Real World Event Discussions

The secret plot to depose Trump

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Saturday, February 7, 2026 22:19
VIEWED: 36601
PAGE 36 of 49

Thursday, June 11, 2020 1:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
I know for a fact that YOU know for a fact that neither Signy nor I are Russian, SHITSTAIN. Intentionally, knowingly, defaming other people is not a good look for you.

I recall that you two Russian Trolls discussed sharing a lawyer who would sue me over that point. Then years passed and nothing happened. Go ahead. Do it. Make your threats more real than Trump's honesty, integrity, and sincerity. He'd have a hard time proving he has those qualities in a courtroom:

One of the unique characteristics of Donald Trump's criminal behavior is that, unlike most other criminals, he actually ends up admitting his wrongdoing in public and insisting that there's nothing wrong with it. That was surprisingly well demonstrated on Thursday when he told George Stephanopoulos that he would happily accept and disseminate dirt on his political opponents, which is against the law.

And one of the reasons that Trump is so comfortable making such public confessions is that he knows he has Fox News (aka State TV) to clean up after him. That's what took place on Friday morning when the President did another call-in interview with the devoted Trump-fluffers on Fox and Friends. It was easily predictable that Trump would book this segment following a gaffe that was essentially an admission of treason.

However, even that brownnosing do-over was stepped on by Trump himself with the release of another clip from the Stephanopoulos interview. In this discussion Trump launched into a familiar and tedious denial that he ever sought to have special counsel Robert Mueller fired. That's a claim that has been refuted by several of his close aides, including his White House Counsel, Don McGahn. Stephanopoulos noted that McGahn had testified to Mueller that Trump did ask him to talk to the Justice Department and make it clear to them that Mueller "had to go." Which led to this incriminating exchange (video below):

Trump: I don't care what he said. It doesn't matter. That was to show everyone what a good counsel he was.
Stephanopoulos: But why would he lie under oath to Robert Mueller?
Trump: Because he wanted to make himself look like a good lawyer. Or he believed it because I would constantly tell anybody that would listen, including you, including the media, that Robert Mueller was conflicted.

First of all, when Stephanopoulos asked why McGahn would lie under oath, Trump didn't reject that premise. In fact, he attempted to justify it. So Trump is accusing his White House counsel of committing criminal perjury. It will interesting to see if Attorney General William Barr will now open an investigation into that and issue an indictment for McGahn. (Don't hold your breath). Because either McGahn is guilty of perjury, or Trump is lying about it.

Secondly, Trump's first explanation for McGahn's alleged perjury is that McGahn was seeking to "make himself look like a good lawyer." How? By lying under oath? How does it burnish his credibility to implicate Trump in a scheme to fire Mueller? Trump is apparently conceding that testimony linking Trump to obstruction of justice is the honorable thing to do. Of course it is. Telling the truth would surely cast a positive glow on McGahn or any other witness. But accusing McGahn of doing the right thing is an odd defense from Trump's perspective.

Finally, Trump's other explanation for McGahn's testimony is that McGahn, and "anybody that would listen," were deluged with complaints by Trump that Mueller was conflicted. That assertion has always been a deliberate lie on Trump's part. But his admission here that he has been inundating everyone around him with that allegation could itself be construed as obstruction of justice. He's trying to materially harm the investigation by falsely impugning the integrity of the special counsel.

So Trump is providing a perverse set of arguments in his defense. On one hand,

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 11, 2020 1:27 AM

"I recall that you two Russian Trolls discussed sharing a lawyer who would sue me over that point."


No, SHITSTAIN, I said I would sue SOMEbody of my choosing, at a time of my choosing, for reasons of my own.



*IS* there a reason I should focus on you? Have your little trollettes bailed on you?

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 11, 2020 1:54 AM

To get back to the OT "The secret plot to depose Trump".


Yes indeed there was a secret plot - and still is.

But time has moved on, as have world circumstances. The most notable factor which has NOT disappeared from the headlines as JACK predicted is COVID-19. I'm not going to predict how this will play out over the next few months, as I don't think I have an understanding of how the virus spreads through the US. Obviously there are superspreader events/ conditions; but there's also at least one OTHER mechanism that doesn't fit with the current understanding of who're the major infection sources - that's responsible for the non-urban persistence and spread in places like LACounty and rural states.

So that's up in the air in terms of the election.

The second and related circumstance is the economy. Right now a lot of people are still coasting on jobless benefits. (Mar 25, 2020 In addition to regular state unemployment insurance, individuals will receive an additional $600 per week for up to four months. https://www.forbes.com/sites/advisor/2020/03/25/what-you-need-to-know-
about-expanded-unemployment-benefits-for-covid-19/#64f9f7136e4a
) So while there's a great deal of angst among people who are truly strapped for cash, as well as among small business owners; it's being muted by those who are still receiving that expanded unemployment. But that's going to run out SOON. And in addition, anyone refusing to go back to work because they think it's unsafe will have their unemployment benefits cut off. And businesses have been freed from liability for SARS-CoV-2 infections. Both of those will land directly on Trump if it becomes prevalent enough. Overall, can Trump restart the economy before the election decision point when people settle on a candidate? I don't think so.


Then there's the George Floyd cotton candy. I'm calling it that because I believe - in terms of numbers - this will dissolve like the fluffed up piece of insubstantial nothing it is. Not that I think police misconduct doesn't exist. Or that police are immune from prejudice. But, as Signy points out, nothing will be done about the root causes of what's wrong with society. (SECOND should know about root causes - it's the factor that underlies any failure analysis.) There will be a lot of what I call Kabuki theater instead, which will mollify enough people enough, but go absolutely nowhere.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 11, 2020 2:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Then there's the George Floyd cotton candy. I'm calling it that because I believe - in terms of numbers - this will dissolve like the fluffed up piece of insubstantial nothing it is. Not that I think police misconduct doesn't exist. Or that police are immune from prejudice. But, as Signy points out, nothing will be done about the root causes of what's wrong with society. (SECOND should know about root causes - it's the factor that underlies any failure analysis.) There will be a lot of what I call Kabuki theater instead, which will mollify enough people enough, but go absolutely nowhere.

1kiki, it is NOT theater. Trump asked the Pentagon to send troops to kill American citizens. The Pentagon told Trump it would not follow his plan:

James Mattis Denounces President Trump, Describes Him as a Threat to the Constitution. In an extraordinary condemnation, the former defense secretary backs protesters and says the president is trying to turn Americans against one another.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200609110559/www.theatlantic.com/politic
s/archive/2020/06/james-mattis-denounces-trump-protests-militarization/612640
/

Trump Wanted to Fire Esper Over Troops Dispute
Defense secretary’s stand against using federal troops to quell protests over George Floyd’s killing prompted president’s plan to remove him

WASHINGTON—President Tramp last week was on the brink of firing Defense Secretary Mark Esper over their differing views of domestic use of active-duty military, before advisers and allies on Capitol Hill talked him out of it, according to several officials.

The officials said Mr. Trump was furious with Mr. Esper for not supporting his inclination to use active-duty troops to quell protests in Washington, D.C., Minneapolis and elsewhere following the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis on May 25.
www.wsj.com/articles/trump-wanted-to-fire-esper-over-troops-dispute-11
591728235



The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 11, 2020 3:08 AM

Rodney George King Floyd

Empty theater.
Stylized protests. Formalized knee-bending.
Nothing changes here.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 11, 2020 3:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Rodney George King Floyd

Empty theater.
Stylized protests. Formalized knee-bending.
Nothing changes here.

It is NOT theater. The president’s threat to send the troops into American cities alarms commanders:

America is in the midst of its worst civil-military crisis for a generation, one that threatens to do enduring harm to democratic norms and the standing and cohesion of its armed forces. Mr Trump’s call to use military force to quell the most widespread unrest in half a century—sparked by the killing by a white police officer of George Floyd, an unarmed black man—has caused unease and alarm up and down the chain of command. Two events, in particular, seem to have prompted the generals to speak out. On June ist Mr Trump threatened to deploy active-duty troops under the Insurrection Act of 1807. He also decided to walk to a church near the White House to stage a photo-op, flanked by Mark Esper, the secretary of defence, and General Mark Milley, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, America’s top military officer. Peaceful protesters had been forcibly cleared away with tear gas from the site moments earlier, even before the city’s curfew had taken effect.

www.economist.com/united-states/2020/06/07/americas-top-brass-break-wi
th-donald-trump


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 11, 2020 3:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SECOND: blah blah blah ... Trump ... blah blah blah


-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 11, 2020 4:20 AM

Members of the U.S. military avoid making overtly political statements. Even former generals avoid criticizing a sitting president -- who serves as the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.

But on Tuesday, retired admiral Mike Mullen said: “The events of the past few weeks have made it impossible to remain silent.” Mullen was the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

Mullen wrote in the Atlantic: “It sickened me yesterday to see security personnel—including members of the National Guard—forcibly and violently clear a path through Lafayette Square to accommodate the president's visit outside St. John's Church.”

The strongest and most public criticism came Wednesday from retired General James Mattis. He is Trump’s former defense secretary. Mattis said in a statement: “When I joined the military, some 50 years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking the same oath would be ordered…to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens—much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside.”

https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/retired-generals-clash-with-trum
p/5449319.html


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 11, 2020 7:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SECOND: blah blah blah ... Trump ... blah blah blah


Oh, and BTW ... if it's true that you know for a fact who I am (and I think it probably is) then defaming me is not just telling an untruth, it's telling a deliberate lie. And if you're willing to lie about something you know for sure, what else are you willing to lie about?

Doesn't your religion tell you not to lie? Or is your God like a tax collector, and as long as you pay your taxes you're good with the Almighty?

I guess that's how you stave off your guilt for killing people, murderer.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, June 11, 2020 8:54 AM

Signym, rather than you speculating about me, someone who is a figment of your Russian Trolling imagination, speculate about someone who is very fat and soft and real:

Donald Trump’s Increasingly Elaborate Bid to Create His Own America
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/06/trump-wants-his-own-americ
a.html


His lies and his degradation of reporting have been constant, but as we head toward the election, something more sinister is afoot.

On Tuesday morning, Donald Trump, whose unsurprising character defects still never fail to surprise, tweeted a Russian-sourced conspiracy theory claiming that the 75-year-old peace activist who remains hospitalized after his head was smashed open by Buffalo, New York, law enforcement officers was in fact a tech-savvy “ANTIFA provocateur” who “fell harder than was pushed.” The president also linked to a report from a conservative cable news outlet, One America News Network, for support. That report claimed, with no supporting evidence, that the man “was attempting to capture the radio communications signature of Buffalo police officers.”

The problem for Trump—but actually the problem for all the rest of us—is that we all saw the video. We all saw a peaceful 75-year-old approach the Buffalo police officers, who then push him to the pavement and walk past his bleeding body. In fact, the existence and wide circulation of that video are what forced the Buffalo Police Department, which originally claimed that a person “was injured when he tripped & fell” during a “skirmish involving protestors,” to suspend the two officers. The existence of the video, for all intents and purposes, closed the case, at least in the court of most sentient public opinion.

But closed cases are actually Donald Trump’s specialty. And the more compelling the evidence of a closed case is, the more apt he is to relitigate it. It’s no accident that some of Donald Trump’s most incendiary claims require his true believers to accept that their own eyes cannot be believed. Whether it’s photographic evidence of his lackluster inaugural crowds or hand-altered meteorological maps, almost every Trumpian fictionalized tour de force starts with a false claim—also known as a lie—that is readily disproven or even obviously wrong to the naked eye, and then subverts it. The more overtly false, the better.

But casual lies alone are for amateurs; the real authoritarian move is to construct an entire false reality—an unreality—around those lies.

Indeed, Trump himself has made the Orwellian claim that, among the many entities he insists lie constantly—the media, the FBI, the intelligence community, the entire House of Representatives now that it’s Democrat-led, the nameless and faceless “deep state” conspirators—the lyingest liars out there are our own eyes and ears. In July 2018, Trump, while addressing a Veterans of Foreign Wars Convention in Kansas City, told those assembled that they shouldn’t trust their eyes and ears at all and should instead get their facts from Trump alone. “Just remember, what you are seeing and what you are reading is not what’s happening,” Trump said. “Just stick with us, don’t believe the crap you see from these people, the fake news.” In some ways it’s an old play, presaged by George Orwell in 1984 when he warned that “the Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” It’s a double whammy that demonizes and delegitimizes the media as a whole while also—as Tyler Cowen has argued—wringing loyalty from all those who must then repeat the lie and cover for it. Every repetition of a lie deepens their loyalty.

But casual lies alone are for amateurs; the real authoritarian move is to construct an entire false reality—an unreality—around those lies. That’s what we’re now seeing from Trump and his loyalists. On Wednesday morning, White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany made just this move on Fox & Friends. Speaking about the peaceful protester pushed to the ground in Buffalo, host Brian Kilmeade asked, “Does the pre

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME