Rethugs start ADMITTING Trump SHOULD BE IMPEACHED, too cowardly to follow LAWS.
POSTED BY: WISHIMAY
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 17:49
VIEWED: 5249
PAGE 4 of 5
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Vindman's twin brother Lt. Col. Yevgeny Vindman was also fired, and he did not testify. This is Trump proving himself a total wacko.
Originally posted by whozit:
Lt Col Vindman has been fired....AHHAHAHAHAHA!! He's going to love his new job in Iraq.
Trump Gives Mitt Romney A Cool New Nickname: Secret Asset Man
Here's the parody to the tune "Secret Agent Man":
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
He's not a wacko, he's proving that pay backs a bitch
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I just want to point out that the title is STILL a lie; no such thing happened. Discussing an idiocy is just... idiotic.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Vindman himself won’t actually be hurt too much: he’ll return to the Pentagon a little earlier than planned, and in a few months he’s going off to war college. But his twin brother was also fired, even though he had nothing to do with the Ukraine affair. And Gordon Sondland is gone too, for refusing to perjure himself to save Trump’s bacon.
Originally posted by whozit:
He's not a wacko, he's proving that pay backs a bitch.
But Trump himself wouldn’t understand why anyone is upset about this. He can hardly be expected to trust people who betrayed him. Right? And when Vindman was let go, his brother would probably harbor a grudge too. He had to make a clean sweep.
And here’s the key to all this: many of the kind of people who voted for Trump agree completely. Firing these people isn’t outrageous, it’s just common sense.
To Trump’s base, this is the way any strong leader acts. I think it’s outrageous. They think it's nuts to be any other way. It is clear from thousands of lawsuits, Trump screws over people all the time. His base also can be screwed once he doesn't need them. Say, after his final election.
Trump's 3,500 lawsuits unprecedented for a presidential nominee
www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/01/donald-trump
-lawsuits-legal-battles/84995854/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Even Chris Matthews is now admitting that Hunter's involvement w/ a gas company in Ukraine, where daddy's job as VP was to oversee US policy was suspect at best, shady ( corrupt ) as hell at worst.
http://twitter.com/i/status/1225997406149332992
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Vindman himself won’t actually be hurt too much: he’ll return to the Pentagon a little earlier than planned, and in a few months he’s going off to war college. But his twin brother was also fired, even though he had nothing to do with the Ukraine affair. And Gordon Sondland is gone too, for refusing to perjure himself to save Trump’s bacon.
Originally posted by whozit:
He's not a wacko, he's proving that pay backs a bitch.
But Trump himself wouldn’t understand why anyone is upset about this. He can hardly be expected to trust people who betrayed him. Right? And when Vindman was let go, his brother would probably harbor a grudge too. He had to make a clean sweep.
And here’s the key to all this: many of the kind of people who voted for Trump agree completely. Firing these people isn’t outrageous, it’s just common sense.
To Trump’s base, this is the way any strong leader acts. I think it’s outrageous. They think it's nuts to be any other way. It is clear from thousands of lawsuits, Trump screws over people all the time. His base also can be screwed once he doesn't need them. Say, after his final election.
Trump's 3,500 lawsuits unprecedented for a presidential nominee
www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/01/donald-trump
-lawsuits-legal-battles/84995854/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
What about Obama's base?
Yanno, the ones who were fine with Obama firing the entire cabinet as the first thing he did when he was in office? How is that warranted? That wasn't even retribution. Unless maybe you consider that a black man's retribution on America, possibly?
That was probably just a front though, because he was doing Valerie "Planet of the Apes" Jarrett's bidding at the time. A Communist, raised by Communists. Let's just say that JFK would not have been a fan of Valerie. Likely not too much of a fan of Obama either.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Not true. Twin Vindman's job put him in a position to be able to review ... AND LEAK ... Bolt-on's pre-publication draft. SOMEbody has to review those manuscripts to make sure that classified info doesn't make it onto the bookshelves, and that was twin Vindman's job. Now, I don't know for sure whether he was the one who reviewed (and leaked) Bolt-on's manuscript, but I presume the WH knows who was given than particular assignment, and responded accordingly.
... But his twin brother was also fired, even though he had nothing to do with the Ukraine affair.
Quote:Sondland? What did he testify to? Nothing important, as far as I can tell. But he sure tried to stab Trump in the back. If I had an employee who did that to me and I had the power to hire and fire, they'd be out on their ass right quick.
And Gordon Sondland is gone too, for refusing to perjure himself to save Trump’s bacon.
Quote:Yep! You seem to have a glimmer of understanding!
But Trump himself wouldn’t understand why anyone is upset about this. He can hardly be expected to trust people who betrayed him. Right?
Quote:I just explained twin Vindman's probable role in the impeachment. Your argument falls flat on its face.
And when Vindman was let go, his brother would probably harbor a grudge too. He had to make a clean sweep.
Quote:Because it's just common sense. Everyone who "testified" against Trump had NO ACTUAL FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE, but that didn't stop them from spreading gossip before Congress. Would YOU want someone that weasely and biased to be working "for" (against) you? Let's say you had someone who was stealing from you, or claiming hours worked that they didn't, or mishandling your tools or your property, and lying about it. Or worse, they hated your politics and prepared your taxes with a little bomb hidden in those papers. Or spread malicious rumors about you to the local sheriff, and he was constantly on your property "checking up" on things. Would you continue to give them a paycheck?
And here’s the key to all this: many of the kind of people who voted for Trump agree completely. Firing these people isn’t outrageous, it’s just common sense.
Quote:
To Trump’s base, this is the way any strong leader acts. I think it’s outrageous.
You have a peculiar sense of "outrageous" considering that you fired people for less.
Yanno, I read your post without checking who it was posted under, and it sounded just like TWITCHY. You sure you're not her sock puppet?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Neither of them were fired.
They were reassigned.
Since they're Democrats in 2020, reassignment might just mean that they're the Vindman Sisters now. Who's to say. 
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
SECOND: I wanted to make sure that you and your outrage didn't miss this question
Quote:
Would YOU want someone that weasely and biased to be working "for" (against) you? Let's say you had someone who was stealing from you, or claiming hours worked that they didn't, or mishandling your tools or your property, and lying about it. Or worse, they hated your politics and prepared your taxes with a little bomb hidden in those papers. Or spread malicious rumors about you to the local sheriff, and he was constantly on your property "checking up" on things. Would you continue to give them a paycheck?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Just pointing out that SECOND was caught yet again in another giant hypocrisy. (see above)
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME