Have Fun Storming The Castle

POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Sunday, November 3, 2024 23:25
VIEWED: 3769
PAGE 3 of 4

FIRST PAGE PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 NEXT PAGE LAST PAGE

SHINYGOODGUY

Wednesday, October 30, 2019 1:08 PM

Quote:
I know I'm not the first to try to introduce you to the factual world, but let me take another shot at it, and see if I can bring some light and peace to your biased and anger-driven world.

Ahhhhh kikipoo, you are the epitome of factual integrity.The Leni Riefenstahl of the modern era. You honor me with your factual acumen, but I take issue with your use of the word "biased", that connotes that I am being unfair in my disgust for the president and his administration. But that falls to interpretation and point of view, so I won't belabor the point. I could though, agree to 'anger.' And...?

Quote:
The House rule book for all of their procedures was written a long time ago and agreed to by the House (and according to the rule for amending the Rule book). (I posted both the link and quoted the impeachment inquiry rules earlier.)

Well, help a brother out and post the link here. Would ya, poo-poo?

Quote:
That Rule book calls for a passing House vote, where the entire House votes - and not restricted to a committee and not restricted to a single party - before even starting an inquiry / investigation.

See the post above about how the Republicans changed that rule. You're raising the point of Congressional process (pretty much the party line and presidential deflection as to facts. Wait, aren't you like, Queen of Factual Information? What gives?) But I looked up a report by The Congressional Research Service, dated October 10, 2019:

The Impeachment Process in the House of Representatives

Overview

Quote:
The impeachment process may be initiated as the result of various actions and events, including the receipt and referral of information from an outside source, investigations by congressional committees under their general authority, or the introduction of articles of impeachment in the form of a House resolution.

"investigations by congressional committees under their general authority"

I may not be as bright as you, but I think that means that Congress can conduct an investigation based upon their authority as prescribed in the Constitution. Something Trey Gowdy and friends had executed some 4 years ago.
Funny how that works. The "closed door" meetings were conducted under the most recent changes made by the Republicans (2015). Bipartisan depositions to find
facts (there goes that word again) to see if there was wrongdoing. Closed door to preserve the integrity of the depositions - much like cops and grand juries do.

Quote:
It also calls for minority members to have active participation - being able to call witnesses, gather and enter evidence, cross examine witnesses etc.

Membership has its privileges.

Quote:
But, according to the NYTimes: "House Democrats, who have resisted a floor vote on the impeachment inquiry for weeks"

Hmmm, the above quote has something missing, don't it? "House Democrats...?
Yes, they've resisted a floor vote on the subject, but what of it? The sentence, it's incomplete. There's something more to that statement.

Quote:
So, this is pretty obviously a kangaroo court, where the democrats are ignoring the House rules in order to do whatever they want.

So you say. Seems I've heard that somewhere. Ah yes, the Fox/Right Wing groan.
You have to give credit where credit is due, you guys stick to the programming. Lemmings.

Quote:
My personal ADDITIONAL objection is that it's in secret. Why is that? Do the democrats not want the people of the country to know what they've been doing all this time? It seems to me that any procedure that can't stand sunshine and fresh air is suspect.

Asked and answered. But, I'll humor you. Soon, within weeks, you will get your
public spectacle. The country will soon know what took place behind closed doors, and will find out what BOTH parties were investigating.

Yeah, "any procedure" that can't stand sunshine, etc. That q

6IXSTRINGJACK

Wednesday, October 30, 2019 7:23 PM

Let's not pretend that you guys wouldn't be going ape shit right now if the roles were reversed and the Republicans were behaving the same way the Democrats are now and call it a day.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

SHINYGOODGUY

Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:18 AM

Well now, did I say that? No, I did not. Actually, it did happen back in 2015 during the whole Bhengazi debacle. The Dems screamed "bloody murder" when the rules were changed.

This is what I'm saying. Bunch of whiny whinging malcontents - Gaetz, Nones,Jordan (straining neck muscles and spittle flying about), McCarthy (who
cannot keep a straight face when he lies).

Turnabout is fair play.

sgg

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Let's not pretend that you guys wouldn't be going ape shit right now if the roles were reversed and the Republicans were behaving the same way the Democrats are now and call it a day.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

1KIKI

Thursday, October 31, 2019 9:17 AM

Quote:
The House rule book for all of their procedures was written a long time ago and agreed to by the House (and according to the rule for amending the Rule book). (I posted both the link and quoted the impeachment inquiry rules earlier.)

Quote:
Originally posted by SHITTYGUY:
Well, help a brother out and post the link here. Would ya, poo-poo?

Sure here 'ya are twaddle-dee

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/HMAN-115/pdf/HMAN-115.pdf
I hope you know how to read - the answer to what the dims should be doing if they were following the impeachment rules is in there.

A billion flies eat shit.

THG

Thursday, October 31, 2019 3:58 PM

Or, you could just listen to what the court determined. It said the impeachment inquiry was being done legally .

Federal Judge Rules Impeachment Inquiry Is Legal

The House is legally engaged in an impeachment inquiry, a federal judge ruled on Friday, delivering a major victory to House Democrats and undercutting arguments by President Trump and Republicans that the investigation is a sham …

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/10/federal-judge-howell-rules-impe
achment-inquiry-is-legal.html

T

1KIKI

Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:01 PM

Dipshit ... no one said anything about it being illegal. One-sided, biased, rule-breaking, politically-motivated, farcical - but legal.

A billion flies eat shit. How does it taste, THUGGER?

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:09 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:

Turnabout is fair play.

Well... that's how we got Trump.

Do you think that if we all keep behaving like this that our future leaders are going to get better or worse?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

SHINYGOODGUY

Saturday, November 2, 2019 3:21 PM

Ha, ha, ha, lmao in the middle of a snowstorm...nice retort!

BTW, the lead shit-eating fly, could it be....SATAN!

Bwah, ha ha ha ha ha......make my millennium!

sgg

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:
The House rule book for all of their procedures was written a long time ago and agreed to by the House (and according to the rule for amending the Rule book). (I posted both the link and quoted the impeachment inquiry rules earlier.)
Quote:
Originally posted by SHITTYGUY:
Well, help a brother out and post the link here. Would ya, poo-poo?

Sure here 'ya are twaddle-dee

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/HMAN-115/pdf/HMAN-115.pdf
I hope you know how to read - the answer to what the dims should be doing if they were following the impeachment rules is in there.

A billion flies eat shit.

SHINYGOODGUY

Saturday, November 2, 2019 4:58 PM

No. Republicans want "do as I say" not "do as I do."

Don't conflate and confuse the topic.

They were IN the deposition and left to protest the process, which they wrote, and now, that it doesn't suit their needs, they walk out to protest and deflect from the main issue:

Trump fucked up and now they don't have any facts to defend him, so they resort to "tactics" and argue "process" rather than factual evidence. They have none. Fuck that he won, good for fucking him. But fucking abuse power!?
Fuck him, fry the bastard.

Well, time will tell. Public hearings are around the corner. He will get his day in court, that's the part of the process that the fucking Republicans have been clamoring for. So here we go!

Of course, that's if these fuckers don't move the goal posts again!

SGG

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:

Turnabout is fair play.

Well... that's how we got Trump.

Do you think that if we all keep behaving like this that our future leaders are going to get better or worse?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Saturday, November 2, 2019 5:48 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Ha, ha, ha, lmao in the middle of a snowstorm...nice retort!

BTW, the lead shit-eating fly, could it be....SATAN!

Bwah, ha ha ha ha ha......make my millennium!

sgg

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:
The House rule book for all of their procedures was written a long time ago and agreed to by the House (and according to the rule for amending the Rule book). (I posted both the link and quoted the impeachment inquiry rules earlier.)
Quote:
Originally posted by SHITTYGUY:
Well, help a brother out and post the link here. Would ya, poo-poo?

Sure here 'ya are twaddle-dee

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/HMAN-115/pdf/HMAN-115.pdf
I hope you know how to read - the answer to what the dims should be doing if they were following the impeachment rules is in there.

A billion flies eat shit.

This is yet another example SGG, of the deflection tactics of SIGNUTTY and KOOKIE. They think they are being so clever, like a 5 year old with chocolate smeared all over their face saying they didn't steal a cookie. This particular tactic is the "link to an enormous block of text that no one has time to read even if they were paid to," and then run away like the chicken sh*ts they are. "Here, read the constitution! See? The Dems are wrong! What? You didn't read the whole thing? Stupid tw@t!"; One of the tells is name calling. This one, a link to 1494 pages of Constitution/text, "here ya go!" With such certainty, surely it means KOOKIE has read it, right? Let's find out if she's read her own link:

Hey KOOKS, where's the section and specific language where you see the Dems disobeying Impeachment rules? Be specific - shouldn't take you long since you linked this document...

It's a similar tactic to the big copy-n-post spam dumps SIG does with Zerohedge. Anyone reading it is not the point. In fact, they hope you don't read it! I'm sure you are aware of these diversions, SGG. Just like to make sure they know we know.

Another tactic seen recently: In faux outrage tone: "Where did I ever say..." a thing I never said that you didn't say I said?

Stalling, diversion, deflection, outright lying, make outrage... remind us of any party in particular right now?

FIRST PAGE PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 NEXT PAGE LAST PAGE