claims of 'stolen' elections - Hillary and the DNC wrote the playbook
POSTED BY: 1KIKI
UPDATED: Sunday, November 3, 2024 21:47
VIEWED: 4184
PAGE 4 of 6
Is Trump Cracking Under the Weight of Losing?
Getting the boot from the White House is an undeniable ego blow for a man who has never admitted defeat.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/12/20/trump-white-house-lo
sing-448903
The combination of an unprecedented rebuke meeting an uncommonly vulnerable ego has some people wondering if there is a chance that Trump’s unusual actions suggest something potentially more dire. Could he be on his way to a mental breakdown?
“He’s never been in a situation in which he has lost in a way he can’t escape from,” Mary Trump, his niece and the author of the fiercely critical and bestselling book about him and their family, told me. “We continue to wait for him to accept reality, for him to concede, and that is something he is not capable of doing,” added Bandy Lee, the forensic psychiatrist from Yale who’s spent the last four years trying to warn the world about Trump and the ways in which he’s disordered and dangerous. “Being a loser,” she said, for Trump is tantamount to “psychic death.”
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Where have I hears this before???
Originally posted by second:
Is Trump Cracking Under the Weight of Losing?
Getting the boot from the White House is an undeniable ego blow for a man who has never admitted defeat.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/12/20/trump-white-house-lo
sing-448903
The combination of an unprecedented rebuke meeting an uncommonly vulnerable ego has some people wondering if there is a chance that Trump’s unusual actions suggest something potentially more dire. Could he be on his way to a mental breakdown?
“He’s never been in a situation in which he has lost in a way he can’t escape from,” Mary Trump, his niece and the author of the fiercely critical and bestselling book about him and their family, told me. “We continue to wait for him to accept reality, for him to concede, and that is something he is not capable of doing,” added Bandy Lee, the forensic psychiatrist from Yale who’s spent the last four years trying to warn the world about Trump and the ways in which he’s disordered and dangerous. “Being a loser,” she said, for Trump is tantamount to “psychic death.”
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
It's not like YOU haven't posted this, or some varation of it, at least a dozen times by now, praying for some kind of article 25 end to your nightmare. And guess what? It wasn't true then, and it's not true now.
YAWN!
Why should Trump "admit" that he "lost" the election when the stats were so hinky, and there was so much evidence of fraud? He may have been defeated, but he didn't lose.
But then, with Hillary, it's a different matter. She lost the electoral college fair and square. a) She didn't keep her eye on the ball, and was lulled into complacency by "popular vote" advantage when any consultant worth his or her salt should have known that it's not the popular vote that counts and b) People just didn't like her all that much. Her negatives were as high as her positives. REAL progressives hated her neocon warmongering, patriots hated her globalist agenda, and social conservatives hated her identitarian virtue-signalling. Plus, she came across as a snaky, greedy, inauthentic, corrupt politician.
With her and her stolen election claims, blaming and ever-shifting cast of "they" and "them" it came across as
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The "stats" from the electoral college are very clear. The "evidence of fraud" has been brought to court and was unpersuasive to all judges. By declaring himself the winner, Trump is stirring a rebellion.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Why should Trump "admit" that he "lost" the election when the stats were so hinky, and there was so much evidence of fraud? He may have been defeated, but he didn't lose.
Trump didn't spend the weekend mustering an emergency response to the spiking pandemic or offering condolences to the families of victims of a disaster that his neglect has immeasurably worsened. He didn't work into the small hours pushing both sides in the Senate and House to overcome differences in line with his sworn duty to the American people.
Instead, he welcomed to the Oval Office Gen. Michael Flynn to discuss Flynn's idea for a declaration of martial law to overturn the election result. Trump's lawyers made a new appeal to the Supreme Court to invalidate millions of legally cast votes in Pennsylvania. On Twitter, he kept up a corrosive stream of lies about the election -- the kind that have already convinced a majority of Republican voters that the election was stolen.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Fake Election.
What have you done today to earn your place in this crowded world? :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
SIGNYM:
Why should Trump "admit" that he "lost" the election when the stats were so hinky, and there was so much evidence of fraud? He may have been defeated, but he didn't lose.
SECOND The "stats" from the electoral college are very clear. The "evidence of fraud" has been brought to court and was unpersuasive to all judges. By declaring himself the winner, Trump is stirring a rebellion.
Trump didn't spend the weekend mustering an emergency response to the spiking pandemic or offering condolences to the families of victims of a disaster that his neglect has immeasurably worsened. He didn't work into the small hours pushing both sides in the Senate and House to overcome differences in line with his sworn duty to the American people.
Instead, he welcomed to the Oval Office Gen. Michael Flynn to discuss Flynn's idea for a declaration of martial law to overturn the election result. Trump's lawyers made a new appeal to the Supreme Court to invalidate millions of legally cast votes in Pennsylvania. On Twitter, he kept up a corrosive stream of lies about the election -- the kind that have already convinced a majority of Republican voters that the election was stolen.
SECONDRATE: I used to, among other job responsibilities, evaluate our own data and OTHER lab data for QA. Large. complex data sets which -in some cases- I had no idea how they were generated except a brief description of the procedure used. Sometimes it was an entire packet of raw and final data. And I could ferret out whether there was a fundamental flaw in the data, or whether it was sound and could be relied on. In my day, I have found MANY fundamentally-flawed data sets. (I also found many robust and relable data sets.) For example, I was once given a data set consisting of multiple tests of FCCU emissions from multiple refineries (I'm sure you know what an FCCU is) each of which had been analyzed for over a dozen different analytes, and I shocked the shit out of the consortium of FCCU owners and tchnical experts when I told them that the samples had been analyzed by three different labs and that one of the labs had fucked up one of the analyses.
So I know whereof I speak when I say the data is hinky. I don't give a rat's patooties what "judges" say because (1) they're not in the business of evaluating data and (2) their decisions are partly legalistic and partly political: never a good combination when you want to arrive at the truth.
Also, I know something about "Chain of Custody" and I know for a fact there was NO SUCH THING on the mail-in-ballots.
So Trump is out. He WAS beaten, but he didn't lose.
All that means to me is that the JUDICIAL avenue for reform is blocked, and now it has to come to raw populist power: If the good people of WI, MN, PA, GA etc want clean elections they have to PUSH for them, and that means pushing their governors, legislatures, and state secretaries for clear, robust, auditable, defensible procedures.
And then we go to round 2 in 2022, and round 3 in 2024.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:In Texas, all Trump voters do it. A simplified example from a Trump voter/Exxon engineer I know in Baytown: "There are blizzards in the Northeast, which means there is no global warming." I'm sure that particular Texan knows how climate change actually works, but he has a clever and very fake justification to bitterly complain about Biden's $2 trillion for clean energy projects. The GOP Senators will use fake facts/justifications to stop dead Biden's plan and help Exxon. People like 1kiki will then complain that Democrats won't do anything about climate change. 1kiki and many others never take into account how the GOP can easily block change forever in the Senate without 1kiki acknowledging/admitting what the GOP did.
Originally posted by THG:
It’s what comrade sig does second. She aggregates, combines false hoods with facts manipulating them to change the context of the information. It’s why she loves zerohedge. They do it for her. She's a troll.
www.cnn.com/2020/12/19/politics/biden-climate-team-introductions/index
.html
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
T
Fox Host Lou Dobbs Forced to Debunk His Own Fraud Claims Under Threat of Legal Action
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:
SIGNYM:
Why should Trump "admit" that he "lost" the election when the stats were so hinky, and there was so much evidence of fraud? He may have been defeated, but he didn't lose.
SECOND The "stats" from the electoral college are very clear. The "evidence of fraud" has been brought to court and was unpersuasive to all judges. By declaring himself the winner, Trump is stirring a rebellion.
SECONDRATE: I used to, among other job responsibilities, evaluate our own data and OTHER lab data for QA.
Me too comrade sig. I used to, among other job responsibilities, evaluate our own data and OTHER lab data for QA as well; go figure right?
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:There is no "Chain of Custody" for electronic voting machines, Signym. And if Trump keeps saying he won, his assassination can be a chapter in his biography. See "List of United States presidential assassination attempts and plots" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_assas
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Also, I know something about "Chain of Custody" and I know for a fact there was NO SUCH THING on the mail-in-ballots.
So Trump is out. He WAS beaten, but he didn't lose.
sination_attempts_and_plots
"Death of Benito Mussolini"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Benito_Mussolini
Loudmouth and ineffectual Trump has been compared to loudmouth and ineffectual Mussolini, Signym.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
But voting can and SHOULD be auditable - see Mitofsky report.
If democrats* don't do any different, how are they any better?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
SIGNYM:
Also, I know something about "Chain of Custody" and I know for a fact there was NO SUCH THING on the mail-in-ballots.
So Trump is out. He WAS beaten, but he didn't lose.
SECONDRATE: There is no "Chain of Custody" for electronic voting machines, Signym. And if Trump keeps saying he won, his assassination can be a chapter in his biography. See "List of United States presidential assassination attempts and plots" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_assas
sination_attempts_and_plots
BUT THERE SHOULD BE. SECONDRATE, you yourself must be familiar with the various electronic gages and recording devices in a modern chemical plant or refinery or petrochemical plnat.
And data ... critical data, from pharmaceutical analyses to hospital stat labs record electronic data ALL OF THE TIME. Are you saying that it is impossible to make this data accurate and auditable? Because, I assure you, many agencies have spent many hours figuring out how to do this. The FDA has come up with a pretty complete procedure on how to make it so, which I have spent a fair bit of time implementing in my section of the lab, and talking over with our prosecutors.
But you're right ... it's not easy to make it sabotage-proof. That's why I think we need
PICTURE ID AT THE POLLS
HAND MARKED BALLOTS
HAND-COUNTED, IN PUBLIC
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME