Mueller Investigation Is Over / Part two are the trials. Hey Jack, I Was Right. 20 Plus Russians Charged, 19 Of Trumps People Convicted of Felonies.
POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Monday, August 31, 2026 21:49
VIEWED: 129258
PAGE 100 of 157
Quote:It's ALWAYS without proof!
Apparent US Intel Meddling in US Election With ‘Report’ Russia is Aiding Sanders
Without any proof
Quote:
The New York Times and Washington Post run “Russia helping Sanders” stories, and Sanders responds by bashing Russia, writes Joe Lauria.
By Joe Lauria
Special to Consortium News
With Democratic frontrunner Bernie Sanders spooking the Democratic establishment, The Washington Post Friday reported damaging information from intelligence sources against Sanders by saying that Russia is trying to help his campaign.
If the story is true and if intelligence agencies are truly committed to protecting U.S. citizens, the Sanders campaign would have been quietly informed and shown evidence to back up the claims.
Instead the story wound up on the front page of the Post, “according to people familiar with the matter.” Zero evidence was produced to back up the intelligence agencies’ assertion.
“It is not clear what form that Russian assistance has taken,” the Post reported. That would tell any traditional news editor that there was no story until it is known.
Instead major U.S. media are again playing the role of laundering totally unverified “information” just because it comes from an intelligence source. Reporting such assertions without proof amounts to an abdication of journalistic responsibility. It shows total trust in U.S. intelligence despite decades of deception and skullduggery from these agencies.
Centrist Democratic Party leaders have expressed extreme unease with Sanders leading the Democratic pack. Politico reported Friday that former New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg’s entry into the race is explicitly to stop Sanders from winning on the first ballot at the party convention.
A day after The New York Times reported, also without evidence, that Russia is again trying to help Donald Trump win in November, the Post reports Moscow is trying to help Sanders too, again without substance. Both candidates whom the establishment loathes were smeared on successive days.
In a Tough Spot
The Times followed the Post report Friday by making it appear that Sanders himself had chosen to make public the intelligence assessment about “Russian interference” in his campaign.
But Sanders had known for a month about this assessment and only issued a statement after the Post asked him for comment before publishing its uncorroborated story based on anonymous sources.
Sanders was put in a difficult spot. If he said, “Show me the proof that Russia is trying to help me,” he ran the risk of being attacked for disbelieving (even disloyalty to) U.S. intelligence, and, by default, defending the Kremlin.
So politician that he is, and one who is trying to win the White House, Sanders told the Post:
“I don’t care, frankly, who Putin wants to be president. My message to Putin is clear: Stay out of American elections, and as president I will make sure that you do. In 2016, Russia used Internet propaganda to sow division in our country, and my understanding is that they are doing it again in 2020.”
The Times quoted Sanders as calling Russian President Vladimir Putin an “autocratic thug.” The paper reported Sanders saying in a statement: “Let’s be clear, the Russians want to undermine American democracy by dividing us up and, unlike the current president, I stand firmly against their efforts and any other foreign power that wants to interfere in our election.”
Responding to a cacophony of criticism that Sanders’ supporters are especially vicious online, as opposed to the millions of other vicious people online, Sanders attempted to use Russia as a scapegoat, the way the Clinton campaign did in 2016. He said: “Some of the ugly stuff on the Internet attributed to our campaign may well not be coming from real supporters.”
But no matter how strong Sander’s denunciations of Russia, his opponents will now target him as being a tool of the Kremlin.
Mission accomplished.
https://consortiumnews.com/2020/02/21/apparent-us
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
While intelligence officials are uncertain about the thinking of their Russian counterparts, Moscow could potentially consider Sanders a weaker general election opponent for Trump than a more moderate Democratic nominee, according to two people familiar with the matter.
Russia also worked to support — or at least not harm — Sanders in 2016. Operatives at a Russian intelligence-backed troll factory were instructed to avoid attacking Sanders or Trump, according to a report by special counsel Robert Mueller and an indictment he secured of 13 Russians working on the operation.
Both the indictment and Mueller’s report quoted internal documents from the Internet Research Agency ordering operatives to attack Hillary Clinton’s campaign. “Use any opportunity to criticize Hillary and the rest except for Sanders and Trump — we support them,” the document said.
Russian operatives used the troll factory in 2016 to pose on social media as Americans and sow divisions among already divisive issues like immigration, religion and race. It was one part of the Kremlin’s multipronged attack on the election that also included hacks of Democratic emails, payments to unsuspecting Americans to stage pro-Trump rallies in battleground states and at least one scouting trip to the United States in 2014.
www.houstonchronicle.com/news/article/Russia-steps-up-election-meddlin
g-in-Trump-15075652.php
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
Bernie is a Communist. There are a lot of Communist-Friendly Democrats in this country today.
Russia doesn't have to do anything but sit back and watch them vote for Bernie.
Trump will destroy anybody who gets nominated, but Bernie will be the most embarrassing defeat if he wins the nomination.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Oh BTW, that Mueller InvestAgation? It went down in flames. And, it's STILL over!
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
1. My 600 lb life. (TV show)
2. Donald Trump
3. Texas Republicans
4. Ruining people's lives because of their political beliefs
5. Talking about how much money he has
6. Republicans in general
7. Conservatives
8. Russia
Quote:And not a single link or piece of evidence except some unlinked quote of no available source. I hear the echo chamber at work.
Originally posted by SECOND:
8. Russia
8. Russia
2. Donald Trump
2. Donald Trump
8. Russia
8. Russia
Boy are you gullible.
Hey, how did the Gulf of Tonkin and Iraq's WMDs work out for you?
And if democrats don't do any different, how are they any better?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Go check out the betting websites. Sanders actually the best chance of all the candidates of beating Trump. Not a great chance, but it's far better than the single digits of everyone else, last time I checked.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Trump will destroy anybody who gets nominated, but Bernie will be the most embarrassing defeat if he wins the nomination.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Go check out the betting websites. Sanders actually the best chance of all the candidates of beating Trump. Not a great chance, but it's far better than the single digits of everyone else, last time I checked.
Originally posted by 1KIKI:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Trump will destroy anybody who gets nominated, but Bernie will be the most embarrassing defeat if he wins the nomination.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
At least as of February 16th, Bernie and Bootyjudge have the same odds head to head with Trump. Bloomberg was the only candidate with winning odds.
I realize that a lot has happened since the 16th though.
Though I like to use the betting odds to figure what's going to happen in the future, and while I appreciate how much more accurately they reflect general trends than the shill Legacy Media does, they are limited in scope and don't take some other things into account.
Amidst all of these ridiculous Democrat debates where they only serve to say stupid shit that makes them weaker, people seem to be forgetting who Trump is.
I still believe that out of the remaining candidates for the Democratic Party, the only one who even has a chance of standing toe to toe in the General Debates with Trump is Bootyjudge. He would absolutely demolish Bernie on stage.
I'm personally hoping that Bernie wins because that will be the most entertaining outcome.
Any bets on how many times Trump calls Bernie a Communist in the General Debates if he wins? Maybe we should start a pool.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Eh, don't dispute me - dispute the oddsmakers!
https://www.thelines.com/odds/election/
Donald Trump (R) -175 -200
Bernie Sanders (D) +400 +333
Michael Bloomberg (D) +450 +500
Joe Biden (D) +2000 +2000
Pete Buttigieg (D) +2500 +2000
Amy Klobuchar (D) +5000 +4000
Elizabeth Warren (D) +10000 +10000
Mike Pence (R) +15000 +10000
Tulsi Gabbard (D) +30000 +20000
Tom Steyer (D) +30000 +20000
https://www.oddsshark.com/politics/2020-usa-presidential-odds-futures
2020 Presidential Election Odds Tracker
Candidate Current Feb 5 Feb 4 Jan 29 Jan 21 Jan 14 Jan 7
Donald Trump -170 -150 -140 -135 -140 -145 -115
Bernie Sanders +375 +425 +350 +250 +500 +500 +700
Michael Bloomberg +500 +750 +1000 +1000 +1200 +1200 +1600
Pete Buttigieg +2000 +1300 +2000 +2800 +2200 +2200 +1600
Joe Biden +1600 +850 +600 +550 +450 +550 +400
Amy Klobuchar +5000 +10000 +10000 +10000 +7500 +6000 +6000
Hillary Clinton +6600 +5000 +5000 +5000 +5000 +4000 +4000
Elizabeth Warren +10000 +3000 +3000 +2500 +1800 +1800 +1600
Mike Pence +15000 +12500 +12500 +12500 +12500 +8000 +8000
Nikki Haley +20000 +15000 +15000 +15000 +10000 +10000 +10000
Tulsi Gabbard +30000 +15000 +15000 +15000 +15000 +15000 +15000
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Try explaining that to Flynn and Stone - The same Witch Hunt Fishing Expedition is still ongoing. Even if you pretend it was an "investigation."
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Oh BTW, that Mueller InvestAgation? It went down in flames. And, it's STILL over!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
You're looking at odds for a different figure.
Head to head odds are different than all candidates combined.
Scroll down to "Trump’s Head-to-Head Odds" in the same link you gave me and you'll see what I'm talking about.
https://www.oddsshark.com/politics/2020-usa-presidential-odds-futures
Both Bernie and Bootyjudge are +105 to Trump's -125.
Bloomberg is -125 to Trump's +105. (Reversed).
But as I said before, those were from February 16th and a lot has happened since then.
It should be assumed that the lower odds for Bloomberg with everyone combined is due to the fact that he'd have a harder chance getting the nomination than Bernie would.
And even though Bernie and Bootyjudge have the same unfavorable odds head to head with Trump compared to Bloomberg, Bootyjudge's chances of actually getting the nomination are quite a bit slimmer than either of them.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
If the Mueller Scam was really over, the Mueller scam-bots wouldn't still be perscuting Stone and Flynn, under the pretext of being "prosecutors" or "judges" like Berman.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME