'Kyle did nothing wrong'? or the crimes of the Kenosha Shooter
POSTED BY: JAYNEZTOWN
UPDATED: Wednesday, September 18, 2024 14:44
VIEWED: 16337
PAGE 13 of 26
All 3 of the Rioters, Looters, arsonists were convicted criminals.
https://www.wisconsinrightnow.com/2021/03/12/kenosha-shooting/
Rosenbaum, the insane jerk who kicked it all off, raped 9-year-old boys in AZ.
Huber Had been charged with a collection of felonies: Recklessly Endangering Safety with Use of a Dangerous Weapon, Strangulation and Suffocation, False Imprisonment with Use of a Dangerous Weapon. He had a stack of violent repetitive Domestic Abuse charges, and he was Court Ordered to not possess weapons - so maybe he figured killing folk with a skateboard was OK.
One armed bandit Grosskreutz, the clown who pointed his handgun at Kyle to provoke Kyle to shoot him, was already convicted of being armed with a firearm while intoxicated in 2016.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I think the word choice was incorrect. I corrected it above.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:That's why you're a stupid and ignorant bitch.
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Not going to click on any of your Jack's links because ... you.
I didn't make the video. That unedited video has been around since the very day of the incident.
Good luck finding it on YouTube anymore where the Leftist Activists ban anyone who doesn'tfollowconform to the narrative. It's not being removed from Bitchute though.
Also, and aside, the total time elapsed from Ziminski firing behind Kyle, then shooting of attacker Rosenbaum, then firing at but not hitting another attacker,then getting bashed in the head with a skateboard by Huber and shooting him, and then firing at and missing another attacker, then Grosskreutz aiming his illegal handgun at Kyle and Kyle shooting him, was all of 16 seconds.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The only people who have reason to carry arms on the street are the police, the national guard, security guards, and criminals. Any other people carrying guns are lunatics. "Your boy with one arm" who had a gun was a criminal. Rittenhouse was a lunatic who will likely join the category of a criminal.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by second:
The Supreme Court Is About to Open the Door to a Lot More Kyle Rittenhouse Situations When Everything Is “Self-Defense” and everyone gets a gun.
Hey dickhead.
Your boy with one arm had a gun. Unlike Kyle's it was an illegal firearm.
In Texas, the noncriminals I know carrying guns think they are 007, James Bond. They are not. They are lunatics. Unlike 007, their marksmanship is poor and gets worse under stress, as does their judgement. Being frightened or angry and being sensible about targets does not go together.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Jack and J ... I've seen more videos than the 2 of you put together. There was MUTUAL gun-pointing going on. It's there - on undeniable video. I even posted a link that cleanly shows Rittenhouse pointing his AR at people. So who's the aggressor, and who's the defender? IT DEPENDS WHO STARTED IT. But all the videos show the end, and none show the beginning.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I have seen people who are slow and unsure about making big decisions in their own lives go to a gun store and purchase a weapon. Suddenly they feel powerful and capable of making quick life or death decisions for other people but they are no more capable than they were before making a gun purchase.
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Jack and J ... I've seen more videos than the 2 of you put together. There was MUTUAL gun-pointing going on. It's there - on undeniable video. I even posted a link that cleanly shows Rittenhouse pointing his AR at people. So who's the aggressor, and who's the defender? IT DEPENDS WHO STARTED IT. But all the videos show the end, and none show the beginning.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Republican Mark McCloskey, a candidate for the U.S. Senate in Missouri, was photographed Tuesday outside the Wisconsin courthouse where Kyle Rittenhouse was on trial for murder. McCloskey on Tuesday was photographed standing next to two men flashing an “OK” sign, which is associated with white supremacists. Rittenhouse was also photographed in January with two men as they made the “OK” sign with their hands. The judge in September ruled against allowing that to be discussed during Rittenhouse's trial.
McCloskey and his wife, Patricia, were both in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Monday and Tuesday to show support for Rittenhouse. The McCloskeys gained national attention after they waved guns at racial injustice protesters who were marching in their gated St. Louis subdivision last summer.
Mark McCloskey compared himself to Rittenhouse in a statement Tuesday, saying they have both been prosecuted and were defending themselves from an “angry mob.” McCloskey said he hopes the jury finds Rittenhouse not guilty.
The McCloskeys pleaded guilty in June to misdemeanor charges after waving guns at protesters and were ordered to pay fines, but Mark McCloskey left the courthouse defiantly pledging to “do it again” if faced with the same circumstances. Both McCloskeys were pardoned by Republican Missouri Gov. Mike Parson.
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/us-senate-candidate-mccloskey-sh
ows-support-for-rittenhouse/2686440/
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I'll bet all the jurors are buying guns after this.
They know that they're going to be murdered if they don't give the "right" verdict.
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:That is where the judge went livid.
Rittenhouse Attorneys Livid After Prosecutors Withheld High-Def Drone Footage, Gave Them "Compressed Version"
Wednesday, Nov 17, 2021 - 11:02 AM
Authored by Andrea Widburg via American Thinker (emphasis ours),
During the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, the prosecution argued that Kyle provoked the men who attacked him by waving his gun. To prove this, during the trial, the prosecution gave the defense fuzzy drone footage. There was a great deal of argument about what could be extrapolated from that fuzzy view. It turns out that the prosecution had within its possession a high-quality video that it played for the judge after the trial ended. On this, and other evidentiary grounds, the defense moved for a mistrial with prejudice. [With prejudice: no retrial possible]
Defense attorney Mark Richards gives his closing argument on Monday
The defense motion states the facts with sufficient clarity that I'm going to reprint them here verbatim:
On November 5. 2021, the fifth day of trial on this case, the prosecution turned over to the defense footage of a drone video which captured some of the incident from August 25, 2020. The problem is, the prosecution gave the defense a compressed version of the video. What that means is the video provided to the defense was not as clear as the video kept by the state. The file size of the defense video is 3.6 MB and the state's is 11.2 MB. Further, the dimensions on our video are 480 x 212, the state's, 1920 x 844. The video which was in the state's possession, wasn't provided to the defense until after the trial concluded. During the jury instructions conference, the defense played their version of the video for the court to review. The state indicated their version was much clearer and had their tech person come into court to have the court review their clearer video. The video is the same; the resolution of that video, however, was not. The state did not provide their quality video to the defense until Saturday, November 13, 2021, and only did so upon specific request by Attorney Wisco — two days before closing arguments and after the evidence had been closed.
Under Wisconsin law, when the defense makes a demand, the prosecution must provide to the defense "[a]ny physical evidence that the district attorney intends to offer in evidence at the trial" and "[a]ny exculpatory evidence." That's Wisconsin Stat. § 971.23(1)(g) & (h). I don't have the time to research the law, but my bet is that if Wisconsin's appellate court ever had before it the question of whether the prosecutor may get away with producing bastardized, degraded versions of the requested evidence, it would say emphatically not.
The motion for a mistrial with prejudice also raises the fact that, when Kyle Rittenhouse took the witness stand, the prosecutors improperly accused him of keeping silent after his arrest. That right, of course, is enshrined in the famous Miranda rights warning that all arrestees in America receive: "You have the right to remain silent ..." The corollary to that right is that this silence cannot be used against the defendant in a court of law, but that's exactly what the prosecution tried to do.
I'm going to add that, according to the video of the trial, prosecution's excuse for even bringing that up is that Rittenhouse only made a statement after having seen
Also, as an aside, in the process of turning our hardcopy evidence into digital, when we scanned it, we ALWAYS used the full-resolution setting (.tiff). .jpg and other file formats are c
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So, what does this all mean?
If prosecutors had a BETTER, higher resolution drone footage of the event showing that Rittenhouse was pointing his gun, why withhold it? Wouldn't it have bolstered their case, instead of forcing jurors to squint at a grainy image, trying to decipher what it showed? Or did the better video show people in the mob making threatening gestures as well?
And why would prosecutors go against the judge's EXPLICIT instructions not to bring up Rittenhouse's "right to remain silent" (as well as contravene the Constitution)?
Either the prosecution is unimagineably imcompetent, or they're deliberately setting up a for mistrial.
Their performance is puzzling, to say the least.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So, what does this all mean?
If prosecutors had a BETTER, higher resolution drone footage of the event showing that Rittenhouse was pointing his gun, why withhold it? Wouldn't it have bolstered their case, instead of forcing jurors to squint at a grainy image, trying to decipher what it showed? Or did the better video show people in the mob making threatening gestures as well?
And why would prosecutors go against the judge's EXPLICIT instructions not to bring up Rittenhouse's "right to remain silent" (as well as contravene the Constitution)?
Either the prosecution is unimagineably imcompetent, or they're deliberately setting up a for mistrial.
Their performance is puzzling, to say the least.
I'd just once again like to point out what I posted yesterday...
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Oh... and P.S. There is no such thing as "enhanced" video. Anybody saying that there is is lying to you. Stop watching stupid cop shows.
Fucking lying media. All they do is lie. Just got caught lying again.
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME