Mueller Investigation Is Over / Part two are the trials. Hey Jack, I Was Right. 20 Plus Russians Charged, 19 Of Trumps People Convicted of Felonies.
POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Monday, August 31, 2026 21:49
VIEWED: 129258
PAGE 145 of 157
lol
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Robert durst just died, right. Fake News said he was just convicted in Sept. For murder in 2000.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Robert Durst is an excellent example of a rich New York real estate baron who has been crazy since youth, but could get away with it because of his wealth.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Robert durst just died, right. Fake News said he was just convicted in Sept. For murder in 2000.
Robert Durst's brother said Robert "Treated me miserably. He would fight with me at every chance. He would embarrass me." Douglas said Robert would "like to murder me”, and he has not spoken to Robert since 1999.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Durst#Robert_Durst
Trump's niece, Mary Trump the psychiatrist, wrote about Donald's mental illnesses, but Donald has more inherited wealth than Robert Durst ever had and Donald has so far used that wealth more efficiently to avoid legal consequences from sociopathic behavior. Durst avoided prison for decades and Trump can do the same as long as he doesn't repeat Durst's mistake of confessing murder on TV.
Download free books about what a lunatic Trump is in his private life written by his psychiatrist niece. https://libgen.unblockit.how/search.php?req=Mary+L.+Trump
There are a few books about Robert Durst, compared to hundreds about Trump being crazy, but prosecutors don't read books. Instead, prosecutors write books after they fail to get a conviction.
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=robert+durst+book
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
lol
Trump's niece is mentally ill.
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So, when are the trials, again?
Or is SECOND's post an admission that they will never come?
Seems like a dead thread.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Opinion: Yes or no on Mueller report criminal charges? Don’t let Trump just run out the clock.
By Randall D. Eliason
February 7, 2022 at 4:47 p.m. EST
It's time for the Biden Justice Department to issue a report on the Mueller report.
There are multiple criminal investigations currently swirling around former president Donald Trump. The Justice Department is investigating the Jan. 6 riot in Washington and attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election, with Attorney General Merrick Garland vowing to pursue those criminally responsible “at any level.” Prosecutors in Georgia are investigating Trump’s alleged efforts to interfere with the election results in that state. New York prosecutors are investigating Trump and his businesses for potential fraud.
But nearly three years ago, special counsel Robert S. Mueller III presented an exhaustive report detailing almost a dozen instances of possible obstruction of justice by Trump in connection with the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. The five-year statute of limitations on the first such instance — Trump’s alleged request to then-FBI Director James B. Comey to drop the criminal investigation of disgraced former national security adviser Michael Flynn — expires on Feb. 14. Other acts of possible obstruction soon will be similarly time-barred.
The fate of Mueller’s report when it was released is by now a familiar story. The special counsel outlined damning evidence of Trump’s possible criminal acts. But he decided that in light of the Justice Department policy against indicting a sitting president, he would not make a “traditional prosecutorial judgment” about whether charges were justified. The report therefore did not accuse Trump of a crime, but pointedly noted that it also did not exonerate him.
William P. Barr, attorney general at the time, infamously spun Mueller’s findings before the report’s public release, announcing that his own review had concluded there was no obstruction. Once the full, redacted report was released, it became clear how misleading Barr’s summary had been. More than a thousand former federal prosecutors signed a letter saying the evidence would justify an indictment. Trump, on the other hand, maintained that the report was a “complete and total exoneration.”
It was a foregone conclusion that Barr’s Justice Department would not prosecute the president. But there were two other potential ways for Trump to be held accountable. One would have been for Congress to impeach him for obstruction of justice. But although it later impeached Trump for attempting to extort Ukraine and for the events of Jan. 6 at the U.S. Capitol, Congress chose not to do so based on the findings in the Mueller report.
The other possibility was that Trump could be charged with obstruction if he left office in 2021. In congressional testimony in 2019 about his report, Mueller noted that a sitting president could be indicted once he left office. Once Joe Biden was sworn in as president, there was no policy impediment to his Justice Department pursuing the obstruction charges.
But more than a year has passed, and we have heard nothing but crickets from Justice about the Mueller report. Admittedly, the department has been a little busy handling, among other things, the massive investigation into efforts to overthrow the election. But the clock is ticking on the potential obstruction charges outlined by Mueller. Is anyone at Justice watching that clock?
I’m not one who argues that Mueller presented a slam-dunk case. No one should underestimate how challenging it would be to prosecute Trump for obstruction. Some of the potential charges are stronger than others, but all of them would face significant legal and evidentiary hurdles. In light of those hurdles, prosecutors might reasonably conclude that Trump’s ultimately unsuccessful attempts at obstruction do not merit the political and constitutional turmoil that would result from the first criminal prosecution of a former president.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yes. Please. I agree.
Come out and finally tell all the Leftist idiots that you've got nothing and you never had anything.
You know that's not going to happen, Second.
Of course they're just going to let this fade into obscurity.
The Legacy Media and Democrats will never have to answer for what they've done, and you will never get closure.
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Shirley the Fake Trials will start in 2021.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The most famous example of never getting closure was Aaron Burr murdering Alexander Hamilton. What Burr did was illegal as hell in both New Jersey (where Burr shot Hamilton) and in New York (where Hamilton died). But neither New Jersey nor New York charged Burr with anything. Each state wanted the other to bring Burr to justice. The result? No justice. Burr kept right on being Burr, free as a bird.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Yes. Please. I agree.
Come out and finally tell all the Leftist idiots that you've got nothing and you never had anything.
You know that's not going to happen, Second.
Of course they're just going to let this fade into obscurity.
The Legacy Media and Democrats will never have to answer for what they've done, and you will never get closure.
Prosecutors are afraid of being humiliated by powerful defendants such as Burr. Or Trump. You practically have to put a gun to the head of a prosecutor to force them to drag a rich, powerful man into court and then jail. The exceptions? The rich man either confesses, or as in Jeffrey Epstein's case, the media does all the gathering of evidence, in which case prosecution is easy.
Only poor men, on the other hand, are what prosecutors want to prosecute because the poor can't fight back, which makes easy work for a prosecutor. Prosecutors almost always win those cases, while they lose cases very often against the rich and powerful. That is the beauty of the jury system. There is often some jackass jurors who won't convict a rich man with elegantly arguing attorneys defending him.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
By the way, after Aaron Burr got away with murdering Alexander Hamilton, Burr committed treason, but a jury ruled not guilty. He was guilty:
Almost no one in 1807 knew for sure what Burr had been up to on the frontier, but President Jefferson demanded that he be charged with treason—a crime punishable by death. (Burr had been Jefferson's V.P.) Burr and his team of lawyers—which included two former U.S. attorneys general—mounted a robust defense against the charges.
They argued that the definition of treason outlined in the Constitution required evidence of an “overt act” from the accused. When Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall ruled in favor of this interpretation of the law, the prosecution’s case crumbled. Burr had repeatedly spoken about various illegal schemes, but since he had been absent when his troops gathered on Blennerhassett’s island—the only “overt act” that could be proved—there was no evidence that he had picked up a rifle and fired it at a government official (taken up arms against the government). With this in mind, the jury found him not guilty of treason.
https://www.history.com/news/aaron-burrs-notorious-treason-case
Trump could use Aaron Burr's defense against treason. If it worked for Burr, it will work for Trump. Same with trying to steal an election -- unless Trump personally stuffed fake paper ballots into ballot boxes, he is "innocent". Same with obstruction of justice -- if Trump gave an order to an underling to fire Mueller than it is the underling, not Trump, who is obstructing justice. That assumes the underling follows Trump's orders but Trump's underlings ignored that fat bastard's repeated orders to fire Mueller. As for Trump's tax cheating -- that was the accountant, not Trump who cheated. Trump will go all the way to Supreme Court to prove that the accountant cheated and therefore Trump need not pay since the statute of limitations had expired. Since Trump has friends on the Supreme Court, as did Aaron Burr, that argument will win.
https://www.historytoday.com/archive/months-past/aaron-burr-arrested-t
reason
Trump’s attempt to fire Robert Mueller, explained. Trump ordered Mueller fired, but White House counsel Don McGahn defied him.
https://www.vox.com/2018/1/26/16934868/trump-fire-mueller-don-mcgahn
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME