Trump Says "TERMINATE" 230....WRONG!!!!
POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Wednesday, November 5, 2025 20:47
VIEWED: 6576
PAGE 1 of 5
He just tweeted this shit...
"For purposes of National Security, Section 230 must be immediately terminated!!!
10:11 PM · Nov 26, 2020"
I really hope that you're just dumbing that down for the dummies and that's not your actual intention, because... THIS IS A TERRIBLE FUCKING IDEA! Terminating 230 in its entirety is the end of free speech on the internet, forever.
Dorsey and Zuckerburg and the heads at Google WANT that. They have boatloads of cash and machine learning A.I. that's going to be able to police all of their content however they see fit. It won't be long before they don't need Section 230 at all anymore.
But removing Section 230 immediately kills off any competition. Any alternative media who supports free speech and doesn't editorialize their content will be 100% liable for any illegal content that shows up on their platform.
If you really meant terminate 230, Trump (and the 270k people who like the Tweet), then y'all need to read a fuckin' book.
DO NOT REMOVE SECTION 230.
ENFORCE SECTION 230.
Strip 230 protections from Twitter and Facebook and Google for abusing the shield.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I dont know enough about US Laws or the legal effects of 230 but it seems we've been going the wrong way for a while now. It seeems 230 was still allowing people to get sued, someone posts an old 70 yr maybe almost 100+ year old cartoon vid of Captain Marvel or old Superman or Captain America or the King Kong nmovie or the Happy Birthday song and some bunch of other guys from some big Rich Mega Corp company send in the lawyers to shut it all down, exceptions for law also include corporate copyright media violations, instagram whores? sex work-related material, and Burn Loot Murder Antifa commie Jihadi violations of federal criminal law?
Why are Whistle blowers that expose shit like Enron and Banking Scandals getting hunted down?
Whatever the Law was to stop help freedom, promote free art and speech, to block political jihad, artist theft, perversions and radicalism it didnt seem to work op well.
What happened to freedom culture and the online culture of free?
Why should I be forced to go to some fringe almost hackerish website to get a show almost 100 yrs old or a 100 year old classic book?
There is something perverted about the way these Mega Corps chase down hundreds of year old songs and try to bribe judges to copyright them, long after the life time of an artist, long after that writer or film maker is dead.
https://opensource.com/article/18/2/grateful-dead-precursor-creative-c
ommons-licensing
http://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/
https://www.scribd.com/document/349922610/Jaffe-Memo-Table
https://www.linuxmint.com/
https://www.pscp.tv/MarcusKulik/1jMKgXgoyekGL
http://www.openculture.com/2017/12/3500-occult-manuscripts-will-be-dig
itized-made-freely-available-online.html
https://publicdomainreview.org/collections/japanese-prints-of-western-
inventors-artists-and-scholars-1873/
https://retrovision.tv/tags/cult-film/
https://www.publicdomainpictures.net/
I honestly find it ridiculous that someone blocks the news from getting out and you have to wait for Fox or the BBC or CNN to start spinnng the bullshit story
It is also ridiculous how some Nasty Criminal Corrupted Judge got bribed and put a copyright to "Happy Birthday to You"
The political and criminal Whistleblower continues to be hunted down.
Libertarianism would probably have gone so much better without those weird Canadian, Euro and American political 'Pirate Party' groups getting corrupted and sold out.
Internet was like a Public notice board, a phone company, and not an overall Newspaper Magazine as publishers of content, such as Tv newspapers or radio and TV broadcasters which are subject to stringent fact-checking before publishing or airing content, 1997, in the landmark cyberlaw case of Reno v. ACLU, the United States Supreme Court struck the anti-indecency provisions of the Act.
an attempt to ban South Park rude jokes, exposing the degeneracy and riots of BLM Antifa and the Perverted Rightwing Republicans who touched people in public bathrooms, it was an attempt regulate both indecency and obscenity in cyberspace. In the 90s the web becomes a thing, people chat and send mails on the internet and 1996, a panel of federal judges blocked part of the CDA, saying it would infringe upon the free speech rights of adults, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act was not part of the original Senate legislation, but was added in conference with the House, where it had been separately introduced by Representatives Christopher Cox (R-CA) and Ron Wyden (D-OR) as the Internet Freedom and Family Empowerment Act, social media companies took direct action against a major U.S. publisher, perhaps a news paper had published a story on a scandal drugs hookers movement of oil or money. The paper is among the top five newspapers by circulation in the United States. New BigTech actions raised serious questions about many social media platforms future Section 230 immunity status, the Big Tech giants Facebook and Twitter interfered, Facebook wanted Trump banned, Reddit bans Trump supporters and Twitter banned people wh
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Agree with you both, but you're talking two different things.
SECTION 230 was enacted into law in 1996 (under Bill Clinton) as part of the Communicatios Decency Act. It protects platforms from liability when third parties post libel or other unlawful content. In order to retain Section 230 protections, the platform must not engage in EDITORIAL CONTROL. Once it does that, it becomes a publisher and responsible for the site contents. I agree with SIX don't terminate 230, ENFORCE it.
All of those COPYRIGHT provisions, as applied to electronic content, are part of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) passed into law in 1998, ALSO under Bill Clinton.
Quote:
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a 1998 United States copyright law that implements two 1996 treaties of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). It criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, devices, or services intended to circumvent measures that control access to copyrighted works (commonly known as digital rights management or DRM). It also criminalizes the act of circumventing an access control, whether or not there is actual infringement of copyright itself.
See? I TOLD you Bill Clinton was a transnationalist!
Anyway, our entire copyright system has been hijacked by big corporations and needs an entire re-do. Copyrights should have much shorter expiry (like seven years) and should never be able to be bought or sold.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump spent Thanksgiving night railing against Section 230 on Twitter as the #DiaperDon hashtag went viral
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/donald-trump-calls-end-section-230-
diaperdon-goes-viral-twitter-2020-11
President Donald Trump accused Twitter on Thursday night of making “false trends” and demanded again that Section 230 be “terminated.”
Twitter users mocked the president using the hashtag #DiaperDon after he sat at a small table during a news conference and posted frustrated tweets.
More than 230,000 posts have used #DiaperDon on Twitter.
Trump also echoed his previous claims accusing Twitter of bias against conservatives.
Among his 14 tweets Thursday, he also targeted Fox News, Rep. Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez, and NFL players kneeling.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
^ No shit buddy. That's what this thread is about.
Since I'm not a "Trump Cultist" like you continually insist, I'm sure as fuck going to speak out when he says something 100% against my core beliefs.
Maybe you should could learn a thing or two about that yourself while you watch me show you how adults behave when they don't get their way.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It's no surprise that you dumbfucks here let this slip down to the second page almost immediately.
If Trump were to get this accomplished, it would be the single largest incorrect decision he made in 4 years... worse than anything else he did combined. And it would change the internet for all of us... forever.
But the Legacy Media and Google WELCOME IT, so your preprogrammed responses and bitches don't include any outrage against terminating section 230.
If we had a government that wasn't corrupt to the core, THIS would have been the thing that was grounds for a Trump impeachment. Not some rediculous transcript with Ukraine's President that was taken wildly out of context and not even an impeachable offense in the first place even if it did go down the way that the NYT tells you to think that it did.
It takes some random GOP member nobody ever heard of before to bring some sanity to the discussion.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/12/04/are_downsides_of
_big_tech_regulations_dawning_on_republicans_144779.html
What have you done today to earn your place in this crowded world? :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump says (but who knows if he means it) that he will veto the defense bill unless 230 is terminated:
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
Very sadly for our Nation, it looks like Senator @JimInhofe
will not be putting the Section 230 termination clause into the Defense Bill. So bad for our National Security and Election Integrity. Last chance to ever get it done. I will VETO!
10:37 PM · Dec 3, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1334718387583377408
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I mean, honestly... Trump's thoughts on how to handle Big Tech and feeling that terminating 230 is the way to go about doing it makes me think that he doesn't actually know shit about the internet outside of turning his phone on and clicking on the Twitter app, and though his entire 2 campaigns and 4 years in office using it was just the result of hiring a bunch of other people who did.
He's just as dumb about tech as 99% of the other crusty old assholes making millions of dollars "serving" the public and making terrible decisions and ruling son all things tech over the last 40 years, and who have given a disproportionate amount of power over free speech and intellectual rights to multi-national corporations who do not have any reason to give a damn about the US Constitution.
What have you done today to earn your place in this crowded world? :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Trump says (but who knows if he means it) that he will veto the defense bill unless 230 is terminated:
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
Very sadly for our Nation, it looks like Senator @JimInhofe
will not be putting the Section 230 termination clause into the Defense Bill. So bad for our National Security and Election Integrity. Last chance to ever get it done. I will VETO!
10:37 PM · Dec 3, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1334718387583377408
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
Yeah. I know this. I've been following it every day.
While you're talking about bullshit like Trump's taxes and calling him a racist, there are actually legitimate reasons to disagree with him.
But since the Legacy Media and Big Tech actually WANT Section 230 terminated, they're going to fake disapproval and let the story die before it ever actually becomes one, and (they hope) before it's too late to do anything about it.
It's shit like THIS that should be making people burn Portland down if that's how they want to express outrage.
DO NOT TERMINATE SECTION 230.
ENFORCE 230.
Remove the shield from Facebook, Twitter, Google/YouTube and any other corporation who have decided that they are publishers.
What have you done today to earn your place in this crowded world? :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Why Trump is a bad President is that (more than the previous 10 Presidents taken all at the same time) he does not mean what he says and what he says doesn't mean anything. He makes noises all the time, but that's because his brain is a very quiet and empty place. His taxes are simply one tiny example (but one that could put him in jail) out of many things he talks about constantly, yet the words out of his mouth make no sense. To say it plainly as I can, Trump is grossly incompetent at everything connected to the job, the actual work that a President does, because he will not shut his mouth and think about CONSEQUENCES of what he is saying before he says it.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Yeah. I know this. I've been following it every day.
While you're talking about bullshit like Trump's taxes and calling him a racist, there are actually legitimate reasons to disagree with him.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME