compilation of 2020 election and vote threads - please add any I missed - & misc posts
POSTED BY: 1KIKI
UPDATED: Tuesday, February 17, 2026 07:21
VIEWED: 9967
PAGE 7 of 15
Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
A link is required - because none of that was in the audit report.
Pertinent info starts at the 14:47 minute mark.
He also wraps it up by saying that this wasn't in the audit report.
So I guess the real question is why wasn't that in the audit report?
I'll let you answer that for yourself, but I think you'll probably come up with something that more or less echos my own.
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
As per the report, duplicates were detected and removed at the ballot level, through individual IDs and SNs given to each ballot, though there were a small number of distinct IDs that were duplicated, and an even smaller number of SNs that were duplicated.
The envelope image files may have been duplicated at the file level - it's easy to systematically and erroneously duplicate files en masse. And by his examples, CLEARLY there were a large number of duplicate image files. So that's a problem of version control. BTW I have no idea how Maricopa handled those blanks signature areas. Here in SoCal the poll workers are supposed to contact the people from whom the blanks envelopes were received (before the envelopes are opened and the ballots removed) so that those people could put their signatures on those envelopes.
But duplicate envelope files don't matter, since the Cyber Ninja vote count removed duplicates from the ballot tally. Assuming Cyber Ninjas did what they said they did, that pretty much removed the vast majority of presumed duplicates from the problem.
That leaves blanks and scribbles. If you agree that no envelopes with blanks or scribbles should have been counted, that leaves 1919 'no signature' envelopes and 2580 'scribble' envelopes. Assuming that they were all counted and they were all for Trump but were thrown towards Biden*, the 5004 invalid ballots (due to invalid envelopes) total makes no meaningful dent in the ~45,000 vote margin.
My guess is the envelope problem in terms of multiples and invalid ones weren't mentioned in the Cyber Ninja report because 1) Cyber Ninja removed all duplicate ballots, and 2) the remaining 'invalid' envelopes were too small a fraction of the total to be anything but within statistical error.
But obviously the rules need to be changed, because there are too many caveats and exceptions; and they also need to be uniformly enforced.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Just wanted to to say THANKS for posting the results of the Maricopa County audit by Cyber Ninjas.
I've been sort of bird-dogging the issue and was waiting for the conclusion. But life intervened, so when I saw the headline in my inbox I was waaaay to busy to post it, but you saved me the trouble.
Thanks again!
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It all sounds like a scam to me.
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
If it's all a scam, then Cyber Ninjas is in on it.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
More than just election fraud stuff here, from Judicial Watch:
Judicial Watch Sues DOJ for Answers About its Challenge to Georgia’s Voter Integrity Bill
For years we have reported on Democrats blocking efforts to make elections honest. Not surprisingly, the problem continues under Joe Biden.
The latest battlefield is Georgia. We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice for records of communications between the DOJ and various left-wing groups and individuals concerning the DOJ’s decision to challenge Georgia’s election integrity law (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:21-cv-02427)).
We filed the lawsuit on September 15, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, after the DOJ failed to respond to a July 26, 2021, FOIA request to the Justice Department’s Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division for the following records:
All documents and communications between (1) the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, or any of their officers, employees, members, agents, or affiliates, and (2) any of the following people and organizations, including any of their officers, members, agents, parent organizations, affiliated entities, branches, subordinate organizations, or chapters, concerning the U.S. Department of Justice’s Voting Rights Act Section 2 lawsuit against the State of Georgia, et al., in the Northern District of Georgia, Civ. No. 21-2575:
ACLU Foundation of Georgia, American Civil Liberties Union, League of Women Voters, Brennan Center for Justice, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Common Cause, NAACP, Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Campaign Legal Center, Fair Fight, Fair Fight Action, Stacy Abrams, Perkins Coie LLP, Marc Elias.
The Justice Department’s lawsuit challenging Georgia’s election law asks the court to strike down major parts of the act, including strengthened voter ID requirements for voting by mail.
The leftists who control the Justice Department have a long record of working hand in glove with extremist and partisan interest groups who oppose any efforts to make it harder to steal votes and elections.
A week after the DOJ filed its lawsuit against Georgia, on July 1 of this year, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld two Arizona voting provisions that Democrats and civil rights groups had challenged as disproportionately burdening minority voters. We and the Allied Educational Foundation filed amici curiae (friends of the court) briefs in support of Arizona’s law. The court’s decision is what I called a knockout blow to the Left’s tsunami of harassing lawsuits challenging virtually any effort by any state to modestly increase the security of elections and minimize the impact of voter fraud.
In response to the Supreme Court ruling, the Left appears to have become desperate to short circuit the efforts of states to implement security measures such as voter ID.
We remain front and center in the fight for clean elections, from our historic election integrity victory in L.A. County, to the current election-related lawsuits in North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Colorado. Attorney Robert Popper is the director of our clean elections initiative.
In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld a voter-roll cleanup program that resulted from our settlement of a federal lawsuit with Ohio. Kentucky began cleaning up hundreds of thousands of old registrations in 2019 after it too entered a consent decree in 2018 to end another of our lawsuits.
Based on this research, in 2020, a federal court ordered the State of Maryland to produce complete voter registration records for Montgomery County that include the registered voters’ dates of birth.
In September 2020, we filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Illinois Conservative Union (ICU) and three of its officers, after Illinois state officials refused to allow them to obtain a copy of the state’s voter registration database. In June 2021, a federal court ruled the lawsuit could proceed.
After years of litigation, it is hard not to
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I had mentioned in another thread, but will also do so here:
https://electionfraud20.org/
And then from this link:
https://electionfraud20.org/fraud-summary-by-state/arizona/
What I was going to quote has changed, but there is lots of great info there.
Also, kudos to those citizens performing the citizen audit canvass.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
If it's all a scam, then Cyber Ninjas is in on it.
Why not.
I have no reason to trust them.
Do you?
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Belief is for religious people, as is adamant non-belief. They're both beliefs, just in different directions.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yup.
Been watching your religion on display regarding Covid since April of last year.
That's a pretty big congregation you've got there.
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME