NOTICE TO HAKEN: Second's Death Threats, Assassination Attempt Fantasies, Violent Posts, and other toxic behavior
POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Friday, June 21, 2024 04:25
VIEWED: 4010
PAGE 2 of 4
Quote:How is your campaign going with Haken to have me banned from fireflyfans.net? No progress yet?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
July 14th, 2022: Death threat against President Trump
https://archive.ph/pWizO
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
I think you should be more energetic. 6ix, call the Secret Service and have them investigate me. Here are the Field Office numbers:
https://www.secretservice.gov/contact/field-offices
Call today. There will be a Secret Service Agent to answer your call 24hours/7days per week. Don't wait. Trump is about to announce his candidacy, which could set off a wave of attempted assassinations:
Report: Trump to Terrorize Nation With 2024 Announcement Soon
If you lived through the years 2016 to 2020, you probably know that there are no fewer than 827,995,126 reasons why Donald Trump should never be allowed to be president again, including but in no way limited to: his penchant for extortion, his total disregard for human life, his affection for murderous authoritarians, and his history of unleashing fascist mobs on America when things don‘t go his way. Unfortunately, in February 2021, Republican senators chose not to bar him from ever holding office again, despite some of those senators admitting publicly that Trump was “practically and morally responsible” for the violent insurrection that took place the prior month. Which leaves us in our current hell-state, in which the former guy is apparently planning to announce a bid for 2024 soon.
NBC News reports that Trump is “bored at Mar-a-Lago and anxious to get back in the political arena—as a candidate, not a kingmaker,” according to advisers who are “divided over whether he should launch a third bid for the presidency as early as this summer.” (Trump, of course, found 99% of the job of being president hugely boring, particularly the daily briefings he ignored. But apparently he can only remember the parts of the gig he enjoyed, like shredding documents and exploiting the office for personal gain and revenge on his enemies.)
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/06/donald-trump-2024-election-ann
ouncement
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
How is your campaign going with Haken to have me banned from fireflyfans.net? No progress yet?
I'll answer that question with one that I asked you on July 21st of 2021 that you never answered:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
If you want to send a message to Haken, use the "SEND ME A MESSAGE" link, which is a direct prayer link to the God of fireflyfans.net, at http://www.fireflyfans.net/profileshow.aspx?u=739
What's the worst that could happen? Haken deletes you? After deletion, you will live on, 6ixStringJack, at least in our memory as an obnoxious whiny little Trumptard.
Things didn't actually turn out the way you imagined they would when "God" finally intervened, did they?
Quote:
I think you should be more energetic. 6ix, call the Secret Service and have them investigate me.
We've already had this conversation. I'll have everything logged and archived if anything does happen.
I don't need to be any more energetic than I'm being right now.
Eventually you'll go and get your Second profile banned just like you got your Reaverfan sockpuppet banned.
Meanwhile, that's not going to help you in the long run if anything does happen to President Trump. You're already a person of interest.
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
August 4th, 2022: Death threat against President Trump
https://archive.ph/Yu3m5
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
August 23rd: Death threat against President Trump.
https://archive.ph/BN2Zi
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:“For years Republicans told us that they opposed abortion, and many people, frankly, did not believe them. But then the Supreme Court overturned Roe, and now Republicans are outlawing abortion even when a woman’s life is at risk, or when a child has been raped. They are prosecuting women and doctors.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
August 23rd: Death threat against President Trump.
https://archive.ph/BN2Zi
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
For years senior Republicans have been telling us they want to cut, privatize, or eliminate Social Security. We should believe them. This is not a joke.”
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"Trump will get two bullets in the back of the head." ~Second, August 23rd, 2022
Your right to post here should have already been revoked.
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:But it has NOT. What is your explanation for that NOT HAPPENING? That it is a mystery, 6ix?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
"Trump will get two bullets in the back of the head." ~Second, August 23rd, 2022
Your right to post here should have already been revoked.
The Trump Legal Team’s Inane, Circular Argument for Why He Can Never Be Prosecuted
A recent barrage of editorials argues that it’s too risky to democracy to criminally investigate a former president and the current leader of the Republican Party, even if said leader can’t seem to stop himself from breaking the law.
Ultimately, that argument boils down to: Trump should be granted impunity to do anything he wants no matter how criminal lest his supporters become angry, or unless you want to give a future Republican president free reign to retaliate against his political rivals. In his filing, Trump makes a version of this same argument, essentially saying: You can’t investigate me, it’s a midterm year and I might run for president.
Under the logic of the filing there is never an appropriate time to investigate, or ultimately, prosecute Trump for any criminal behavior, ever. The filing suggests the Department of Justice was wrong to pursue Trump, because it is corrupt to investigate him while he’s cooperating with a probe, or after he’s failed to cooperate (if it’s too close to a midterm election), or so long as he is threatening to run for office ever again.
The motion even puts it in a manner that dubiously overstates Trump’s political strength. It would read as ironic if the Trump team had any self-awareness:
"Politics cannot be allowed to impact the administration of justice. President Donald J. Trump is the clear frontrunner in the 2024 Republican Presidential Primary and in the 2024 General Election, should he decide to run. Beyond that, his endorsement in the 2022 mid-term elections has been decisive for Republican candidates." - Trump's lawyers
You see, Trump might decide to run for president, and according to his own lawyers, he’s a shoo-in for victory if he does. Also, he’s made a bunch of endorsements in the 2022 midterm primaries, and many of them have panned out (even if others have imploded spectacularly). Therefore, ipso facto, you can never investigate or prosecute him, even for refusing to comply with a lawful subpoena and turn over “scores” of classified documents, some of which were classified under the highest security level, because justice should not be corrupted by politics. Game, set, match. Donald Trump will be in politics forever!
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
"Trump will get two bullets in the back of the head." ~Second, August 23rd, 2022
Your right to post here should have already been revoked.
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
Jezzus.
STILL???
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE someone poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:6ix is as silly as Trump and his lawyers:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
"Trump will get two bullets in the back of the head." ~Second, August 23rd, 2022
Your right to post here should have already been revoked.
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
Jezzus.
STILL???
Trump points to the statement from Attorney General Merrick Garland releasing the details of the Mar-a-Lago search warrant (which showed that a judge found probable cause that Trump violated the Espionage Act and obstructed justice) to prove that this is all political, and therefore he should get his documents back. Here’s what Trump’s team says of the fact that Garland said he approved the search warrant himself:
"This public statement is deeply troubling, given that President Donald J. Trump is the clear frontrunner in the 2024 Republican Presidential Primary and in the 2024 General Election, should he decide to run. The statement clearly suggests that the decision to raid Mar-a-Lago, a mere 90 days before the 2022 midterm elections, involved political calculations aimed at diminishing the leading voice in the Republican party, President Trump."
The motion further argues that Garland’s statement “stray from long-standing DOJ policy” by “confirming the existence of or otherwise commenting about ongoing investigations.”
It fails to mention that Garland’s statement came only after Trump announced the search himself and spent days spreading the lie that FBI agents may have “planted” materials at his residence. It also came after leading Republicans demanded “immediate” “transparency” from Garland, lest the search be considered a corrupt breach that required Congressional oversight. It’s a neat trick. Demand transparency and then when transparency is offered, call it political gamesmanship.
Funnily, in the same motion in which Trump’s attorneys lambasted the attorney general for talking about the raid publicly, they also demanded he do so some more, arguing “there is no basis for keeping information about the raid from the public.”
Heads Trump wins, tails everyone else loses.
What about if the DOJ had acted prior to this tense period entering the final stretch of the midterm election season? Would that have been OK with the president’s lawyers? No, that wouldn’t have worked either—because prior to now, Trump claims he “voluntarily cooperated with your every request.” (There’s even an entire section in the motion titled “President Donald J. Trump’s Voluntary Assistance.”)
Trump has not provided adequate voluntary assistance—as the New York Times reported on Monday, that cooperation did not extend to turning over “26 boxes, including 11 sets of material marked as classified, comprising scores of additional documents.” As the Times added: “One set had the highest level of classification, top secret/sensitive compartmented information.”
Could all of this have been a “breakdown in communications between President Trump’s representatives and the Government,” as the motion states? Perhaps it just wasn’t clear which documents marked “top secret/sensitive compartmented information” the government was interested in getting back?
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
What is being argued is a constitutional question and much narrower than what you present. I leave it to you to figure out what that is.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE someone poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME