Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
POSTED BY: captaincrunch
UPDATED: Sunday, September 6, 2026 21:09
VIEWED: 562266
PAGE 348 of 1104
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Signym, where did you get the idea that Russians make competent soldiers?
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Anyone who predicates their argument with "200,000 Russian dead" is a retard.
SECOND-RATE, where did you get the idea that the western military is honest?

The BBC independently estimates Russian dead in the realm of 25,000. Compared to Kiev's estimated deaths of 100,000- 200,000 soldiers.
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Words don't persuade Russians, therefore the Ukrainians switched to bullets and explosives. Whichever side is best at hitting their targets will win with the most persuasive argument.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Signym, where did you get the idea that Russians make competent soldiers?
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Anyone who predicates their argument with "200,000 Russian dead" is a retard.
SECOND-RATE, where did you get the idea that the western military is honest?
The BBC independently estimates Russian dead in the realm of 25,000. Compared to Kiev's estimated deaths of 100,000- 200,000 soldiers.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I guess that means Russia's already winning, since they're hitting a lot more targets than Kiev.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Anyone who predicates their argument with "200,000 Russian dead" is a retard.
SECOND: Signym, where did you get the idea that Russians make competent soldiers?
SIGNY: SECOND-RATE, where did you get the idea that the western military is honest?
The BBC independently estimates Russian dead in the realm of 25,000. Compared to Kiev's estimated deaths of 100,000- 200,000 soldiers.
SECOND: Words don't persuade Russians, therefore the Ukrainians switched to bullets and explosives. Whichever side is best at hitting their targets will win with the most persuasive argument.
Unless the west resorts to nuclear weapons, Russia will win.
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Anyone who predicates their argument with "200,000 Russian dead" is a retard.
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
We've got a couple of retards on this board.
One of them doesn't even acknowledge the other exists, while that one constantly begs the other for just a scrap of attention.

--------------------------------------------------
Growing up in a Republic was nice... Shame we couldn't keep it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The only country threatening to use nuclear weapons is Russia, so you don't even comprehend that. I get the feeling you misunderstand that Russia invaded Ukraine, rather than the other way around, although Russians did say Ukraine invaded them. Russia could stop being confused and could declare victory at any time and go home but doesn't because Putin's life and fortune hang by a weak thread. If Russia goes home without an obvious win, Putin loses his job.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I guess that means Russia's already winning, since they're hitting a lot more targets than Kiev.
Unless the west resorts to nuclear weapons, Russia will win.
Russia tells BBC “we did not invade Ukraine” and there is “no war” there
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:The only country threatening to use nuclear weapons is Russia, so you don't even comprehend that.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I guess that means Russia's already winning, since they're hitting a lot more targets than Kiev.
Unless the west resorts to nuclear weapons, Russia will win.
There's only one country that ever did use nuclear weapons.
You don't have to say you're going to use them to threaten their use. Simply having them in the first place IS the threat.
--------------------------------------------------
Growing up in a Republic was nice... Shame we couldn't keep it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:There is a reason why the US does NOT threaten people with nukes and Russia still does, even in the last week. The US is well aware that the deaths are NOT limited to the few hundred thousand in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Russians are totally oblivious to the over a million deaths they caused with their atmospheric nuclear tests.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
There's only one country that ever did use nuclear weapons.
You don't have to say you're going to use them to threaten their use. Simply having them in the first place IS the threat.
Approximately 2.4 million people died from cancer as a result of atmospheric testing globally. In the United States, which conducted almost half of all nuclear tests, a 2017 study estimated that fallout from nuclear testing contributed between 340,000 to 460,000 excess deaths from 1951 and 1973.
The Russians never paid any attention to those over a million deaths the Russians caused, which is why the blithering Russian idiots keep threatening to nuke the world. If you weren't as ignorant as a Russian, you would know this, 6ix.
https://www.gcsp.ch/global-insights/75-years-later-nuclear-weapons-sti
ll-kill
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
SECOND, if Russia based nuclear missiles in Cuba, Mexico, Nicaragua and Canada, would that to be a threat?
U.S. Nuclear Weapons in Europe
https://armscontrolcenter.org/fact-sheet-u-s-nuclear-weapons-in-europe/
Biden’s Nuclear Strike Policy Is the Same as Russia’s
https://theintercept.com/2022/04/11/nuclear-weapons-biden-russia-strik
e-policy/
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:There is a reason why the US does NOT threaten people with nukes and Russia still does, even in the last week. The US is well aware that the deaths are NOT limited to the few hundred thousand in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Russians are totally oblivious to the over a million deaths they caused with their atmospheric nuclear tests.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
There's only one country that ever did use nuclear weapons.
You don't have to say you're going to use them to threaten their use. Simply having them in the first place IS the threat.
Approximately 2.4 million people died from cancer as a result of atmospheric testing globally. In the United States, which conducted almost half of all nuclear tests, a 2017 study estimated that fallout from nuclear testing contributed between 340,000 to 460,000 excess deaths from 1951 and 1973.
The Russians never paid any attention to those over a million deaths the Russians caused, which is why the blithering Russian idiots keep threatening to nuke the world. If you weren't as ignorant as a Russian, you would know this, 6ix.
Yeah. The problem here is that I and/or the Russians are ignorant of nuclear fallout.
Quote:
There is a reason why the US does NOT threaten people with nukes and Russia still does, even in the last week. The US is well aware that the deaths are NOT limited to the few hundred thousand in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Russians are totally oblivious to the over a million deaths they caused with their atmospheric nuclear tests.
And as for that part, no. That isn't the fucking reason. We're the military power of the world, and even though we have less nukes than Russia, that's just a technicality since both of us have enough to destroy the planet many times over.
I don't even believe that anybody with any authority has threatened nuclear missile use, and even if they did I could hardly blame them with how the media, the Biden* admin, NATO and the NATO thralls in Europe are CEASELESSLY antagonizing Russia.
You're a dumb fucking goon that is bereft of any sense of logic.
Go find some place where you can talk to people as stupid as you are.
Your nonsense doesn't fly here.
--------------------------------------------------
Growing up in a Republic was nice... Shame we couldn't keep it.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I've seen the movies and read the books about the Cuban Missile Crisis. Kennedy kept a big secret that changes the whole meaning of the crisis:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
SECOND, if Russia based nuclear missiles in Cuba, Mexico, Nicaragua and Canada, would that to be a threat?
U.S. Nuclear Weapons in Europe
https://armscontrolcenter.org/fact-sheet-u-s-nuclear-weapons-in-europe/
Biden’s Nuclear Strike Policy Is the Same as Russia’s
https://theintercept.com/2022/04/11/nuclear-weapons-biden-russia-strik
e-policy/
The Jupiter Missiles and the Endgame of the Cuban Missile Crisis: A Matter of “Great Secrecy”
https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/jupiter-missiles-and-endgame-cu
ban-missile-crisis-matter-great-secrecy
The proper response from Kennedy to missiles in Cuba should have been DO NOTHING. THREATEN NO ONE. What difference does it make if the Russian nuke that hits Miami came from Cuba or from a Russian submarine in the Atlantic or even from Russia? No difference but few minutes flight time. Apparently, Russians don't understand that Russia can be nuked from anywhere and Ukraine is not special. Kennedy didn't understand about missile launch distance making no difference, either.
During the Cuban Missile Crisis, General Curtis LeMay was in the room. He wanted to nuke Cuba because of missiles in Cuba. LeMay was NOT sane. He ran as VP with George Wallace the Super Racist. LeMay wanted to nuke Vietnam. He wanted to nuke Korea. Actually did nuke Japan. LeMay was not a sane man, but he made Kennedy look sane and wise and calm in comparison.
Russia has its own Curtis LeMays, which is too bad for Russia, and its own rich playboys like the Kennedys pretending to have level heads, but Kennedys were not level-headed. They were excitable little men almost daily committing adultery because they were immature and needed constant stimulation, either with sex or with international crises they caused. Thank Kennedy for the assassination of South Vietnam's President Ngo Dinh Diem when you see Kennedy in hell.
Too bad for Russia that it has Putin, another immature playboy like Kennedy who needs constant sexual stimulation and international crises to feel alive. At least Putin's not a drunk like Boris Yeltsin. Being an alcoholic would be too many behavioral flaws in Putin. He wouldn't be able to function, just like Yeltsin wasn't functioning toward the end.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_LeMay#Vice_presidential_candidacy
,_1968
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME