party.
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Judges were ruling on voting and vote-counting procedures, dimwit. NOT on the disinformation and censorship campaign waged on behalf of Biden*. And since the DOJ, FBI, and CIA were in on it, you think they're going to out themselves?
Also, they did not investigate the en masse mail-in-fraud and ballot harvesting that took place under new Covid rules in blue states and swing states.
Too bad for Democrats because it appears that Republicans and Trump have embraced their cheating apparatus and will now be using it against Democrats and do it better going forward.
They were warned.
--------------------------------------------------
Growing up in a Republic was nice... Shame we couldn't keep it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
another article that could belong in this thread, the 'justice for me but not for thee' thread, or any number of threads about DOJ/ FBI/ CIA/ DNC/ Biden* rot
:
Quote:blocked by...?
Was Garland Lying? New York Times Confirms Weiss Was Blocked From Bringing Additional Charges [against hunter biden]
Wednesday, Jun 28, 2023 - 09:05 AM
Authored by Jonathan Turley,
I recently wrote a column entitled “Who is Lying? Merrick Garland or the Whistleblowers?” after the allegations of IRS whistleblowers and the categorical denial of Attorney General Merrick Garland on the Hunter Biden investigation.
I noted that it would not be a difficult question to answer given the highly specific account of the whistleblowers of meetings, including witnesses.
Now the New York Times has confirmed one of the key allegations. While the newspaper buried the major fact in the 21st paragraph of the story, it confirmed that U.S. Attorney David Weiss did attempt to bring additional charges in California and D.C. but was blocked.
Quote:
Many have observed that the placement of the disclosure in the Times is a classic example of “burying the lede.” If this were Bill Barr, the confirmation of the story would have been a banner headline. Instead, the confirmation is found in with the baggage 21 cars down the train. That is where you will find this bombshell:
“But in mid-2022, Mr. Weiss reached out to the top federal prosecutor in Washington, Matthew Graves, to ask his office to pursue charges and was rebuffed, according to Mr. Shapley’s testimony. A similar request to prosecutors in the Central District of California, which includes Los Angeles, was also rejected, Mr. Shapley testified. A second former I.R.S. official, who has not been identified, told House Republicans the same story. That episode was confirmed independently to The New York Times by a person with knowledge of the situation
MORE AT https://jonathanturley.org/2023/06/28/was-garland-lying-new-york-times
-confirms-weiss-was-blocked-from-bringing-additional-charges/
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Biden officials blocked from colluding with Big Tech in major censorship case: Judge
by Haisten Willis, White House Reporter
July 04, 2023 02:46 PM
A federal judge has blocked contact between Biden administration officials and social media companies, ruling that the two were working together to censor speech.
The judge, Trump appointee Terry A. Doughty, made the preliminary injunction in response to a lawsuit from Republican attorneys general in Missouri and Louisiana that alleged government officials and social media companies collaborated to suppress speech based on content.
LET INDEPENDENCE DAY MEAN INDEPENDENT THOUGHT, NOT GROUPTHINK
"The Court has granted our motion to BLOCK top officials in the federal government from violating the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans," Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey tweeted. "What a way to celebrate Independence Day." — Attorney General Andrew Bailey (@AGAndrewBailey) July 4, 2023
The suit stems largely from efforts made during the pandemic to address social media posts related to COVID-19 policy. The attorneys general accused the Biden administration of creating a sprawling federal "Censorship Enterprise," the Washington Post reported, encouraging Big Tech companies to remove disfavored speech.
The pair called it “the most egregious violations of the First Amendment in the history of the United States of America.”
While the judge hasn't made a final ruling, he said the plaintiffs had produced evidence of a "massive effort" from the White House and federal agencies to "suppress speech based on its content." Doughty allowed for exceptions to the communication block, including national security threats and criminal activity.
Collaboration between the government and Big Tech during the pandemic has been controversial for years now.
In one famous exchange, then-White House press secretary Jen Psaki said in July 2021 the administration was "flagging problematic posts for Facebook," leading a reporter to ask how long the administration had been spying on people's profiles.
In subsequent Twitter posts, Bailey said the injunction prohibits nearly all of the federal government, including the Department of Justice, Department of Health and Human Services, and Department of Homeland Security, from colluding with social media companies and prevents key officials from participating.
MORE AT
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/judge-blocks-biden
-officials-collude-big-tech-censorship
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
Loving America is like loving an addicted spouse - SIGNYM
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
This is great news.
Fuck Joe Biden*.
--------------------------------------------------
How you do anything is how you do everything.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Judges were ruling on voting and vote-counting procedures, dimwit. NOT on the disinformation and censorship campaign waged on behalf of Biden*. And since the DOJ, FBI, and CIA were in on it, you think they're going to out themselves?
Meanwhile...
You obviously don't realize how stupid you look when you post the DOJ, FBI, and CIA were involved in stealing an election. Or for that matter, being behind a Hunter Biden coverup. Trump put the heads of these agencies in place. They're his people.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Judges were ruling on voting and vote-counting procedures, dimwit. NOT on the disinformation and censorship campaign waged on behalf of Biden*. And since the DOJ, FBI, and CIA were in on it, you think they're going to out themselves?
Meanwhile...
Don't worry, there is an equal percentage of Republicans that are dummies on other topics. Try not to be a dummy of either party.
Again, if you'd paid attention when this was going down, you'd know that in those 60 cases allegations of fraud were not presented to any of the judges.
That is because Trumps lawyers knew if they filed false charges in court it would lead to their disbarment. So, none of what they said outside the courtrooms was presented as fact inside.
Your so funny comrade.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Facing possible disbarment, pro-Trump lawyer files for retirement
L. Lin Wood may not be a household name in much of the country, but when it comes to the radical legal fights that followed Donald Trump’s defeat in 2020, Wood was a central figure that stood out for his conspiratorial litigation.
The Republican lawyer has faced some consequences for his antics, including facing court-imposed sanctions, but as a Daily Beast report recently summarized, Wood continues to face difficulties on multiple fronts.
L. Lin Wood became a key promoter of election fraud myths shortly after the 2020 presidential election and helped Donald Trump’s team unsuccessfully challenge the election results in court. Since those failed challenges, Wood has faced his own legal trouble. A trio of former colleagues sued him in Georgia, accusing him of bizarre behavior and breach of contract. The Georgia Bar held a disciplinary trial for Wood in May while it weighs whether to disbar him. Earlier that month, a Michigan attorney regulatory agency filed a misconduct case against Wood and colleagues for their election fraud lawsuits. And [in June], a former ally in the QAnon world filed suit against Wood, accusing him of defamation.
It was against this backdrop that the controversial attorney took a step yesterday to address one of those problems: Wood sent a letter to the State Bar of Georgia, asking that he be allowed to transfer to “retired status,” effective immediately. This would permanently prohibit him from practicing law again in the state.
It would also, of course, preempt the disciplinary process that might lead to Wood’s disbarment.
While we wait to see if his retirement request is approved, Wood is not the only pro-Trump lawyer facing such a dilemma. John Eastman, who played a leading role in the scheme to try to keep Trump in power despite his defeat, is currently facing 11 disciplinary charges in the State Bar Court of California, and it’s entirely possible that he’ll soon be disbarred.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/facing-possible-di
sbarment-trump-lawyer-files-retirement-rcna92652
And then there were some of Trumps lawyers who took the lie of election fraud too far indeed.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
US Supreme Court Overrules Biden’s $400bn Student Debt Cancellation Plan
https://www.channelstv.com/2023/06/30/us-supreme-court-overrules-biden
s-400bn-student-debt-cancellation-plan/
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME