Dr. Fiona Hill
POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Tuesday, September 30, 2025 18:33
VIEWED: 9414
PAGE 4 of 8
Bloviate!?
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
There's only so much bullshit that I can stomach, and her statements tested my limit. Every other sentence that came out of her mouth was manipulative.
OOC tho "SHINY", what was her testimony on the matter of the hearings?
Did she witness anything? Or did she just bloviate?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
You idiots have been oppressing the entire sexual spectrum as long as you have existed. I can't wait for the day your kind is dead - WISHIMAY
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
My God, don't be silly Jack. You guys kill me!
SGGQuote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
A Putin expert, you say?
I'm going to need to see some credentials. Did she get her degree in Putinology?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
I thought Liberals only went to college to study racial inequality and gender studies.
Even though she chose not to get into STEM, I for one think it's great that Fiona got her Doctorate in Putin instead. That's why she's making the big bucks now and not asking you if you'd like cream in your Starbucks coffee while bitching about "muh Patriarchy" on Twitter until 3:00AM.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The same 400-lb guy laying in bed cracking the DNC, when everybody knows it was.....Ukraine!?
Ha!
sgg
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
My God, don't be silly Jack. You guys kill me!
SGGQuote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
A Putin expert, you say?
I'm going to need to see some credentials. Did she get her degree in Putinology?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
I thought Liberals only went to college to study racial inequality and gender studies.
Even though she chose not to get into STEM, I for one think it's great that Fiona got her Doctorate in Putin instead. That's why she's making the big bucks now and not asking you if you'd like cream in your Starbucks coffee while bitching about "muh Patriarchy" on Twitter until 3:00AM.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
The same 400-lb guy laying in bed cracking the DNC, when everybody knows it was.....Ukraine!?
Ha!
sggQuote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
My God, don't be silly Jack. You guys kill me!
SGGQuote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
A Putin expert, you say?
I'm going to need to see some credentials. Did she get her degree in Putinology?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
I thought Liberals only went to college to study racial inequality and gender studies.
Even though she chose not to get into STEM, I for one think it's great that Fiona got her Doctorate in Putin instead. That's why she's making the big bucks now and not asking you if you'd like cream in your Starbucks coffee while bitching about "muh Patriarchy" on Twitter until 3:00AM.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
Nobody needs to crack the DNC, bud.
They're already broke.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/04/dnc-turns-to-2020-candidates-for-help-
as-they-struggle-to-raise-cash.html
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And please, do note how they report the facts here.
The first paragraph:
Quote:
The Democratic National Committee, which is struggling to keep up with its Republican counterpart’s fundraising pace, is turning to 2020 presidential candidates for help raising cash in the pivotal fourth quarter.
Which is written right after the third key point:
Quote:
The latest filings show that the Republican National Committee raised just over $23 million in August and has $53 million on hand, while the DNC brought in $7.9 million and has $7.2 million in debt
"Struggling to keep up with its Republican counterpart's fundraising pace"??????
Gee. Ya think?
Now, SGG...
How do you suppose cnbc would have presented that story if the roles were reversed, and the DNC had $53 Million dollars on hand while the RNC only had $700,000? What about CNN? Vox? Motherjones?
I can assure you, the kid gloves would not be applied.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Do you mean the video that you posted?
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
You want an answer. Did you actually watch her testimony.
THAT WASN'T TESTIMONY. It was an opening statement.
Yes, I watched it. Ten minutes of her telling us what an "expert"she is and then spewing bullshit. That was the part I couldn't stomache.
Quote:I say you're a dick. I waited nine hours for "anyone" to respond, and several posts had gone by without "anyone" responding. But yanno, you;re typical of liberaloids, applying a different set of standards to your own behavior because the one thing you all have in xommon is that you're all hypocrites.
Time's up....you didn't immediately answer. Your rules, not mine.
What say you?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
You idiots have been oppressing the entire sexual spectrum as long as you have existed. I can't wait for the day your kind is dead - WISHIMAY
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Do you mean the video that you posted?
THAT WASN'T TESTIMONY. It was an opening statement.
Yes, I watched it. Ten minutes of her telling us what an "expert"she is and then spewing bullshit. That was the part I couldn't stomache.
Careful there sweetheart, you'll bust a gasket. Did you take your meds?
I wouldn't want you to have to call 911 and rush you off to the ER. And don't be such a cunt, you know perfectly well I meant her on-air testimony. Of course, fascists hate hearing the truth. "stomache" is that French? Or do you have a "tummy ache." Silly girl, Trix are for kids!
Quote:
I say you're a dick.
Ooo, that one hurt.
Quote:
I waited nine hours for "anyone" to respond, and several posts had gone by without "anyone" responding.
Really!? did you time it with an official Guinness World Record Holder watch?
Of course, if you never respond, does that count?
Quote:
But yanno, you;re typical of liberaloids, applying a different set of standards to your own behavior because the one thing you all have in xommon is that you're all hypocrites.
Ooo, another biting remark. Someone certainly has their panties in a twist.
Sigsquatch cunt.
this low budget response is sponsored by the letter "C"
sgg
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
And please, do note how they report the facts here.
You mean "the facts" the Fake News delivers on a daily basis? according to the Scumbag-in-Chief. Aren't they the purveyors of "fake" news. So which is it?
Quote:
"Struggling to keep up with its Republican counterpart's fundraising pace"?????
Gee. Ya think?
I don't know, but I remember once hearing that no matter how much the Dems accumulate that they wouldn't win. So now garnering all the money in the world is a good thing? Yeah, the Slugs are now rich. Someone get the champagne!
Well, I guess that means we've lost, and a bunch of losers.
Quote:
Now, SGG...
How do you suppose cnbc would have presented that story if the roles were reversed, and the DNC had $53 Million dollars on hand while the RNC only had $700,000? What about CNN? Vox? Motherjones?
The "Fake' news Legacy media. Of course, they would lie! Wait, I'm confused.
You mean that the news of a hefty sum of money garnered by the RNC is "fake"
news or real news, and that the "Legacy" media has somehow managed to manipulate this story against(?) the Right Wing fascists? Or, have they've
been up to their shenanigans!?
Please help a "shiny" out! You seem to know more about this "fake" news stuff than I do.
Quote:
I can assure you, the kid gloves would not be applied.
Ooo, is that a threat?
SGG
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6STRINGJACK:
And please, do note how they report the facts here.
Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
You mean "the facts" the Fake News delivers on a daily basis? according to the Scumbag-in-Chief. Aren't they the purveyors of "fake" news. So which is it?
Yes. Thanks for clearing that up. I forgot the quotation marks.
Quote:
"Struggling to keep up with its Republican counterpart's fundraising pace"?????
Gee. Ya think?
Quote:
I don't know, but I remember once hearing that no matter how much the Dems accumulate that they wouldn't win. So now garnering all the money in the world is a good thing? Yeah, the Slugs are now rich. Someone get the champagne!
Yes. No matter how much they accumulate they will not win. That makes it especially bad that they have barely made enough money to pay off that $10 Million dollar loan from mid-summer.
Quote:
Well, I guess that means we've lost, and a bunch of losers.
You're only a loser if you willingly choose to associate yourself with losers.
Quote:
Now, SGG...
How do you suppose cnbc would have presented that story if the roles were reversed, and the DNC had $53 Million dollars on hand while the RNC only had $700,000? What about CNN? Vox? Motherjones?
Quote:
The "Fake' news Legacy media. Of course, they would lie! Wait, I'm confused.
You mean that the news of a hefty sum of money garnered by the RNC is "fake"
news or real news, and that the "Legacy" media has somehow managed to manipulate this story against(?) the Right Wing fascists? Or, have they've
been up to their shenanigans!?
My point being that they would be absolutely trashing Republicans and laughing at them for coming up with ABSOLUTELY NO MONEY. Instead, they brush it off as if it's not a big deal and not proof that they have absolutely zero chance in 2020.
Quote:
Please help a "shiny" out! You seem to know more about this "fake" news stuff than I do.
Yup. I sure do.
Quote:
I can assure you, the kid gloves would not be applied.
Quote:
Ooo, is that a threat?
That wasn't directed toward you. That was a reference to how the Legacy Media would have reported the story if the RNC was broke and the Democrats had 70 times as much money saved up.
But that's just rhetorical nonsense, since it is the DNC that is broke and the Democrats are going to get destroyed in 2020.
Just another example of money proving all of the lies as nothing more than lies. That seems to be happening a lot recently, huh?
All those polls are bullshit brother. Pull out now before you get a one way trip to crazy town when it all comes crashing down on the Dems and you have no idea how it happened... again.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Is Jack quoting CNBC and suggesting what they've written is factual? How exactly does that work? Is all mainstream media fake news, or only when they write stories that challenge his perceptions?
For the record. Jack posts mostly opinions because he can't site the media. This is due to the fact they, and the facts they report, exist in an alternate reality from his. Still, he does quote the media when it suits him.
Question, does Jack realize if his perceptions are based on lies or denials of the facts, that his perceptions are incorrect? Does he realize if his opinions differ from what is being reported on around the globe, because to him all mainstream media is fake, that he is more than likely warped?
T 
Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME