Have Western Neo-Feminists now destoryed 'The West'?
POSTED BY: JAYNEZTOWN
UPDATED: Friday, June 12, 2026 19:13
VIEWED: 82669
PAGE 16 of 20
Online Greta Thunberg and James Woods drama? https://www.dailywire.com/news/greta-issues-political-womens-day-post-
james-woods-responds-with-one-single-right-men-have-over-women
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Why Men Shouldn't Listen To MGTOW and Red Pill Blindly
https://www.hiddendominion.com/why-men-shouldnt-listen-to-mgtow-and-re
d-pill-blindly/
Are Men Adapting to the New Sexual Marketplace?
https://therationalmale.com/2019/10/02/are-men-adapting-to-the-new-sex
ual-marketplace/
What do feminists think of men going their own way MGTOW
https://www.quora.com/What-do-feminists-think-of-men-going-their-own-w
ay-MGTOW
Topic: Society for Men's Freedom
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/society-for-mens-freedom-2/
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
US Marriage Rate Falls to Lowest Level in 120 Years
https://www.onenewspage.com/n/Europe/1zlreqwfm1/US-Marriage-Rate-Falls
-to-Lowest-Level-in.htm
US Birth Rate Nosedive: Lowest in 30 Years
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/u.s-birth-rate-nosedive-lo
west-in-30-years
The U.S. marriage rate has fallen to its lowest level in 120 years after having declined steadily since the 1980s and plateauing over the past decade, a study says
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/29/marriage-rate-falls-t
o-lowest-level-in-120-years/
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hey... as long as you don't destroy yourself while you're not married, it sure is a good way to live.
Grass is always greener though.
I tell my married friends that even though I wouldn't trade the freedom of being single for anything, they should appreciate their wives for keeping them more or less in line. All of my married friends seem to have skipped the whole self-destruction phase in their life, and not too many of the unmarried ones ever came back from that. My own story is littered all over these boards, and it wasn't pretty.
It's actually somewhat difficult to maintain focus and ambition and not succumb to idle-hands syndrome and all that entails when you don't have somebody constantly nagging at you and you find yourself living a life absent of the responsibility that most other people your age have.
Can't speak for what it was like to be married 50 or more years ago, but from the outside looking in it seems these days that most guys getting married just need to keep a mom figure in their life. I mean, that's essentially what a wife is after the honeymoon phase is over.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Can't speak for what it was like to be married 50 or more years ago, but from the outside looking in it seems these days that most guys getting married just need to keep a mom figure in their life. I mean, that's essentially what a wife is after the honeymoon phase is over.
I agree with you on something for once!
Now, you wanna discuss the reasons why a lotta men would need a "mommy" and why women would generally be more responsible??
I'm guessing not....
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Women in general have a better sense of self preservation than men. It's in the genetic code.
Until recently, making sure their man stayed healthy and strong was in a woman's best interest. They've got other options now though, via alimony, child support and government programs.
The US Government is Daddy to a lot of kids these days.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I agree with SIX. Evolutionarily, female reproduction is the rate-limiting step for many animals (mammals in particular). Most males in many species are redundant, unless they also feed the young (like many birds). It's beneficial for the species if superfluous males risk and die ... fewer mouths to feed, more food for the young! That's what "intraspecies competition" is all about. But if females were equally risk-taking it would be species suicide.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There are exceptions though. Orcas, dolphins, bonobos that I can think of off the top of my head.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Is the exception to redundant males being gotten rid of (somehow) or to females being more risk averse than males, or both?
I know that orca pods are headed by females. Also elephant herds. I think bonobos as well. OTOH I don't know the dophin hierarchy. (btw Dolphins perform what looks like gang-rape when mating.)
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I agree with SIX. Evolutionarily, female reproduction is the rate-limiting step for many animals (mammals in particular). Most males in many species are redundant, unless they also feed the young (like many birds). It's beneficial for the species if superfluous males risk and die ... fewer mouths to feed, more food for the young! That's what "intraspecies competition" is all about. But if females were equally risk-taking it would be species suicide.
Yup. In a true end-of-the-world scenario, we'd be a much better chance surviving if there were 5 men and 50 women than if there were 5 women and 50 men.
We all need agency, but it's not a coincidence that in times of high unemployment the suicide rate increases are staggeringly slanted on the male side.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME