January 6th Commission investigating coup attempt.
POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Sunday, August 23, 2026 23:24
VIEWED: 64657
PAGE 66 of 108
Quote:So, ummmm.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:No. You're still not getting it.
Originally posted by CAPTAINCRUNCH:Quote:Okay:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Obviously, you didn't understand my post at all.
Not at all surprising, considering I'm dealing with about 60 IQ points on your end.
Read it all again dummy. I don't have time to explain simple shit to assholes.
"no one is disputing that even after knowing that this crowd was dangerous, Trump still wanted to lead them to the Capitol."
Right! Trump lead an armed insurrection! You're finally seeing it. I guess I was surprised to see you agree with that.
Trump made a video that he posted to social media telling people that he loved them but it was time to go home. That video was almost IMMEDIATELY deleted by Social Media, right before he was banned off of it.
Trump wanted to get back there to stop the madness that the Legacy Media was egging on and that the Democrats were allowing by opening the doors (after not having security there when they were warned ahead of time), because he fucking knew what they were doing.
Trump did nothing wrong on January 6th.
There was no coup. There was no insurrection. There were a bunch of angry drunk rednecks there who were tired of the Democrat woke bullshit that is ruining everybody's lives, and it got out of hand because IT WAS ALLOWED TO. These people were not insurrectionists with a plan. Most of them couldn't even wipe their own asses when they were sober.
Fast forward to July 2022... It's the only fucking thing that Democrats have in their pocket right now.
And it's far from enough to keep them from being destroyed.
Nobody is disputing that Trump led a Time Travel Excursion to go Back In Time from his Rally, to the Nancy-planned and scheduled invitation to be ushered into the Capital?
And not one single scientist (or even Science Fiction writer) is objecting to the Physics calamity which ensues from such a large group of humans Travelling Backwards In Time?
"Nobody disputing" my a$$.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:Quote:WTF sex strike? Libtards want be having sex with Libtards? Or does sex strike mean something else?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:Yup.
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:
The resident Libtards here must really be getting terrified, having reality begin to Dawn on them, for they can do nothing now but sh!tflinging like monkeys.
Been a while since I've seen this much sh!tflinging around here. Maybe when Trump won they were too stupified to react.
That and the only things they can talk about are Russia and January 6th. Two topics that don't play at all outside of the rabid Leftoid circles of the Democratic Party.
They've already lost the Latino vote. They're well on their way to losing the black vote too.
I haven't seen Democrats this angry since Lincoln took the slaves from them.
And now they're claiming they're going on a sex strike? Good. These people shouldn't be breeding.
What more could sensible, reasonable, rational folk ask for?
But all of those Libtard Unicorn guns that shoot people might get frustrated from the sex thing and go on rampages.
And those Evil Republicans, taking away Slaves from Anti-Freedom Democrats.
I dunno. Some dumb shit that the pink haired potbelly Twitter vampire trolls came up with after SCOTUS threw out Roe v Wade.
Half of them weren't getting any before anyhow. The other half nobody should be having babies with.
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:So we'll have a rash of pink haired potbelly sluts killing folk now?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:I dunno. Some dumb shit that the pink haired potbelly Twitter vampire trolls came up with after SCOTUS threw out Roe v Wade.
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:Quote:WTF sex strike? Libtards want be having sex with Libtards? Or does sex strike mean something else?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:Yup.
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:
The resident Libtards here must really be getting terrified, having reality begin to Dawn on them, for they can do nothing now but sh!tflinging like monkeys.
Been a while since I've seen this much sh!tflinging around here. Maybe when Trump won they were too stupified to react.
That and the only things they can talk about are Russia and January 6th. Two topics that don't play at all outside of the rabid Leftoid circles of the Democratic Party.
They've already lost the Latino vote. They're well on their way to losing the black vote too.
I haven't seen Democrats this angry since Lincoln took the slaves from them.
And now they're claiming they're going on a sex strike? Good. These people shouldn't be breeding.
What more could sensible, reasonable, rational folk ask for?
But all of those Libtard Unicorn guns that shoot people might get frustrated from the sex thing and go on rampages.
And those Evil Republicans, taking away Slaves from Anti-Freedom Democrats.
Half of them weren't getting any before anyhow. The other half nobody should be having babies with.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:Quote:So we'll have a rash of pink haired potbelly sluts killing folk now?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:I dunno. Some dumb shit that the pink haired potbelly Twitter vampire trolls came up with after SCOTUS threw out Roe v Wade.
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:Quote:WTF sex strike? Libtards want be having sex with Libtards? Or does sex strike mean something else?
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:Yup.
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:
The resident Libtards here must really be getting terrified, having reality begin to Dawn on them, for they can do nothing now but sh!tflinging like monkeys.
Been a while since I've seen this much sh!tflinging around here. Maybe when Trump won they were too stupified to react.
That and the only things they can talk about are Russia and January 6th. Two topics that don't play at all outside of the rabid Leftoid circles of the Democratic Party.
They've already lost the Latino vote. They're well on their way to losing the black vote too.
I haven't seen Democrats this angry since Lincoln took the slaves from them.
And now they're claiming they're going on a sex strike? Good. These people shouldn't be breeding.
What more could sensible, reasonable, rational folk ask for?
But all of those Libtard Unicorn guns that shoot people might get frustrated from the sex thing and go on rampages.
And those Evil Republicans, taking away Slaves from Anti-Freedom Democrats.
Half of them weren't getting any before anyhow. The other half nobody should be having babies with.
Nah. Maybe one or two wack jobs that were already sick in the head. The rest of them will just masturbate a few more times a day.
The people on Twitter that talk all the shit are the least scary people you'll ever meet in real life. They spent their entire childhood being bullied outcasts and now the Leftoids created a safe space for them where they get to be the bullies.
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Anne Applebaum: If the January 6 Hearings Don’t Change Minds, Nothing Will
https://www.anneapplebaum.com/2022/06/29/if-the-january-6-hearings-don
t-change-minds-nothing-will/
Nothing will, sweetheart.
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Some peeps will fall for anything.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Anne Applebaum: If the January 6 Hearings Don’t Change Minds, Nothing Will
https://www.anneapplebaum.com/2022/06/29/if-the-january-6-hearings-don
t-change-minds-nothing-will/
Nothing will, sweetheart.
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony changed two lawyers' minds about indicting Donald Trump
Alan Z. Rozenshtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman write:
Until Tuesday, we had both publicly stated that the Department of Justice had insufficient evidence to indict former President Trump for his conduct on Jan. 6. Our conclusion, which we each came to independently, was largely grounded in First Amendment concerns about criminalizing purely political speech.
But Tuesday’s explosive testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson, a former aide to Trump’s chief of staff, Mark Meadows, changed our minds. In particular, Hutchinson testified to hearing Trump order that the magnetometers (metal detectors) used to keep armed people away from the president be removed: “I don’t fucking care that they have weapons, they’re not here to hurt me. They’re not here to hurt me. Take the fucking mags [magnetometers] away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here; let the people in and take the mags away.”
Admittedly, Hutchinson is only one witness, and it is true that some of her testimony would, in the context of a criminal trial, constitute hearsay. But Hutchinson—unlike many of her detractors who have contested certain details of her testimony—testified under oath and, contrary to the sneering commentary of the House Judiciary Committee GOP Twitter account, not all of Hutchinson’s second-hand remarks were introduced to establish the truth of the matter asserted. Even much of that portion of her testimony that did constitute hearsay might still be admissible under the relevant evidentiary rules.
These utterances by Trump (as alleged by Hutchinson) were not political speech. They serve as additional proof of intent and context, and—crucially—a material act to increase the likelihood of violence. This easily distinguishes Trump’s speech at the rally from other kinds of core political speech that should never be criminalized.
Continue reading at https://www.lawfareblog.com/cassidy-hutchinsons-testimony-changed-our-
minds-about-indicting-donald-trump
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
'All lies': Trump launches fresh attack on Cassidy Hutchinson
Taking to his Truth Social account early on Sunday morning, former president Donald Trump raged at the former senior aide to ex-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows over her testimony this past week that raised serious questions about his action on Jan 6th.
Earlier in the week Cassidy Hutchinson, under oath, told the House select committee investigating the Jan 6th insurrection that the former president was aware some of the rioters were armed and didn't care leading to questions about whether Trump could face seditious conspiracy charges.
Additionally, it was revealed that supporters of Trump tried to influence her testimony with veiled threats.
After several days of silence about Hutchinson, Trump fired off a fresh attack on Sunday, calling her a liar despite evidence backing up her assertions. In contrast, Trump did NOT provide evidence backing up his assertions.
More at https://www.rawstory.com/cassidy-hutchinson-2657602517/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:Quote:Some peeps will fall for anything.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Anne Applebaum: If the January 6 Hearings Don’t Change Minds, Nothing Will
https://www.anneapplebaum.com/2022/06/29/if-the-january-6-hearings-don
t-change-minds-nothing-will/
Nothing will, sweetheart.
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
Yeah. But it's all the same ones.
Really though, it's only half of the same ones. The only people who care about these sham hearings are the ones panicking because they know the Democratic Party is finished.
--------------------------------------------------
Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
