The secret plot to depose Trump
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Saturday, February 7, 2026 22:19
VIEWED: 36601
PAGE 39 of 49
Quote:I read your post, 1kiki. You want Flynn to go free. The article you quoted says, "Judge Sullivan’s actions this week raise serious doubt whether he paid attention to this recent, unanimous decision." 1kiki, your article aligns itself with what you want - Sullivan must let Flynn go free. Today, the Court of Appeals said you and your article are full of shit.
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Not at all what my post was about, but keep 'pretending' to be stupid.
As your article said, "DOJ and/or Flynn may well seek and receive a mandamus judgment against J. Sullivan from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals." The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against you, 1kiki.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"So, whether or not one agrees with the Department of Justice’s call to drop its charges against President Trump’s former National Security Advisor, Gen. Michael Flynn, there should be widespread agreement that J. Sullivan has veered way out of line."
But, keep 'pretending' to be stupid.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The D.C. Court of Appeals said yesterday that Judge Sullivan has NOT veered out of line. 1kiki, your legal opinion has been stomped to death by the Court of Appeals.
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
"So, whether or not one agrees with the Department of Justice’s call to drop its charges against President Trump’s former National Security Advisor, Gen. Michael Flynn, there should be widespread agreement that J. Sullivan has veered way out of line."
But, keep 'pretending' to be stupid.
www.cnn.com/2020/06/12/politics/michael-flynn-hearing-sullivan/index.h
tml
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Actually, the appeals court said it was too early to file an appeal on the process of dismissing the Flynn case because there hadn't yet been a ruling.
It didn't rule on the merits of Sullivan hiring John Gleeson as an amicus curiae to represent his (Sullivan's) introduced arguments, which is the point of the two recent Supreme Court rulings.
The two are completely separate matters.
But what the heck - keep 'pretending' to be stupid!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
T 
Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals. 
T
Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
LIKE MOST OF WHAT WAS IN THE STEELE "DOSSIER", THIS TOO WAS FALSE
Quote:AND PEOPLE STUPIDLY BELIEVED IT. THUGR IN PARTICULAR MADE A BIG DEAL ABOUT IT, DESPITE BEING REPEATEDLY TOLD THERE WAS NO "THERE" THERE
British court rules against Christopher Steele, orders damages paid to businessmen named in dossier
Court rules Steele's firm violated Britain's data privacy law by failing to aggressively check allegations in his dossier
By John Solomon
A British judge ruled Wednesday that Christopher Steele violated a data privacy law by failing to check the accuracy of information in his infamous dossier, ordering the former spy’s firm to pay damages to two businessmen he wrongly accused of making illicit payments in Russia.
Justice Mark Warby of the High Court of England and Wales ordered Steele’s firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, to pay a modest 18,000 English pounds – about $22,596 in American currency – each to Petr Aven and Mikhail Fridman as compensation for a violation of Britain’s Data Protection Act 1998 .
Warby ruled that while Steele had a national security interest to share his intelligence with U.S. and British authorities, several of the allegations in Memo 112 of the Steele dossier were “inaccurate or misleading as a matter of fact.”
Aven v Orbis.Judgment Summary.pdf
The judge ruled Steele violated the law by failing to aggressively check the accuracy of one claim accusing Aven and Fridman of making illicit payments to Russia President Vladimir Putin before distributing it to various U.S. and British figures, including the FBI.
“That is an allegation of serial criminal wrongdoing, over a prolonged period. Even in the limited and specific context of reporting intelligence for the purposes I have mentioned, and despite all the other factors I have listed, the steps taken to verify that proposition fell short of what would have been reasonable,” Warby ruled.
“The allegation clearly called for closer attention, a more enquiring approach, and more energetic checking,” the judge added.
The ruling involves a long-discredited claim in Steele’s dossier – repeatedly used by U.S. news media – that Russia’s Alfa Bank, connected to Aven and Fridman, was transmitting secret messages between Moscow and the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.
Quote:
The FBI concluded the computer pings were not nefarious messages but rather routine behavior most likely connected to email spam. Special Counsel Robert Mueller told Congress last year he did not believe the allegations.
Fridman hailed the ruling in a statement.
“We are delighted with the outcome of this case and that Mr Justice Warby has determined what we have always known to be the case – that the contents of Memorandum 112 are inaccurate and misleading," he said. "Ever since these odious allegations were first made public in January 2017, my partners and I have been resolute and unwavering in our determination to prove that they are untrue, and through this case, we have finally succeeded in doing so.”
Though a matter of British law, the ruling is likely to have impact as well in the United States, where the Justice Department continues to investigate the actions of the FBI in the Russia collusion probe, including its interactions with Steele and agents' honesty with the FISA court.
The judge ruled that in Memo 112, one of several that made up Steele's dossier, there were six factually inaccurate or unproven claims that Steele provided from his alleged intelligence sources including that:
the businessmen did not do favors for or receive favors from Putin as the memo claimed;
Fridman and Aven did not provide informal foreign policy advice to the Russian leader as Steele alleged;
Fridman did not meet with Putin in September 2016 as claimed by Steele's source;
the businessman did not bribe Putin when he was Deputy Mayor of St Petersburg;
And Fridman and Aven did not do Putin’s political bidding as the dossiNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I'm not familiar enough with the British Courts.
Perhaps something in this ruling can be used in another system to compel adequate damages.. American Courts allow findings between Civil/Criminal Courts to be used in the other.
These damages awarded are pitiful.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I'VE HEARD THIS BEFORE, BUT NOT FROM JOHN SOLOMON. MAYBE IT'S TRUE THIS TIME
Quote:
John Solomon: Indictments coming in Russia investigation
'My sources tell me there's a lot of activity'
Investigative reporter John Solomon says there's a "lot of activity" in U.S. Attorney John Durham's criminal investigation of the Obama administration's probe of now-debunked claims of Trump-Russia collusion during the 2016 election.
"My sources tell me there's a lot of activity. I'm seeing, personally, activity behind the scenes [showing] the Department of Justice is trying to bring those first indictments," Solomon said in an interview with the Fox Business Network's Lou Dobbs reported by the Washington Examiner.
"And I would look for a time around Labor Day to see the first sort of action by the Justice Department."
https://www.wnd.com/2020/07/john-solomon-indictments-coming-russia-inv
estigation/
Unfortunately the original source (Washington Examiner) is behind a paywall.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
John Solomon and Sara Carter used to have their news organization, but now I can't recall the name of it.
I can't find more now, but I'd expect his report to be already published somewhere, but not findable with Fake News search engines.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
THIS IS FROM THE SAME ARTICLE BUT DESERVES TWO SEPARATE POSTS BC IT DEALS WITH TWO SEPARATE ISSUES:
THE SOURCE OF CHRISTOPHER STEELE'S "DOSSIER" WAS A NON-RUSSIAN EMPLOYEE OF CHRISTOPHER STEELE
Quote:
Declassified: Christopher Steele's "Primary Sub-Source" Was His Own Employee;
FBI documents declassified by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC) reveal that Christopher Steele's "primary sub-source" for his infamous Clinton/DNC-funded dossier was a 'non-Russian employee of Christopher Steele's firm.'
Per Graham's office:
The document reveals that the primary “source” of Steele’s election reporting was not some well-connected current or former Russian official, but a non-Russian based contract employee of Christopher Steele’s firm. Moreover, it demonstrates that the information that Steele’s primary source provided him was second and third-hand information and rumor at best.
Critically, the document shows that Steele’s “Primary Sub-source” disagreed with and was surprised by how information he gave Steele was then conveyed by Steele in the Steele dossier.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME