Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Monday, April 14, 2025 23:28
VIEWED: 485499
PAGE 397 of 404
--------------------------------------------------
A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.
Collection of links to Second's, Nilbog's and Marcos' death threats: https://cutt.ly/tkCvEX6
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
THUGR started this thread Feb 14 (Valentine's Day) 2017, exactly four years ago.
In four years, despite a few thousand exhortations, "impeachment" has gone nowhere. Due, I might add, to lack of evidence. This is truly a dead thread about a dead topic.
Wuduyu tokking about?
The countdown finished 424 dayz ago. Trump wuz impeached Desembr 18th 2019.
T + 424, dood!
And now that he iz impeached twise, he haz exeeded the stated goal line uv this thred by... hmmm. Not sure how to even calculate that. Its like scoring more than 300 in bowling!
And going by any reazonable parameterz, he beats all former bad Prezidents combined quite handily! In a class by himself. Peerless. Incomparable.
Hard to understand how you coud hav possibly missed the newz, but herez an article that coverz the subject to explain wy this thred iz a complete sekses:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
The real solution: https://fundrazr.com/71jIY1?ref=ab_f9ZUS0
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It was both good and terrible to watch McConnell’s post-verdict speech in which he excoriated Trump – but said he had voted to acquit because the trial was unconstitutional.
It was telling that many of the 43 Republicans who voted to acquit felt the need to hang their hats on the constitutionality argument, which was rejected by constitutional scholars and twice by the Senate itself.
Not even Trump’s lawyers attempted to claim he won an election he actually lost by more than 7 million popular votes and 74 electoral votes.
Nor did Trump’s legal team, led by a personal injury lawyer and a former county prosecutor who declined to pursue charges against Bill Cosby, succeed in freeing Trump from blame for the attack on the Capitol, judging by Republican senators’ speeches.
Instead, Trump’s lawyers denied a copious and unambiguous record of what the former president said and did, while drawing false parallels between routine political speech and Trump’s coup attempt.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Sen. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell delivers statement after Trump acquittal.
He starts out "January 6th wuz a disgrase".
True, but he apparently duznt realize or maybe duznt care that its a disgrase for America in the eyez uv the world. He had alredy voted agenst conviction, amplifying that disgrase.
'America! HA! A criminal can be prezident and get away with ANYTHING! Even trying to overthrow the goverment!!! So much for democrasy. The best any peepl can hope for iz a wize benevolent onest King hoo livez a very long time, kuz the children are alwayz stoopid and evil.'
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
The real solution: https://fundrazr.com/71jIY1?ref=ab_f9ZUS0
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I think THUGR was assuming that Trump would be impeached and convicted, and (maybe) even run out of office in a rail. not that he would be impeached and acquitted.
Originally posted by JO753:Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
THUGR started this thread Feb 14 (Valentine's Day) 2017, exactly four years ago.
In four years, despite a few thousand exhortations, "impeachment" has gone nowhere. Due, I might add, to lack of evidence. This is truly a dead thread about a dead topic.
Wuduyu tokking about?
The countdown finished 424 dayz ago. Trump wuz impeached Desembr 18th 2019.
T + 424, dood!
And now that he iz impeached twise, he haz exeeded the stated goal line uv this thred by... hmmm. Not sure how to even calculate that. Its like scoring more than 300 in bowling!
And going by any reazonable parameterz, he beats all former bad Prezidents combined quite handily! In a class by himself. Peerless. Incomparable.
Hard to understand how you coud hav possibly missed the newz, but herez an article that coverz the subject to explain wy this thred iz a complete sekses:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
The real solution: https://fundrazr.com/71jIY1?ref=ab_f9ZUS0
Because if "impeachment" was the actual threshold, HE would have declared success a long time ago!
And JO, whatever happened to "innocent until proven gulity"? Don't tell me that YOU'RE ready to ditch our Constitution because it protects people you don't like!
Or are you just a fair-weather patriot?
(For the record, I believe you TALK about patriotism but you don't practice it.)
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
THUGR posts about Putin so much, he must be in love.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by TWO:Quote:Impeachment went as far as 7 Republicans, Bernie Sanders, Senator King the Independent from Maine and 48 Democrats could move it without help from the rest of the Republicans. Not just impeachment, but all the legislative tasks of the Federal government can't happen when Republicans keep obstructing, yet Signym and 1kiki pretend that the Democrats can do it all without the GOP's help. When help is needed, the GOP says no, as it has been saying since Herbert Hoover was President. There is no "lack of evidence" about what the GOP is and what Trump did.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
THUGR started this thread Feb 14 (Valentine's Day) 2017, exactly four years ago.
In four years, despite a few thousand exhortations, "impeachment" has gone nowhere. Due, I might add, to lack of evidence. This is truly a dead thread about a dead topic.
Here's evidence about the GOP: Sen. Graham says Kamala Harris could be impeached if GOP takes over the House
https://nypost.com/2021/02/14/sen-graham-says-kamala-harris-could-be-i
mpeached-if-gop-takes-over-the-house/
Typical response from the GOP. Graham is being stupid, vindictive, and obstructive. Even he doesn't believe his impeachment plan is meaningful.
Nuts Two, their just nuts. It's most apparent when they assume what others want, believe or think will happen. Trolls Two, their just trolls.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Probably like most peepl, he didnt no the distinction bak then. But He didnt rite 'impeachment and conviction' so it duznt matter. A win iz a win. Thats the rulez, man.
For this 2nd impeachment, the dumass GoPs depended on a teknicality, and a misinterpretted teknikality at that, AND a tekniknikality they created at that, to justify not convicting.
If you really think such a flimzy and transparent excuse counts az exoneration, you are either really stoopid or part uv the crime that iz the entire Trump saga.
But really, all uv us here no the truth. I dont need to state it.
The only mystery for me iz wy the GoP leaderz didnt dump Trump wen they had the chans. Both timez. Especially this time.I see no advantaj that duznt evaporate befor it can do them any good.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
The real solution: https://fundrazr.com/71jIY1?ref=ab_f9ZUS0
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:
Probably like most peepl, he didnt no the distinction bak then. But He didnt rite 'impeachment and conviction' so it duznt matter. A win iz a win. Thats the rulez, man.
For this 2nd impeachment, the dumass GoPs depended on a teknicality, and a misinterpretted teknikality at that, AND a tekniknikality they created at that, to justify not convicting.
If you really think such a flimzy and transparent excuse counts az exoneration, you are either really stoopid or part uv the crime that iz the entire Trump saga.
But really, all uv us here no the truth. I dont need to state it.
The only mystery for me iz wy the GoP leaderz didnt dump Trump wen they had the chans. Both timez. Especially this time.I see no advantaj that duznt evaporate befor it can do them any good.
The case they made against Trump will be used to convict him in a court of law should the District of Columbia choose to go that route.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Then why keep posting?
Originally posted by JO753:
Probably like most peepl, he didnt no the distinction bak then. But He didnt rite 'impeachment and conviction' so it duznt matter. A win iz a win. Thats the rulez, man.
Quote:What technicality was that? I really know of only 1, and it was a Supreme Court ruling. What 'technicality' were you thinking of?
For this 2nd impeachment, the dumass GoPs depended on a teknicality, and a misinterpretted teknikality at that, AND a tekniknikality they created at that, to justify not convicting.
Quote:And that was ... ?
If you really think such a flimzy and transparent excuse counts az exoneration, you are either really stoopid or part uv the crime that iz the entire Trump saga.
Quote:Truth must be related to facts, and facts can only be shown by evidence. And your evidence is ... ??? (fill in the blanks)
But really, all uv us here no the truth. I dont need to state it.
Quote:Approval ratings maybe?
The only mystery for me iz wy the GoP leaderz didnt dump Trump wen they had the chans. Both timez.
Quote:Trump seems to have captured not only the GOP voters but a chunk of independents as well. The GOP has become the tail, and they're not about to try wagging the dog, imo.
Especially this time. I see no advantaj that duznt evaporate befor it can do them any good.
The question you need you answer for yourself JO, is why does Trump have so many followers and so many voters? Is an entire swathe of the country comprised of many tens of millions of people of all economic levels, all education backgrounds, all(or both) sexes, all IQ levels, etc so boneheadedly stupid as you think (because, ya' know - you're smarter than everybody)? Or is Trump saying something the other 2 main parties aren't saying? Does he represent, however imperfectly, something other than the status quo?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:
Probably like most peepl, he didnt no the distinction bak then. But He didnt rite 'impeachment and conviction' so it duznt matter. A win iz a win. Thats the rulez, man.
For this 2nd impeachment, the dumass GoPs depended on a teknicality, and a misinterpretted teknikality at that, AND a tekniknikality they created at that, to justify not convicting.
If you really think such a flimzy and transparent excuse counts az exoneration, you are either really stoopid or part uv the crime that iz the entire Trump saga.
But really, all uv us here no the truth. I dont need to state it.
The only mystery for me iz wy the GoP leaderz didnt dump Trump wen they had the chans. Both timez. Especially this time.I see no advantaj that duznt evaporate befor it can do them any good.
The case they made against Trump will be used to convict him in a court of law should the District of Columbia choose to go that route.
T
No it won't.
--------------------------------------------------
A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.
Collection of links to Second's, Nilbog's and Marcos' death threats: https://cutt.ly/tkCvEX6
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME