Countdown Clock, Trumps Removal 'Starts'
POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 25, 2026 22:20
VIEWED: 47528
PAGE 30 of 64
Just barely...
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
T 
Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
T
Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.
You can probably add Chief Speaking Bull to the list once it's clear that Bernie isn't going to be the nominee or she gets a REALLY good feeling the Super Delegates are going Biden if nobody is a clear winner.
She is such a filthy whore.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump Is Counting on the Supreme Court to Save Him
The president’s remarkable lawsuit against his own accountants and bankers can succeed only if the conservative majority intervenes on his behalf. Plainly, there is something in Trump’s tax documents that Trump dreads letting the world see.
The issues raised by impeachment in early 2020 come roaring back for the election finale. Trump’s evident corruption, the questions over his thralldom to the Putin regime in Russia, the refusal of the Republican Party to uphold law when inconvenient to Trump—you thought we’d talked them to death during impeachment? There is so much more to come.
Sometime before June 29, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court will either plunge the United States into the severest constitutional crisis of the Trump years—or save Americans from that crisis.
Three different committees of Congress, as well as New York State prosecutors, have issued subpoenas to President Donald Trump’s accountants and bankers for his tax and business records. Trump has sued to stop the accountants and bankers from complying. He has lost twice at the district-court level and twice at the appeals-court level. Now he is looking to the conservative majority on the Supreme Court to rescue him.
On March 31, the court will hear oral arguments in the cases of Trump v. Mazars and Trump v. Deutsche Bank. The decision will be rendered sometime between then and the court’s summer break.
Although Trump is suing his accountants and his bankers as a private citizen, his case has been joined by the Department of Justice. Solicitor General Noel Francisco has signed an amicus brief on behalf of the United States. It is an astonishing document. It invites the Supreme Court to junk two centuries of precedent—and to substitute an entirely new system of judicial review of congressional subpoenas that involve a president:
Quote:All the requirements in that above paragraph were devised for purposes of this litigation. None of them has ever been enforced—none of them has ever been imagined—in the previous 230 years of skirmishing between Congresses and presidents. Every must and should and cannot was invented in this very brief, for the immediate legal purposes of this president in this dilemma. The solicitor general might as well have said that subpoenas must be delivered by a sled pulled by flying reindeer, for all the connection between these demands and the previous constitutional history of the United States.
A legislative subpoena must therefore satisfy heightened requirements when it seeks information from the President. At the threshold, the full chamber should unequivocally authorize a subpoena against the President. Moreover, the legislative purpose should be set forth with specificity. Courts should not presume that the purpose is legitimate, but instead should scrutinize it with care. And as with information protected by executive privilege, information sought from the President should be demonstrably critical to the legislative purpose. A congressional committee cannot evade these heightened requirements merely by directing the subpoena to third-party custodians, for such agents generally assume the rights and privileges of their principal, as this Court has recognized in analogous cases.
As the House of Representatives noted in the brief it filed, previous Congresses have obtained the bank records of Presidents Andrew Johnson and Jimmy Carter, and the tax records of President Richard Nixon. They have read the diaries of President Ronald Reagan and the law-firm billing records of first lady Hillary Clinton.
It’s never before been the law that a subpoena of the president must be authorized by “the full chamber,” much less that this authorization be “unequivocal”—whatever that means.
It’s never before been the law that the president’s privileges—whatever they are—also extend to his private business agents.
It’s never before been the law that the courts set themselves over Congress as scrutinizers of its subpoenas, approving or disapproving. Until n
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Trump Is Counting on the Supreme Court to Save Him
The president’s remarkable lawsuit against his own accountants and bankers can succeed only if the conservative majority intervenes on his behalf. Plainly, there is something in Trump’s tax documents that Trump dreads letting the world see.
Fraud, wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. That and the IRS will have its pound of flesh.
T
Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
T
Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.
Trump fires acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
tick tock
T
Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.
Dr. Redlener, the director of the National Center for Disaster Preparedness, tells Lawrence O’Donnell that President Trump is leading the country in the wrong direction causing a "complete active melting down of America's health and hospital system."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump!!! You're killing people...
T
Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.
As the number of coronavirus cases continues to surge across America, Trump took time at his briefing and on Twitter to go after the governors of Michigan and Washington as dire reports pour out of American hospitals.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Was this the "Tick Tock to 47% Approval" thread?
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_app
roval-6179.html
You read that right. 47.3% approval, vs. 49.3% disapproval. The best looking number's he's seen in either category since he was elected, and continuing to trend up.
Even the "experts" have said that Trump is a lock at 47%.
I don't think it's going to stay that high, but after all of this Trump should find a new floor, probably no lower than 46% unless all of this nonsense somehow drags on through the whole summer.
Trump wins in November easily if he is still at 45%.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
