From the Desk of Donald J Trump
POSTED BY: 6ixStringJack
UPDATED: Sunday, September 6, 2026 19:59
VIEWED: 18717
PAGE 10 of 39
Quote Trump
When the Broken Old Crow, Mitch McConnell, agreed to a two-month extension, he allowed the Democrats to get their act together and pass the $1.2 Trillion “Non-Infrastructure” Green New Deal Bill, which is a disaster for America in that only 11% of the money will be spent on REAL Infrastructure, with most being spent on Green New Deal nonsense, with big tax increases. Its actual cost is over $2 Trillion, but the bigger disaster is yet to come in the next, much larger version of the Green New Deal, which some people say will be $5 Trillion. This was all allowed by Mitch McConnell’s incompetence and now I understand that a couple Republican Senators may get on board so that they can have yet another and even bigger victory, for the Democrats, while at the same time ensuring massive Inflation and the destruction of our Country as we know it. This is what happens when you allow a guy who lost an Election to take over the Office of the President. He obviously had no mandate, but they’re changing our Country and everything it stands for. Mitch McConnell couldn’t stop the first Bill so 19 Senators, including himself, joined in. That’s what he does—if you can’t beat them, join them. If he wasn’t so stupid and didn’t give the two-month extension, he could have stopped it all. Now he and his RINO friends will allow a much bigger and far worse Bill to pass, ruining our Country while giving the Democrats a great political lift, all at the same time. People, with the help of the Fake News Media, have already forgotten about the horrendous Afghanistan withdrawal, an economy and jobs that are in shambles, and so many other things. The good news is, they can’t forget about Inflation because it’s hitting them right in the face. This is the Broken Old Crow’s fault. He could have won it all using the Debt Ceiling—they were ready to fold. Now the Democrats have a big victory and the wind at their back. McConnell is a fool and he damn well better stop their “Dream of Communism Bill” and keep his Senators in line, or he should resign now, something he should have done a long time ago. Use the Debt Ceiling like it should have been used, you Old Broken Crow, to do so would hurt our Country far less than this horrible Bill. Any Republican in the House or Senate who votes for this Bill will never ever get a Trump Endorsement. Thank you, and good luck!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quotes of President Trump
A very sad sight watching yesterday as the Taliban had a major Military parade displaying much of the $85 Billion of Military equipment the United States surrendered to them. The handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal was the greatest embarrassment in the history of our Country!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Repeated Lying About Lying
Donald Trump has been using his Big Lie method of simply endlessly repeating a Big Lie with his claim that last year's presidential election was "rigged" or "stolen". According to the latest poll I just saw on the order of 70% of Republicans accept his Big Lie.
But this practice seems to be spreading as figures who have not done this like Trump now seem to be imitating him. The latest is Hugh Hewitt, a conservative who is a columnist for WaPo and usually avoids this sort of flagrant lying. But he seems to have caught the bug.
I rarely listen to his radio show, but yesterday (Nov. 15) I inadvertently heard it when it was turned on for awhile and got quite an earful. He was repeating over and over and over way more times than I could count, "Everyone knows Adam Schiff is lying. Everyone knows Adam Schiff is lying..." It was weird, so many times without a break or explanation, and even after a break he did it again and again. It was obviously an effort to convince his listeners of something he knew they did not necessarily believe. Heck, near as I can tell, at least among most Dems and non-GOPs, Schiff has a very high level of credibility. I have always found him one of the most credible people in the entire Congress with a substantial grasp of a lot of fairly complicated information and never have seen him appear to knowingly lie.
So what had Hewitt on this binge of repeated lying? It was Schiff's response to the indictment of Ivan Danchenko by the John Durham, the Special Prosecutor appointed to the DOJ during the Trump era that Merrick Garland has left in place to do his thing. Danchenko has been indicted for lying to the FBI about who his sources of information were when he provided information to Steele of the famous Steele dossier. This is all part of a long running campaign by Trump allies to somehow discredit the Steele dossier, which Hewitt, following the likes of Sean Hannity and others on Fox News, described as "totally discredited" and "shown not to contain a shred of truth."
Well, first of all, Danchenko was not indicted for actually saying anything false to Steele, only lying about who his sources were to the FBI, a point Hewitt did not mention. Indeed, and I have checked on this numerous times after hearing some of the more perfervid claims against the Steele dossier, over 70% of it has been confirmed, with some of those confirmations actually in the Mueller Report. Most of it was/is true. Only about two items in it have been shown to be false, a claim that Cohen visited Prague and that Carter Page was going to get some huge sum of money from Gazprom. Otherwise, most of it has been found to be true, with some items still in the undetermined category. That latter includes its most notorious item, the infamous "golden shower" story about Trump, which seems increasingly likely to in fact also be true, given all the stuff that just seems to keep coming out about Trump, and which may be why so many of Trump's followers are so keen on just totally discrediting the whole dossier.
As for Schiff supposedly being disbelieved by "everyone," supposedly even including people like Nancy Pelosi according to Hewitt, the only evidence he seemed to supply for this is that Schiff's recent book has not been a bestseller, #357 on some list or other. That it is not a big seller is obviously not at all evidence one way or the other about whether what is in the book is accurate or not. It is evidence that people are not all that interested, and in fact at this point most people are not much interested in this leftover 2016 election stuff, which the Steele dossier is. But the Trumpistas are still desperate to somehow discredit that dossier, even as it has largely been verified. So Hewitt and his ilk are the ones making a big fuss about his latest indictment and trying to dump on Schiff for his showing the dossier is largely accurate, in an effort to stir their own base up. But not that many
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The fact is nobody has proved to this date whether Trump lost and Biden* won. Either is conceivably true.
Donald Trump has been using his Big Lie method of simply endlessly repeating a Big Lie with his claim that last year's presidential election was "rigged" or "stolen". According to the latest poll I just saw on the order of 70% of Republicans accept his Big Lie.
How can I say that an entire presidential election can be thrown in the US? Because it's happened before. The 2004 Bush/ Kerry presidential election had impossible (in ordinary terms) discrepancies between exit polls and vote counts. (Edison/ Mitofsky).
Quote:
https://www.datamation.com/trends/computer-experts-allege-u-s-vote-fra
ud/
A group of distinguished computer scientists and mathematicians, including nine Ph.D.s, says it has found statistical evidence that vote counts of the 2004 U.S. presidential election were tampered with in one or more states, affecting the outcome.
The discrepancies ... are worse in the U.S. than in one of two exit polls conducted during Ukraine’s recent national election, which resulted in the results being thrown out by that country’s Supreme Court last December.
And while the report didn't examine how it happened, the statistical anomalies point in a few likely directions.
Quote:
https://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/exit_polls_2004_edison-mitofsky.pdf
Exit Poll Discrepancies Rise with Concentration of Bush Voters
Very (their emphasis) Implausible Patterns of Exit Poll Participation Are Required to Satisfy E/M's data in 80-100% Bush Precincts.
The Same Exit Polls More Accurately Projected the Senate Races
And the 2004 election was a quite ordinary election, not held during a pandemic when procedures were being created on the fly.
One might even argue that the Bush/ Kerry election was also tampered with, since a complete recount of ALL votes in Florida would have narrowly decided for Gore; and the discrepancies between officially reported votes v re-counted votes only occurred in districts with electronic voting.
So the question isn't 'Is vote-rigging in US presidential elections that changes the vote outcome possible?'. The questions are 'How can we detect it?' and 'How can we prevent it?'.
And that leads to the CalTech/ MIT Voting Technology Project.
https://www.vote.caltech.edu/
https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/96641/WP%20118.pdf
One of the recommendations is that every vote be subject to statistical analysis, to validate the vote.
BTW there's a difference between data validation and data verification.
Verification is lower-level quality control that means that some check has been made to show that the data has been accurately recorded. A vote recount is data verification.
Data validation is a more comprehensive look, using a variety of tools, including statistical analysis, examination of chain-of-custody, etc, to ensure that the data is internally consistent with itself, externally consistent with known parameters, and legally defensible. For example, this would be a check for internal consistency: in a vote where 10 people voted for the democrat, 10 people voted for the republican, and 10 people voted for the 'other', one needs to show that the vote total is 30 - and not 10, or 50.
The CalTech/ MIT Voting Technology Project recommends that ALL votes be subject to verification, a procedure that hasn't happened to date, except incidentally in 2004.
And when it comes to voting technology itself, it found that
~ paper ballots
~ hand counted
~ in public
is THE most accurate technology and procedure for matching officially recorded votes to actual votes.
Just getting to that minimal point would eliminate many of the avenues for US election fraud that actually
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:1kiki and Kevin McCarthy proved that Trumptards have an exhaustible supply of bullshit:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
The fact is nobody has proved to this date whether Trump lost and Biden* won.
Leader Kevin McCarthy's 8.5 hour, Record Setting Speech Against Democrats' Socialist Spending Scam
Trump has own smaller supply of bullshit. Smaller because his fingers get tired quickly:
From the Desk of Donald J Trump
11/19/21
Great job by Kevin McCarthy last night, setting a record by going over 8 hours of speaking on the House Floor in order to properly oppose Communism. We must never forget what the Democrats have done, at the highest level of evil. If Mitch McConnell had fought, you would have a different Republican President right now.
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/news-fkdrf6uac70
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
What does this have to do with validating the currently unvalidated 2020 election?
OH! THAT'S RIGHT!
It's more of your trolling and bullshit!
Because you're a troll and non-stop liar! 
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Meanwhile, to get back to the topic of all claims about the 2020 election:
Quote:The fact is nobody has proved to this date whether Trump lost and Biden* won. Either is conceivably true.
Donald Trump has been using his Big Lie method of simply endlessly repeating a Big Lie with his claim that last year's presidential election was "rigged" or "stolen". According to the latest poll I just saw on the order of 70% of Republicans accept his Big Lie.
How can I say that an entire presidential election can be thrown in the US? Because it's happened before. The 2004 Bush/ Kerry presidential election had impossible (in ordinary terms) discrepancies between exit polls and vote counts. (Edison/ Mitofsky).
Quote:
https://www.datamation.com/trends/computer-experts-allege-u-s-vote-fra
ud/
A group of distinguished computer scientists and mathematicians, including nine Ph.D.s, says it has found statistical evidence that vote counts of the 2004 U.S. presidential election were tampered with in one or more states, affecting the outcome.
The discrepancies ... are worse in the U.S. than in one of two exit polls conducted during Ukraine’s recent national election, which resulted in the results being thrown out by that country’s Supreme Court last December.
And while the report didn't examine how it happened, the statistical anomalies point in a few likely directions.
Quote:
https://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/exit_polls_2004_edison-mitofsky.pdf
Exit Poll Discrepancies Rise with Concentration of Bush Voters
Very (their emphasis) Implausible Patterns of Exit Poll Participation Are Required to Satisfy E/M's data in 80-100% Bush Precincts.
The Same Exit Polls More Accurately Projected the Senate Races
And the 2004 election was a quite ordinary election, not held during a pandemic when procedures were being created on the fly.
One might even argue that the Bush/ Kerry election was also tampered with, since a complete recount of ALL votes in Florida would have narrowly decided for Gore; and the discrepancies between officially reported votes v re-counted votes only occurred in districts with electronic voting.
So the question isn't 'Is vote-rigging in US presidential elections that changes the vote outcome possible?'. The questions are 'How can we detect it?' and 'How can we prevent it?'.
And that leads to the CalTech/ MIT Voting Technology Project.
https://www.vote.caltech.edu/
https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/96641/WP%20118.pdf
One of the recommendations is that every vote be subject to statistical analysis, to validate the vote.
BTW there's a difference between data validation and data verification.
Verification is lower-level quality control that means that some check has been made to show that the data has been accurately recorded. A vote recount is data verification.
Data validation is a more comprehensive look, using a variety of tools, including statistical analysis, examination of chain-of-custody, etc, to ensure that the data is internally consistent with itself, externally consistent with known parameters, and legally defensible. For example, this would be a check for internal consistency: in a vote where 10 people voted for the democrat, 10 people voted for the republican, and 10 people voted for the 'other', one needs to show that the vote total is 30 - and not 10, or 50.
The CalTech/ MIT Voting Technology Project recommends that ALL votes be subject to verification, a procedure that hasn't happened to date, except incidentally in 2004.
And when it comes to voting technology itself, it found that
~ paper ballots
~ hand counted
~ in public
is THE most accurate technology and procedure for matching officially recorded votes to actual votes.
Just getting to that minim
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
QUOTE
Donald Trump
'
The Communist Democrats are engaging in yet another Witch Hunt, this time going after my Administration’s unprecedented and incredible coronavirus response, despite the fact that, sadly, more Americans have died this year from Covid than in all of 2020. It is a Witch Hunt that’s been going on for years. Why don’t they investigate Crooked Hillary, when so much has now been proven about her and her campaign’s lies and dealings with Russia to smear me and spy on my campaign? I’m telling Peter Navarro to protect executive privilege and not let these unhinged Democrats discredit our great accomplishments. The Witch Hunts must end!
'
45th President of the United States of America
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Trump said he received millions of votes that were not counted. He lied. And he has never stopped lying. Just so you know, 1kiki, all your subtle tricks and little asterisks behind Biden's name are completely worthless to Trump because he always wins and need not prove he won.
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Meanwhile, to get back to the topic of all claims about the 2020 election:
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/12/donald-trump/trumps-
tweet-about-27-million-deleted-votes-basele/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump won the election.
And now we get to sit back and watch the Democrat party destroy itself after stealing it.
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME