How it is possible to acquit someone at a trial with NO witnesses when witnesses were present at the time of the CRIME?? DIRTY MONEY and DIRTY SELF-SERVING LAWYERS
POSTED BY: WISHIMAY
UPDATED: Sunday, June 21, 2026 15:21
VIEWED: 7905
PAGE 6 of 12
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
I rewrote it so you can understand.
I don't need a perpetual man-child to talk to me in his baby talk language.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I will repeat myself, since you clearly did not understand. This is the key paragraph from Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska):
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
SECOND, there's a big gap between a small offense and an offense big enough to remove a president. Yanno, like the gap between littering and murder.
Get a grip already. Those senators are saying what Trump did was too little to remove him over it.
And, from (somewhat) following the proceedings, I think the democrats knew it. The testimony was a bust. NO ONE could testify they heard Trump firsthand say anything about anything, except *I WANT NOTHING*. So the democrats had to fall back to the transcript itself which was a big, fat nothing burger. Which they also knew. So they had to make up (with the help of the NYTimes) a Bolt-on moment, kind of like what they did with Kavanaugh. Which worked about as well as it did with Kavanaugh.
I know Trump is your personal bête noire. Yanno he's richer than you, more famous than you, he's a republican, and he's even president. And he's NONE of those things you think about yourself when you recite to yourself why being rich means you're better than everyone.
But dooood, get over yourself.
"The President’s behavior was shameful and wrong. His personal interests do not take precedence over those of this great nation. The president has the responsibility to uphold the integrity and honor of the office. Not just for himself but for all future presidents. Degrading the office, by actions or even name calling, weakens it for future presidents, and weakens our country."
www.murkowski.senate.gov/press/speech/speech-senator-murkowski-on-impe
achment-trial
I forgot to mention that Trump says he is perfect.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:But not a high crime or misdemeanor.
"The President’s behavior was shameful and wrong.
Quote:But if he fails that, it's not a high crime or misdemeanor.
His personal interests do not take precedence over those of this great nation. The president has the responsibility to uphold the integrity and honor of the office.
Quote:Neither of which is a high crime or misdemeanor.
Not just for himself but for all future presidents. Degrading the office, by actions or even name calling,
Quote:But those aren't high crimes or misdemeanors.
weakens it for future presidents, and weakens our country."
It looks like she would have been happier if the Senate had censured Trump. But she QUITE OBVIOUSLY wasn't on board with removal. If she was, she would have voted for it.
Maybe that explanation helps you have a better grip on reality.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Indeed, KIKI. SECOND, get a grip.
Originally posted by second:Quote:I rewrote it so you can understand. This is the key paragraph from Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska):
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
All I read there is a deficiency of the Congress itself for decades now.
Congress can, and should, take back the power over making war decisions. We can agree on that.
Trump isn't guilty of anything he was impeached for. If Congress wants that power back after it has abdicated it since the early years of GWB, then it better get to work on that after Trump is acquitted.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
"The President’s behavior was shameful and wrong. His personal interests do not take precedence over those of this great nation. The president has the responsibility to uphold the integrity and honor of the office. Not just for himself but for all future presidents. Degrading the office, by actions or even name calling, weakens it for future presidents, and weakens our country."
www.murkowski.senate.gov/press/speech/speech-senator-murkowski-on-impe
achment-trial
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
There is nothing in the Constitution about removing a President because he did something "inappropriate" or "shameful". The Founding Fathers spent quite a bit of time discussing what would require removing a President.
Well, treason, for one. Did Trump commit treason? High crimes, and "misdemeanors" But in those days, the word didn't mean the same thing as today, and we know this because the FF left actual written records about what they meant. It would be more like embezzlement: pocketing large amounts of government money, for example.
The FF definitely did NOT want a partisan impeachment, which is why they required a 2/3 majority. They did NOT want impeachment for "malpractice" ... in other words, Congress disagrees with the President's foreign policies, since foreign policy is the President's purview. We know this because they left writings about that too.
Seriously, wipe the spittle off your mouth and go watch The Biggest Little Farm. It's a delightful and inspiring movie, I think you'd like it.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:FREM once posted something that has stuck with me ever since: We spend our adult lives fighting the battles we lost as children (or, in SECOND's case, as a teenager). He's stuck in the past. He keep recycling that same event over and over in different guises ... he just can't move forward.
SECOND: I rewrote it so you can understand
SIX: I don't need a perpetual man-child to talk to me in his baby talk language.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Happy New Year, WISHY. I edited out your psychopathic screed!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There might be a better thread to put this in, but I guess I'll put it here:
What went wrong with this impeachment process? Well, for one thing, Schifty decided to treat the entire House as if it was the prosecution.
And the Senate is the jury, NOT an investigating body.
So, between the House and the Senate, where's the defense? In a trial, there's the prosecution AND a defense. And if you're not going to have a defense per se, where's the full-scope investigation into ALL of the facts?
What happened in the House didn't just LOOK like a partisan star chamber, that's exactly what it was.
I'm ecstatic the democrats failed! You can tell by the way democrats structured it, this whole process was a malodorous coup attempt.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Having downloaded and watched the movie The Biggest Little Farm, I am now in perfect harmony with Trump. I look forward to another 4 years of him serving the nation with wisdom, competence, fortitude, etc.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Seriously, wipe the spittle off your mouth and go watch The Biggest Little Farm. It's a delightful and inspiring movie, I think you'd like it.
“The film chronicles eight years of daunting work and outsize idealism as they attempt to create the utopia they seek, planting 10,000 orchard trees and over 200 different crops, and bringing in animals of every kind– including an unforgettable pig named Emma and her best friend, Greasy the rooster. When the farm’s ecosystem finally begins to reawaken, so does the Chesters’ hope – but as their plan to create perfect harmony takes a series of wild turns, they realize that to survive they will have to reach a far greater understanding of the intricacies and wisdom of nature, and of life itself.”
www.apricotlanefarms.com/news-and-events/press/
The Biggest Little Farm
www.metacritic.com/movie/the-biggest-little-farm
Download The Biggest Little Farm 2018 Documentary
https://yts.mx/movie/the-biggest-little-farm-2018
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Please quickly tell Mitt Romney -- Republican Presidential Candidate in 2012 -- before it is too late for him to change his mind!
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
I'm ecstatic the democrats failed! You can tell by the way democrats structured it, this whole process was a malodorous coup attempt.
Romney gave a speech on why he'll vote to convict Trump.
www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/full-text-romney-s-
speech-why-he-ll-vote-convict-n1130936
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
lol Romney
RIP to the political career of another Neo-Con piece of shit.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Nothing you post can change my mind, SECOND. Because unlike you, I actually listened to the testimony. Let me rephrase that - the SWORN testimony. Not the rumor from the NYTimes. Not Schifty's fantasizing. Not Pelosi's mean-girls high school reprisal. Not Romney's political grandstanding. The actual SWORN testimony of record. And I've watched the process. There was no overarching investigation into all the facts. There was no defense.
This was a biased political lynching based on rumor and opinion.
My reasons are sound.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME