Another Putin Disaster
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Wednesday, August 26, 2026 22:07
VIEWED: 114667
PAGE 29 of 160
I'm sure they're both devastated, yanno, both of them being American citizens and all.
Idiot.
Meanwhile, your English is always in question. We can't figure out if you're a foreign agent or if you're just retarded.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
U.S. envoy says U.N. vote on Russia bid to cut Syria aid access is 'good versus evil'
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/u-s-envoy-says-u-n-vote-on-russia
-bid-to-cut-syria-aid-access-is-good-versus-evil/ar-BB16uPeu?ocid=msedgntp
T 
Stupid people don't know they're stupid, and they certainly don't realize how obvious it is to others.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Every time I read that line about stupid people, I can only appreciate the irony.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
US officials tell AP: Russia spreading virus disinformation
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/us-officials-tell-ap-russia-sprea
ding-virus-disinformation/ar-BB17ijnk?ocid=msedgntp
T
Stupid people don't know they're stupid, and they certainly don't realize how obvious it is to others.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
YAWN!!
Like anyone cares what Russia has to say. ** I ** certainly don't.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Are we sure Putin isn't a female? After all, poison is a womens choice when killing someone.
T
Stupid people don't know they're stupid, and they certainly don't realize how obvious it is to others.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
YAWN!!
Like anyone cares what Russia has to say. ** I ** certainly don't.
Great, then STFU.
https://nyti.ms/2Qb3QXF
The Trump Campaign Accepted Russian Help to Win in 2016. Case Closed.
“Cooperation” or “collusion” or whatever. It was a plot against American democracy.
By The Editorial Board
The editorial board is a group of opinion journalists whose views are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values. It is separate from the newsroom.
Aug. 19, 2020
From the start, the Trump-Russia story has been both eye-glazingly complex and extraordinarily simple.
Who is Oleg Deripaska? What’s the G.R.U. again? Who owed what to whom? The sheer number of crisscrossing characters and interlocking pieces of evidence — the phone calls, the emails, the texts, the clandestine international meet-ups — has bamboozled even those who spend their days teasing it all apart. It’s no wonder average Americans tuned out long ago.
A bipartisan report released Tuesday by the Republican-controlled Senate Intelligence Committee cuts through the chaff. The simplicity of the scheme has always been staring us in the face: Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign sought and maintained close contacts with Russian government officials who were helping him get elected. The Trump campaign accepted their offers of help. The campaign secretly provided Russian officials with key polling data. The campaign coordinated the timing of the release of stolen information to hurt Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
The Senate committee’s report isn’t telling this story for the first time, of course. (Was it only a year ago that Robert Mueller testified before Congress about his own damning, comprehensive investigation?) But it is the first to do so with the assent of Senate Republicans, who have mostly ignored the gravity of the Trump camp’s actions or actively worked to cast doubt about the demonstrable facts in the case.
It’s also a timely rebuke to the narrative that Attorney General William Barr has been hawking since before he took office early last year — that “Russiagate” is a “bogus” scandal. Mr. Barr and other Trump allies claim that the Russia investigation was begun without basis and carried out with the intent of “sabotaging the presidency.” That argument has been debunked by every investigative body that has spent any time looking into what happened, including the nation’s intelligence community, Mr. Mueller’s team, the Justice Department’s inspector general and now the Senate Intelligence Committee.
In fact, the committee report, which is nearly 1,000 pages long and is the fifth in a series examining Russian interference in 2016, goes further than Mr. Mueller’s investigation.
For example, Mr. Mueller declined to say whether Mr. Trump had lied under oath when he said that he did not recall speaking with Roger Stone, his longtime aide and confidant, about WikiLeaks, which released the batches of emails stolen by the Russians. But the Senate committee found that the president “did, in fact, speak with Stone about WikiLeaks and with members of his campaign about Stone’s access to WikiLeaks on multiple occasions.”
The committee documented that, on Oct. 7, 2016, Mr. Stone received advance notice of the impending release of the “Access Hollywood” tape, in which Mr. Trump brags about sexually assaulting women. In response, Mr. Stone made at least two phone calls arranging for WikiLeaks to release stolen internal emails from the Democratic National Committee.
The report also found that Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime business associate of Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, was a Russian intelligence officer, and may have been linked to the Russian military’s hacking and leaking of the D.N.C. emails in the first place.
Mr. Trump and his allies will parse and prevaricate forever. Ignore them. If it wasn’t already overwhelmingly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Germany: Don't criticise us for being bearer of bad news on Navalny's poisoning
BERLIN (Reuters) - The fact that independent laboratories in other countries have confirmed Germany's conclusion that Alexei Navalny was poisoned with a Russian military nerve agent should bring an end to criticism of Germany's finding, Germany's foreign minister said.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germany-don-t-criticise-us-for-be
ing-bearer-of-bad-news-on-navalny-s-poisoning/ar-BB191m0D?ocid=msedgntp
T
Stupid people don't know they're stupid, and they certainly don't realize how obvious it is to others.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Are we sure Putin isn't a female? After all, poison is a womens choice when killing someone.
Found the sexist, Kiki.
BTW, retard Ted. It's "woman's" choice. Not "womens" choice.
You really need to at least pay attention to those red squiggly lines in your browser if you're not going to bother learning English.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Russian Media Is Rooting for Civil War in America: ‘The Worse, the Better’
https://www.thedailybeast.com/russian-media-is-rooting-for-civil-war-i
n-america
There is no shortage of local topics that interest the Kremlin—from the poisoning of an inconvenient dissident, to the events in neighboring Belarus and the ongoing battle against the coronavirus. In the thick of it all, America remains front and center of the Russian state media’s steely focus. In Putin’s Russia, U.S. President Donald J. Trump’s rallies, events and press comments are viewed and reported with maniacal obsession.
Russian state media happily poked fun at the Trump campaign’s use of a stock photo of Russian-made fighter jets, but aside from an occasional jab, Moscow’s coverage of the Trump presidency closely resembles that of Fox News. State-controlled media’s slant is a telling indicator of the Kremlin’s leanings. To imagine the relationship between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his massive media apparatus, one may reference the coziness between Sean Hannity and Trump—and magnify that intensity tenfold, with directives flowing only from the top down. Obsessed with retaining his dominance and fully realizing the power of propaganda, Putin leaves nothing to chance.
Russian lawmakers, state media experts and pundits on tightly-choreographed TV shows openly reveal that the Kremlin is still rooting for Trump. But Moscow has a growing concern that this time around, their preferred candidate might lose. Appearing on a state TV show The Right To Know, Margarita Simonyan, the editor-in-chief of the Kremlin-funded propaganda networks RT and Sputnik, said about Trump’s chances of re-election: “I think Trump will lose, but then I think there will be a major blow-up from the standpoint of accepting or not accepting the outcome of the election. They’ll be battling over that for a long time, who knows how it might end.”
Trump's boss wants him to murder even more people than he already has.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME