new deadly human-to-human-transmissible coronavirus emerges out of China
POSTED BY: 1KIKI
UPDATED: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 22:21
VIEWED: 203741
PAGE 249 of 283
As to this post:
Quote:I looked everywhere for information about that. The only thing I came up with is this:
And yet the vaccination cards that will be issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other public health agencies worldwide will make enforcing that norm a challenge.
Quote:and this:
Keeping Your Vaccine Records Up to Date
How to Locate Your Vaccination Records
Unfortunately, there is no national organization that maintains vaccination records. The CDC does not have this information. The records that exist are the ones you or your parents were given when the vaccines were administered and the ones in the medical record of the doctor or clinic where the vaccines were given.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/adults/vaccination-records.html
Quote:... which indicate that the CDC is NOT keeping a COVID-19 vaccination 'database', and definitely NOT issuing 'cards'. I don't necessarily believe this just because its been posted. But it should be easy enough to check out if anyone has the time and is willing to spend the effort to track at least one chain of information down to its end. Probably the most telling circumstance would be at a mass vaccination site. That would be a place where there could be a lot of phony driver's licenses or other ID's, and a really poor environment to do due diligence. If databasing COVID-19 vaccinations is going to fail, I think it'd fail there.
What to do if you lose your COVID-19 vaccine card
Go back to where you got inoculated if you misplace your paper card.
The CDC is not collecting information on who received COVID-19 vaccines, meaning the paper card also works as proof that you've gotten your shot.
https://news.yahoo.com/lose-covid-19-vaccine-card-151700052.html
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Yes, because ASKING people to imagine something and how they might feel is imposing guilt.
Here's your post:
Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
I think 'guilt' only works if people recognize a truth in it. I would feel guilty if I decided to just not care about COVID-19, and then I carried COVID-19 to a vulnerable person who subsequently had serious consequences - death, an ICU ordeal, or even a mild case followed by long COVID. Because, well, I would be guilty of doing that - of causing harm to others through my choices.
How about you?
Don't play games with me. I'm not some idiot like Ted. That post was pure manipulation that said a lot without needing to say it.
"Well I for one would feel guilty about that. Any person who wasn't a total piece of shit would feel guilty about that. How about you? Are you a piece of shit?"
Fuck right off with your guilt trip.
Quote:
So much for you being able to discuss ... anything. Let alone you being honest in your postings.
Telling you that I don't believe a single person died of Covid wasn't honest enough for you?
Quote:
But fwiw I see a lot of the emotional trauma that your mommy dearest put you through. I imagine she made you feel guilty if your brother was having a rough time neurologically. And maybe she even beat you over the care you were giving him. And now, you see it everywhere, even where it doesn't exist.
My mom smoked through all three of her pregnancies and couldn't stop gorging on 10,000 calories worth of M&M's before shoving her fingers down her throat and puking them all up all throughout her pregnancy with him, leading to him being over 3 months premature, weighing less than a pound, spending his first few weeks in this world in a plastic box, and the last 30 years of his life pissed off at the world for the undeniably shitty hand he was dealt in life.
Don't be a cunt.
--------------------------------------------------
" 'You're like the Nazis' is the new 'I don't like you'. That disqualifies her from marching around planet Who-Gives-a-Shit in a helmet? ~Bill Maher
Collection of links to Second's, Nilbog's and Marcos' death threats: https://cutt.ly/tkCvEX6
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
EXPLAINED: What can the parliament’s inquiry tell us about Sweden’s coronavirus strategy?
https://www.thelocal.se/20210326/explained-ku-what-can-the-parliaments
-inquiry-tell-us-about-swedens-coronavirus-strategy/
Brazil coronavirus deaths 'biggest genocide in our history': Former President Lula da Silva
https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/brazil-coronavirus-deaths-biggest
-genocide-in-our-history-former-president-lula-da-silva/
France reports 41,869 new coronavirus cases
https://www.bignewsnetwork.com/news/268232372/france-reports-41869-new
-coronavirus-cases
Coronavirus digest: Sweden halts AstraZeneca vaccine use
https://www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-digest-sweden-halts-astrazeneca-vacc
ine-use/a-56882733
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It's the same old story around the globe. More cases here, more hospitalizations, and more deaths ... and fewer cases and so on elsewhere.
As sad as it is, nothing is going to change that scenario until the countries get together to finally end it, like they got together to end smallpox.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
It's the same old story around the globe. More cases here, more hospitalizations, and more deaths ... and fewer cases and so on elsewhere.
As sad as it is, nothing is going to change that scenario until the countries get together to finally end it, like they got together to end smallpox.
Well, according to Divoc-91) on a normalized basis, in terms of "cases" the nations that REALLY peaked out were Turkey (173 cases per 100,000) and Belgium (155). Czechia had three major waves, all at about 121-125. Hungary is currently peaking at 88.
But, as you know, since "new cases" are subject to how much testing is being done, looking at new deaths (normalized, one week average)...
Currently, Hungary is in its second, higher peak, at 2.5, followed by Bosnia/H, Czechia, Moldova and Brasil. For a developed nation, SWEDEN really rung some bells at 1.3, but is now at 0.16, so they took it on the chin early- twice, and hard. The USA is currently at 0.3.
You have to admit, the vaccine rollout here in the USA is not as munged up as in the EU. We were able to schedule an appointment a month or so after we became eligible, and dear daughter ... because of her neurological condition ... is also eligible and I just found an appointment for her (not thru her regular healthcare provider but thru a pharmacy). Wish I could get the Pfizer for her, bc hubby and I both had the Pfizer shots and they was pretty much non-events, but the only available right now is Moderna.
****
However, I DID find some interesting info on vaccine technology. I know that Pfizer and Moderna are mRNA (NO, it does not change your DNA!) and I know that China uses the inactivated virus, but have been very curious about Sputnik V. The only thing I could find out about it was that it uses the same technology that they used to develop the Ebola vaccine. Which is...???
But, I found this
Quote:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Compared to the mRNA vaccines, Johnson & Johnson used a different approach to guard against SARS-2 proteins in your body. J&J’s vaccine was created from what is known as a viral vectored vaccine, where human cells are instructed to make the SARS-2 spike protein, which then triggers an immune response. This approach has been used in a number of vaccines across the years, including the Ebola vaccine from the early 2000s.
https://www.pasadenahealthcenter.com/blog/vaccines/comparing-covid-19-
vaccines-johnson-johnson-vs-moderna-and-pfizer/
So I assume that's what Sputnik V is.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yes, Sputnik-V is virus-vectored, as are AstraZeneca, J&J, and a few others. They're in DNA form, and attached to the DNA of a modified adenovirus (modified to not be able to reproduce). AFAIK what makes AZ's different is that they used a chimpanzee adenovirus rather than a human one.
Their mode of action is more complex than the RNA vaccines, since the DNA needs to be incorporated into the nucleus where DNA->RNA translators are found. However they are NOT retroviruses and they do NOT insert themselves into human DNA. Once the RNA is created and moved into the cytoplasm, the various vaccines work the same way. (Note that each vaccine probably targets a slightly different portion of the spike protein, so they'll be some immunity differences.)
But since DNA is double-stranded, and it's further encapsulated into the adenovirus, it's FAR more stable on only needs average refrigeration temperatures.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I could have had my vaccine weeks ago.
I won't be getting one.
I'm interested to see when they start taking things away from me.
They can have everything but my freedom.
Forced vaccination is Rape.
--------------------------------------------------
" 'You're like the Nazis' is the new 'I don't like you'. That disqualifies her from marching around planet Who-Gives-a-Shit in a helmet? ~Bill Maher
PSA: Don't click on any links in Second's posts. He's trying to fish your private information out of you.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Ok, more explanation is needed.
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Yes, Sputnik-V is virus-vectored, as are AstraZeneca, J&J, and a few others. They're in DNA form, and attached to the DNA of a modified adenovirus (modified to not be able to reproduce). AFAIK what makes AZ's different is that they used a chimpanzee adenovirus rather than a human one.
Their mode of action is more complex than the RNA vaccines, since the DNA needs to be incorporated into the nucleus where DNA->RNA translators are found. However they are NOT retroviruses and they do NOT insert themselves into human DNA. Once the RNA is created and moved into the cytoplasm, the various vaccines work the same way. (Note that each vaccine probably targets a slightly different portion of the spike protein, so they'll be some immunity differences.)
But since DNA is double-stranded, and it's further encapsulated into the adenovirus, it's FAR more stable on only needs average refrigeration temperatures.
The only thing that I remember about DNA etc is that "DNA makes RNA, and RNA makes protein" (in the ribosomes). There is some sort of complex "unwrapping" and demethylation - if I understand correctly - of the portion of the DNA that is to be activated, in order to expose it to the DNA>RNA copying process.
So how do you get DNA to make RNA without inserting it into the DNA itself? Isn't that how ALL viruses work?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Not all viruses start at the DNA-> part of the chain DNA-> mRNA-> protein.
SINGLE AND DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA VIRUSES
Some start at single-stranded RNA directly, which acts like messenger RNA. They get into the cytoplasm, hijack the manufacturing facilities with their template, and crank out more of themselves. Some single-stranded RNA viruses are the 'negative sense' of the necessary RNA, and they need to have the complementary RNA created first, which they do with an enzyme they carry on-board. And there are some double-stranded RNA viruses. (Looking at the genetics, apparently double-stranded RNA viruses evolved completely separately two different times, and have very different enzymes and so on, and so there are 2 different classes of double-stranded RNA viruses.)
SINGLE AND DOUBLE-STRANDED DRNA VIRUSES
Then there are DNA viruses. Some are double-stranded DNA, some are single-stranded DNA. The single-stranded DNA viruses need to be re-manufactured into double-stranded DNA first.
RETROVIRUSES
Retroviruses are a completely different class of virus. They start out with RNA genetics - but their genetics are then transcribed into DNA in the nucleus. Since they go through a 'DNA' phase of replication, they're not considered true RNA viruses and are excluded from that classification completely. They also carry an on-board enzyme called integrase that inserts their double-stranded DNA into the host genome.
Nothing about the end-results of evolution is simple! It looks like there are many paths to the same end!
https://www.americanscientist.org/article/viruses-and-vaccines-a-basic
-flowchart-of-viral-families
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME