Trunp loses again in Court
POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Tuesday, September 1, 2026 04:15
VIEWED: 52231
PAGE 17 of 100
Trump election lawsuit in Arizona's Maricopa County dismissed, outcome wouldn't have affected races
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Daniel Kiley on Friday dismissed claims filed on behalf of Donald Trump's campaign, the Republican National Committee and the Arizona Republican Party as moot, meaning further legal proceedings are pointless.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-election-lawsuit-in-ariz
ona-s-maricopa-county-dismissed-outcome-wouldn-t-have-affected-races/ar-BB1b0tTf?ocid=msedgntp
T ![]()
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump's DHS leader Chad Wolf unlawfully in position: Federal judge
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-s-dhs-leader-chad-wolf-u
nlawfully-in-position-federal-judge/ar-BB1b1h60?ocid=msedgntp
T ![]()
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The Washington Post
It goes from bad to worse for the Trump legal team
Over the past two days, two prominent law firms have sought to withdraw from representing the Trump legal effort in Arizona and Pennsylvania. And Friday, the campaign was forced to reverse course in an Arizona case, acknowledging that the lawsuit, even if successful, wouldn’t overturn President-elect Joe Biden’s lead in the state.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/it-goes-from-bad-to-worse-for-
the-trump-legal-team/ar-BB1aZSen?ocid=msedgntp
Can you say oops?
T ![]()
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
T ![]()
PRESIDENT LOSER
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Rudy Giuliani Isn’t Even Trying to Make Coherent Legal Arguments Anymore
On Wednesday, a federal judge in Pennsylvania rejected the Trump campaign’s request for an additional evidentiary hearing over its effort to invalidate the vote in the state over a set of technicalities. The rejection didn’t deter the Trump campaign, though, which a few hours later requested to file an amendment to its already amended complaint, asking the judge in the case to throw out the entire election in Pennsylvania and declare Donald Trump the winner, an argument that already failed in state court. The new request was signed by Rudy Giuliani, who just one day earlier had appeared on behalf of a client as a lawyer in court for the first time in nearly three decades.
You may have heard that Giuliani’s appearance before the court on Tuesday did not go well. “I’ve never seen worse lawyering in an election law case in my life,” University of California–Irvine School of Law professor and Slate contributor Richard Hasen tweeted.
Since the election, Trump campaign attorneys have been arguing similarly thin cases in courts all over the country (and judges are trashing them for it). But Giuliani’s appearance on Tuesday was distinctly terrible. He treated the entire affair as though it were a Fox News appearance, raising baseless conspiracy theories unrelated to the case, failing to understand or answer basic questions of law, and contradicting himself on whether or not the campaign was actually alleging any “fraud.”
Giuliani’s appearance might have been amusing, if not for his goal: to invalidate the ballots of hundreds of thousands of mostly Black voters in Pennsylvania as part of a plan to overturn an election the president lost by about 6 million votes and functionally end American democracy. (It’s worth noting that Giuliani was reportedly only placed in charge of Trump’s legal strategy a few days ago, after multiple law firms withdrew from the president’s team.)
Below are some of the most dumbfounding lowlights of Giuliani’s legal presentation, which now appears doomed to fail.
Giuliani spent most of his time on a claim that was deleted from the lawsuit.
The lawsuit concerns Pennsylvania voters who claim they were disenfranchised because their Republican-leaning counties did not allow for cures of absentee ballot problems while some Democratic counties did. As U.S. District Judge Matthew W. Brann pointed out, these voters should be asking the counties that didn’t accept their votes for relief. Instead, they and the Trump campaign are asking that voters in the Democratic-leaning counties have their ballots thrown out, alleging a violation of the Equal Protection Clause based on an incredibly stretched interpretation of Bush v. Gore. Even if the court went along with this ridiculous argument, it would still only net President Donald Trump a small number of votes, far fewer than he needs to overturn Biden’s current 82,127 vote lead in the state.
More at https://web.archive.org/web/20201119062157/https://slate.com/news-and-
politics/2020/11/trump-rudy-giuliani-pennsylvania-lawsuits-not-coherent.html
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Giuliani is panicked. He colluded with Russians in an attempt to alter US elections. He attempted to frame a presidential candidate. He knows what's coming and he is trying to delay, and in desperation, change the outcome.
T ![]()
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:Quote:They ARE dominated by fascists...
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
How's that?
SCOTUS is going to be making rulings you don't approve of for decades after Biden is committed to a home.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
Your definition of fascist is incorrect and means nothing.
It also in no way changes the truth of my statement.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:You've repeatedly shown that you don't know what words mean.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Your definition of fascist is incorrect and means nothing.
It also in no way changes the truth of my statement.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:Quote:You've repeatedly shown that you don't know what words mean.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Your definition of fascist is incorrect and means nothing.
It also in no way changes the truth of my statement.
Never once have I.
And you're an authority on nothing, so I reject any opinion that comes out of your ill-informed brainlet.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
