Real World Event Discussions

The secret plot to depose Trump

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Saturday, February 7, 2026 22:19
VIEWED: 36601
PAGE 29 of 49

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, February 13, 2020 5:28 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

They would, if there were number rigging going on like you suggested. But there isn't, so they don't.

And how do you know that? Do you even use Twitter?

Did you read the rest of my comment?

No. Apparently, you did not.

And how would using Twitter qualify one as being an expert on Twitter anyhow.

What a stupid, stupid question on several levels.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, February 13, 2020 6:33 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
They would, if there were number rigging going on like you suggested. But there isn't, so they don't.
And how do you know that? Do you even use Twitter?

Did you read the rest of my comment?

No. Apparently, you did not.

And how would using Twitter qualify one as being an expert on Twitter anyhow.

What a stupid, stupid question on several levels.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Wouldn't any nominal expert on tweeter by definition know better than to actually use tweeter?

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, February 13, 2020 6:43 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The times.... and the DOJ... they are a-changing.
Quote:
Both Roger Stone Prosecutors Resign 'Immediately' After DOJ Rejects Absurd

Update (1605ET): Just a few short hours after Aaron Zelinsky resigned, Roger Stone's other prosecutor Jonathan Kravis has also just resigned as Assistant US Attorney.

Jonathan Kravis "has resigned as an Assistant United States Attorney and therefore no longer represents the government in this case."

Kravis, a former clerk to Justice Stephen Breyer and Judge Merrick Garland on the US Court of Appeals, served as an associate White House counsel for the Obama administration from 2009 to 2010.

***

The prosecutor who recommended that Trump confidant Roger Stone receive up to nine years in prison has resigned, effective immediately - after reports have emerged that his office misled the DOJ over the proposal, which reportedly 'shocked' DOJ officials enough that they will re-file it.

Prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky gave no details in a Tuesday letter submitted in Stone's case, however a footnote reads that it was "effective immediately."

The notice doesn't give a reason - it cites to a local court rule that requires the U.S. government to designate a DOJ attorney who will appear on behalf of the government. Zelinsky signed the withdraw notice. pic.twitter.com/gSCTh6Y0zQ — Brad Heath (@bradheath) February 11, 2020

Gotta read the footnotes. Zelinsky, the former Mueller prosecutor still helping with the Stone case, resigned from DOJ "effective immediately." pic.twitter.com/kELeKQ11Eo — Brad Heath (@bradheath) February 11, 2020

Earlier Tuesday, AP reported that the Justice Department would "take the extraordinary step of lowering the recommended prison time for Roger Stone, an ally of President Donald Trump, a federal official said Tuesday."

This is a horrible and very unfair situation. The real crimes were on the other side, as nothing happens to them. Cannot allow this miscarriage of justice! https://t.co/rHPfYX6Vbv — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 11, 2020

Beg your pardon?

Hours later, The Federalist's Sean Davis reported that federal prosecutors were reportedly blindsided by the recommendation, which a Fox News source said the DOJ felt was "extreme, excessive, and grossly disproportionate" to Stone's crimes.

“The Department was shocked to see the sentencing recommendation in the filing in the Stone case last night,” the DOJ official reportedly told Fox. “The sentencing recommendation was not what had been briefed to the Department.”
The report from Fox News suggested that DOJ was in the process of rescinding the rogue prosecutors’ recommendation. -The Federalist

What's more, "Sources told The Federalist that Timothy Shea, who was recently appointed to take over as the top federal prosecutor in D.C. earlier this month, was bullied into agreeing to the sentence recommendation by Adam Jed and Aaron Zelinsky, who were originally tapped by Mueller to investigate whether Donald Trump treasonously colluded with the Russian government to steal the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton."

To put it in perspective: The FBI/special counsel/Democrats initially suspected that Trump associates actively conspired with Russia & WikiLeaks. At the end, all they found was that Roger Stone committed process crimes related to his *conversations* about (not with) WikiLeaks. — Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) February 11, 2020

In a Monday evening sentencing memorandum, prosecutors asked for Stone to serve between 87 and 108 months in federal prison, which they argued was within federal guidelines. They argued in court filings that "Stone’s actions were not a one-off mistake in judgement," and that he "decided to double – and triple – down on his criminal conduct by tampering with a witness for months in order to make sure his obstruction would be successful."

[i

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME

1KIKI

Thursday, February 13, 2020 10:09 AM

Quote:
Is this your "unthinkable travesty"?

You don't remember? You brought up the topic.

CLEARLY you can't follow along with your own argument.

Oh well, that's your problem, not mine.

And if democrats don't do anything different, how are they any better?

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, February 13, 2020 11:11 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
They would, if there were number rigging going on like you suggested. But there isn't, so they don't.
And how do you know that? Do you even use Twitter?

Did you read the rest of my comment?

No. Apparently, you did not.

And how would using Twitter qualify one as being an expert on Twitter anyhow.

What a stupid, stupid question on several levels.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Wouldn't any nominal expert on tweeter by definition know better than to actually use tweeter?

I do believe you're right.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Thursday, February 13, 2020 7:39 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

They would, if there were number rigging going on like you suggested. But there isn't, so they don't.

And how do you know that? Do you even use Twitter?

Did you read the rest of my comment?

No. Apparently, you did not.

And how would using Twitter qualify one as being an expert on Twitter anyhow.

What a stupid, stupid question on several levels.

If you used Twitter you would, gee, I don't know, actually learn more about how it works?

If the Dems owned Twitter wouldn't Dem candidates all have more followers than Trump? If the Silicon Valley was all Dem would Facebook be so Trump friendly?

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Thursday, February 13, 2020 7:41 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
They would, if there were number rigging going on like you suggested. But there isn't, so they don't.
And how do you know that? Do you even use Twitter?

Did you read the rest of my comment?

No. Apparently, you did not.

And how would using Twitter qualify one as being an expert on Twitter anyhow.

What a stupid, stupid question on several levels.

Do Right, Be Right. :)
Wouldn't any nominal expert on tweeter by definition know better than to actually use tweeter?

It's really a toss up who posts the stupidest sh*t on this forum, but you can always count on JSF to be right near the top.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, February 13, 2020 8:14 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

They would, if there were number rigging going on like you suggested. But there isn't, so they don't.

And how do you know that? Do you even use Twitter?

Did you read the rest of my comment?

No. Apparently, you did not.

And how would using Twitter qualify one as being an expert on Twitter anyhow.

What a stupid, stupid question on several levels.

If you used Twitter you would, gee, I don't know, actually learn more about how it works?

If the Dems owned Twitter wouldn't Dem candidates all have more followers than Trump? If the Silicon Valley was all Dem would Facebook be so Trump friendly?

I know how Twitter works, dipshit. It's easy enough, even a monkey like you can use it. That's why there are hundreds of millions of people using it. Not a very good cross section of the best and the brightest minds in the world on that platform.

The Democratic Party doesn't own twitter. It's not state run. It's run by Silicon Valley sycophants out of California.

Try to keep two thoughts in your head at one time... I know how hard that is for you.

You said the numbers are rigged for Trump. I said they weren't.

But if number rigging were happening in Social Media, it would be much easier for Democrats to get away with it because of the obvious bias and countless examples of censorship of anybody who doesn't tow the "progressive" line.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Thursday, February 13, 2020 10:45 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I know how Twitter works, dipshit. It's easy enough, even a monkey like you can use it.

Like Trump. He uses the sh*t out of it. Must be where he gets his bananas.

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
That's why there are hundreds of millions of people using it. Not a very good cross section of the best and the brightest minds in the world on that platform.

That's why Trump uses it.

If - according to you - it's such a shit platform with so many idiots and controlled by the Dems, why does Trump spend so much time on it?
Also: if you know so much about Twitter then should I assume you know you can buy followers as easy as you can buy books at Amazon?

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
The Democratic Party doesn't own twitter.

You said they did. Direct quote: "You mean the Democrats who lie for a living just haven't figured out how to game Twitter yet? C'mon dude. Democrats own Twitter."

So... you meant something else maybe?

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
You said the numbers are rigged for Trump. I said they weren't.

And I asked you how you knew and you haven't answered that yet. Not intelligently at least. How do you know they aren't rigged?

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
But if number rigging were happening in Social Media, it would be much easier for Democrats to get away with it because of the obvious bias and countless examples of censorship of anybody who doesn't tow the "progressive" line.

Complete logic fail. It's easy - just write a check. It's especially easy if you are a conman and have zero scruples like that fat, Lying-f*ck-in-chief.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, February 14, 2020 1:16 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I know how Twitter works, dipshit. It's easy enough, even a monkey like you can use it.

Quote:
Like Trump. He uses the sh*t out of it. Must be where he gets his bananas.

Okay.

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
That's why there are hundreds of millions of people using it. Not a very good cross section of the best and the brightest minds in the world on that platform.

Quote:
That's why Trump uses it.

That's why they ALL use it.

Quote:
If - according to you - it's such a shit platform with so many idiots and controlled by the Dems, why does Trump spend so much time on it?

I said it has so many idiots use it AND was controlled by Dems. Please try to keep two thoughts in your head at the same time, as I asked you to do above.

Quote:
Also: if you know so much about Twitter then should I assume you know you can buy followers as easy as you can buy books at Amazon?

It's also gotten much easier for them to purge these bot accounts you're talking about. Jack Dorsey and Vijaya Gadde talked about this at length on the Joe Rogan podcast.

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
The Democratic Party doesn't own twitter.

Quote:
You said they did. Direct quote: "You mean the Democrats who lie for a living just haven't figured out how to game Twitter yet? C'mon dude. Democrats own Twitter."

I said Democrats own Twitter. I didn't say the Democrat Party owns twitter.

Quote:
So... you meant something else maybe?

Yup.

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
You said the numbers are rigged for Trump. I said they weren't.

Quote:
And I asked you how you knew and you haven't answered that yet. Not intelligently at least. How do you know they aren't rigged?

Because if they were rigged, they are rigged for everybody. And it's easier for Democrats to rig it. Given the numbers that everybody has, it shows that either A) the numbers are not rigged, or B) the Democrats know that the numbers that they did rig are all they could get away with without drawing suspicion, compared to the numbers that Trump has rigged.

Conversely, it's also believable that Obama has 113 Million followers compared to Trump's 72 Million, even though he is not the current president or he doesn't hold a political position of power at all. Even if he's rigging them too.

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
But if number rigging were happening in Social Media, it would be much easier for Democrats to get away with it because of the obvious bias and countless examples of censorship of anybody who doesn't tow the "progressive" line.

Quote:
Complete logic fail. It's easy - just write a check. It's especially easy if you are a conman and have zero scruples like that fat, Lying-f*ck-in-chief.

Is it now?

I'll point you to the CINEMA board where you can see plenty examples of companies losing millions again and again and again and again and again but not learning their lesson and continuing to push an agenda that doesn't sell in the box office.

Do Right, Be Right. :)