Real World Event Discussions

The End of Constitutional America

POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Sunday, May 3, 2026 16:33
VIEWED: 10061
PAGE 3 of 11

Friday, January 22, 2021 2:47 AM


Quote:

Have you proof it was stolen, was there enough glitches and lost votes in the system to throw an election?
Since no one has actually - yanno - STUDIED - the vote, of course there's no proof. Just like there wasn't in 2004 until it was - what's that word again? - STUDIED. (Mitofsky Report)

And I guarantee democrats* are never, ever, "in a million years"• (•PS that's hyperbole in case you didn't get it), going to institute any of the reforms of CalTech/ MIT's Vote Project, but especially not the one that calls for statistical evaluation of all votes.

Because ...



... democrats* aren't better than any stupid republican. And neither are you.

Let's hear it for democracy*! and the US mystery vote*!

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, January 22, 2021 6:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Quote:

Have you proof it was stolen, was there enough glitches and lost votes in the system to throw an election?

Since no one has actually - yanno - STUDIED - the vote, of course there's no proof. Just like there wasn't in 2004 until it was - what's that word again? - STUDIED. (Mitofsky Report)

And I guarantee democrats* are never, ever, "in a million years"• (•PS that's hyperbole in case you didn't get it), going to institute any of the reforms of CalTech/ MIT's Vote Project, but especially not the one that calls for statistical evaluation of all votes.



Neither are Republicans. What does that tell you?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, January 22, 2021 6:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Quote:

Have you proof it was stolen, was there enough glitches and lost votes in the system to throw an election?
Since no one has actually - yanno - STUDIED - the vote, of course there's no proof. Just like there wasn't in 2004 until it was - what's that word again? - STUDIED. (Mitofsky Report)

And I guarantee democrats* are never, ever, "in a million years"• (•PS that's hyperbole in case you didn't get it), going to institute any of the reforms of CalTech/ MIT's Vote Project, but especially not the one that calls for statistical evaluation of all votes.

Quote:



Neither are Republicans. What does that tell you, genius?

As I have been pointing out ... If democrats* don't do any different, HOW ARE THEY ANY BETTER?

And what it tells me is that you're no better than a stupid republican OR a stupid democrat*, because I don't see you calling for the vote to be studied either.





MUSHY is lying asshole.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, January 22, 2021 8:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Quote:

Have you proof it was stolen, was there enough glitches and lost votes in the system to throw an election?

Since no one has actually - yanno - STUDIED - the vote, of course there's no proof. Just like there wasn't in 2004 until it was - what's that word again? - STUDIED. (Mitofsky Report)

And I guarantee democrats* are never, ever, "in a million years"• (•PS that's hyperbole in case you didn't get it), going to institute any of the reforms of CalTech/ MIT's Vote Project, but especially not the one that calls for statistical evaluation of all votes.

Quote:



Neither are Republicans. What does that tell you, genius?

As I have been pointing out ... If democrats* don't do any different, HOW ARE THEY ANY BETTER?

And what it tells me is that you're no better than a stupid republican OR a stupid democrat*, because I don't see you calling for the vote to be studied either.

MUSHY is lying asshole.



Shouldn’t it be up to the Republicans to study the vote to prove their case for their candidate? Your grasp of simple concepts is fleeting at best.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, January 22, 2021 9:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CAPTAINCRUNCH:
Shouldn’t it be up to the Republicans to study the vote to prove their case for their candidate? Your grasp of simple concepts is fleeting at best.



I would think it would be int he bet interest for all parties involved to make sure that elections aren't fraudulent, since we're all Americans.



First step is to ensure we never do mail in ballots again and that all elections require a photo ID.

Until we do that, all elections are fraudulent.


--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, January 22, 2021 9:16 AM


Quote:

More MUSHY nonsense.


fify

In your undeveloped brain you think that republicans are going to get something done when democrats* control the WH and Congress ...



But in any case, I never said it should be a partisan effort. In fact I have ALWAYS CALLED FOR A

.NONPARTISAN. THOROUGH. ACADEMIC. STUDY.

BECAUSE

- as I've pointed out before - too many people would absolutely distrust it if politicians were in charge. Instead, there should be a bipartisan call for the experts to study the election.



Hmmmm ...



Who could do the job?





I know!!! Maybe people people who've spent the last 10+ years looking at voting in the US ... ? You know ... the Vote Project people at CalTech/ MIT!!! (and how MANY times have I brought THAT up already??!!)


Gosh, I'm surprised a 'smart' guy like yourself with your smartphone didn't think of it!



NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, January 22, 2021 1:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by captaincrunch:


Under rated comment: "Big day for complete sentences."



NO JOKE!
You know how nice it was to turn up the radio today on the way home and LISTEN to what the prez had to say, instead of turning the thing OFF??

And to know there would be some reasoning behind whatever statement he had to make??

The little things I had taken for granted before 2016!





NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, January 22, 2021 7:01 PM

Yup. It was super nice hearing Obama and GWB lie eloquently while committing acts of evil.




--------------------------------------------------

A government is a body of people usually, notably, governed by Mark Zuckerborg and Slack Dorsey.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, January 22, 2021 7:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Yup. It was super nice hearing Obama and GWB lie eloquently while committing acts of evil.

On the other hand, truthful Trump said that Joe Biden is "following the radical left agenda, take away your guns, destroy your Second Amendment, no religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God. He’s against God.”
— Donald Trump, during remarks Aug. 6 in Cleveland
https://apnews.com/article/global-trade-ap-top-news-religion-politics-
joe-biden-a3c57cdcf8e44755d15930b29c660e36


We were warned that Joe Biden would hurt the Bible, and he has done that. Biden has gone through the Bible and crossed out all the passages of which he disapproves, so now the only thing that is in there at all is the passage where the prophet Elisha tells some bears to maul 42 young boys for calling him an “old baldhead.”
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Kings+2%3A23-24&ver
sion=NKJV


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, January 22, 2021 8:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I would think it would be int he bet interest for all parties involved to make sure that elections aren't fraudulent, since we're all Americans.



I agree - and thanks for seeing the light on this one. I know it probably wasn't easy. Case closed.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME