A thread for Democrats Only
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Sunday, September 6, 2026 15:36
VIEWED: 755368
PAGE 476 of 725
“I’d be happy to die in this fight. ... This is a fight for everything.”
That’s what Eric Metaxas, a prominent Christian radio host, told President Donald Trump during a radio interview a few weeks after the 2020 election. If the hysteria in those words surprises you, you probably haven’t paid close attention.
Sean Illing: I keep wondering where this goes from here, and it’s not encouraging, David. If the stakes are now that high, if the religious right is fully convinced that their very way of life is on the verge of extinction, then how does this ever stop escalating? Are they not a serious threat to the rule of law in this country?
David French: I have written a lot about how the hardcore Trump evangelical base threatens our constitutional rule of law. People on my side have told me for a long time that I’m exaggerating the threat, that I should stop pearl-clutching. But now we’ve seen a direct violent attack on the US Capitol, on the very seat of American democracy, and it was designed to prevent a peaceful transition of power that was taking place at the exact same time as the attack.
And we’re seeing all across the country bogus attempts to manufacture legal doctrines to overturn a presidential election. People are walking into court with manufactured evidence, with made-up legal doctrines to try to reverse an election. You’re walking into legislatures trying to manufacture a way that they can overturn an election. Then when all that was in the process of failing, they tried to manufacture a revolution to overturn an election. I think that that’s a pretty comprehensive top-to-bottom threat to the rule of law.
Sean Illing: I now live in the Deep South, as you do, and I really don’t think people outside of these areas understand how pervasive this kind of paranoid, alarmist thinking truly is. These are not fringe beliefs. Millions of people are convinced an election was stolen, and if you really believe that, you’re already mentally prepared to justify extreme countermeasures.
More at https://www.vox.com/22188646/trump-evangelical-christianity-david-fren
ch
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
China didn't have a seat at the big boy table before Uncle Billy sold us out.
China cheats alot. Especially by stealing intelectual property.
But, like 2nd sed, America duznt hav any say so about their development.
A better perspectiv to take iz that we need all nationz to do well. The human rase and the planet will be better if we can all co-operate and get past the dirty oil based economy. Trying to be the greatest by holding otherz down iz a craven, self defeating stratejy.
Hoo wants the Earth to be a collection uv petty minded warring tribez forever?
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
The real solution: https://fundrazr.com/71jIY1?ref=ab_f9ZUS0
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:1kiki, psychoanalyze Biden. I'm fairly sure (if I haven't lost track of the games these pseudonyms are playing) that 1kiki, Signym, and 6ix are strongly opposed to Biden's immigration policy and methods:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
You know Signy, there are things I don't want to think about too deeply or for too long. And one of them is whatever is going on in SECOND's head. I think he's far more deviant than I'd care to imagine. . . .
It's not important to him to BE moral - truthful, honorable, charitable - it's important to not be caught at being everything but.
How Biden Is Walking His Talk on Unity
There are roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States today. According to Pew Research, two thirds of them have been in this country for more than 10 years.
Back in 2013, when Congress last considered passing comprehensive immigration reform, the CBO estimated that providing a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants would reduce the federal deficit by $197 billion in the first 10 years and an additional $700 billion in the second decade. Additionally, the Center for American Progress calculated that such reforms would increase the earnings of all American workers by $470 billion over 10 years, increase tax revenue by $109 billion over a decade, and create on average an additional 121,000 jobs per year. Finally, over the next three and a half decades, legalized immigrants would add a net of more than $606 billion to the Social Security system.
When President Biden prioritizes immigration reform, including a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, the arguments in favor of doing so aren't simply about allowing over 11 million people to come out of the shadows. The economic benefits of doing so would redound to all of us.
But even Republicans like Senator Marco Rubio, who once advocated for immigration reform, have already stated that they will not support Biden's plan.
Coming out of the 2012 election, there were still some Republicans who knew that immigration reform was something their party had to embrace. That is why the bipartisan "gang of eight" produced a bill that passed the Senate by a vote of 68-32. As had become typical of these kinds of negotiations, Republicans pressed for massive spending on border security in exchange for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented workers. But the lunatic caucus in the House threatened to oust Rep. John Boehner as speaker if he brought the bill up for a vote. That is how Republicans killed immigration reform in 2013. Three years later, they elected a president who had based much of his campaign on demonizing immigrants.
Long before his first day in office, Biden knew that, having gone full-nativist over the last eight years, Republicans wouldn't support comprehensive immigration reform—even given the economic benefits of doing so. That is why he took a different approach than the one utilized by President Obama.
Biden didn't pre-negotiate with Republicans. He produced his own plan that didn't include massive spending on border security. As Frank Sharry, founder and executive director of America's Voice, told Ron Brownstein, Biden's approach differed in that it recognized that "Republicans demand way too much in the sausage-making and, in the end, still kill off immigration reform." Sharry went on to say that "Biden is presenting a bill that unifies and inspires the entire Democratic coalition. In effect, he's saying, 'Work with me in good faith, Republicans, to get to 60 votes, and if you don't...we'll find a way to get something done with our 51 votes.'"
That is a perfect example of how Biden is walking the talk when it comes to what he means by unity.
http://immasmartypants.blogspot.com/2021/01/how-biden-is-walking-his-t
alk-on-unity.html
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
China didn't have a seat at the big boy table before Uncle Billy sold us out.
China cheats alot. Especially by stealing intelectual property.
But, like 2nd sed, America duznt hav any say so about their development.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States%E2%80%93China_Relations_Ac
t_of_2000
--------------------------------------------------
A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Millions of people are convinced an election was stolen, and if you really believe that, you’re already mentally prepared to justify extreme countermeasures.
Not true.
Rigged game is rigged. Don't give a shit.

--------------------------------------------------
A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:1kiki, psychoanalyze Biden. I'm fairly sure (if I haven't lost track of the games these pseudonyms are playing) that 1kiki, Signym, and 6ix are strongly opposed to Biden's immigration policy and methods:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
You know Signy, there are things I don't want to think about too deeply or for too long. And one of them is whatever is going on in SECOND's head. I think he's far more deviant than I'd care to imagine. . . .
It's not important to him to BE moral - truthful, honorable, charitable - it's important to not be caught at being everything but.
How Biden Is Walking His Talk on Unity
There are roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States today. According to Pew Research, two thirds of them have been in this country for more than 10 years.
Back in 2013, when Congress last considered passing comprehensive immigration reform, the CBO estimated that providing a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants would reduce the federal deficit by $197 billion in the first 10 years and an additional $700 billion in the second decade. Additionally, the Center for American Progress calculated that such reforms would increase the earnings of all American workers by $470 billion over 10 years, increase tax revenue by $109 billion over a decade, and create on average an additional 121,000 jobs per year. Finally, over the next three and a half decades, legalized immigrants would add a net of more than $606 billion to the Social Security system.
When President Biden prioritizes immigration reform, including a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, the arguments in favor of doing so aren't simply about allowing over 11 million people to come out of the shadows. The economic benefits of doing so would redound to all of us.
But even Republicans like Senator Marco Rubio, who once advocated for immigration reform, have already stated that they will not support Biden's plan.
Coming out of the 2012 election, there were still some Republicans who knew that immigration reform was something their party had to embrace. That is why the bipartisan "gang of eight" produced a bill that passed the Senate by a vote of 68-32. As had become typical of these kinds of negotiations, Republicans pressed for massive spending on border security in exchange for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented workers. But the lunatic caucus in the House threatened to oust Rep. John Boehner as speaker if he brought the bill up for a vote. That is how Republicans killed immigration reform in 2013. Three years later, they elected a president who had based much of his campaign on demonizing immigrants.
Long before his first day in office, Biden knew that, having gone full-nativist over the last eight years, Republicans wouldn't support comprehensive immigration reform—even given the economic benefits of doing so. That is why he took a different approach than the one utilized by President Obama.
Biden didn't pre-negotiate with Republicans. He produced his own plan that didn't include massive spending on border security. As Frank Sharry, founder and executive director of America's Voice, told Ron Brownstein, Biden's approach differed in that it recognized that "Republicans demand way too much in the sausage-making and, in the end, still kill off immigration reform." Sharry went on to say that "Biden is presenting a bill that unifies and inspires the entire Democratic coalition. In effect, he's saying, 'Work with me in good faith, Republicans, to get to 60 votes, and if you don't...we'll find a way to get something done with our 51 votes.'"
That is a perfect example of how Biden is walking the talk when it comes to what he means by unity.
http://immasmartypants.blogspot.com/2021/01/how-biden-is-walking-his-t
alk-on-unity.html
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190paNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I checked that wiki article to see if China trade is all Bill Clinton's fault. If Clinton hadn't been President, would China have been able to export to the USA? It just so happens that it is Ronald Reagan who got the ball rolling:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
China didn't have a seat at the big boy table before Uncle Billy sold us out.
China cheats alot. Especially by stealing intelectual property.
But, like 2nd sed, America duznt hav any say so about their development.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States%E2%80%93China_Relations_Ac
t_of_2000
Quote:In 1980, you can blame Reagan for the Chinese economy surpassing America but I blame the Chinese. They try too hard. They should have been lazier and stupider and more disorganized in order for America to continue being the world leader in economic power. There is still one thing America does better than China: America is the World Leader in Covid-19 deaths and infections. We're Number One!
Prior to passage of the bill, China was subject to an annual review by Congress of China's trade status with the United States. Since 1980, the president has had to issue annual waivers to trade with China. The act removed the review, eased some trade barriers, and facilitated China's entry into the WTO.
Analysis: China and U.S. economies diverge over coronavirus response
https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-usa-china-analysis/
analysis-china-and-u-s-economies-diverge-over-coronavirus-response-idUSKBN277066

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Texas wasn't cooperative with Trump's plan to build a wall because Republicans want cheap illegal laborers. Trump didn't even pretend to have a plan to deport the 11 million illegals, although he had the power and budget to do it. Why didn't he use that power? Because Republican businessmen want cheap illegal laborers, same reason why businessmen don't want a $15/hour minimum wage since that would require paying illegal aliens and citizens $15/hour.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Rewarding 11 Million criminals who have been leaching off of our society not only will not bring any unity to this country, but it will just light the fire under the asses of the next 11 Million criminals to come.
Rinse and repeat until there's nothing left to give away.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Texas wasn't cooperative with Trump's plan to build a wall because Republicans want cheap illegal laborers. Trump didn't even pretend to have a plan to deport the 11 million illegals, although he had the power and budget to do it. Why didn't he use that power? Because Republican businessmen want cheap illegal laborers, same reason why businessmen don't want a $15/hour minimum wage since that would require paying illegal aliens and citizens $15/hour.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Rewarding 11 Million criminals who have been leaching off of our society not only will not bring any unity to this country, but it will just light the fire under the asses of the next 11 Million criminals to come.
Rinse and repeat until there's nothing left to give away.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
I told you before, I'm not a Republican. I don't disagree with that comment.
However, it in no way negates my own.
--------------------------------------------------
A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
I checked that wiki article to see if China trade is all Bill Clinton's fault. If Clinton hadn't been President, would China have been able to export to the USA?
First sentence:
Quote:
The U.S.–China Relations Act of 2000 is an Act of the United States Congress that granted China permanent normal trade relations (NTR) status (previously called most favoured nation (MFN)) when China becomes a full member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), ending annual review and approval of NTR. It was signed into law on October 10, 2000 by United States President Bill Clinton.
Parting farewell and fuck you to America by Uncle Billy.
Quote:
In 1991, China only accounted for 1% of total imports to the United States.
President Bill Clinton in 2000 pushed Congress to approve the U.S.-China trade agreement and China's accession to the WTO,[13] saying that more trade with China would advance America's economic interests.
By 2018, U.S. manufacturing jobs had decreased by almost 5 million since 2000, with the decline accelerating
--------------------------------------------------
A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME